ADVERTISEMENT

U.S. Economy Added 303,000 Jobs in March

dgordo

HR Legend
Nov 15, 2001
26,735
38,860
113
Chicago
U.S. job growth was strong last month, and the unemployment rate fell slightly.

U.S. employers added a seasonally adjusted 303,000 jobs in March, the Labor Department reported on Friday, significantly more than the 200,000 economists expected. The unemployment rate slipped to 3.8%, versus February’s 3.9%, in line with expectations.

The Federal Reserve is mandated to keep employment as strong as possible while keeping inflation under control. Balancing those objectives has put the central bank in a difficult position as it mulls cutting interest rates this year: Cut too soon, or by too much, and inflation could heat back up all over again. Wait too long, and the strain of high rates could damage the job market, pushing the economy into a recession.
The labor market has continued to add jobs over the past year despite high interest rates. At the same time, the unemployment rate has drifted up and wage gains have cooled. In March of last year, the unemployment rate was 3.5%.
Those dynamics have defied the conventional wisdom that, for inflation to cool, job creation would need to dramatically slow down.
Lately many economists and even Fed officials have come to believe that, in part as a result of immigration, the supply of available workers has increased. If that is right, the number of jobs can grow faster.
Supply alone isn’t enough to generate job gains, however; there has to be demand. At the moment, it still looks as if there is plenty of that. Layoff activity remains low, and the number of unfilled jobs is high, with the Labor Department reporting earlier this week that there were 8.8 million job openings as of the end of February. The job-opening rate, or openings as a share of filled and unfilled positions, was 5.3%. That has fallen over the past year, but in prepandemic 2019—a period of strength for the job market—that ratio averaged 4.5%.
But the share of people quitting their jobseach month has fallen to prepandemic levels, which indicates that the intensity with which businesses were hiring away workers from each other has subsided. Moreover, the private-sector job market has been drawing most of its strength from just two broad sectors—private education and healthcare, and leisure and hospitality.
Economists at Bank of America call those sectors “high touch.” Much of the work must be done in person, and a lot of it—such as waiting tables or working in a hospice—entails face-to-face interactions.
High-touch employment fell sharply when the pandemic hit, and even now, four years later, appears low. Relative to the trend during the five years before the pandemic, there are some two million fewer jobs in those sectors than might have been expected.
This raises a question, points out Bank of America economist Michael Gapen. “Should we expect employment in those sectors to return to their prior trend line? Or are there structural reasons to think maybe the employment gap will not close and therefore this catch-up effect could finish sooner?” he said.
He thinks the answer might be mixed. Lately, employment growth in leisure and hospitality has moderated. One reason why is that for some of those employers, business is still down—think restaurants near offices where many people are still working from home a few days a week. Another is that some businesses adopted practices when labor became short that probably won’t get undone. Lots of restaurants, for example, introduced QR codes in place of paper menus, allowing customers to place orders with their phones rather than waitstaff.
But for private education and healthcare, the story could be different. The loss of jobs these areas experienced when the pandemic hit was truly exceptional: Other than in 2020, employment in the sector has experienced near constant growth over the 85 years of available data. Moreover, the healthcare needs of an aging U.S. population will probably only grow. The sector is still about a million jobs short of its old trend. If that gap continues to narrow, as Gapen expects it will, it could help bolster job growth into next year.
Write to Justin Lahart at Justin.Lahart@wsj.com
Copyright ©2024 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

 
Yeah, but....The Rock won't be endorsing Joe Biden this election.

At least, I read that on HORT...
 
U.S. job growth was strong last month, and the unemployment rate fell slightly.

U.S. employers added a seasonally adjusted 303,000 jobs in March, the Labor Department reported on Friday, significantly more than the 200,000 economists expected. The unemployment rate slipped to 3.8%, versus February’s 3.9%, in line with expectations.

The Federal Reserve is mandated to keep employment as strong as possible while keeping inflation under control. Balancing those objectives has put the central bank in a difficult position as it mulls cutting interest rates this year: Cut too soon, or by too much, and inflation could heat back up all over again. Wait too long, and the strain of high rates could damage the job market, pushing the economy into a recession.
The labor market has continued to add jobs over the past year despite high interest rates. At the same time, the unemployment rate has drifted up and wage gains have cooled. In March of last year, the unemployment rate was 3.5%.
Those dynamics have defied the conventional wisdom that, for inflation to cool, job creation would need to dramatically slow down.
Lately many economists and even Fed officials have come to believe that, in part as a result of immigration, the supply of available workers has increased. If that is right, the number of jobs can grow faster.
Supply alone isn’t enough to generate job gains, however; there has to be demand. At the moment, it still looks as if there is plenty of that. Layoff activity remains low, and the number of unfilled jobs is high, with the Labor Department reporting earlier this week that there were 8.8 million job openings as of the end of February. The job-opening rate, or openings as a share of filled and unfilled positions, was 5.3%. That has fallen over the past year, but in prepandemic 2019—a period of strength for the job market—that ratio averaged 4.5%.
But the share of people quitting their jobseach month has fallen to prepandemic levels, which indicates that the intensity with which businesses were hiring away workers from each other has subsided. Moreover, the private-sector job market has been drawing most of its strength from just two broad sectors—private education and healthcare, and leisure and hospitality.
Economists at Bank of America call those sectors “high touch.” Much of the work must be done in person, and a lot of it—such as waiting tables or working in a hospice—entails face-to-face interactions.
High-touch employment fell sharply when the pandemic hit, and even now, four years later, appears low. Relative to the trend during the five years before the pandemic, there are some two million fewer jobs in those sectors than might have been expected.
This raises a question, points out Bank of America economist Michael Gapen. “Should we expect employment in those sectors to return to their prior trend line? Or are there structural reasons to think maybe the employment gap will not close and therefore this catch-up effect could finish sooner?” he said.
He thinks the answer might be mixed. Lately, employment growth in leisure and hospitality has moderated. One reason why is that for some of those employers, business is still down—think restaurants near offices where many people are still working from home a few days a week. Another is that some businesses adopted practices when labor became short that probably won’t get undone. Lots of restaurants, for example, introduced QR codes in place of paper menus, allowing customers to place orders with their phones rather than waitstaff.
But for private education and healthcare, the story could be different. The loss of jobs these areas experienced when the pandemic hit was truly exceptional: Other than in 2020, employment in the sector has experienced near constant growth over the 85 years of available data. Moreover, the healthcare needs of an aging U.S. population will probably only grow. The sector is still about a million jobs short of its old trend. If that gap continues to narrow, as Gapen expects it will, it could help bolster job growth into next year.
Write to Justin Lahart at Justin.Lahart@wsj.com
Copyright ©2024 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

"High paying green jobs?" 🤣
 
Clearly immigration is a positive for the labor markets and economic growth.
Now, can we ever have a rational debate over increasing legal immigration?
Our economic strength is the key to maintaining our military and diplomatic dominance of this planet.
No other industrialized country has matched our economic performance since the pandemic.
Why? One reason is shrinking labor pool.
Immigrants have bolstered our country since its conception.
C'mon Congress!
Figure it out!
Almost all economists agree that immigration labor is a major part of the secret sauce that has lifted the US economy above all others.
Attack the border issues from both sides...increase legal immigration significantly and tighten up enforcement with the bill that conservative republican Oklahoma Senator crafted.

Do we want to fix this or not?
 
Why with all these new federal tax payers, you would think the gov would be out of debt in no time?!?! I know none of you comrades will bother looking, but in the lower center, there's a ticker labeled "Government Employees" and it sits at 27,782,028. Think, kids, think! 🤡 Many of the new "private sector" jobs, were "created" to deal with the invasion. Tell me, what effect on inflation, do you suppose jobs paying interpreters $100k+ has??

 
The “feelings” on the economy have long been disconnected from reality. Almost a direct positive relationship to the rise of 24/7 news/entertainment channels
This is why I laugh when Rs tell me the media is extreme left leaning. Why then does 70% of the country think the economy is bad? It's beacuse Fox News reaches far and wide. I've talked about some of my Trump loving neighbors before but the husband basically is a repeat machine of Fox News (otherwise good guy) and will say how bad the economy is but then talk about the trip they are going on or the 70k truck they just bought.

I also think a lot of this is because of social media. It's toxic, folks.
 
Clearly immigration is a positive for the labor markets and economic growth.
Now, can we ever have a rational debate over increasing legal immigration?
Our economic strength is the key to maintaining our military and diplomatic dominance of this planet.
No other industrialized country has matched our economic performance since the pandemic.
Why? One reason is shrinking labor pool.
Immigrants have bolstered our country since its conception.
C'mon Congress!
Figure it out!
Almost all economists agree that immigration labor is a major part of the secret sauce that has lifted the US economy above all others.
Attack the border issues from both sides...increase legal immigration significantly and tighten up enforcement with the bill that conservative republican Oklahoma Senator crafted.

Do we want to fix this or not?
you know the answer to this question
 
The reason that people are down on the economy, is pretty obvious Grocery Store Prices are astronomical compared to a few years ago.

Gas is heading back $4 or $5 because of the middle east.

That's what people see most famlies go to the Grocery Store once or twice a week.
 
Point of order - Can we get a HORT consensus on the jobs report?

Do we all agree to go by the numbers as they are released each month (i.e. we discuss March #’s today)?

Or

Do we agree to use the revised numbers that lag a few months later? (i.e. we should be discussing December #’s today)?


Because….there is a difference.

 
Point of order - Can we get a HORT consensus on the jobs report?

Do we all agree to go by the numbers as they are released each month (i.e. we discuss March #’s today)?

Or

Do we agree to use the revised numbers that lag a few months later? (i.e. we should be discussing December #’s today)?


Because….there is a difference.

ideally we'd be looking at economic indicators that go beyond month over month employment growth

but we (posters on this board and the american public as a whole) have the attention span of gnats, so we always need something new to react to
 
  • Like
Reactions: TennNole17
I hate Bartiromo, but she might have a point here (re: impact on possible future rate cuts).

Of course, the interest rates we've experienced lately are much closer to historical norms than the rates we've seen in the last 10-15 years.
Regarding Bartiromo and her comment...she just repeated what the Mpls Fed Governor said on Thursday.

Goldman disagreed with his POV and said three cuts are still likely.

These labor numbers, tho likely a bit overestimated, are really phenomenal.

The wage growth wouldn't be as high if Republicans would address immigration.
 
The reason that people are down on the economy, is pretty obvious Grocery Store Prices are astronomical compared to a few years ago.

Gas is heading back $4 or $5 because of the middle east.

That's what people see most famlies go to the Grocery Store once or twice a week.
Are grocery store prices REALLY astronomical? They are higher in many areas. My entire life prices have consistently gone up while packaging size has shrunk. Not to mention, half of the rising costs are corporations raising prices under the guise of inflation. I wish more people would understand that fact.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT