Jamarcus Russell has left the buffet and entered the chat.
Jamarcus Russell has left the buffet and entered the chat.
There’s an argument for Tiger, but to go back to Page 1 of the thread, Len Bias could have been a megastar and never got to do anything because of the OD. We saw Tiger’s greatness, his off-course issues just shortened his window.Tiger, AINEC.
There’s an argument for Tiger, but to go back to Page 1 of the thread, Len Bias could have been a megastar and never got to do anything because of the OD. We saw Tiger’s greatness, his off-course issues just shortened his window.
That’s also fair. He probably would have won some number of additional majors, but he was past his prime when the the off-course stuff happened for sure.I’d argue his injuries did far more to affect his window than the off course stuff.
And it was quite a window.I’d argue his injuries did far more to affect his window than the off course stuff.
That’s also fair. He probably would have won some number of additional majors, but he was past his prime when the the off-course stuff happened for sure.
Maybe, if he stayed fully healthy for the length of his career, but he upped the game on his own. Competition was coming for him in ways not seen before. Jack was really the perfect career. You have to hit it out of the park to even sniff that level. Tiger was absolute dominance for close to a decade and he didn’t come close to Jack’s record.If not for the injuries I think he catches Jack for sure.
Dude just liked to break in places and watch women sleep. What’s the harm in that?Cecil the Diesel Collins.
Don’t forget david thirdkill.Yes. He was the precursor to LeBron James.
As a Celtics fan, I can only imagine what 1986-87 and beyond would have looked like with Parish, McHale, Bird, Bias, DJ.
He was not Bo Jackson, but the 30 for 30 on him is really good. I believe it is titled the best that never was.Marcus Dupree
The guy was Bo Jackson, just not as smart, and without the work ethic. With the right coach, he could have had a great college career and a lucrative pro career. Switzer was not that coach.
Really good 30 for 30.He was not Bo Jackson, but the 30 for 30 on him is really good. I believe it is titled the best that never was.
Maybe, if he stayed fully healthy for the length of his career, but he upped the game on his own. Competition was coming for him in ways not seen before. Jack was really the perfect career. You have to hit it out of the park to even sniff that level. Tiger was absolute dominance for close to a decade and he didn’t come close to Jack’s record.
He lost recognition in the form of the HOF, but his career was basically over as a player when he got the ban hammer for gambling.Has Pete Rose been mentioned?
Oh, I think Tiger is absolutely the GOAT. Totally different world than the world Jack played in. Tiger came in and changed the game and competed in a PGA with way more depth of talent than the one Jack competed in. That’s where I was going with Jack having the “perfect career”…he came along at the right time and dominated, but he didn’t dominate as great a field as Tiger did. I don’t think Tiger would have caught Jack without the injuries, but only because of the level of the competition and the number of younger players coming on.Not close? He’s four shy, and that’s after winning his last one after not winning a major for a decade after he had to basically rebuild his leg after winning the US Open against Rocco. Then his physical struggles began, his off-course issues piled on and it was a long road back.
To me, Tiger is the GOAT. Not just for his career success, but for how he changed the game.
Yeah, I'm not sure having the MLB career record in a stat like hits qualifies as having their career ruined.He lost recognition in the form of the HOF, but his career was basically over as a player when he got the ban hammer for gambling.
Oh, I think Tiger is absolutely the GOAT. Totally different world than the world Jack played in. Tiger came in and changed the game and competed in a PGA with way more depth of talent than the one Jack competed in. That’s where I was going with Jack having the “perfect career”…he came along at the right time and dominated, but he didn’t dominate as great a field as Tiger did. I don’t think Tiger would have caught Jack without the injuries, but only because of the level of the competition and the number of younger players coming on.
The one caveat I’ll add is that there was definitely an intimidation factor that Tiger had. Without the injuries, maybe he holds that a little longer, but I still don’t think he would have caught Jack.
That’s certainly a fair point. I do think his injuries were somewhat inevitable at some point - he had a TON of torque in his swing and his back and knees were not going to last forever….but I am very curious how things would have gone without his personal life falling apart for a couple years there. If he was only dealing with the physical injuries and recovery and not having his marriage fall apart very publicly and then the string of other personal issues.Honestly I thought that intimidation factor he has was the part most affected by the off-course stuff that came out. He’d so carefully kept his career and private life separate until then that all of the stuff that came out totally shattered that mystique. Combine that with all the tournaments he missed due to injury and we practically had an entire generation of golfers who never experienced him at his best.
That’s certainly a fair point. I do think his injuries were somewhat inevitable at some point - he had a TON of torque in his swing and his back and knees were not going to last forever….but I am very curious how things would have gone without his personal life falling apart for a couple years there. If he was only dealing with the physical injuries and recovery and not having his marriage fall apart very publicly and then the string of other personal issues.
Pre-rape Mike Tyson was a better boxer than post-rape Mike Tyson.
Could be a horse. And by the way, does Shoeless Joe qualify.?How does OP not know it should be “Who” in the thread title, not “What”??
That's silly. He's close and has more tour wins. Plus, they didn't change courses to try to keep Jack from winning.Maybe, if he stayed fully healthy for the length of his career, but he upped the game on his own. Competition was coming for him in ways not seen before. Jack was really the perfect career. You have to hit it out of the park to even sniff that level. Tiger was absolute dominance for close to a decade and he didn’t come close to Jack’s record.
As I said in a follow-up post, I think Tiger is easily the GOAT. I just don’t think he was going to match Jack’s number of majors won due to the competition and, as you point out, people designing courses specifically to challenge him.That's silly. He's close and has more tour wins. Plus, they didn't change courses to try to keep Jack from winning.
As I said in a follow-up post, I think Tiger is easily the GOAT. I just don’t think he was going to match Jack’s number of majors won due to the competition and, as you point out, people designing courses specifically to challenge him.
As I said in a follow-up post, I think Tiger is easily the GOAT. I just don’t think he was going to match Jack’s number of majors won due to the competition and, as you point out, people designing courses specifically to challenge him.
That’s also why this is a particularly interesting question framed up for a guy like Tiger. When his off-field issues came up, he was already having injury problems and general aging/injuries are outside the scope here. That’s also why, while he is the GOAT, I have a hard time saying that the off-field issues cost him Jack’s record. I think he was already trending in a way that was going to keep him short.Impossible to say obviously and that’s what makes arguments like this so much fun. Between his win at the US Open to when he won again at the Masters, he went a decade in between wins.
If healthy I don’t think it’s a stretch to say he’d have gotten 4 more out of 40 attempts when fully healthy - not sure how many he did play, played hurt or just flat out missed due to injury in that stretch.
All 210 seconds of it…Yes, but he already got knocked out by Douglas before he ever went to prison. The prison term deprived Tyson of money and the public of many spectacles, but it didn't rob us of prime Tyson. We got to see his prime, and it was when he was about 21.
That’s also why this is a particularly interesting question framed up for a guy like Tiger. When his off-field issues came up, he was already having injury problems and general aging/injuries are outside the scope here. That’s also why, while he is the GOAT, I have a hard time saying that the off-field issues cost him Jack’s record. I think he was already trending in a way that was going to keep him short.
And yet, I can see the other side - that the breakdown of his marriage really led him off track and then his use of painkillers led to the car accident that really cemented his injuries, so there’s definitely an argument…..but I think his knees and back were already going to hold him short. He’d have gotten a couple more without the off-field stuff, but I think he’d have come up one or two short.
All 210 seconds of it…