Hmmmmm, seems like with all that evidence you have, coupled with a house majority, Biden should be impeached.
Oh wait... You guys already tried that and failed.
No real evidence.
Why is Trump calling Putin so many times?
- Thread starter sabula
- Start date
Oh wait... You guys already tried that and failed.
No real evidence.
Indeed, the larger point is not whether one agrees or disagrees with the specifics - it's that a Trump victory, and for that matter, Trump, are taken semi-seriously for a change by a non-frivolous publication. Now with that said, my personal view is that geopolitical types such as the author who love to draw a lot of lines on maps as if international relations are an 'easy' thing tend to end up disappointed, or at least wrong. It's like when George Costanza came up with the "Jim Leyritz and Bernie Williams for Barry Bonds" trade proposal.
Dude was impeached for trying to bribe a foreign government to invent dirt against his political opponent. Yet Ard pretends he's an innocent little angel. Ridiculous.
Yes really. You keep giving a felon rapist twice impeached Coup leading POS the benefit of doubt. Why?
Remind me. Was he convicted? Also, two simple questions: what, precisely, was discussed/shared on the calls, and what is the source of that information? I'm all ears.
I am in fact skeptical he's a stooge, but more than happy to acknowledge he is the loosest of loose cannons who is motivated mostly by his own self interest; to make the inferential leap to the former accusation though, I need specifics.
Because i don't guess at things, particularly if they are things I "want" to believe.
It's like you're trying to prove my point that you're an idiot with this post. "Was he convicted?" Really? This is your lead?
I do not think they are getting the scale wrong. Whatever we do, at some point a serious response, something bigger than Desert Storm will be called for ... unless this stuff can be resolved through our current nickel and dime, supply OUR proxies' approach ... maybe through a twenty-year ceasefire and then do it all over again.
Like this entire thread? Like big tech collision, media and WH concealment of JB? OK
Been down this path with you guys. Did you have evidence of the WH and media concealment of JB? Took you suckers to see it for yourselves and most if not all supporters were ok with it based on your comments. Big tech collusion? Pretty much the same. One born every minute.
With all due respect to Foreign Affairs editors, believing that Trump could or would successfully navigate that important area successfully is straight up insanity. I have zero trust in that dumdum to get anything correct outside of those matters that personally benefit him. He’s a security risk of the highest degree.Honestly, I'm not too obsessed with phone calls and covid test kits, especially in stories by woodward, who jumped the shark with his Bob Casey story. But here's a curiosity:
How America Can Regain Its Edge in Great-Power Competition
A second Trump term would require a new strategy.www.foreignaffairs.com
Foreign affairs is not a fly-by-night publication, and their lead story is actually a non-histrionic consideration of "what if" trump were reelected, from a foreign policy perspective, which suggests the things he got right, what might need to be done differently, etc.
look at some of the board tools trying to justify trump bending over for a murderous dictator.
The reason why this is true:
when does trump ever act like a little b!tch: in front of people that own him. That is as obvious as anything I've ever seen.
The reason why this is true:
when does trump ever act like a little b!tch: in front of people that own him. That is as obvious as anything I've ever seen.
Latest posts
-
-
McNamara Remains the Starter Despite Turnovers, Lack of Production
- Latest: hawk_a_holic
-
-
