ADVERTISEMENT

Why is Trump calling Putin so many times?

Research for them, more than likely all in a .gov site or two with timelines, photos of the Bidens and foreign business partners, bank receipts and more. Should be able to get through them pretty quickly in real time, might feel like a while in your state.
Hmmmmm, seems like with all that evidence you have, coupled with a house majority, Biden should be impeached.

Oh wait... You guys already tried that and failed.

No real evidence.
 
That is a really good analysis. Here is a teaser; the "Why Trump" part:

"... But Trump, with his competitive instincts, inclination to disrupt the status quo, and sense of urgency, could be the kind of leader to push the United States much closer to where it needs to be."

Click on the link and read the "How" part. You will sleep better tonight knowing there are actually some answers; that we may not be living through the start of the End Times.
Indeed, the larger point is not whether one agrees or disagrees with the specifics - it's that a Trump victory, and for that matter, Trump, are taken semi-seriously for a change by a non-frivolous publication. Now with that said, my personal view is that geopolitical types such as the author who love to draw a lot of lines on maps as if international relations are an 'easy' thing tend to end up disappointed, or at least wrong. It's like when George Costanza came up with the "Jim Leyritz and Bernie Williams for Barry Bonds" trade proposal.
 
Dude was impeached for trying to bribe a foreign government to invent dirt against his political opponent. Yet Ard pretends he's an innocent little angel. Ridiculous.
Remind me. Was he convicted? Also, two simple questions: what, precisely, was discussed/shared on the calls, and what is the source of that information? I'm all ears.

I am in fact skeptical he's a stooge, but more than happy to acknowledge he is the loosest of loose cannons who is motivated mostly by his own self interest; to make the inferential leap to the former accusation though, I need specifics.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Tom Paris
Remind me. Was he convicted? Also, two simple questions: what, precisely, was discussed/shared on the calls, and what is the source of that information? I'm all ears.

I am in fact skeptical he's a stooge, but more than happy to acknowledge he is the loosest of loose cannons who is motivated mostly by his own self interest; to make the inferential leap to the former accusation though, I need specifics.
It's like you're trying to prove my point that you're an idiot with this post. "Was he convicted?" Really? This is your lead?
 
Indeed, the larger point is not whether one agrees or disagrees with the specifics - it's that a Trump victory, and for that matter, Trump, are taken semi-seriously for a change by a non-frivolous publication. Now with that said, my personal view is that geopolitical types such as the author who love to draw a lot of lines on maps as if international relations are an 'easy' thing tend to end up disappointed, or at least wrong. It's like when George Costanza came up with the "Jim Leyritz and Bernie Williams for Barry Bonds" trade proposal.
I do not think they are getting the scale wrong. Whatever we do, at some point a serious response, something bigger than Desert Storm will be called for ... unless this stuff can be resolved through our current nickel and dime, supply OUR proxies' approach ... maybe through a twenty-year ceasefire and then do it all over again.
 
He believes it, so it's true. Evidence is for suckers.
Been down this path with you guys. Did you have evidence of the WH and media concealment of JB? Took you suckers to see it for yourselves and most if not all supporters were ok with it based on your comments. Big tech collusion? Pretty much the same. One born every minute.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: SI_NYC
Been down this path with you guys. Did you have evidence of the WH and media concealment of JB? Took you suckers to see it for yourselves and most if not all supporters were ok with it based on your comments. Big tech collusion? Pretty much the same. One born every minute.
I heard truth social is colluding with team trump.

Better run and tell someone.
 
Honestly, I'm not too obsessed with phone calls and covid test kits, especially in stories by woodward, who jumped the shark with his Bob Casey story. But here's a curiosity:


Foreign affairs is not a fly-by-night publication, and their lead story is actually a non-histrionic consideration of "what if" trump were reelected, from a foreign policy perspective, which suggests the things he got right, what might need to be done differently, etc.
With all due respect to Foreign Affairs editors, believing that Trump could or would successfully navigate that important area successfully is straight up insanity. I have zero trust in that dumdum to get anything correct outside of those matters that personally benefit him. He’s a security risk of the highest degree.
 
So during that 2-3 month period when Covid was raging and when Russia was staging its troops along the Ukrainian border, and when Donald J. Trump was still President, we were to have no contact with Putin?

This a half-story. Left out is any mention of what was discussed. I suspect this is intentional since the U.S. media and the blogosphere can be counted on to supply what they THINK was discussed. ... through the lens of 2024 and not the view during that 2–3-month period.
You seem to be asserting that all the calls came in a 2-3 month window. Is that what we know?
 
Been down this path with you guys. Did you have evidence of the WH and media concealment of JB? Took you suckers to see it for yourselves and most if not all supporters were ok with it based on your comments. Big tech collusion? Pretty much the same. One born every minute.
JB concealment? WE all knew he was old, just like Trump, but we also knew he's a good man, unlike Trump.

We know Twitter/X is colluding with Trump. It appears NBC is colluding with Trump as well by not running Errol Morris Documentary about separating kids from their parents at the border until after the election because it will hurt Trump. We also know Fox News and Newsmax are colluding with Trump. So, WTF are you whining about again?
 
The new book by Bob Woodward cites at least seven times since losing the election in 2020 that Bonespurs has reached out to Putin. I realize he's always been a lapdog suck up to Putin, but that's kind of ridiculous. It's like he can't keep his hands off of him. Even though he's a murderous dictator. Sad. And probably telling of what kind of relationship Russia would exert over the US if Bonespurs got elected. Scary to think a US president would continue to kowtow to a Russian dictator.
There is money to be made with murderous dictators.
 
JB concealment? WE all knew he was old, just like Trump, but we also knew he's a good man, unlike Trump.

We know Twitter/X is colluding with Trump. It appears NBC is colluding with Trump as well by not running Errol Morris Documentary about separating kids from their parents at the border until after the election because it will hurt Trump. We also know Fox News and Newsmax are colluding with Trump. So, WTF are you whining about again?
L O L

Woman gestures
 
I am in fact skeptical he's a stooge, but more than happy to acknowledge he is the loosest of loose cannons who is motivated mostly by his own self interest; to make the inferential leap to the former accusation though, I need specifics.

Narrator: Trump is, in fact, Putin’s stooge.

Or useful idiot if we want to quibble about labels.

But continue.

1*0MapsvuGf-8saH85OEG8aw.png
 
It's interesting how Harris and Trump characterize Putin. Harris: Putin is a thug, killer, war criminal. Trump: Putin is smart, savvy, a great leader. Trump is Putin's lap-dog as witnessed by his outlandish agreement with Putin at Helsinki in 2018 and his current refusal to condemn him for his unprovoked and illegal occupation of Ukraine. Trump's alarming suck-up interactions with the likes of Xi, Kim, and Putin is indeed alarming and raises the serious question of Trump being a national security risk.
 
Honestly, I'm not too obsessed with phone calls and covid test kits, especially in stories by woodward, who jumped the shark with his Bob Casey story. But here's a curiosity:


Foreign affairs is not a fly-by-night publication, and their lead story is actually a non-histrionic consideration of "what if" trump were reelected, from a foreign policy perspective, which suggests the things he got right, what might need to be done differently, etc.

Foreign Affairs​


Foreign Affairs - Least Biased - Credible
Factual Reporting: High - Credible - Reliable


LEAST BIASED​

 
  • Like
Reactions: Titus Andronicus
Honestly, I'm not too obsessed with phone calls and covid test kits, especially in stories by woodward, who jumped the shark with his Bob Casey story. But here's a curiosity:


Foreign affairs is not a fly-by-night publication, and their lead story is actually a non-histrionic consideration of "what if" trump were reelected, from a foreign policy perspective, which suggests the things he got right, what might need to be done differently, etc.

Anything that starts out with this:

His administration’s first National Security Strategy emphasized that adversaries of the United States were seeking to erode its position in the international order. This outlook was relatively novel at the time,
Is probably not to be taken too seriously...
This has been both Russia's and China's gambit for a few decades.

Also:

A second Trump administration would need to adjust its mindset to ensure that the United States can protect itself and restore deterrence in an increasingly dangerous world.
This is pretty much an admission that he was "too cozy" during his first tenure in office with these dictators and doing the opposite of what he says in his opening lines.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT