ADVERTISEMENT

U.S. Economy Added 303,000 Jobs in March

Under Biden, full time workers have fallen. Part time has grown. Workers 25-54 full time has fallen significantly.

Older workers over 60 have grown significantly having to make ends meet...part time. See above.

Govt jobs are growing with part of that involving taking care of immigrants.

Let the ignorant ha ha ha begin.
 
Under Biden, full time workers have fallen. Part time has grown. Workers 25-54 full time has fallen significantly.

Older workers over 60 have grown significantly having to make ends meet...part time. See above.

Govt jobs are growing with part of that involving taking care of immigrants.

Let the ignorant ha ha ha begin.

Significantly bro. What else does Zerohedge say?

 
U.S. job growth was strong last month, and the unemployment rate fell slightly.

U.S. employers added a seasonally adjusted 303,000 jobs in March, the Labor Department reported on Friday, significantly more than the 200,000 economists expected. The unemployment rate slipped to 3.8%, versus February’s 3.9%, in line with expectations.

The Federal Reserve is mandated to keep employment as strong as possible while keeping inflation under control. Balancing those objectives has put the central bank in a difficult position as it mulls cutting interest rates this year: Cut too soon, or by too much, and inflation could heat back up all over again. Wait too long, and the strain of high rates could damage the job market, pushing the economy into a recession.
The labor market has continued to add jobs over the past year despite high interest rates. At the same time, the unemployment rate has drifted up and wage gains have cooled. In March of last year, the unemployment rate was 3.5%.
Those dynamics have defied the conventional wisdom that, for inflation to cool, job creation would need to dramatically slow down.
Lately many economists and even Fed officials have come to believe that, in part as a result of immigration, the supply of available workers has increased. If that is right, the number of jobs can grow faster.
Supply alone isn’t enough to generate job gains, however; there has to be demand. At the moment, it still looks as if there is plenty of that. Layoff activity remains low, and the number of unfilled jobs is high, with the Labor Department reporting earlier this week that there were 8.8 million job openings as of the end of February. The job-opening rate, or openings as a share of filled and unfilled positions, was 5.3%. That has fallen over the past year, but in prepandemic 2019—a period of strength for the job market—that ratio averaged 4.5%.
But the share of people quitting their jobseach month has fallen to prepandemic levels, which indicates that the intensity with which businesses were hiring away workers from each other has subsided. Moreover, the private-sector job market has been drawing most of its strength from just two broad sectors—private education and healthcare, and leisure and hospitality.
Economists at Bank of America call those sectors “high touch.” Much of the work must be done in person, and a lot of it—such as waiting tables or working in a hospice—entails face-to-face interactions.
High-touch employment fell sharply when the pandemic hit, and even now, four years later, appears low. Relative to the trend during the five years before the pandemic, there are some two million fewer jobs in those sectors than might have been expected.
This raises a question, points out Bank of America economist Michael Gapen. “Should we expect employment in those sectors to return to their prior trend line? Or are there structural reasons to think maybe the employment gap will not close and therefore this catch-up effect could finish sooner?” he said.
He thinks the answer might be mixed. Lately, employment growth in leisure and hospitality has moderated. One reason why is that for some of those employers, business is still down—think restaurants near offices where many people are still working from home a few days a week. Another is that some businesses adopted practices when labor became short that probably won’t get undone. Lots of restaurants, for example, introduced QR codes in place of paper menus, allowing customers to place orders with their phones rather than waitstaff.
But for private education and healthcare, the story could be different. The loss of jobs these areas experienced when the pandemic hit was truly exceptional: Other than in 2020, employment in the sector has experienced near constant growth over the 85 years of available data. Moreover, the healthcare needs of an aging U.S. population will probably only grow. The sector is still about a million jobs short of its old trend. If that gap continues to narrow, as Gapen expects it will, it could help bolster job growth into next year.
Write to Justin Lahart at Justin.Lahart@wsj.com
Copyright ©2024 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

and will be adjusted downward in the next couple weeks with little fanfare as usual
 
Under Biden, full time workers have fallen.

It has? Reached an all time high during Biden and is higher than the all time high under Trump since Jan of 22.

 
More government lies.

The personal savings rate is near seventeen-year lows. Credit card debt is at record levels. Millions of prime-age workers have quit the job market, and full-time employment continues to wither.

Another factor pointing to weakness in job markets is the fact that the number of full-time workers fell in December. Nearly all of the gains in workers were part time.

Specifically, full-time employees dropped by 1,000 workers while part-time workers rose by 679,000 (month-over-month). The total gain in all workers for the period was 717,000. Moreover, the overall trend since 2021 is one in which growth in full-time work in general is falling—and turning negative in some months—while part-time employment represents most of the growth.

David Rosenberg summed it up in a recent tweet, these are jobs "gains" characterized by part-timers, side giggers, and multiple job holders:



Image
rb

An important aspect of the "household survey" Rosenberg mentions is that it considers part-time workers and barely-employed self-employed people as among the "employed" on a par with full-time workers. Yet, when we consider the reality of slowing wages combined with a lack of growth in full-time workers, one suspects that the employment situation isn't exactly lucrative for a great many workers. There is also good reason to believe that many workers who are now taking on part-time work are doing so because the cost of living has increased substantially. For example, over the past year, the average hourly wage increased 4.6 percent while CPI prices rose 6.4 percent. Workers are falling behind, and it's hard to square this with Biden's claim that workers are doing unusually well.


 
  • Haha
Reactions: BelemNole
More government lies.

The personal savings rate is near seventeen-year lows. Credit card debt is at record levels. Millions of prime-age workers have quit the job market, and full-time employment continues to wither.

Another factor pointing to weakness in job markets is the fact that the number of full-time workers fell in December. Nearly all of the gains in workers were part time.

Specifically, full-time employees dropped by 1,000 workers while part-time workers rose by 679,000 (month-over-month). The total gain in all workers for the period was 717,000. Moreover, the overall trend since 2021 is one in which growth in full-time work in general is falling—and turning negative in some months—while part-time employment represents most of the growth.

David Rosenberg summed it up in a recent tweet, these are jobs "gains" characterized by part-timers, side giggers, and multiple job holders:



Image
rb

An important aspect of the "household survey" Rosenberg mentions is that it considers part-time workers and barely-employed self-employed people as among the "employed" on a par with full-time workers. Yet, when we consider the reality of slowing wages combined with a lack of growth in full-time workers, one suspects that the employment situation isn't exactly lucrative for a great many workers. There is also good reason to believe that many workers who are now taking on part-time work are doing so because the cost of living has increased substantially. For example, over the past year, the average hourly wage increased 4.6 percent while CPI prices rose 6.4 percent. Workers are falling behind, and it's hard to square this with Biden's claim that workers are doing unusually well.



If you’ve lost the Mises Institute


 
U.S. job growth was strong last month, and the unemployment rate fell slightly.

U.S. employers added a seasonally adjusted 303,000 jobs in March, the Labor Department reported on Friday, significantly more than the 200,000 economists expected. The unemployment rate slipped to 3.8%, versus February’s 3.9%, in line with expectations.

The Federal Reserve is mandated to keep employment as strong as possible while keeping inflation under control. Balancing those objectives has put the central bank in a difficult position as it mulls cutting interest rates this year: Cut too soon, or by too much, and inflation could heat back up all over again. Wait too long, and the strain of high rates could damage the job market, pushing the economy into a recession.
The labor market has continued to add jobs over the past year despite high interest rates. At the same time, the unemployment rate has drifted up and wage gains have cooled. In March of last year, the unemployment rate was 3.5%.
Those dynamics have defied the conventional wisdom that, for inflation to cool, job creation would need to dramatically slow down.
Lately many economists and even Fed officials have come to believe that, in part as a result of immigration, the supply of available workers has increased. If that is right, the number of jobs can grow faster.
Supply alone isn’t enough to generate job gains, however; there has to be demand. At the moment, it still looks as if there is plenty of that. Layoff activity remains low, and the number of unfilled jobs is high, with the Labor Department reporting earlier this week that there were 8.8 million job openings as of the end of February. The job-opening rate, or openings as a share of filled and unfilled positions, was 5.3%. That has fallen over the past year, but in prepandemic 2019—a period of strength for the job market—that ratio averaged 4.5%.
But the share of people quitting their jobseach month has fallen to prepandemic levels, which indicates that the intensity with which businesses were hiring away workers from each other has subsided. Moreover, the private-sector job market has been drawing most of its strength from just two broad sectors—private education and healthcare, and leisure and hospitality.
Economists at Bank of America call those sectors “high touch.” Much of the work must be done in person, and a lot of it—such as waiting tables or working in a hospice—entails face-to-face interactions.
High-touch employment fell sharply when the pandemic hit, and even now, four years later, appears low. Relative to the trend during the five years before the pandemic, there are some two million fewer jobs in those sectors than might have been expected.
This raises a question, points out Bank of America economist Michael Gapen. “Should we expect employment in those sectors to return to their prior trend line? Or are there structural reasons to think maybe the employment gap will not close and therefore this catch-up effect could finish sooner?” he said.
He thinks the answer might be mixed. Lately, employment growth in leisure and hospitality has moderated. One reason why is that for some of those employers, business is still down—think restaurants near offices where many people are still working from home a few days a week. Another is that some businesses adopted practices when labor became short that probably won’t get undone. Lots of restaurants, for example, introduced QR codes in place of paper menus, allowing customers to place orders with their phones rather than waitstaff.
But for private education and healthcare, the story could be different. The loss of jobs these areas experienced when the pandemic hit was truly exceptional: Other than in 2020, employment in the sector has experienced near constant growth over the 85 years of available data. Moreover, the healthcare needs of an aging U.S. population will probably only grow. The sector is still about a million jobs short of its old trend. If that gap continues to narrow, as Gapen expects it will, it could help bolster job growth into next year.
Write to Justin Lahart at Justin.Lahart@wsj.com
Copyright ©2024 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

Companies are hiring because they've seen that Trump is leading in the polls.
 
Under Biden, full time workers have fallen. Part time has grown. Workers 25-54 full time has fallen significantly.

Older workers over 60 have grown significantly having to make ends meet...part time. See above.

Govt jobs are growing with part of that involving taking care of immigrants.

Let the ignorant ha ha ha begin.
Link?
 
It has? Reached an all time high during Biden and is higher than the all time high under Trump since Jan of 22.

Damn these guys are constantly full of crap.
 
U.S. job growth was strong last month, and the unemployment rate fell slightly.

U.S. employers added a seasonally adjusted 303,000 jobs in March, the Labor Department reported on Friday, significantly more than the 200,000 economists expected. The unemployment rate slipped to 3.8%, versus February’s 3.9%, in line with expectations.

The Federal Reserve is mandated to keep employment as strong as possible while keeping inflation under control. Balancing those objectives has put the central bank in a difficult position as it mulls cutting interest rates this year: Cut too soon, or by too much, and inflation could heat back up all over again. Wait too long, and the strain of high rates could damage the job market, pushing the economy into a recession.
The labor market has continued to add jobs over the past year despite high interest rates. At the same time, the unemployment rate has drifted up and wage gains have cooled. In March of last year, the unemployment rate was 3.5%.
Those dynamics have defied the conventional wisdom that, for inflation to cool, job creation would need to dramatically slow down.
Lately many economists and even Fed officials have come to believe that, in part as a result of immigration, the supply of available workers has increased. If that is right, the number of jobs can grow faster.
Supply alone isn’t enough to generate job gains, however; there has to be demand. At the moment, it still looks as if there is plenty of that. Layoff activity remains low, and the number of unfilled jobs is high, with the Labor Department reporting earlier this week that there were 8.8 million job openings as of the end of February. The job-opening rate, or openings as a share of filled and unfilled positions, was 5.3%. That has fallen over the past year, but in prepandemic 2019—a period of strength for the job market—that ratio averaged 4.5%.
But the share of people quitting their jobseach month has fallen to prepandemic levels, which indicates that the intensity with which businesses were hiring away workers from each other has subsided. Moreover, the private-sector job market has been drawing most of its strength from just two broad sectors—private education and healthcare, and leisure and hospitality.
Economists at Bank of America call those sectors “high touch.” Much of the work must be done in person, and a lot of it—such as waiting tables or working in a hospice—entails face-to-face interactions.
High-touch employment fell sharply when the pandemic hit, and even now, four years later, appears low. Relative to the trend during the five years before the pandemic, there are some two million fewer jobs in those sectors than might have been expected.
This raises a question, points out Bank of America economist Michael Gapen. “Should we expect employment in those sectors to return to their prior trend line? Or are there structural reasons to think maybe the employment gap will not close and therefore this catch-up effect could finish sooner?” he said.
He thinks the answer might be mixed. Lately, employment growth in leisure and hospitality has moderated. One reason why is that for some of those employers, business is still down—think restaurants near offices where many people are still working from home a few days a week. Another is that some businesses adopted practices when labor became short that probably won’t get undone. Lots of restaurants, for example, introduced QR codes in place of paper menus, allowing customers to place orders with their phones rather than waitstaff.
But for private education and healthcare, the story could be different. The loss of jobs these areas experienced when the pandemic hit was truly exceptional: Other than in 2020, employment in the sector has experienced near constant growth over the 85 years of available data. Moreover, the healthcare needs of an aging U.S. population will probably only grow. The sector is still about a million jobs short of its old trend. If that gap continues to narrow, as Gapen expects it will, it could help bolster job growth into next year.
Write to Justin Lahart at Justin.Lahart@wsj.com
Copyright ©2024 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

I swear we see this every month now, and the same people are here trying to convince that the economy is terrible. Next month, let's just link to this post and be done with it.
 
Are grocery store prices REALLY astronomical? They are higher in many areas. My entire life prices have consistently gone up while packaging size has shrunk. Not to mention, half of the rising costs are corporations raising prices under the guise of inflation. I wish more people would understand that fact.
They are raising prices because consumers are willing and able to pay more.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Tom Paris
I already have about 146 times. I’m not wasting my time. Go read an economics book or just go look at a supply and demand graph and read up on the money supply and what I’d has done the last 4 years.
The non-conservatives on this board refuse to accept the impact of a 44% increase in M2. I have stopped trying to educate them. They refuse to acknowledge it, because it does not fit their narrative. Or, they are just stupid.
 
I just interviewed a kid two years out of college for a junior accountant position we have open. He's looking for $70-$75k. Had another newb yesterday that said he "will only work in the office 2-3 days/week, will work at home the rest of the time." Full time office work cramps his lifestyle with other activities. He would need an "incentive" to be in the office all week. I have had numerous other candidates that I did phone screenings with that had 5-7 years of experience, all wanted $80k+. Job market must not be too shabby in the accounting field at least.
 
The non-conservatives on this board refuse to accept the impact of a 44% increase in M2. I have stopped trying to educate them. They refuse to acknowledge it, because it does not fit their narrative. Or, they are just stupid.
Janet Yellen in the house.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IIowaFarmBoy
I just interviewed a kid two years out of college for a junior accountant position we have open. He's looking for $70-$75k. Had another newb yesterday that said he "will only work in the office 2-3 days/week, will work at home the rest of the time." Full time office work cramps his lifestyle with other activities. He would need an "incentive" to be in the office all week. I have had numerous other candidates that I did phone screenings with that had 5-7 years of experience, all wanted $80k+. Job market must not be too shabby in the accounting field at least.

We have to offer flex work from home or lose candidates to other law firms.

We are at 3 days in 2 out right now and that meets the market demands.


.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jasonrann
We have to offer flex work from home or lose candidates to other law firms.

We are at 3 days in 2 out right now and that meets the market demands.


.
I personally don't care either way. My preference (for me) is to be in the office because I'm much more productive. The ownership group is staunchly against hybrid or work from home. With the kid yesterday, what surprised me was his approach. He didn't ask, he told us what his deal was. Hey, if it works out for him, good for him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: St. Louis Hawk
Why? Based on the history of the last 3 years the odds are that they're lying and inflating the numbers again anyways. A revision downwards will quietly come months later and receive zero attention from the usual propaganda outlets.

Based on your posting the last 3 years the odds are that you have been lying.
 
I just interviewed a kid two years out of college for a junior accountant position we have open. He's looking for $70-$75k. Had another newb yesterday that said he "will only work in the office 2-3 days/week, will work at home the rest of the time." Full time office work cramps his lifestyle with other activities. He would need an "incentive" to be in the office all week. I have had numerous other candidates that I did phone screenings with that had 5-7 years of experience, all wanted $80k+. Job market must not be too shabby in the accounting field at least.
I drew the short straw this year and now I’m the office managing partner—in a year that we are looking to move office space. Spent 3 days this week looking at space. A big issue is paying rent for offices that people don’t use during the week. People are going to bitch at me for going ith the more utilitarian building for 45 bucks a sq ft and not the new tower with all the bells and whistles at 71 bucks a sq ft., but we ain’t paying for it not to be used.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jasonrann
Why? Based on the history of the last 3 years the odds are that they're lying and inflating the numbers again anyways. A revision downwards will quietly come months later and receive zero attention from the usual propaganda outlets.
captain projection to the rescue. Have a good day comrade.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mattymoknows
I drew the short straw this year and now I’m the office managing partner—in a year that we are looking to move office space. Spent 3 days this week looking at space. A big issue is paying rent for offices that people don’t use during the week. People are going to bitch at me for going ith the more utilitarian building for 45 bucks a sq ft and not the new tower with all the bells and whistles at 71 bucks a sq ft., but we ain’t paying for it not to be used.
Samuel L Jackson Reaction GIF by Coming to America
 
I drew the short straw this year and now I’m the office managing partner—in a year that we are looking to move office space. Spent 3 days this week looking at space. A big issue is paying rent for offices that people don’t use during the week. People are going to bitch at me for going ith the more utilitarian building for 45 bucks a sq ft and not the new tower with all the bells and whistles at 71 bucks a sq ft., but we ain’t paying for it not to be used.
$ 71 - damn son.
 
Wow. That is high. We just reupped at our office for three years for $15/foot. It isn't fancy, but it'll do.
Yeah, the (relatively) new Texas Tower in Houston has a lot of bells and whistles. But only the firm’s offices in Philly and NYC get that kind of love
 
I just interviewed a kid two years out of college for a junior accountant position we have open. He's looking for $70-$75k. Had another newb yesterday that said he "will only work in the office 2-3 days/week, will work at home the rest of the time." Full time office work cramps his lifestyle with other activities. He would need an "incentive" to be in the office all week. I have had numerous other candidates that I did phone screenings with that had 5-7 years of experience, all wanted $80k+. Job market must not be too shabby in the accounting field at least.

Thanks Covid! We have employees losing their mind over being made to return to the office 50% of their time instead of once a week. And I saw a guy ask this question the other day..."Should I take a grade 12 remote job or a grade 13 job that I have to go in once a week. My commute is 5 minutes". It's over 10K more to drive 5 minutes once a week. smh.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT