She also said Trump is unfit for office. That’s usually the sort of thing you don’t publicly say about the guy you voted for.
Tulsi Gabbard doing the Kremlin's work...
- Thread starter NoleATL
- Start date
Then provide a link in which she says she voted for him. Criticizing the FBI for searching Mar-a-lago doesn’t mean she voted for him.
Because she was a Kremlin plant inside the Democratic Party, and wanted to stay in that position. Unlike Kremlin mouthpieces Jimmy Dore and Glenn Greenwald on the "left" that were vocal Tulsi supporters saying how Trump was better than Biden incessantly leading up to the election. Now that she's been blacklisted from the party, she can drop the charade.
Weird that she didn't criticize Trump for stealing government documents....
All the evidence of HER ACTIONS proves she is full throated MAGA
Stop listening to the blow hearted lies.
Interesting conspiracy theory.
What’s the evidence?
Opposition to neocons’ warmongering is always labeled ‘Kremlin talking points’, as though it’s un-American to oppose our military adventurism that simply spreads destruction while it breeds terrorists and enmity toward our nation.
The neocons can’t defend their failed wars on their merits, so they focus on smearing detractors and hope no one notices how much they’re screwing up the world and our position in it.
Please. I was anti-neocon while you were still shitting your pants. She's APPEASED warmongers like Assad and Putin. All of her anti-interventionist rhetoric, especially against even non-violent policy, conveniently enable Putin. You're buying the anti-war angle hook, line and sinker while spouting the same enabling bullshit to murderous warmongering despots abroad:
Gabbard, who has long been accused of being an apologist for Putin and other dictators, has made frequent Fox News appearances of late to criticize the Biden response to increasing tensions. For the most part, she’s called for the United States to guarantee Russia that Ukraine will never join NATO while insisting Ukraine is not a democratic state but instead an “authoritarian” regime. Furthermore, she’s claimed Biden wants Putin to invade solely so he can impose crippling sanctions on Russia.
Even Sean Hannity Balks at Tulsi Gabbard’s Putin Apologia
The conservative Fox News host felt it necessary to jump in and push back as Gabbard’s pro-Putin talking points went a bit too far.
Last edited:
Has Gabbard been similarly critical of Putin’s warmongering? Or just said we made him do it?
Genuine question, I don’t know.
See my addition of context above. Shockingly, she never has called out Putin's warmongering, or killing of innocent civilians. Just our sanctions
.
Those who disagree are racist traitors. Am I doing that right?
Gym teacher? Anything?
Interesting conspiracy theory.
Evidence beyond fevered imagining?
And by evidence I don’t mean links to an article where a neocon denounced her for not supporting their failed wars.
Assuming that’s true (as I suspected), that’s the issue. It’s the same with Tucker and others. Always “just asking questions” but always only in one direction.See my addition of context above. Shockingly, she never has called out Putin's warmongering, or killing of innocent civilians. Just our sanctions
Wonder what Tulsi thinks of Putin lobbing missiles indiscriminately towards playgrounds and apartment buildings? Our fault?
Um, regurgitating every single Kremlin talking point not enough? Being pissed at America for peaceful sanctions and not a peep about Russia killing civilians, innocent women and children, not enough? Are you saying she's just too stupid to realize she's a Putin stooge?
See my addition of context above. Shockingly, she never has called out Putin's warmongering, or killing of innocent civilians. Just our sanctions
It's not true.
Please. I was anti-neocon while you were still shitting your pants. She's APPEASED warmongers like Assad and Putin. All of her anti-interventionist rhetoric, especially against even non-violent policy, conveniently enable Putin. You're buying the anti-war angle hook, line and sinker while spouting the same enabling bullshit to murderous warmongering despots abroad:
Gabbard, who has long been accused of being an apologist for Putin and other dictators, has made frequent Fox News appearances of late to criticize the Biden response to increasing tensions. For the most part, she’s called for the United States to guarantee Russia that Ukraine will never join NATO while insisting Ukraine is not a democratic state but instead an “authoritarian” regime. Furthermore, she’s claimed Biden wants Putin to invade solely so he can impose crippling sanctions on Russia.
Even Sean Hannity Balks at Tulsi Gabbard’s Putin Apologia
The conservative Fox News host felt it necessary to jump in and push back as Gabbard’s pro-Putin talking points went a bit too far.www.thedailybeast.com
Hannity won't push back now that she's left the Democrat Party
Introduced pro-life bills
Says "don't say gay" bill didn't go far enough.
Sponsors anti-trans bills
Had
Complete flip flop during the campaign
She's working on this - lots of her twitter videos feature her shooting now.
Old ratings mean nothing. Her position before she ran for president were anti LGBT and her anti LGBT and trans comments now show that she's returning to form.
Just like all the rest of this stuff. She put up a front to try to win the nomination. Now we see who she really is. Tucker in a skirt.
When the sanctions are impacting your Kremlin paycheck, you fight the sanctions, yo.
Ok, fair enough. Why 7-8 months later is she claiming warmonger Democrats are dragging us to nuclear war?
It takes two to tango, no?
“He is not joking when he talks about potential use of tactical nuclear weapons or biological and chemical weapons, because his military is, you might say, significantly underperforming,” Biden added, referring to Russian President Vladimir Putin.
“I don’t think there’s any such thing as the ability to easily use tactical nuclear weapons and not end up with Armageddon.”
If Putin uses a nuke on Ukraine, what then has to happen for 'Armageddon' to follow?
If Putin uses a nuke on Ukraine, what then has to happen for 'Armageddon' to follow?
Why do you find yourself not wanting to answer that question?
Im not avoiding it, it’s a ridiculous point you’re making. Biden’s point is we/the world would need to respond in some fashion that could easily escalate. How is that the Democrats dragging us to nuclear war, as Gabbard claims? It’s not.
I am not sure a domestic political party is the one flirting with nukes.That part in bold is how the Democrats drag us into nuclear war.
It’s a ridiculous argument. 97 knows that.
JFC. You are one weird mother****er.That part in bold is how the Democrats drag us into nuclear war.
I know it's nearing Halloween, but I didn't foresee chatting with the ghost of Neville Chamberlain or Charles Lindbergh on HROT this year.That part in bold is how the Democrats drag us into nuclear war.
Does Armageddon require nuclear armaments in your world?Answer the question.
How does Armageddon happen?
Everyone (but you, apparently) understands that references to Armageddon in the context of nuclear weapons isn't a Sunday school lesson.
What kind of point do you think being this obtuse makes?
