It's my fault you make assumptions? Somehow thousands of other members of this board didn't make that assumption, but OK, I'll be the bigger man, it's my fault There, all better cupcake? Lol. I've already mentioned that you are obviously not the sharpest knife, but you at least have enough cognitive ability to understand that you personally insulted me first. Don't you??? I'm just being a smart ass, you don't bother me any, but if I can get you riled up after you insult me, I will. Good times.
Yeah, sure, whatever. You threw the first insult, but whatever gets you thru the day. LOL.
All we have to do is go back and look. And I did...You insulted me. Everyone on here who looks can see that, but you still deny it. Are you a politician? Like I said, can't take any responsibility for themselves are never wrong. Oh, the old 'basement' comeback. Once again showing you lack intelligence and apparently creativity. But, I'm not finished with you. If you're going to run your mouth, better understand your opponent.
This ^^^^^^^. Stats are for losers and so is 66 yards of total offense against a division rival.
Are you talking to me? I haven't said a word about Kirk's offenses. I said statistics are for losers. Why is reading so hard for some on this site? And it's amazing how people just make stuff up out of the blue on this site. Must be lots of drugs being done by posters.
Oh, I understand exactly what I am dealing with here. You are a very thin-skinned, immature person. You cannot help but resort to childish name calling.
LOL. Calling my bluff? What have I 'bluffed' about. The coaches and knowledgeable posters on here understand what I'm talking about. The typical fan...not so much. And once again, it was you throwing the insults and name calling. You just did again. You don't remember what you just posted? There are quite a few 'challenged' people on here, but that's ok. It takes all kinds.... I can handle it. I just consider the sources.
I hear all this 'predictability' stuff all the time, so I did a little experiment on Sat. and asked some average fans that I was around to predict the plays (not just run or pass) and they admitted they didn't know the plays and didn't know the difference between inside/outside zone, power, or gap scheme runs etc. but they were wrong on about every play even just calling a run or pass or direction etc. in the first qtr. I don't think it's really that 'predictable'. Yes, it appears harder to predict a play when a team is running a spread veer like Georgia Tech/Navy/AirForce etc. and they have triple options, and it appears harder to predict when a team is running a lot of zone 'read' or Run/Pass options, but I think it's just perception. You watch Iowa every sat. and a lot of it looks the same if you don't understand the subtleties of their offense. You only see these other teams once a year, maybe once every 3 years, so it 'appears' more complex, but it really isn't, there just may be more options. A lot of it is just smoke and mirrors. A team like Texas Tech isn't that unpredictable. They are going to run some inside zone, but they are going to throw more than they run most of the time and they are going to throw under most of the time. They just use a LOT of formations. Really not that hard to predict, is it?
I don't 'resort' to anything, I just don't put of with jerks. I'm not going to reveal who I am to you and I have nothing to prove to you, so save the dramatics. I will say that Al Reisner, Julian Vandervelde and Drake Kulick know me quite well if you want some references.
What are our personnel packages called? How are they called from the sidelines? How many formations do we run out of each package? How many total formations do we have? How many formations do other teams run? Unless you know this info, your statement is meaningless.
I'm having a great day. Just came from a big fish fry while watching the Packer game. How about you?
There you go with name calling. You just can’t help yourself.
