You'll have to provide more details, not sure what you're referencing.
That's the exact argument Putin makes for invading Donbas. In Serbia the Muslim Kosovars tried to secede, and the central government fought them. That's what happened in eastern Ukraine, and was Putin justification for intervening - Obama's 'duty to protect' civilians that was the justification to intervene in the Libyan civil war on the side of the jihadists.
This is criminally disingenuous.
You actually want to assert that the Obama administration's justification for intervening on the side of jihadists was that a QUARTER OF CENTURY EARLIER the Libyan's had bombed a disco in Germany (an act which Reagan retaliated against back then)?
They took responsibility and paid reparations for those bombings last century. That was nothing to do with the decision to intervene in their civil war on the side of jihadists in 2011.
Hell, in 2003 they came clean about their WMD.
December 19, 2003: Libya’s Foreign Ministry publicly renounces the country’s WMD programs. Tripoli promises to eliminate its chemical and nuclear weapons programs, adhere to its commitments under the NPT and BWC, as well as accede to the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC). Libya also promises to limit the range and payloads of its missiles to conform to guidelines set by the Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR). Additionally, Libya agrees to conclude an additional protocol to its IAEA safeguards agreement. The protocol expands the IAEA’s authority to check for clandestine nuclear activities. Libya invites inspectors to verify compliance with the agreements and assist in the dismantling of its weapons programs.
No one was accusing the Libyan government of backing international terrorists groups in 2011.
So the Putin invasion of Donbas wasn't unprovoked, he was just responding to 'humanitarian crisis with ethnic cleansing' started by the Ukrainians.
You realize that's the case you just built, right? Good job.
