ADVERTISEMENT

Where did Dennis Hastert get the $3.5 million?

lucas80

HR King
Gold Member
Jan 30, 2008
116,142
169,777
113
Watching Morning Joe and they were reporting Hastert will most likely go before a judge today on charges he attempted to conceal the cash transactions totaling $3.5 million to a young man he sexually assaulted while he was a high school teacher. That's not a high paying job. He spent a decade or so in the House of Representatives. Was he really able to stuff enough money in his pockets, and as a lobbyist since he left the House to pay that much in hush money?
 
Illinois politician pays a lot.
Didn't he abruptly retire before finance rules/laws changed that allowed him to keep campaign funds he raised? I thought he was the guy who did this which drew a lot of criticism at the time. If so, I am guessing that some is coming from that. Then, he probably is a lobbyist or has some sort of connections that still see him paid well.
 
Last edited:
How many of these clowns go to Washington without much more than a pot to piss in and all of a sudden they are multi-millionaires?
 
Former House speaker Dennis Hastert was making $165,200 a year in 2007 when he resigned from Congress, and quickly parlayed his political experience into a much more lucrative career as a federal lobbyist.

One industry expert estimated that a lobbyist with Hastert's background today could bring in at least $1 million a year. On top of his lobbying work, Hastert made substantial sums from sitting on corporate boards, giving speeches and consulting.

And he continues to collect three government pensions that in total exceed $100,000 a year.

Hastert, 73, was charged last week in a federal indictment that said he agreed to pay $3.5 million in hush money over past misconduct over a person who knew him for most of that person's life. Law enforcement sources said the misconduct was sexual in nature and happened when Hastert was a high school teacher and wrestling coach in far west suburban Yorkville.


Officials said he had withdrawn $1.7 million in cash to give to "Individual A" since June 2010. His income in recent years makes clear Hastert wouldn't have had much trouble coming up with the millions of dollars he allegedly promised.

The longest-serving Republican House speaker in history, Hastert had accumulated wealth mostly in real estate when he left Congress in November 2007 as a rank-and-file member, having earlier surrendered the speaker's gavel.

He and his wife, Jean, reported a net worth in the range of $2.1 million to $10.3 million in a financial disclosure statement at the end of 2007. Much of that was in income-generating farmland in Illinois and Wisconsin, the disclosure said.

Hastert joined the Washington-based lobbying firm of Dickstein Shapiro in 2008 but couldn't lobby on behalf of clients right away because of a cooling-off period required of former lawmakers.

Before his resignation from the firm last week, Hastert did work for companies including Lorillard Tobacco , ServiceMaster and the shipping giant Maersk Inc. His lobbying disclosure reports, which date to 2009, show in roughly six years his clients paid Dickstein Shapiro more than $11 million.

His biggest client was Lorillard, a Maryland-based cigarette maker that paid Hastert and colleagues almost $7.9 million.

A lobbyist's compensation is not disclosed in federal reports, which ask for an estimate, rounded to the nearest $10,000, of lobbying-related money paid by clients.

But according to Steve Nelson of The McCormick Group, an executive search firm in Arlington, Va., a House speaker going into full-time lobbying today would command at least $1 million a year and probably closer to $2 million.

Dickstein Shapiro did not respond to Tribune questions Monday.


Hastert also lobbied on behalf of Oak Brook-based CenterPoint Properties, which develops, owns and manages industrial real estate and related rail, road and port infrastructure in the Chicago area. CenterPoint paid Dickstein Shapiro $170,000 to lobby from 2009 to 2014 in an attempt to shape energy and waste-disposal policy along with Environmental Protection Agency regulations, reports show.

Naperville-based PolyBright International Inc., a lighting technology company, also paid $20,000 for Hastert to keep tabs on federal energy-efficiency standards and the 2009 stimulus bill.

Hastert also represented the government of Luxembourg, where his ancestors lived, and the Republic of Turkey.

Hastert also received good-sized paychecks from corporate boards, among them the CME Group, a Chicago-based derivatives marketplace. In 2014 his CME Group compensation was $205,019, of which $105,000 was paid in cash and the rest in stock, a Securities and Exchange Commission filing in April said.

He was a director of CME Group since 2008, and according to the SEC owned 9,235 shares of CME as of March 24. Those shares, if he still holds them, would be worth more than $869,000 at the close of Monday's trading.

Following the federal indictment, Hastert resigned from the CME board Thursday. The next day, he quit the board of the Dayton, Ohio-based REX American Resources. That firm paid him $22,500 in 2014 for board service. He also lobbied for the firm on energy and nuclear policy issues.

Hastert collects three public pensions — from teaching, the state legislature and Congress — that provide an estimated $116,349 a year. Even if he is convicted of the crimes of which he is accused, he figures to still take in at least $100,000 in pensions, assuming the alleged misconduct he was covering up did not involve his work as a state or federal lawmaker. The only pension that appears to be in jeopardy is his smallest, a $16,139-a-year teacher's pension.

It's possible Hastert could continue to be collecting royalties from his book, "Speaker: Lessons from 30 Years in Coaching and Politics," put out in 2004 by Regnery Publishing, known for politically conservative authors. According to his 2007 financial disclosure, his royalties that year were $2,501 to $5,000.

In addition to lobbying after leaving office, Hastert hit the lecture circuit with an asking price of $25,000 per speech.

For years, Hastert has faced criticism for using his political connections on money-making deals.

While still in office, he turned a solid profit on a controversial land deal. Hastert in 2005 made $2 million profit by flipping property near the proposed route of the Prairie Parkway, a highway project through his district.

The property was a few miles from a planned interchange with Route 34, for which Hastert secured and directed $55 million of federal assistance. The sale went through just four months after then-President George W. Bush signed a transportation bill that included money for the Prairie Parkway project.

The Prairie Parkway project officially fell apart in 2012 when the Federal Highway Administration rescinded approval for the proposed highway.

In his 2007 financial disclosure, Hastert said he and his wife jointly owned a one-third share of about 126 acres of land in Kendall County, Ill., as well as unspecified acreage in Crawford County, Wis. The properties each were valued in the range of $1 million to $5 million, the disclosure said.

He said his wife owned a home and property in Plano, Ill., in the same $1 million to $5 million range. They sold a Washington, D.C., town house just before Hastert left the Congress for $250,001 to $500,000, the disclosure said.

Today the Hasterts also own land in Marion County, Fla., which has Ocala as its county seat, records show.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-hastert-income-met-0602-20150602-story.html
 
How many of these clowns go to Washington without much more than a pot to piss in and all of a sudden they are multi-millionaires?


Nearly all of them.

yet people still want to believe that one side protects their interests more than the other side. They have us all fooled. When the doors of congress close for session, the American people cease to exist.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CarolinaHawkeye
How many of these clowns go to Washington without much more than a pot to piss in and all of a sudden they are multi-millionaires?
Too many, which is where I was going. Term limits, an end to gerrymandering for Federal elections, and a lifetime ban on lobbying once you leave office would be a great start to end politicians from cashing in on their, "service".
 
Too many, which is where I was going. Term limits, an end to gerrymandering for Federal elections, and a lifetime ban on lobbying once you leave office would be a great start to end politicians from cashing in on their, "service".

Term limits are for lazy electorates.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
Term limits are for lazy electorates.
And your point is? Yes, much of the electorate is lazy but those benefiting from this most aren't in a rush to fix it either.
Take out the pedo part of this story and it could have been about 90%+ of the members of Congress.
 
How are they lazy if their choices are constantly "shit vs shittier"?
Because they could nominate better, but let others make that choice for them. Then use that lazy error in the nominating process to justify being more lazy in not voting at all. This is how we get representatives that don't actually represent anyone but the tiny sliver of people that vote in the primary elections.
 
Because they could nominate better, but let others make that choice for them. Then use that lazy error in the nominating process to justify being more lazy in not voting at all. This is how we get representatives that don't actually represent anyone but the tiny sliver of people that vote in the primary elections.


If no one better is running........who do you nominate? Reluctant people?
If shitty people are running.........you're choices are automatically shit. You can't get around it, especially when the competition is equally as shitty, OR not purchased and anointed by the powers that be.
Take away their ability to make millions while in office and shorten the time they can be there. It's the only way.
 
If no one better is running........who do you nominate? Reluctant people?
If shitty people are running.........you're choices are automatically shit. You can't get around it, especially when the competition is equally as shitty, OR not purchased and anointed by the powers that be.
Take away their ability to make millions while in office and shorten the time they can be there. It's the only way.
That would be fine too, but it's hardly the only way to improve things.
 
That would be fine too, but it's hardly the only way to improve things.


To improve things, you take away the incentives that attract shady people to run for office. Remove them entirely. Also limit their time for fundraising(actually remove fundraising completely and move to publicly funded elections) and campaigning, and make mandatory requirements for attendance, and meeting with with constituents.
 
To improve things, you take away the incentives that attract shady people to run for office. Remove them entirely. Also limit their time for fundraising(actually remove fundraising completely and move to publicly funded elections) and campaigning, and make mandatory requirements for attendance, and meeting with with constituents.
I like those too. I'd advocate for adding the elements of the Australian voting system to your remedies and we might just take back our government.
 
Replealing Citizens United would go a long way....but how do you get politicians to cut off the cash cow?

Hillary is reportedly going to spend $2 billion dollars campaigning for president. That's not only very wrong, but insane that the American people stand for it.
 
Replealing Citizens United would go a long way....but how do you get politicians to cut off the cash cow?

Hillary is reportedly going to spend $2 billion dollars campaigning for president. That's only very wrong, but insane that the American people stand for it.
The really fun part of that is she is doing it while calling for getting the money out. I have no idea how any of the remedies we want will ever get passed, but I would like to be given the power to remake the election system.
 
The really fun part of that is she is doing it while calling for getting the money out. I have no idea how any of the remedies we want will ever get passed, but I would like to be given the power to remake the election system.


And people look at her blatant hypocrisy....and will still voter for her. Because somehow, she'll be better than the other charlatan, simply because she has tits and a (D) in front of her name.
 
Watching Morning Joe and they were reporting Hastert will most likely go before a judge today on charges he attempted to conceal the cash transactions totaling $3.5 million to a young man he sexually assaulted while he was a high school teacher. That's not a high paying job. He spent a decade or so in the House of Representatives. Was he really able to stuff enough money in his pockets, and as a lobbyist since he left the House to pay that much in hush money?

He might have sold some of that high priced Illinois farmland he owns. About 240 acres would do it @ $15,000 per acre. That's not much land this day and age. Plenty of willing buyers who will pay cash. That's just hypothetical.

In reality, I wonder if at least some of the $3.5 mill somehow is part of the huge Illinois state budget deficit. It wouldn't surprise me.

Hastert should have to share a very small, smelly cell and a small bar of soap with Blago. They deserve each other.
 
How many of these clowns go to Washington without much more than a pot to piss in and all of a sudden they are multi-millionaires?

He was already a millionaire back in his child molesting heyday. NY Times article from the other day said that he had substantial property holding before he was even elected.
 
And people look at her blatant hypocrisy....and will still voter for her. Because somehow, she'll be better than the other charlatan, simply because she has tits and a (D) in front of her name.

No, they vote for her because her policies are indisputably better for the country and the world than would be those of any of her opponents.
 
No, they vote for her because her policies are indisputably better for the country and the world than would be those of any of her opponents.
In other words, they vote for her because they're ignorant. I can accept that.
 
And people look at her blatant hypocrisy....and will still voter for her. Because somehow, she'll be better than the other charlatan, simply because she has tits and a (D) in front of her name.

Clearly that bitch needed a flat screen TV when she was an underachieving middle schooler in order to set her on the right path.
 
Much of Hastert's wealth is a product of many instructional wrestling tapes he made when he was the wrestling coach at Yorkville HS, Illinois. "Post wrestling practice showering techniques" and "How to wear your singlet" are a couple of the more popular Hastert titles. Some of these instructional tapes are available for viewing throughout the internet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Willy Loman
No, they vote for her because her policies are indisputably better for the country and the world than would be those of any of her opponents.
While I think that might be true in the general, I don't think that is true at the present time. She is likely to have similar tax, trade, labor, foreign and regulatory policies as her R counterpart. She might be better on environment, investment and SCOTUS nominations. But we could improve several other areas if the Ds nominated most anyone else.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hawk in SEC Country
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT