I'm sure you believe that. That's why you're such a gullible moron.
trump voters, just so I can change my vote accordingly
- Thread starter BlIIlken2
- Start date
Holy shit, you're an idiot. Another libtard fell for the lie.
LOL - you have proven to be the most gullible and ignorant of the bunch of dupes on this board.
Violent Crime Rates (per 100,000 inhabitants)
- 2015: 373.7
- 2016: 386.3
- 2017: 382.9
- 2018: 368.9
- 2019: 366.7
- 2020: 398.5
- 2021: 395.7
- 2022: 380.7
The new fourth-quarter numbers showed a 13% decline in murder in 2023 from 2022, a 6% decline in reported violent crime and a 4% decline in reported property crime. That’s based on data from around 13,000 law enforcement agencies, policing about 82% of the U.S. population, that provided the FBI with data through December.
“It suggests that when we get the final data in October, we will have seen likely the largest one-year decline in murder that has ever been recorded,” said Jeff Asher, a former CIA analyst who now studies crime trends.
In October, the FBI will release its final and most comprehensive look at crime in 2023.
======
Violent crime dropped by more than 15% in the United States during the first three months of 2024, according to statistics released Monday by the FBI.
The new numbers show violent crime from January to March dropped 15.2% compared to the same period in 2023, while murders fell 26.4% and reported rapes decreased by 25.7%. Aggravated assaults decreased during that period when compared to last year by 12.5%, according to the data, while robberies fell 17.8%.
The numbers released Monday were gathered from 13,719 of the just over 19,000 law enforcement agencies from across the country, according to the bureau.
Meanwhile, property crime went down 15.1% in the first three months of this year. Burglaries dropped 16.7%, while motor vehicle theft decreased by 17.3%. The declines in violent and property crimes were seen in every region of the US.
I am on here a lot and I have never seen anyone brag about Obama’s attendance…
I'm not saying that was a convo here but that was a literal lie and fact check by the media networks lol and as I said, he knows those comments are triggering to some which is why he makes said comments.
Look Riley, another lie you believed revealed to be a leftist hoax. You must feel like an even bigger idiot than normal this am lol
Now you're not just a gullible idiot, you're a liar as well. That's what desperate people do when they have no basis for their opinions.
Your choice of reference material makes me chuckle. You can't help but be stupid with what you consume.
You are wrong again. That demonstrates your stupidity. Your also a blatant liar - that demonstrates your lack of character and weakness.
You are a complete failure.
I think the Dear Leader is affected by essential tremors and doesn't want people to see it.
- Sep 13, 2002
- 94,971
- 193,359
- 113
And he only answers questions with redirected questions. The oldest “debate” trick in the book when you have zero credibility or evidence to support your thesis.
You can't call someone stupid then use the wrong "your" in the following sentence. You just look foolish (which is something I'm sure you're used to by now).
And there you go again, being wrong. You certainly can make a small, irrelevant mistake while calling a stupid person stupid. I just did it. And it doesn't detract in the least from your idiocy. You trying to call it out demonstrates how desperate you are and your lack of wit. You keep proving my point.
Was "lame" your attempt at an original insult? Good one... lmfao no wonder you believe all those hoaxes
Since we are talking danger and all…
How is it different than you and the rest discounting the fact that Chinese nationals and terrorists have been flooding over the border since Biden told them to “surge” it?
How do you all continue to talk about how Trump is dangerous for the country (which he is) but be completely fine with all of the steps Biden has taken to literally make us way less safer? Have you seen the numbers of all of the non-Latin/ Hispanic folks crossing the border? Why is it that it took three years for Biden to even accept the fact that we may have a crisis at the border?
Completely fvcking malfeasance. And the dumbest part of it is that in trying to pander to Hispanic voters by doing this they’ve completely pissed them off because these fvcking fools in the WH forget that those Hispanics are American first and actually like the idea of a secure border.
You can count on the laugh emojis here from the same cast of idiots who think that’s a good response rather than addressing it.
Good job using you're properly this time. Glad I could teach you something today
Wow - lame might not be apt after all. Incapable is better.
I know you're too insecure to stop yourself from looking foolish so I will do you a favor and stop my participation with you in this thread. I doubt that will matter though. I'm confident you'll still find a way.
- Sep 13, 2002
- 94,971
- 193,359
- 113
It was malfeasance for the feckless GOP legislators to renege on their bipartisan bill at Trump’s urging.
Fortunately, the administration’s efforts following the GOP chosing to walk away from a joint solution seem to be having a positive impact:
WASHINGTON (AP) — The number of arrests by Border Patrol agents of people illegally crossing into the United States fell in May to the third lowest of any month during the Biden presidency, while preliminary figures released Thursday show encounters with migrants falling even more in the roughly two weeks since the president announced new rules restricting asylum.
The figures are likely welcome news for a White House that has been struggling to show to voters concerned over immigration that it has control of the southern border. But the number of people coming to the border is often in flux, dependent on conditions in countries far from the U.S. and on smugglers who profit from global migration.
Border Patrol made 117,900 arrests of people entering the country between the official border crossing points in May, Customs and Border Protection said in a news release. That’s 9% lower than during April, the agency said. The agency said preliminary data since President Joe Biden’s June 4 announcement restricting asylum access shows arrests have fallen by 25%.
Border Patrol reports arrests are down 25% since Biden announced new asylum restrictions
Preliminary federal government figures show the number of people arrested by Border Patrol agents fell by 25% since President Joe Biden announced new rules restricting asylum access two weeks ago.
apnews.com
I don’t discount the border. I don’t understand why something wasn’t done sooner unless he was waiting for bi-partison legislation to get passed. It is concerning but I think that can be handled eventually where I honestly think TOC will fubar things and emulate his buddy Putin. The fact that he touts his “stollen” election and total immunity and classified documents crap to me is more dangerous than having rogue illegals. We can sort them out later. Again, I don’t know why the border issue wasn’t handled better….
It took 3 1/2 years for Democrats to even give a shit about the border. You don’t get to claim the moral high ground here.It was malfeasance for the feckless GOP legislators to renege on their bipartisan bill at Trump’s urging.
Fortunately, the administration’s efforts following the GOP chosing to walk away from a joint solution seem to be having a positive impact:
WASHINGTON (AP) — The number of arrests by Border Patrol agents of people illegally crossing into the United States fell in May to the third lowest of any month during the Biden presidency, while preliminary figures released Thursday show encounters with migrants falling even more in the roughly two weeks since the president announced new rules restricting asylum.
The figures are likely welcome news for a White House that has been struggling to show to voters concerned over immigration that it has control of the southern border. But the number of people coming to the border is often in flux, dependent on conditions in countries far from the U.S. and on smugglers who profit from global migration.
Border Patrol made 117,900 arrests of people entering the country between the official border crossing points in May, Customs and Border Protection said in a news release. That’s 9% lower than during April, the agency said. The agency said preliminary data since President Joe Biden’s June 4 announcement restricting asylum access shows arrests have fallen by 25%.
Border Patrol reports arrests are down 25% since Biden announced new asylum restrictions
Preliminary federal government figures show the number of people arrested by Border Patrol agents fell by 25% since President Joe Biden announced new rules restricting asylum access two weeks ago.
I’m beginning to believe he is the most dishonest person who posts here.
I agree they suck ass and should have passed it. But Biden went out of his to loosen restrictions, turned a blind eye for three years and then shouted “The border is a mess! Why won’t the GOP do anything!”It was malfeasance for the feckless GOP legislators to renege on their bipartisan bill at Trump’s urging.
Fortunately, the administration’s efforts following the GOP chosing to walk away from a joint solution seem to be having a positive impact:
WASHINGTON (AP) — The number of arrests by Border Patrol agents of people illegally crossing into the United States fell in May to the third lowest of any month during the Biden presidency, while preliminary figures released Thursday show encounters with migrants falling even more in the roughly two weeks since the president announced new rules restricting asylum.
The figures are likely welcome news for a White House that has been struggling to show to voters concerned over immigration that it has control of the southern border. But the number of people coming to the border is often in flux, dependent on conditions in countries far from the U.S. and on smugglers who profit from global migration.
Border Patrol made 117,900 arrests of people entering the country between the official border crossing points in May, Customs and Border Protection said in a news release. That’s 9% lower than during April, the agency said. The agency said preliminary data since President Joe Biden’s June 4 announcement restricting asylum access shows arrests have fallen by 25%.
Border Patrol reports arrests are down 25% since Biden announced new asylum restrictions
Preliminary federal government figures show the number of people arrested by Border Patrol agents fell by 25% since President Joe Biden announced new rules restricting asylum access two weeks ago.
No one except for the White House was saying there wasn’t a big problem with the border. And they were alone, saying it for three years.
Keep being deceived by the media, libtard. You're an idiot as usual. One day you'll wake up.
The fourth quarter 2023 crime report from the FBI, the federal government’s keeper of crime data, is unreliable at best and deceptive at worst.
The FBI’s preliminary 2023 data show murder declined by 13.2% across the country and violent crime dropped 5.7% compared to 2022 levels. Various news headlines have reported the FBI’s numbers unquestioningly, claiming murder is “plummeting” and violent crime “declined significantly” to pre-pandemic levels.
But these latest figures warrant skepticism, as we outline in a new report. In fact, violent crime is up substantially from 2019 levels, and last year’s apparent drop is less significant than it appears.
Part of the problem is how police departments report offenses to the FBI. The FBI asked, then demanded, that law enforcement agencies “transition” away from the system they used for decades to a new, more detailed but onerous one. The 2021 mandate to use NIBRS to submit crime data proved a disaster as overstretched departments, especially in large cities, failed to reach compliance and thus did not submit data.
In 2019, 89% of agencies covering 97% of the population submitted data, but by 2021, that coverage plummeted to less than 63% of departments overseeing just 65% of the population. Chicago, Los Angeles, and New York City all failed to submit crime data. To increase participation, the FBI relaxed the NIBRS requirement in 2022, allowing agencies to report via the legacy system.
But many other cities, such as St. Louis, which had transitioned to the new method, still struggle to comply and submit partial or faulty data. The FBI compensates by relying more heavily on “estimation,” or informed guesswork, to fill in the gaps and produce aggregated data.
That method of inferring offense totals is based on similar jurisdictions and past trends but is prone to error since it cannot compensate for local factors or events. For example, comparing Baltimore’s 2015 homicide total to similar cities’ trends would produce a skewed result. Baltimore, beset by riots and a police stand-down, saw murder rise 62% that year. In peer cities, murders rose in Cleveland only 15% and fell in Detroit by 1% and Memphis by 4%.
And the figures the agencies do report to the FBI do not match the agencies’ publicly reported figures. For Baltimore, the FBI reported 225 murders in 2023, but the city reported 262 — which means the FBI left out 37 murders. In Milwaukee, the police department reported a 7% increase in robberies, but the FBI showed a 13% drop. Nashville’s own data tallied more than 6,900 aggravated assaults in 2023, but the FBI counted only 5,941, leaving almost 1,000 of those offenses “missing.” This trend is consistent across the board: While 2022’s FBI city-level figures track the police’s own data, the 2023 numbers consistently undercount offense totals. Any year-to-year comparison overstates decline.
Other measures of crime levels undermine, or at least muddle, the veracity of the FBI’s data, which rely on “reported” offenses by victims and law enforcement themselves. The federal government’s own victims’ survey, which attempts to capture the gap between the number of actual offenses and the number reported to police, shows much higher offense rates than the FBI does. Moreover, a rising share of victims are failing to report their victimizations at all. In 2022, only 42% of violent crime victims and 33% of property crime victims bothered to report the crime to police.
That underreporting reduces the reliability of FBI numbers in measuring actual offense levels. For example, robbery offenses, which constitute roughly 25% of all violent crime by volume compared to 5% for murder, declined 18% between 2019 and 2022, according to the FBI, while the victim’s survey suggests a 30% rise.
Another complicating factor is underreporting by the police themselves, who might be under pressure to “downcharge” offenses or dissuade the victims from reporting the crime at all. While the prevalence of underreporting by the police is hard to quantify, an investigation found that between 2005 and 2012, the Los Angeles Police Department erased thousands of crimes, mostly violent assaults, by reclassifying them as lesser offenses or not capturing them at all. The fuzzy math artificially reduced the city’s crime rate by 7%. Any such malfeasance, when officials are under immense pressure to show progress in fighting crime, would inject bad data into the FBI’s estimation model, only compounding its errors.
Our analysis of 40 jurisdictions that both reported data to the FBI and the Major Cities Chiefs Association, which collects data from the largest police departments, shows that homicide declined 10.2% across 40 major cities in 2023 since 2022, but the FBI reported a 12.8% decline in those same jurisdictions. Similarly, the FBI reported a 6.6% decline in violent crime since 2022, but the same cities reported only a 4.5% drop, with the FBI counting 3,200 more violent crimes in 2022 than the MCCA and 2,600 fewer in 2023 — a net discrepancy of almost 5,900 offenses. That gap conveniently results in a more significant drop in crime levels year to year.
In reality, violent crime is up substantially from 2019 levels. In big cities, murder is still elevated — up 23% since 2019 across all 70 cities tracked by the MCCA and up 18% according to a 32-city analysis by the nonprofit organization Council on Criminal Justice. For aggravated assaults, CCJ’s 25-city sample found those up 8%, while the MCCA larger sample of cities reported a 26% increase over the same period.
To say crime is down is like descending from a tall peak and standing on a high bluff and saying you are closer to the ground — a true but misleading statement. Worse, the FBI’s crime data serve as a poor altimeter to judge how high (or low) crime actually is.
