ADVERTISEMENT

Where are we at now and next year

perryhawk

HB Legend
Apr 3, 2008
11,331
14,331
113
Perry, Iowa
It's been a tough week and I have mixed emotions that get me thinking about where we are at now and how does that look going into next year.

First question that I have that others might have the answer toooooo; is this team doing an overseas trip this next summer? It would seem to be an ideal time for it with all of the guys we have coming back and would be a good head start going into next year.

Where we are at the moment. I mentioned in a post early in the B10 season about getting a win and where it would put us in the standings.....another poster gave a response that it was to early to think about the standings at that point. In some ways that is true.....but (Maybe others don't do this) I start thinking about "jeesh, if we had just won a couple more games" where that would put us. I think that in the pre conference schedule that we could have easily been two more games that we should have won...easily 2, if we had just started playing some sort of defense early in the year. Hang with me, this ties together going into next year (I understand that we don't have the same schedule).

But we are currently 14-12 overall and 6-7 in the B10. Two more pre conference wins and we are now at 16-10. Then let's say we win just 1 of Nebraska or Minnesota. 17-9 at this stage and the possibility of another NCAA tournament bid looks a lot different than it does right now.

I have no idea how we finish this year....I am generally feeling pretty good about how we are playing but the B10 is tough from top to bottom and who knows what will happen.....next year the B10 should be pretty tough, better than this year. A lot of teams are young with developing talent, although I think we are the youngest in the B10?

That leads me to look at what we will need to do to take a significant step forward next year. So, here is what I would list as my priorities.

1) Play better team defense in the half court. Our press has started to look pretty good, but this is the area that I think we can and will make the most improvement in for next year.

2) Free throw shooting. Losing Pete is significant in this area. Solid improvement from guys like Cook, Pemsl, and Wagner is vital. If they make decent improvement, which is certainly possible, I think it's a difference maker.

3) Turnovers......I love Pete but I don't think that losing him hurts us in this area. That said our young guys can/should make solid improvement in this area.

4) Rebounding......we can and should do a better job of rebounding. Pete is a pretty good rebounder for a guard, but our front line guys can and should step up with a year under their belts. This is an area where Tyler Cook could make a significant improvement.

Sorry this is getting long but....next year.

The physical conditioning and strength improvements for guys like JB, Pemsl, and Kreiner (Maishee if he stays) could be a major factor. I know that most people think that Pemsl is strong enough but what I am referring to is his conditioning. The young man fought injuries all through HS and I think is just getting healthy. Give him an off season to really get his body in top condition and I think he will be even better.

Mid range game.....Cook, Pemsl, and Wagner. Some level of improvement I think does a lot for their games.

I could go on and on but I will finish with this: Improved team defense (5 points a game), better FT shooting (2 points a game), a couple fewer turnovers (1 point a game), better rebounding (1 point a game), and individual development (2 points a game) and that puts us at 11 points a game better than this year. Since these guys have proven that they can win without Pete I'm estimating this level of point improvements understanding that Pete is gone.

I haven't even mentioned that often times players improve the most between their freshman and soph years...very good for us. Seniors often times have their best years....and I think Dom might be our best perimeter defender. If we don't count on him for scoring I think he is a major contributor.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ihawkhoops and nu2u
Well thought out post.........with Pete being gone I think our guys will step up and be just fine. Free throws is a huge concern for the bigs. My other concern is our best athlete (Cook) cannot get 3 to 4 rebounds a game with 1 or 2 of those off missed FT's. Now, I know he's a freshman but still. A 3 that can defend well would be awesome too!! Otherwise, I believe we will be a better team!
 
16 - 15. 8-10 in conf. 1 win in BIG tourney, maybe 2 to finish off this year.
Next season we should have a few more wins than this year (3 or 4) but the BIG conf will be tougher next year. A lot of teams return most of their rosters. My guess is 10-8 or 11-7 in BIG play next year. It would be nice to think we'll have a huge leap in the conference next year but I'm holding off that kind of optimism for 1 more year. I think we'll make a huge leap in '18-19.
SRs
Baer
Wagner
Ellingsen
Williams
JRs
Bohannon
Moss
Dailey
Cook
Pemsl
Kriener
SOs
McCaffrey
Garza
Nungee
FR
Weiskamp
2 will have to have transferred out to make the numbers work by the time that season starts. But that has the makings of a good line up with the playing experience that will be on the floor.
 
Last edited:
Patrick Mc is a 2019 recruit.

16 - 15. 8-10 in conf. 1 win in BIG tourney, maybe 2 to finish off this year.
Next season we should have a few more wins than this year (3 or 4) but the BIG conf will be tougher next year. A lot of teams return most of their rosters. My guess is 10-8 or 11-7 in BIG play next year. It would be nice to think we'll have a huge leap in the conference next year but I'm holding off that kind of optimism for 1 more year. I think we'll make a huge leap in '18-19.
SRs
Baer
Wagner
Ellingsen
Williams
JRs
Bohannon
Moss
Dailey
Cook
Pemsl
Kriener
SOs
McCaffrey
Garza
Nungee
FR
McCaffrey
Weiskamp
2 will have to have transferred out to make the numbers work by the time that season starts. But that has the makings of a good line up with the playing experience that will be on the floor.
 
A top 6 finish in the B1G and an NCAA tournament bid is a very legitimate goal for next year. We have been close to that this year....hell...this week!
 
  • Like
Reactions: SotaHawk87
16 - 15. 8-10 in conf. 1 win in BIG tourney, maybe 2 to finish off this year.
Next season we should have a few more wins than this year (3 or 4) but the BIG conf will be tougher next year. A lot of teams return most of their rosters. My guess is 10-8 or 11-7 in BIG play next year. It would be nice to think we'll have a huge leap in the conference next year but I'm holding off that kind of optimism for 1 more year. I think we'll make a huge leap in '18-19.
SRs
Baer
Wagner
Ellingsen
Williams
JRs
Bohannon
Moss
Dailey
Cook
Pemsl
Kriener
SOs
McCaffrey
Garza
Nungee
FR
McCaffrey
Weiskamp
2 will have to have transferred out to make the numbers work by the time that season starts. But that has the makings of a good line up with the playing experience that will be on the floor.


I think we are pretty much in agreement....if we end this year with 16 wins before the B10 tournament, next year we could be at 20 at the same point.

I also agree with you and the second poster in this thread that in 2 years look out!
 
It's time for me to admit I was overly optimistic for this team. I felt this team would have finished this year at 12-6 in the B1G. I didn't expect to lose to the Illini and expected that with our improving defense we this week would have pulled off a win in Minnesota or at Michigan State. Some questionable officiating at Nebraska and Minnesota didn't help, but oh well I have loved watching the improvements this year both individually and as a team. Maybe with a week off to refocus we can still make a push to get to 10-8, but that seems to me pretty optimistic still. I expected more from CW. Maybe next year the light goes on that he needs to stay aggressive immediately after a miss or a make and battle full out fir 40 minutes. Too often I see him miss a shot, layup, bad pass and know he is thinking about it, instead of what comes next. Bohannon or Baer and now Wagner to me are make it or miss continuously playing for the next play, I'd say fearless in their case. Others on this team have this to on both sides of the argument. It's not that they're not playing hard,( I'm sure they are all trying hard) it is playing through a bit of adversity. Confidence !!!!
Anyway, next year will go as far as their confidence will take them IMO. I'm hoping and thinking you'll get that in spades from Conner Mac. I suspect indecision is o e thing you won't see very often from him. I expect mistakes until he adjusts to size and speed if everyone on the court but once he has experienced it for a bit we will see a very explosive team offense.
So I was a year early for my 12-6 prediction. Next year we are right there.
 
16 - 15. 8-10 in conf. 1 win in BIG tourney, maybe 2 to finish off this year.
Next season we should have a few more wins than this year (3 or 4) but the BIG conf will be tougher next year. A lot of teams return most of their rosters. My guess is 10-8 or 11-7 in BIG play next year. It would be nice to think we'll have a huge leap in the conference next year but I'm holding off that kind of optimism for 1 more year. I think we'll make a huge leap in '18-19.
SRs
Baer
Wagner
Ellingsen
Williams
JRs
Bohannon
Moss
Dailey
Cook
Pemsl
Kriener
SOs
McCaffrey
Garza
Nungee
FR
McCaffrey
Weiskamp
2 will have to have transferred out to make the numbers work by the time that season starts. But that has the makings of a good line up with the playing experience that will be on the floor.

unless both McCaffrey boys plan on playing without scholarship :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: HawksAndChiefs24
16 - 15. 8-10 in conf. 1 win in BIG tourney, maybe 2 to finish off this year.
Next season we should have a few more wins than this year (3 or 4) but the BIG conf will be tougher next year. A lot of teams return most of their rosters. My guess is 10-8 or 11-7 in BIG play next year. It would be nice to think we'll have a huge leap in the conference next year but I'm holding off that kind of optimism for 1 more year. I think we'll make a huge leap in '18-19.
SRs
Baer
Wagner
Ellingsen
Williams
JRs
Bohannon
Moss
Dailey
Cook
Pemsl
Kriener
SOs
McCaffrey
Garza
Nungee
FR
McCaffrey
Weiskamp
2 will have to have transferred out to make the numbers work by the time that season starts. But that has the makings of a good line up with the playing experience that will be on the floor.

Isn't McCaffrey #2 the year after Weiskamp?
 
The one thing I have notice is the bigs need to learn to kick the ball back out for open 3s I'm sure this is something they never had to do in HS or AAU ball.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ScoutRefugee
Has the conference schedule for next year been released yet? That will play a big role for me in predicting our final record, knowing who we play 2x, on the road or at home.

Hopefully the noncon will be a bit more balance. Too big a difference between good and bad opponents that I don't think helped the young guys.
 
The one thing I have notice is the bigs need to learn to kick the ball back out for open 3s I'm sure this is something they never had to do in HS or AAU ball.

Yup, our posts have to learn to kick it back out. I realize we want to "isolate" the post, but dang we need guys in the passing lanes so they can kick it out. It seems like we have our post player and then the other 4 guys go stand on the other side. Need to have someone trying to go back door or even go baseline and spot up for a 3.

We also need a guy who can penetrate towards the basket. Our offense moves side to side and mainly post feeds. We need some slashers or a PG who can attack and get the defense to collapse. We are very outside in offense and I would like to see our guards get more aggressive and attack. But they have to be strong with the ball.

I think we will see at least 1 deflection off this years squad. I don't know who, but I am sure someone will leave. Its just way too many bodies next year to get PT. Unless 2-3 guys redshirt.
 
Has the conference schedule for next year been released yet? That will play a big role for me in predicting our final record, knowing who we play 2x, on the road or at home.

Hopefully the noncon will be a bit more balance. Too big a difference between good and bad opponents that I don't think helped the young guys.

I think the conference slate gets released sometime in June??

I hope Fran and Iowa go out and get into a decent tournament. And then fill in a lot of games vs top 200 teams. Do not schedule ANY MEAC, SWAC, or other bottom leagues.
 
It's been a tough week and I have mixed emotions that get me thinking about where we are at now and how does that look going into next year.

First question that I have that others might have the answer toooooo; is this team doing an overseas trip this next summer? It would seem to be an ideal time for it with all of the guys we have coming back and would be a good head start going into next year.

Where we are at the moment. I mentioned in a post early in the B10 season about getting a win and where it would put us in the standings.....another poster gave a response that it was to early to think about the standings at that point. In some ways that is true.....but (Maybe others don't do this) I start thinking about "jeesh, if we had just won a couple more games" where that would put us. I think that in the pre conference schedule that we could have easily been two more games that we should have won...easily 2, if we had just started playing some sort of defense early in the year. Hang with me, this ties together going into next year (I understand that we don't have the same schedule).

But we are currently 14-12 overall and 6-7 in the B10. Two more pre conference wins and we are now at 16-10. Then let's say we win just 1 of Nebraska or Minnesota. 17-9 at this stage and the possibility of another NCAA tournament bid looks a lot different than it does right now.

I have no idea how we finish this year....I am generally feeling pretty good about how we are playing but the B10 is tough from top to bottom and who knows what will happen.....next year the B10 should be pretty tough, better than this year. A lot of teams are young with developing talent, although I think we are the youngest in the B10?

That leads me to look at what we will need to do to take a significant step forward next year. So, here is what I would list as my priorities.

1) Play better team defense in the half court. Our press has started to look pretty good, but this is the area that I think we can and will make the most improvement in for next year.

2) Free throw shooting. Losing Pete is significant in this area. Solid improvement from guys like Cook, Pemsl, and Wagner is vital. If they make decent improvement, which is certainly possible, I think it's a difference maker.

3) Turnovers......I love Pete but I don't think that losing him hurts us in this area. That said our young guys can/should make solid improvement in this area.

4) Rebounding......we can and should do a better job of rebounding. Pete is a pretty good rebounder for a guard, but our front line guys can and should step up with a year under their belts. This is an area where Tyler Cook could make a significant improvement.

Sorry this is getting long but....next year.

The physical conditioning and strength improvements for guys like JB, Pemsl, and Kreiner (Maishee if he stays) could be a major factor. I know that most people think that Pemsl is strong enough but what I am referring to is his conditioning. The young man fought injuries all through HS and I think is just getting healthy. Give him an off season to really get his body in top condition and I think he will be even better.

Mid range game.....Cook, Pemsl, and Wagner. Some level of improvement I think does a lot for their games.

I could go on and on but I will finish with this: Improved team defense (5 points a game), better FT shooting (2 points a game), a couple fewer turnovers (1 point a game), better rebounding (1 point a game), and individual development (2 points a game) and that puts us at 11 points a game better than this year. Since these guys have proven that they can win without Pete I'm estimating this level of point improvements understanding that Pete is gone.

I haven't even mentioned that often times players improve the most between their freshman and soph years...very good for us. Seniors often times have their best years....and I think Dom might be our best perimeter defender. If we don't count on him for scoring I think he is a major contributor.
Wrong message board. Short Story Fiction Writing can be found at the Iowa Writers Workshop page.
 
We need our guards to become stronger and also attack more. I think with a true post presence next year and also hopefully (Wagner, Cook, Pemsl) can add the 15ft jump shot to their game. If we can continue to see improvement out of those 3 that will go along ways. But our guards have to become more aggressive and attack.

I'll go early line prediction for next year (11-7) and 22-9 overall next year and a borderline NCAA tourney team. Like I said our guards have to get better.
 
Next year I think it is realistic to expect to return to the NCAA tournament and have at least 10 wins in the conference. Anything beyond that is icing on the cake and anything less than is disappointing. This years team was not ready for that noncon schedule. This was a blessing in disguise. The tourney was never realistic this year and Fran knew that. We all knew that deep down as much as we like to dream. I even caught myself getting a little excited before being jobbed in the Barn.

Next year it is imperative for the program to return to the NCAA tournament. If we don't it will feel like we have hit a big rut. I hope we can get some NIT experience this year and make a nice little BTT run. I am a firm believer we could go out and beat any conference team on a neutral court this year. This young core has something the last group (Gessell, Woody, etc) did not. Jordan Bohannon. The dude is FEARLESS. He will hit some big time shots in his career. Between him and Moss we will have all the back court scoring we will need for the foreseeable future. It is imperative we get someone big and tough down low who can rebound. I love Pemsl and Cook and am very excited to see them develop as scorers. All this team is really missing is a bruiser IMO. Kreiner can stretch the D out down low, Cook can make anyone pay for one false step and Pemsl can already score with the best of them.

My prediction is we end up with a 6 seed next year and make it to the BTT semis. Where it gets tricky is the rest of the conference is very young and returns a lot as well. I think if we have some really lean years those won't come until 2019-20. Go hawks.
 
My hopes for this year was to win 20 games total & make post season...stay away from a season with more losses than wins and no post season. After losing those 4 games in non-conference then dropping the Omaha game our chances for NCAA was going to be tough going into the B1G.

In the B1G we have played 2 really poor games @ NW & Illinoise. We lost 2 games in OT we could have & should have won Neb & Min. We won a great game over Purdue & OT against Michigan..its easy to say if we had won this one or that one...fact is we stand at 6-7...was hoping we were at 7-6. (15-11) at this point.

So...5 games to go...obviously the Wisc & Mary games will be tough. hoping for a 3-2 finish at worse..9-9 (17-14)...

BTT..we have been awful the last few years..have not been able to pull out very many wins & playing on a Saturday is a distant memory...its time the Hawkeyes win some games...I'm hoping for 2 wins...now we are (19-15)..

I don't trust the NCAA inviting us to NIT...but assuming that happens...19-15 going in...get a win...there is the 20 win season...there is a post season...and who knows maybe we can make it to New York for NIT finals again.

Next year??? I agree Perry we need to get better..will be interesting to see how things play out with the addition of 2 bigs in Garza & Nunge..what does that mean for Wagner - Uhl - Kriener...seems Pemsl is in the rotation somewhere as well as Cook.

And lets not forget..the 1st of the McCaf boys will be on the roster..where does he fit in?
I'm guessing we lose someone to transfer..just a guess but it is common place in college basketball so I don't think we are any different. I don't think Jones will be back..so we are full at 13 + Connor unless someone moves on. We have had a pretty good last 5 years under Fran..103-61 overall (48-37) in B1G..now where will the next 5 years be..Big Ten championships & NCAA Sweet 16, Elite 8 & Final 4 ...also seem to be a distant memory..this century has not been the most kind to us...I'm hoping the freshman we have on this team along with the future recruits coming in right behind them...are the ones to get us back to those days of the 80's & even 90's.
 
Not worried at all about next year other than defections. This might be a disappointing year to some, but I refused to oversell the talent and looked to the first year for Gesell/Woody et al.

I saw growing pains this year, given the youth and only one true "semi-point" who was a frosh, and only one known scorer who had never "led" the team before. There was really only 3 players who had played the roles they would have this year in prior years (Baer, Uhl, Ellingson)...and those were mostly bit parts at best. Williams I didn't think applied cause he really wasn't backup point last year.

Jok wasn't The Man last year either. Logic to me was we knew he could score big, but how would he hold up needing to bring that every game?

I saw issues with players finding their roles the entire year given the depth, I saw lessons applied in the conference where the youth would be taken more advantage of by teams who knew Iowa all too well with Fran. Road game lessons so to speak.

I'm no Nostrodamus, not sticking my chest out or anything, I just thought the volume of youth would be too telling to overcome.

Minnesota, Nebraska, Illinois, Memphis and UNO hurt...but the two in-staters sort of make up for UM and UNO. A "fair trade" so to speak.

Those are 5 games are "the ones that got away" that change how we judge this year for certain. Yet, Iowa to me could easily be sitting 10-16 or 11-15 right now too...Michigan, Purdue, UNI, ISU being losses.

Yet, they won. So, there is good in this season, something to build upon. Finish 9-9 and 17-14...pretty much right where I thought we'd be, just a bit different path to get there is all.
 
Next year??? I agree Perry we need to get better..will be interesting to see how things play out with the addition of 2 bigs in Garza & Nunge..what does that mean for Wagner - Uhl - Kriener...seems Pemsl is in the rotation somewhere as well as Cook.

Next year is a traffic jam of big men and I agree, a lot of questions regarding roles and rotation. Wagner, Uhl, Pemsl, Cook, and Kriener all return with significant game experience. Add Jack Nunge and Luka Gargza. Now you have 7 players to cover two positions -C/PF - 5 of whom are underclassmen.

Assuming all stay eligible, that presents a major dilemma for distribution of minutes - especially if one argues that Kriener (and Pemsl?) deserve expanded playing time.

A couple of possible options: move Uhl to the 3, redshirt Nunge? Maybe Nunge will begin his career at SF?. It will certainly be interesting to see how Fan sorts this out. Garza appears B10 ready to play Center so I think he will be in the rotation (off the bench) from the start.
 
They are the definition of Bill Parcell's "You are what your record says you are".

I don't go much for the wunna, gunna, shunna. They deserved to win the games they won. They also had the losses coming, the exception being at minny.

It's been a season filled with erratic play. Plenty of fun and excitement to go with a large dose of mistakes.
Of course I want to see them win, but I also want to watch entertaining basketball. And they were entertaining more often than not.

I thought that they might be an NIT team, virtually no chance at the NCAA tourney. NIT still possible at this point.

A 3-2 finish, and win one in the BTT would be a solid conclusion to the season.

As for next year, I think they have a decent shot at getting back to the Dance.
They'll obviously need to improve on D and rebounding quite a bit.

Bohannon has done a nice job. Still, I'd like to see them add a grad transfer PG with the ability to penetrate and keep some of the quicker points from driving at will.
 
Next year is a traffic jam of big men and I agree, a lot of questions regarding roles and rotation. Wagner, Uhl, Pemsl, Cook, and Kriener all return with significant game experience. Add Jack Nunge and Luka Gargza. Now you have 7 players to cover two positions -C/PF - 5 of whom are underclassmen.

Assuming all stay eligible, that presents a major dilemma for distribution of minutes - especially if one argues that Kriener (and Pemsl?) deserve expanded playing time.

A couple of possible options: move Uhl to the 3, redshirt Nunge? Maybe Nunge will begin his career at SF?. It will certainly be interesting to see how Fan sorts this out. Garza appears B10 ready to play Center so I think he will be in the rotation (off the bench) from the start.
I think Nungee is going to play SF. That looks to be his game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: easy2
I think the conference slate gets released sometime in June??

I hope Fran and Iowa go out and get into a decent tournament. And then fill in a lot of games vs top 200 teams. Do not schedule ANY MEAC, SWAC, or other bottom leagues.

I don't mind one or two of those to start with to get the teams feet wet before noncon tourneys, Iowa state game etc. this year seemed like a bigger than usual gap in quality of opponents and I wonder if that impacted the teams development at all.
 
Next year is a traffic jam of big men and I agree, a lot of questions regarding roles and rotation. Wagner, Uhl, Pemsl, Cook, and Kriener all return with significant game experience. Add Jack Nunge and Luka Gargza. Now you have 7 players to cover two positions -C/PF - 5 of whom are underclassmen.

Assuming all stay eligible, that presents a major dilemma for distribution of minutes - especially if one argues that Kriener (and Pemsl?) deserve expanded playing time.

A couple of possible options: move Uhl to the 3, redshirt Nunge? Maybe Nunge will begin his career at SF?. It will certainly be interesting to see how Fan sorts this out. Garza appears B10 ready to play Center so I think he will be in the rotation (off the bench) from the start.

I agree ... frontline may very well be a frontline..and big.
5-4-3...with 8 guys (if no one leaves) for those 3 spots. We know Baer, Cook & Uhl (Fran wont redshirt a Senior)...besides need his spot available for Wieskamp.

So that leaves 5 guys..Garza, Nunge, Pemsl, Wagner & Kriener..couple years ago we did start Woody,White&Uthoff..so its been done before.

if no one leaves...Guards...Bohannon & Moss... Ellingson & Williams have played every game this year..Dailey...McCaffery.

My land something has to give
 
I am looking forward to next year and years to come but also have concerns. Iowa played 11 players the first half of MSU game. I checked the box scores of several top college teams and most played 7-8 guys. Fran seems to struggle with rotations and trying to play too many players. Hate to see players transfer and have no idea who might but it might not hurt in the long run.
 
We have some good players coming back, and some really good players coming back.

To win the B1G or go deep in the tourney, Iowa needs one or two to develop into stars. That means a complete floor game, or totally dominate inside game.

I think Iowa will be fun to watch, and fun to cheer for, but they are going to need something extra to get over the top.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hawksfor3
We are about where I projected right now....finishing 9-9 would be great and making the NIT would meet my hopes for this team...after the non-con I thought the NIT was a pipedream.

Next Year ?

Teams in the league who will stay good or be better?

NW,PSU,Neb.,MSU,Mich.,Minny,RU.,....maybe OSU and Md.
Only IU,Ill.PU and Wis should drop.....unless the bigs at IU andPU return.

How much can we rise? Gonna be hard to get outta the middle of that pack again...but league-wide improvement should provide a chance for 8-9 teams to make the Dance...
Hawks could finish 7th and go Dancing....which works for me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: perryhawk
Unless one of the incoming guys really contributes next year, I think we will see a repeat of this season. Bohannon does a lot of nice things, but is a defensive liability. Williams / Ellingson at PG is a band-aid on a gun shot wound. Moss shows flashes, but is inconsistent. Cook and Pemsl will benefit from all the PT this season, but neither is a rim protector. Defensively, we aren't very good (again) and it shows in how many times we get broken down and dunked on. Teams aren't running complex stuff against us. Blow by our 1-3's and get to the rim or lob it up.

Fran needs to change his style to fit his talent. We are not a running team. Moss and Cook are suited to the transition game, but that's about it. Getting into a track meet with teams who have better athletes is a recipe for disaster as we saw against MSU. The team plays best when there is ball movement and that does not happen when guys are jacking up 3's and making 20% of them.

I hope I am wrong, but I think this team will end the season with a whimper as Fran's teams historically do. I would love to think that guys will be PO'd heading into the BTT and win 2 games, but history is not on their side.
 
Gophers won 7 total games in their rebuilding year.. Iowa could win 17-18.. this program is in an amazing spot!

I agree, but look at their athleticism vs. ours. There isn't a coach out there who can consistently win with inferior athletes. Occasional success / upsets happen, but over the course of a season, the teams with better talent win. We had no answer for their size / rebounding and that isn't the exception in the Big Ten.

I admit that offensively, Bohannon has made me eat at the Crow Buffet. Unfortunately there are two ends of the court and athletically, he is no match for quick guards. Jok and Baer are matador defenders also, which gives you 3 guys on the perimeter who are blow by's waiting to happen. What chance do our interior guys have when they have to help on dribble drives? Most games are won / lost in the last 5 minutes and Fran's teams have historically stunk in these situations because we don't have a dribble drive guy and can't defend the other team's guards.
 
Right now, we are about where I thought we'd be, and probably better so far. This year depends mostly how Jok does. If he starts hitting his shot again, we could make the NIT. We are not in the NCAA.

As far as players, I'm impressed with Jok on offense, not defense. I'm impressed with Bohannon, Pemsl, Baer and Cook and maybe Ellingson. Wagner is showing some signs of life, although he is by far our worst free throw shooter, and kind of fades as the game goes on. Uhl has his minutes, but does not have aggressiveness and leadership. Kriener is about like I thought he would be-- a hard worker, decent rebounder but definitely not first line yet. Moss is an enigma: great skills but terrible rebounder and disappears at times. Has his spurts. Williams has to develop a shot. Why even guard him? I like Ellingson. He has to take more shots. Jones is not healthy enough for Fran to depend on him and Dailey is a guard project.

Next year I see Connor McCaffery moving eventually into the starting rotation at guard. Like Bohannon, he has the "it" factor- coolness, a nice shot, and is a leader. Nunge and Garza will have to show us what they have. I think Garza is a taller Kriener with more upside. Nunge, who I think has more skills than Garza, is my bet to move into the rotation at small forward, with Baer and Wagner ahead of him at the start. Next year I think we can win enough to sneak into the NCAAs.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Ihawkhoops
Right now, we are about where I thought we'd be, and probably better so far. This year depends mostly how Jok does. If he starts hitting his shot again, we could make the NIT. We are not in the NCAA.

As far as players, I'm impressed with Jok on offense, not defense. I'm impressed with Bohannon, Pemsl, Baer and Cook and maybe Ellingson. Wagner is showing some signs of life, although he is by far our worst free throw shooter, and kind of fades as the game goes on. Uhl has his minutes, but does not have aggressiveness and leadership. Kriener is about like I thought he would be-- a hard worker, decent rebounder but definitely not first line yet. Moss is an enigma: great skills but terrible rebounder and disappears at times. Has his spurts. Williams has to develop a shot. Why even guard him? I like Ellingson. He has to take more shots. Jones is not healthy enough for Fran to depend on him and Dailey is a guard project.

Next year I see Connor McCaffery moving eventually into the starting rotation at guard. Like Bohannon, he has the "it" factor- coolness, a nice shot, and is a leader. Nunge and Garza will have to show us what they have. I think Garza is a taller Kriener with more upside. Nunge, who I think has more skills than Garza, is my bet to move into the rotation at small forward, with Baer and Wagner ahead of him at the start. Next year I think we can win enough to sneak into the NCAAs.

I hope you are right. I struggle to see how adding another combo guard who will be predominantly be a 3 point shooter helps us on offense. I think Kriener will take a big step and if we get some contributions from the new bigs, our interior play could improve immensely. Have to find a couple guys that want to rebound and play D.
 
To win the B1G or go deep in the tourney, Iowa needs one or two to develop into stars. That means a complete floor game, or totally dominate inside game.
I know this is an older thread but I think we have 2 or maybe even 3 stars. Garza, Weezy, and CJ. Garza is totally in control of the post. How did you know? ;)
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT