I'll also ask you the question I asked him. Let's see if you're too chicken shit to answer it.
I'll ask you again. I will listen to any suggestions and will champion any of them that I think will help curb this problem. Will you?
Well what do you know? Oregon shooter obtained all his guns legally
- Thread starter Huey Grey
- Start date
I'll also ask you the question I asked him. Let's see if you're too chicken shit to answer it.
I'll ask you again. I will listen to any suggestions and will champion any of them that I think will help curb this problem. Will you?
Have you heard of 1 crime this man committed before he did this? Have you heard that he was in any kind of treatment for mental health problems?. If not then there was nothing to keep him from passing any background check anywhere. There is nothing you could have done to prevent him from getting a gun that wouldn't violate the Second Amendment for all of us.
That is what it comes down to. The only way to do any of the stupid ideas that you keep throwing out in all of these threads would require this country to repeal the Second amendment. You can't even get stricter background checks. How in the hell will you get the Second Amendment repealed?
There are over 300,000,000 guns in this country. The ship has already sailed. People who desire to do harm to masses of people will always have the means to do it. On top of that there are many other ways to commit mass murder.
Everything listed in this thread a pure hypothesis regardless of which opinion you have.
Your example of comparing cocaine to firearms is apples and oranges. Guns an be purchased legally, cocaine can't be. The only way to compare these is to make cocaine legal or guns illegal. We know which one you prefer.
All of the regulations i followed are federally mandated, not just a state law.
Why should I or any gun owner have to jump through additional "hoops" to enjoy the freedoms allowed to us in an attempt to hide the real problem?
"I'll ask you again. I will listen to any suggestions and will champion any of them that I think will help curb this problem. Will you?[/QUOTE]"
So you are willing to listen and champion any suggestion as long as you like it? That's quite the disclaimer for someone that wants to appear open minded. Basically if someone makes a proposal that goes against what you want or believe, they're wrong.
The most ignorant part of your post is who needs to shoot animals. Ask that to a farmer who's crops are eaten by deer or the person that hit one with their car.
THE security guard? The area of the college seemed rather large. Are you saying there was one security guard for the whole campus or one for each building.
Its questionable if the shooter should have been able to purchase guns...
http://www.oregonlive.com/pacific-n...f/2015/10/new_details_emerge_on_umpqua_c.html
The system is never going to be perfect...and here it may have failed.
Figure out a way to strengthen the system without penalizing law abiding citizens.
There really isn't anything there that would have come close to restricting his right to purchase a gun. Unless it would have been a dishonorable discharge, but it wasn't.
For me it would come down to what changes we as a country are looking to make and if they would have effected the outcomes.
I think the major reason the NRA fights against any change is that restrictions will be put in place and when they don't solve the problem we will just keep putting restrictions in place until we get to the no gun one.
I think the NRA reacts to reasonable gun control exactly the same way the pro-choice bunch reacts to proposals to restrict abortion. It's all politics baby - screw human life!
