Same can be said for coaching issues. Just look at Iowa the last 5 years.
I'd agree that the turnover on the staff has hurt Iowa through the past 5 years. Losing Norm was big. Having Greg Davis get acclimated to our program took time - as did it take a time for Ferentz and Co to learn the lingo of Greg's system and better integrate our running game with the O.
However, during the interim, the Hawks still developed plenty of excellent players. The proof is in the pudding that the overall quality of coaching was decent. However, putting it all together to lead more consistently to victories CLEARLY WASN'T there ... the proof is in the pudding there too.
Other examples of coaching being an issue include:
- Michigan State's D coping with the loss of Narduzzi
- Wisconsin's O right after they lost Chryst and Rudolph to Pitt
- Michigan's O in the transition from Carr to Rodriguez.
- the examples go on and an ....
However, I think that most Iowa fans would agree that Greg Davis's "horizontal O" needed a trigger-man who could get the ball to the edges more quickly. We saw in 2013 how the O could move the ball between the 20s when guys could get decent yards after the catch. Rudock could hit some of the quick-hitters. However, the O still suffered in the red-zone when the field got compressed.