The last couple of years we are seeing guys lose in the national tourney to guys they beat, and often times beat somewhat handily in the regular season. Not sure what the issue is but not a good look.
Some athletes just can't performance under the big lights... he's a perfect example.I was just thinking about the Bull. He came into college a finished product. People complain that he didn’t improve much at Iowa. I propose there wasn’t really any room for improvement. He was already very near the top of his potential. Many wrestlers seem to “peak” at nationals. I feel the Bull gave his best every time out on the mat. It really isn’t him regressing at NCAA’s as much as it is about others finding another level while AM was wrestling at his maximum potential all year. Not sure if it’s true but it kind of feels like it to me.
Yep. All of his state titles, high school national tournaments, or his 4 big ten titles weren’t “big lights”(I think you meant bright lights) 🤦♂️Some athletes just can't performance under the big lights... he's a perfect example.
Some athletes just can't performance under the big lights... he's a perfect example.
Are we saying the Big Ten titles are equal to National Championships? I think Marinelli would agree they are both very different competitions when you consider his results in both.Really? How many Big Ten titles does someone need to consider them able to perform under the “big lights”?
Are we saying the Big Ten titles are equal to National Championships? I think Marinelli would agree they are both very different competitions when you consider his results in both.
This is an interesting take. Maybe Bull was not your typical freshman. But I don’t agree that he was at the top of his potential, that’s ridiculous. He did give his best, he’s a warrior. So others figured him out. There are similar thoughts on another thread. That is completely on the coaches, and they need to work with him so he’s not so one dimensional. Here’s something to ponder…. RBY lost to Austin his first 2 matches. He adjusted, and hasn’t lost since. That’s coaching. Thats what you wanted to see with Bull.I was just thinking about the Bull. He came into college a finished product. People complain that he didn’t improve much at Iowa. I propose there wasn’t really any room for improvement. He was already very near the top of his potential. Many wrestlers seem to “peak” at nationals. I feel the Bull gave his best every time out on the mat. It really isn’t him regressing at NCAA’s as much as it is about others finding another level while AM was wrestling at his maximum potential all year. Not sure if it’s true but it kind of feels like it to me.
He did make the SEMI-finals at the NCAA Championship.We were talking in the arena today trying to name a wrestler with higher accolades or expectations in a good program with several chances just not pull it off to even make a semifinal at the national tournament.
Definitely not looking for Brands to go. They do however need to do an evaluation of their methods. When does fairly consistent ‘bad luck’ injuries become a pattern? When does a fairly consistent lack of offense become a pattern and get tweaked? 1-1, 2-1 matches holding out at the end puts you on the edge.I’m not embarrassed by our team in any way shape or form. I am embarrassed by some of our “fans” however. Some absolutely idiotic takes on multiple threads. We were the best team in the country for two straight years. This year we lost SL and had at least 4 MAJOR injuries to our remaining lineup and since we didn’t do it a third year in a row it’s on the coaches. Yep the brands need to go. What Jimmy Z doing these days? Maybe he can resurrect this shameful program.
I wonder if there are lingering effects from his broken rib that have caused this change in his approach. Certain positions don't have the same feel or he doesn't have the same strength.IMO - Bull has gotten away from what worked for him in the past.
No longer does he look for chest wraps, body locks, or throws.
No longer does he even attempt to ride.
He used to be a big move, big point machine that could then turn on a hellacious ride.
Remember us complaining about him spending too much time riding looking for that 3/4 nelson? That seems like a distant memory.
The throws can be explained by guys wrestling at distance or refusing to tie, but I remember the old days where he'd force that position and stalk his guys to the edge because they knew what was coming.
The riding, however, makes no sense. He doesn't even attempt it at this point.
Idk, perhaps his philosophy changed this year and he was simply in "survival mode". But it seems counterproductive to go away from your two best positions (neutral and top game) and instead rely on last second/ OT TD's to squeak out a win.
We can call it whatever we want, but I think the best word right now is "Disappointing"
just when I think there aren’t anymore douche bags that haven’t shown up to the partySome athletes just can't performance under the big lights... he's a perfect example.
This is an interesting take. Maybe Bull was not your typical freshman. But I don’t agree that he was at the top of his potential, that’s ridiculous. He did give his best, he’s a warrior. So others figured him out. There are similar thoughts on another thread. That is completely on the coaches, and they need to work with him so he’s not so one dimensional. Here’s something to ponder…. RBY lost to Austin his first 2 matches. He adjusted, and hasn’t lost since. That’s coaching. Thats what you wanted to see with Bull.
Must not be very tough conference if you still can’t place above sixth at National… you’re sounding like a clown, just stop.You know exactly what I am saying. He hasn’t performed as well as you expect him too at Nationals yet has 4 titles in the toughest conference in the nation. To say that he “can’t performance under the big lights” is idiotic. You can run along back to the basketball board now.
No!!! Disagree. Ask Vincenzo!! He was supposed to lose all matches against him. He willed his way to a win. He lost because he didn’t wrestle anyone else like he did against Vincenzo!!I was just thinking about the Bull. He came into college a finished product. People complain that he didn’t improve much at Iowa. I propose there wasn’t really any room for improvement. He was already very near the top of his potential. Many wrestlers seem to “peak” at nationals. I feel the Bull gave his best every time out on the mat. It really isn’t him regressing at NCAA’s as much as it is about others finding another level while AM was wrestling at his maximum potential all year. Not sure if it’s true but it kind of feels like it to me.
any suggestions on who to bring in? who to cut/how to re-organize from the current staffnot going to find a better coach than brands. with that being said, i think there need to be some adjustments. some fresh perspectives on training and competition philosophy. bring in a young rising assistant who wasn’t a hawkeye. there are a few areas that the hawks have consistently struggled with for years with little progress. time to try something new.
You still tone deaf?… you’re sounding like a clown, just stop.
The last time I saw noticable changes from a technique perspective is when Frayer was an assistant here.not going to find a better coach than brands. with that being said, i think there need to be some adjustments. some fresh perspectives on training and competition philosophy. bring in a young rising assistant who wasn’t a hawkeye. there are a few areas that the hawks have consistently struggled with for years with little progress. time to try something new.
‘That’s coaching’ is a lazy take. RBY was a heralded recruit that adjusted to the college level. Nobody has beat him in two yearsThis is an interesting take. Maybe Bull was not your typical freshman. But I don’t agree that he was at the top of his potential, that’s ridiculous. He did give his best, he’s a warrior. So others figured him out. There are similar thoughts on another thread. That is completely on the coaches, and they need to work with him so he’s not so one dimensional. Here’s something to ponder…. RBY lost to Austin his first 2 matches. He adjusted, and hasn’t lost since. That’s coaching. Thats what you wanted to see with Bull.
The last couple of years we are seeing guys lose in the national tourney to guys they beat, and often times beat somewhat handily in the regular season. Not sure what the issue is but not a good look.
You said he doesn’t perform under the “big lights” and what you meant to say was he hasn’t had great NCAA tourneys.Are we saying the Big Ten titles are equal to National Championships? I think Marinelli would agree they are both very different competitions when you consider his results in both.
Choking? No. Maybe a faulty strategic plan, but not choking.Some athletes just can't performance under the big lights... he's a perfect example.
Or just have better recruits than everyone else and when they win as expected call it peaking.To win a national championship it's important to win in the semi finals, Cael is 45-5 in semi final matches in his time at Penn st so it maybe coaching and getting your guys to peak at the right time.
Your lack of understanding what a message board is for is truly embarrassing.You still tone deaf?
Look in the mirror!
Your lack of self awareness is a thing to behold.
Seems like an Astrological phenomenon. Seems to come around once a year about the 3rd weekend in March.Seems like people just can't handle the disappointment and want to blame someone. Lots of silly, whiny posts the last few days.
Bull has done a lot for the program but he is not comparable to a 3x finalist. Warner will likely end with more NCAA team points scored for career if not done already. He was money in duals and at conference which are important too but we didn't get the NCAA scoring from him you expect from that high of recruit.Mike Deanna was a 4x Big10 champ and 4xAA who Gable considers one of best in Hawkeye history. He was a three time finalist. Marinelli's accomplishments are pretty comparable.
And yet here we are, with my comments still standing… Marinelli has zero top 5 finishes under the big lights. Sorry about your feelings being so hurt by this. So many crybaby fans in here lol.You said he doesn’t perform under the “big lights” and what you meant to say was he hasn’t had great NCAA tourneys.
Throughout his career Alex proved enough times he is a gamer when the lights are big and bright. And you proved that you aren’t very articulate. Amazing, he did his thing over a career and you took one post.