Trump’s Ukraine money holdup doesn’t make for an impeachable breach of the law
- Thread starter Phenomenally Frantastic
- Start date
don't give a f#ck. The economy is the best since the 1960's. What f#cking idiots want to ruin that. The dems would LOVE to destroy the economy for everyone. They want everyone's lives to suck! Just like their own miserable lives.
Yes because that one call was all of the interaction. You can’t be that stupid.
warning or asking for an announcement or finding hunter biden has snorted coke … does not a law break. now, hunter is breaking the law, but not trump
the transcript was released. that's it. done deal. I am hearing today that mcconnell has put a kill switch into these proceedings and will shut it down when dems start acting like fools again. which probably will happen soon.
What law did Hunter break? Why is Ukraine investigating Trump and not the Biden’s?
no it isn't. trump warned them that bidens were criminals. to save money. nothing like taking donations. which is spending money.
Telling Ukraine that the Biden’s were doing illegal things (which they weren’t) is different than asking them to announce an investigation
I have to imagine you are typing on the other end of this thinking what is something crazy I could make up to have fun with everyone. That is the only way I can comprehend your responses.
Last edited:
1) there is no rulebook for what is or isn't impeachable. The Radical Republicans impeached Andrew Johnson over the Tenure in Office Act which was clearly unconstitutional. Impeachment is and always has been a political process because politicians conduct it.
2) Everyone, and I mean EVERYONE knows the Senate is not going to convict and remove Trump.
3) This entire process is about political leverage for the 2020 House and Senate elections. The Dems are counting on winning the Senate and keeping the House on the premise they provided evidence Trump violated the Constitution but the Republicans in the Senate refused to act on said evidence. The Republicans are banking on the people not being convinced of said evidence and not wanting to rock the boat in a strong economy. It will be interesting to see how the elections fall in 2020. The only thing I am sure of is the losing side will cry "foul" regardless how it plays out.
2) Everyone, and I mean EVERYONE knows the Senate is not going to convict and remove Trump.
3) This entire process is about political leverage for the 2020 House and Senate elections. The Dems are counting on winning the Senate and keeping the House on the premise they provided evidence Trump violated the Constitution but the Republicans in the Senate refused to act on said evidence. The Republicans are banking on the people not being convinced of said evidence and not wanting to rock the boat in a strong economy. It will be interesting to see how the elections fall in 2020. The only thing I am sure of is the losing side will cry "foul" regardless how it plays out.
Holy shit, I think you might actually have brain damage. You cannot be this phvcking partisan and stupid - it’s not possible. I just visited the Trump re-election website and guess what - at no point is a visitor asked if he/she can legally donate to a US election. Looks like the Trump campaign is raising illegal cash overseas!!!!
Seriously, how phvcking stupid do you have to be to read this article, which is obvious right-wing propaganda bullshit, and think it makes a salient point?
What are the thoughts on Trump threatening to seize $35 Billion of Iraq's money in a Federal Reserve account should Iraq move forward to expel US troops from Iraq as Parliament had voted?
trump will need the 391 million after he's thrown out of office, to pay off the multiple sexual crimes he's going to be convicted of.
trump knows criminals because he's been dealing with them for 50 years and then went and hired a bunch of them in his campaign and administration.
So Trump and his minions in Congress lied to all of us about “No quid pro quo”, so the brainwashed cult are just moving the goalposts? Got it.
It's very likely that Hunter Biden broke no laws,... however, his activities in Ukraine were shady as hell and more than worthy of investigation...
Primarily one simple question,.. What did Burisma gain, or hope to gain, by employing the son of the Vice President of the United States as a member of it's board of directors, when he had no legitimate qualifications for serving in such a position.
How does the answer to that question have anything to do with Trump’s conduct in dealing with Ukraine?
The Dem argument has always been that Trump was pushing for this investigation solely to gather dirt on his political rival, Joe Biden,.. I think it could be demonstrated that Hunter Biden's involvement with Burisma was more than suspicious enough to justify further scrutiny by the Trump administration...
Since Burisma is a Ukrainian company it would make sense to have Ukraine begin the review...
Hunter Biden was more than qualified to serve on Burisma’s board of directors. Why do conservatives insist on pushing this bullshit talking point? Do I really need to run through the list of his qualifications again?
Rudy was a contact,.. Ukraine was intended to begin the investigation...
Why is Rudy a contact if this is such a matter of national interest?
Think about it, man. It’s OK to see the light.
Hunter Biden had no background in the energy sector where Burisma plied it's trade,.. His singular qualification was his proximity to his father...
Latest posts
-
-
-
-
Players file lawsuit against state for privacy rights violations
- Latest: WaterlooChazz
-
