Trump WILL be sentenced tomorrow

[pepsicock]

Jesus Christ.

I have to ask: Are you really this stupid and lacking in self awareness or is this some type of dumb, illiterate, redneck-impersonating troll job?

Enjoy the next 4 years because the last 4 years was pure 💩 💩

 

[RollingBallofButcherKnives]

Only official acts are covered by immunity.

Oh, there were some acts involved alright….

 

[RagnarLothbrok]

Enjoy the next 4 years because the last 4 years was pure 💩 💩

What does that have to do with my question? I was genuinely asking.

My life has been good regardless of who the president was.

Answer the actual question.

 

[DFSNOLE]

Because evidence was presented at trial that pertained to his presidency. For instance conversations that occurred during his presidency. They will say that evidence should not have been presented to the jury because it was covered by immunity.

I'm sorry. I'm not buying this. May I ask if you're an attorney?

 

[joelbc1]

Only official acts are covered by immunity.

Trump’s position was all acts as Oresudent are protected…
Much like Nixon’s “if the President does it, how can it be illegal?”

 

[Joes Place]

These acts happened before he was elected in 2016. How could he have presidential immunity before he was ever president?

Alito, Thomas, Gorsuch and Roberts will figure something out...

 

[Joes Place]

First of all the conviction will be overturned when responsible (non-partisan) judges review this. Secondly, the American voting public recognized what all of this lawfare was about and acquitted him in the court of public opinion. The lefties now have their talking point for what it is worth and we have our President. We win again.

Poor Bob Menendez chose the wrong party...

 

[Joes Place]

Because evidence was presented at trial that pertained to his presidency.

None of those are remotely "official acts".

 

[Joes Place]

Only official acts are covered by immunity.

"Covering up a crime is an 'official act' "
- Gorsuch, Thomas, Roberts, Alito, Barrett

 

[theiacowtipper]

"Covering up a crime is an 'official act' "
- Gorsuch, Thomas, Roberts, Alito, Barrett

That is exactly what they will say. Members of the White House staff discussed the payoff. That information was presented at trial. They will say those discussions were “official” and should not have been allowed as evidence, throwing out the case.

 

[theiacowtipper]

I'm sorry. I'm not buying this. May I ask if you're an attorney?

You don’t have to buy it. I don’t have to buy it. The point is that this Supreme Court will seek out any path to throw out any charge or conviction of Trump. I don’t know why it’s so hard for people to understand. It doesnt matter that it’s illegitimate. It is politics.

If a Democrat was charged they wouldn’t throw it out. It’s simple

 

[Joes Place]

That is exactly what they will say. Members of the White House staff discussed the payoff. That information was presented at trial. They will say those discussions were “official” and should not have been allowed as evidence, throwing out the case.

Which means murdering citizens w/o due process is also an "official act".

Once you allow crimes as "official acts", there is no guardrail anymore.

 

[DFSNOLE]

You don’t have to buy it. I don’t have to buy it. The point is that this Supreme Court will seek out any path to throw out any charge or conviction of Trump. I don’t know why it’s so hard for people to understand. It doesnt matter that it’s illegitimate. It is politics.

If a Democrat was charged they wouldn’t throw it out. It’s simple

Are you an attorney?

 

[theiacowtipper]

Are you an attorney?

No