ah maybe I’m thinking of grinder. you’d know, is that the site where it’s an automatic hookup. 😉WTF. No lol
ah maybe I’m thinking of grinder. you’d know, is that the site where it’s an automatic hookup. 😉WTF. No lol
We're talking to the guy that once said he didn't know how to talk to an individual without knowing what gender they are first. We should not be surprised that he'd assume meeting a person from Tinder is giving consent.
Tinder is a dating app people use to hook up. If you are ever confused about consent, just assume that you do not have consent until told otherwise.
never said I don’t know how to talk to them. I said I talk to people differently based on their gender. Get it right.We're talking to the guy that once said he didn't know how to talk to an individual without knowing what gender they are first. We should not be surprised that he'd assume meeting a person from Tinder is giving consent.
Omgosh, I'm sorry for being so far off on that. You're right.never said I don’t know how to talk to them. I said I talk to people differently based on their gender. Get it right.
I love how you two dingleberries just skip over the part where I said I’m joking so you can live out your little bromance you have going on.
Tinder is a dating app people use to hook up. If you are ever confused about consent, just assume that you do not have consent until told otherwise.
oh, hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaI love how you two dingleberries just skip over the part where I said I’m joking so you can live out your little bromance you have going on.
I love you, bro.oh, hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
I think I do, but we have to match on Tinder first.I love you too, bro.
Do you consent?
I respect your decision.I think I do, but we have to match on Tinder first.
That mother fvcker has been raping the shit out of Tinder dates. JFC. Imagine thinking that someone agreeing to see you allows you consent to make the sects with them.WTF. No lol
The dumb shit said on this site never ceases to amaze me.That mother fvcker has been raping the shit out of Tinder dates. JFC. Imagine thinking that someone agreeing to see you allows you consent to make the sects with them.
That mother fvcker has been raping the shit out of Tinder dates. JFC. Imagine thinking that someone agreeing to see you allows you consent to make the sects with them.
Consent begins at swiping right. Even if she doesn't respond, she still put her information on that app.The dumb shit said on this site never ceases to amaze me.
"Well, we met in real life for dinner for 1 hour. So now I get to bang you because consent was given the second you walked through the restaurant door"
no you two are clearly matching on grinder. Which answers the question I had on a previous post that you skipped over.I think I do, but we have to match on Tinder first.
its grindrno you two are clearly matching on grinder. Which answers the question I had on a previous post that you skipped over.
At this point i really don’t know if you guys are fvcking with me, you really can’t read or are just that stupid.Consent begins at swiping right. Even if she doesn't respond, she still put her information on that app.
My apologies, didn’t mean to offend you and “your people”its grindr
They're not my people, they're just people, like you and me. And they deserve to have their apps spelled correctly, just as we all do.My apologies, didn’t mean to offend you and “your people”
Do you still have to talk to them differently though, or can you talk to them like you would regular people? Like what would one do if you don't know.They're not my people, they're just people, like you and me. And they deserve to have their apps spelled correctly, just as we all do.
Do you still have to talk to them differently though, or can you talk to them like you would regular people? Like what would one do if you don't know.
I’d guess that you say you talk to everyone the same. Doesn’t matter what gender they are, sexual preference or intelligence level.Do you still have to talk to them differently though, or can you talk to them like you would regular people? Like what would one do if you don't know.
Yes. Humans.I’d guess that you say you talk to everyone the same. Doesn’t matter what gender they are, sexual preference or intelligence level.
Everyone is the same.
WITAF? This can’t have been an actual thought.Side note and I’m joking. But if you match with someone on tinder and decide to meet up in person, isn’t that basically giving consent? Isn’t tinder just a hookup site?
I'm a registered incel and even I knew that.I learned a lot about consent today.
Of course they do. Doesn't mean it's any less ridiculous. But I suppose this is what college athletics are now.
This guy, his attorney and Judge Colleen Lawless (interesting last name for a judge), completely disagree with your opinion on the matter.
My larger point is yes, privileges can be infringed upon bc they are just that, something you're being given the opportunity to do, not something you're entitled to. Just like a coach can choose to sit you bc your attitude sucks, schools should be able to suspend you bc there are credible accusations of serious wrong doing.Right. Great deleniation.
The rights side vs the privilege side.
Which is more meaningful?
Obviously the rights side. That's where the important stuff happens. Not the side where we're talking about "image" -- right?
Privilege? Football, games, image...etc
Which is exactly why I don't care that much whether an accused plays football or whatever sport. The ****ing sports participation question pales in comparison to the society question where significance is concerned. (which the law already has a handle on)
Which is why it's not a major moral blunder to let someone like this play football. (it ceases to be a major moral question)
Now we can talk about actual actions and what's fair within the context of a privilege like playing football. Even if not governed by the law of rights, the law of rights possesses certain logic that's rather universally applicable and lauded in handling questions like this. Like innocent until proven guilty and etc...
Where I'm at with it? Unless the coach is privy to certain inside information that the legal system isn't, or if he knows an arrest is eminent or whatnot, I'm fine with him letting the athlete continue to participate while the investigation is ongoing. Because it's just football.
IAFB2021Champs said:
Side note and I’m joking. But if you match with someone on tinder and decide to meet up in person, isn’t that basically giving consent? Isn’t tinder just a hookup site?
There can’t really be this many illiterate f’s on this board that you skip right over the “I’m joking” part.WITAF? This can’t have been an actual thought.
There can’t really be this many illiterate f’s on this board that you skip right over the “I’m joking” part.
But why would I be surprised.
There can’t really be this many illiterate f’s on this board that you skip right over the “I’m joking” part.
But why would I be surprised.
Because he wasn’t interested and took an NFL OC jobI wonder why Ryan Grubb wasn't hired as offensive coordinator at Iowa.
There can’t really be this many illiterate f’s on this board that you skip right over the “I’m joking” part.
But why would I be surprised.
I’m guessing the old folks on here don’t realize tinder has been know for being a hookup sit and the others missing the joke never leave mom and dads basement. Probably why they don’t get the joke.I, for one, thought your joke about automatic consent based on a dating site profile and an agreement to meet was frickin hilarious.
I think the whole little misunderstanding about rape and demonstrating power over women would vanish if we simply laughed more.