ADVERTISEMENT

Trump never heard of these guys or their plan

Trump video from 2022, cut short to eliminate context, and once again telling us what the posters want us to believe trump said vs what Trump said.

Get a new playbook guys. Taking things out of context and adding your own is played out.
 
Trump video from 2022, cut short to eliminate context, and once again telling us what the posters want us to believe trump said vs what Trump said.

Get a new playbook guys. Taking things out of context and adding your own is played out.
I've posted videos of other speakers at this event talking up 2025, how Trump loves it, and how they will give him full credit when it's enacted.
 
Trump video from 2022, cut short to eliminate context, and once again telling us what the posters want us to believe trump said vs what Trump said.

Get a new playbook guys. Taking things out of context and adding your own is played out.

What did he really say? I'm interested in the context that will clarify this situation.
 
What did he really say? I'm interested in the context that will clarify this situation.
Hell if I know, but the video was too short to capture it. We can bet more would be included if it supported the poster's point. Here's a reasonable line of thinking from that video and the short podcast clip:

1. Trump said heritage (presumably "foundation") was laying the groundwork.

2. Groundwork is not final.

3. Whatever Trump's team took from earlier drafts of the "groundwork" is likely part of Agenda 47 (the plan trump published).

4. We don't know why for certain trump doesn't support project 2025 and instead chooses his own Agenda 47, because he's not given a straight answer.

My best guess is that because the final product of project 2025 strays from conservative and is instead right wing. Trump has always been pretty moderate, and isn't going to let some think tank tell him what to believe, especially when it's unpopular with a significant portion of the country.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: BelemNole
Hell if I know, but the video was too short to capture it. We can bet more would be included if it supported the poster's point. Here's a reasonable line of thinking from that video and the short podcast clip:

1. Trump said heritage (presumably "foundation") was laying the groundwork.

2. Groundwork is not final.

3. Whatever Trump's team took from earlier drafts of the "groundwork" is likely part of Agenda 47 (the plan trump published).

4. We don't know why for certain trump doesn't support project 2025 and instead chooses his own Agenda 47, because he's not given a straight answer.

My best guess is that because the final product of project 2025 strays from conservative and is instead right wing. Trump has always been pretty moderate, and isn't going to let some think tank tell him what to believe, especially when it's unpopular with a significant portion of the country.

Okay...you still five him the benefit of the doubt. Good luck.
 
Okay...you still five him the benefit of the doubt. Good luck.
Calling it what it is. A played out method of manipulating videos and statements to recontextualize them.

It's why MSNBC and CNN stopped showing trump live. They want to be able to tell you how you should think rather than thinking through it yourself. The left isn't the only one who does it.

Remember all the "cheap fake" Biden videos? Videos cut short to eliminate context and make Joe look less coherent than he is (ok some of those ended up being real, but edited to be worse than reality).

More recently, right wing media used the "Big boy press conference" phrase to make it sound as if the white house had come up with this idea, as if to demean Biden. In fact it was a quip by a reporter earlier in the week. KJP thought it was kind of funny and leaned into it. In fact in all the montages of the WH staff calling it a "big boy press conference" it always cuts off before they make a gesture toward or give a nod in the direction of the WH press corps member who said it initially.

All of this simply political gaming by media and influencers, and you simply have to be more discerning and not simply be a lemming happily charging toward the cliff.

This whole project 2025 thing is a desperate fear mongering campaign by the left. It's a pre-meditated tactic to fool voters, and it's wrong.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: BelemNole
Calling it what it is. A played out method of manipulating videos and statements to recontextualize them.

It's why MSNBC and CNN stopped showing trump live. They want to be able to tell you how you should think rather than thinking through it yourself. The left isn't the only one who does it.

Remember all the "cheap fake" Biden videos? Videos cut short to eliminate context and make Joe look less coherent than he is (ok some of those ended up being real, but edited to be worse than reality).

More recently, right wing media used the "Big boy press conference" phrase to make it sound as if the white house had come up with this idea, as if to demean Biden. In fact it was a quip by a reporter earlier in the week. KJP thought it was kind of funny and leaned into it. In fact in all the montages of the WH staff calling it a "big boy press conference" it always cuts off before they make a gesture toward or give a nod in the direction of the WH press corps member who said it initially.

All of this simply political gaming by media and influencers, and you simply have to be more discerning and not simply be a lemming happily charging toward the cliff.

This whole project 2025 thing is a desperate fear mongering campaign by the left. It's a pre-meditated tactic to fool voters, and it's wrong.

Wtf do you think a political campaign is?

The rest of your post reads like an old man tangent about how we can't trust weathermen. Of course, who ever told you to ever trust media wholeheartedly, especially if it's television?
 
  • Like
Reactions: noleclone2
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT