Do the eyes and numbers continue with CC gone? A lot of people say she has transformed the game but these big numbers were to see her. What will the future hold? More than before but not quite like this years run?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think it might've been different had Iowa won today and proven that a team like Iowa could win a national championship.Do the eyes and numbers continue with CC gone? A lot of people say she has transformed the game but these big numbers were to see her. What will the future hold? More than before but not quite like this years run?
I think the numbers go back to shit moving forward
Yeah stacked teams with many elite players and a deep bench and the ref's still pretty bad. The longer the blue's keep winning these the less folks will watch. But who knows, maybe the CC effect changes that.
Agree, unless there’s another player that can pass like CC and shoot 35 footers. Juju can’t do it and neither can Buekers or Hilgado. Iowa has supported the women’s team for a long time and will continue to do so but the average fan can now afford to get to a game again.I think the numbers go back to shit moving forward
Big drop in interest from fans going forward.
The numbers will drop for sure but the 2022 championship had 4.85 million viewers which is around twice as much as what stanley cup finals games usually get. Not like we are talking wrestling numbers hereI think the numbers go back to shit moving forward
Yep, this team drew Iowa fans and national fans cheering for CC and the underdogs but also drew viewers with nothing better to do than hate on CC's success and there was a large number of viewers wanting the "mostly white" team to lose.Nah people won’t be interested in the sport going back to its ridiculous lack of parity. And people won’t have their team to hatewatch like they had in our team.
LSU vs SC this year had 9.5 million viewers….Someone caredNo way the ratings stay up because Clark didn't really grow the actual game's popularity, she just became a unique star that kind of followed in the Steph Curry mode that became popular herself. She was the draw otherwise women's games not involving Iowa would be highly rated too. Nobody cared about watching USC or LSU unless they were playing Iowa. Angel Reese got Instagram followers because of her looks and attitude, not from people that are going to watch a basketball game. And outside of Iowa, Clark really wasn't a national star as a freshman, and then they sort of choked her sophomore year in the tournament so we don't know if they could've built this up a year earlier. Last year's postseason was her coming out party and this whole season was a different level because they kept trying find new gimmick records like Pistol Pete to keep eyeballs and it worked every time. But the popularity has to catch on organically to maintain itself, the media trying to force Juju Watkins into the role just because she scored points as freshman won't work. Lots of college girls have been great at basketball, but only Cheryl Miller and Caitlin Clark have really been part of multiple top ten ratings draws in it's history (Technically LSU twice because they played Iowa twice, and also Kim Mulkey from the first ever title game in 1982 as a player, but those were happenstance).
Staley thanked CC for elevation of wbb after the game. Acknowledged she made a big differenceI'll be watching next year as I have for the past 25 or more years. Whoever said Caitlin hasn't elevated women's basketball is nuts.
LSU vs SC this year had 9.5 million viewers….Someone cared
Ryan is coming back next year for her Covid year.. . . Can Fennelly parley his young players into a team to deal with over the next couple of years? He’ll need a PG as Ryan was a stud. . . .
Yeah, 3 or 4 of the same teams dominating doesn't help grow the sport.Not with the stacked teams with many elite players and a deep bench and the ref's still pretty bad. The longer the blue's keep winning these the less folks will watch. But who knows, maybe the CC effect changes that.
Didn’t realize that. They’ll be a load next year with all those players back. They were playing really well at the end of the year.Ryan is coming back next year for her Covid year.
Agreed. If South Carolina has one loss total in three years the TV sets will find something else.Yeah, 3 or 4 of the same teams dominating doesn't help grow the sport.
Unfortunately, this is the correct answerWith no parity, I think viewership goes back to shit
This. CC was a phenom. She drew in non-traditional fans. They'll go back to Taylor Swift or whatever is trendy. Some will tune in initially to see her in the upcoming season but it won't be sustainable and significant.I think the numbers go back to shit moving forward
I wonder if this is the end or the beginning of an era for women's hoops.Do the eyes and numbers continue with CC gone? A lot of people say she has transformed the game but these big numbers were to see her. What will the future hold? More than before but not quite like this years run?
Is there such a thing as bad publicity?Yep, this team drew Iowa fans and national fans cheering for CC and the underdogs but also drew viewers with nothing better to do than hate on CC's success and there was a large number of viewers wanting the "mostly white" team to lose.
Neither. It'll supply a small bump,and they'll try to hype the next star (likely JuJu Watkins) but you're not going to see the level of excitement you did this year. It was an anomaly.I wonder if this is the end or the beginning of an era for women's hoops.
Agree.I always tape sporting events, so I can watch them when convenient and replay sections that I wanted to see more closely. Yesterday, I mistakenly started taping the game on ESPN, which had the game with ongoing dialog among some former UConn players, who seem to be everywhere. They spent a lot of time continuing the crap about the illegal pick call "that cost UConn a chance to win the game." Taursi (sp?) seems to also have a grudge she is carrying about Caitlin getting so much attention and being called the GOAT. Fortunately, I started watching about a quarter into the game, so I was able to watch all but the first quarter on ABC, but I still listened to their rooting for SC and heavy bias against Iowa. Except for a visit from Snoop Dog, who likes Iowa, the UConn girls refused to give Iowa or CC much credit, even when they were whipping SC in the first quarter. The blue bloods don't like it when someone disrupts their dominance...
Think a lot of that was Iowa fans watching to see the road of possibilities in the tourney. And Angel Reece to lose lol. Not saying they don't draw big numbers, but CC def had an affect on other game numbers.LSU vs SC this year had 9.5 million viewers….Someone cared
Sorry….fat finger typo on my part. Meant 1.5 mill. Thanks for keeping me straight. That’s still lots of eyes.I'm seeing 1.56 million for their first game and 1.96 million for the SEC title game (but please correct me if I'm wrong). Those are great numbers compared what the women's game has generally drawn (top five all time regular season viewership type numbers in fact), but that's also the most high profile matchup the sport could've had outside Iowa and UConn being involved. SC-NC State had 7.1 million. So hitting 2 million in a regular season game or 7 million for the final four games will be a good benchmark to watch going forward.