Welp looks more and more like it is rudock to Michigan. Gonna come back to bite us I'm afraid.
Posted from Rivals Mobile
Posted from Rivals Mobile
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There is some talk out there...Originally posted by iagoldhawk:
Welp looks more and more like it is rudock to Michigan. Gonna come back to bite us I'm afraid.
Posted from Rivals Mobile
If true, how will this come back to "bite US"??? Iowa doesn't play Michigan in 2015 unless it in the BCG and that ain't happening.Originally posted by iagoldhawk:
Welp looks more and more like it is rudock to Michigan. Gonna come back to bite us I'm afraid.
Posted from Rivals Mobile
he just hasn't had that spark, whether it's his fault or our coaching and talent level. He does lack arm strength, which leads to inaccuracy and winding up to throw down field. He is risk averse, which, if combined with good running backs is ok. We didn't have any of those.Originally posted by Hawkeye2222:
JR's RSSO stats
204-346 2386 yards 59% comp, 6.89 ypa, 18 TD's. 13 INT's and a QB rating of 126.5 IN 13 GAMES
JR's RSJR stats
213-345 2436 yards 61.7% comp, 7.06 ypa, 16 TD's, 5 INT's and a QB rating of 133.5 in 12 games
can there be a more moronic comment made about a QB regressing than the ones being made
Stanzi RSJR year
171-304 2417 yards 56.3% comp, 7.95 ypa 17 TD's, 15 INT's, with a rating of 131.6 in 11 games
Stanzi RSSR year
221-345 3004 yards 64.1 % comp, 8.71 ypa, 25 TD's, 6 INT's with a rating of 157.6 in 13 games
if that is regressing in youtr minds that just comfirms what I have known about you posters that you are a bunch of total MORON's
What were the win totals?Originally posted by Hawkeye2222:
JR's RSSO stats
204-346 2386 yards 59% comp, 6.89 ypa, 18 TD's. 13 INT's and a QB rating of 126.5 IN 13 GAMES
JR's RSJR stats
213-345 2436 yards 61.7% comp, 7.06 ypa, 16 TD's, 5 INT's and a QB rating of 133.5 in 12 games
can there be a more moronic comment made about a QB regressing than the ones being made
Stanzi RSJR year
171-304 2417 yards 56.3% comp, 7.95 ypa 17 TD's, 15 INT's, with a rating of 131.6 in 11 games
Stanzi RSSR year
221-345 3004 yards 64.1 % comp, 8.71 ypa, 25 TD's, 6 INT's with a rating of 157.6 in 13 games
if that is regressing in youtr minds that just comfirms what I have known about you posters that you are a bunch of total MORON's
Jake isn't really all that much like Alex. Maybe only in the fact they don't throw the ball down the field much but Alex is easily more athletic than Jake and has a stronger arm when he does decide to throw down field on the rare occasion. Remember, he ran the pistol at Utah under Urban Meyer. He escapes the pocket and can get first downs with his legs much more often that Jake, Not sure why all of the praise for Jake in this thread. He's not that good. He even looks worse in person. The Nebraska game alone I watched on at least 2 separate occasions a WR was well behind the defense, 20-25 yards down the middle of the field (where you know Rudock can't miss seeing him) and he didnt even throw the ball.Originally posted by kyleparm:
Found this interesting article on twitter regarding a Jake Rudock to Alex Smith comparison under John Harbaugh. I personally think it's a little far fetched but coming from a Chiefs fan they are very similar in frustrating ways. Main difference for me is Alex Smith doesn't throw picks in crunch time "usually". All of this is hypothetical I suppose but seems close to a done deal from what I have read. *SOURCES* mannnnn "http://mgofish.com/jake-rudock-would-be-harbaughs-alex-smith-at-michigan/ "
Tate had Iowa in position for more wins...defense was brutal and he didn't have healthy receivers. Iowa's defense lost against Tennessee.Originally posted by Hawkeye2222:
if you judge a QB only by the wins and losses the Tate was worse that JR his last 2 seasons as he went 7-5 then 6-7 for a 13 -12 2 year total.
JR went 7-6, 6-5 for a 13-11 2 year record as for the bowl game CJ lost that game not JR
PS the JR haters are really loving this, what will be interesting to see is how long posters will take before throwing CJ under the bus saying that Weigers has more upside,
This post was edited on 2/24 8:19 PM by Hawkeye2222
Get your win totals correct, then we will talk.Originally posted by Hawkeye2222:
if you judge a QB only by the wins and losses the Tate was worse that JR his last 2 seasons as he went 7-5 then 6-7 for a 13 -12 2 year total.
JR went 7-6, 6-5 for a 13-11 2 year record as for the bowl game CJ lost that game not JR
PS the JR haters are really loving this, what will be interesting to see is how long posters will take before throwing CJ under the bus saying that Weigers has more upside,
This post was edited on 2/24 8:19 PM by Hawkeye2222
This might be the worst post I have ever seen you do. You need help.Originally posted by Hawkeye2222:
Clarinda the JR hater don't want to admit that every single loss the last 2 years were all JR's fault, like he was to play defense be the punter and FG kicker, he was to do everything, because itv was all his fault IA lost, and in his 1st season starting he quided IA to a 2nd place finish in the Legends division behind BT champion MSU.
but hey JR just had to win both the BT and NT IN BACK TO BACK seasons, otherwise he is/was a COMPLETE FAILURE.
I like how he gives evidence to the point that Iowa has struggled to have QBs progress. He left out Drew Tates sophomore year completely. Tate didn't even play against Syracuse his senior year. I don't remember off the top of my head if he missed anymore time. He is obviously giving Rudock credit for Beathard coming back and beating Pitt this year. He also gave Rudock credit for going 7-6 his sophomore year when he went 8-5. Yowsa.Originally posted by ClarindaA\:
Tate had Iowa in position for more wins...defense was brutal and he didn't have healthy receivers. Iowa's defense lost against Tennessee.Originally posted by Hawkeye2222:
if you judge a QB only by the wins and losses the Tate was worse that JR his last 2 seasons as he went 7-5 then 6-7 for a 13 -12 2 year total.
JR went 7-6, 6-5 for a 13-11 2 year record as for the bowl game CJ lost that game not JR
PS the JR haters are really loving this, what will be interesting to see is how long posters will take before throwing CJ under the bus saying that Weigers has more upside,
This post was edited on 2/24 8:19 PM by Hawkeye2222
Posted from Rivals Mobile
your needs quit working. You've lost it completely.Originally posted by Hawkeye2222:
Clarinda the JR hater don't want to admit that every single loss the last 2 years were all JR's fault, like he was to play defense be the punter and FG kicker, he was to do everything, because itv was all his fault IA lost, and in his 1st season starting he quided IA to a 2nd place finish in the Legends division behind BT champion MSU.
but hey JR just had to win both the BT and NT IN BACK TO BACK seasons, otherwise he is/was a COMPLETE FAILURE.
Did you even watch the game?Originally posted by Hawkeye2222:
if you judge a QB only by the wins and losses the Tate was worse that JR his last 2 seasons as he went 7-5 then 6-7 for a 13 -12 2 year total.
JR went 7-6, 6-5 for a 13-11 2 year record as for the bowl game CJ lost that game not JR
PS the JR haters are really loving this, what will be interesting to see is how long posters will take before throwing CJ under the bus saying that Weigers has more upside,
This post was edited on 2/24 8:19 PM by Hawkeye2222
+1, would be interesting to see how that plays out.Originally posted by dawgs_04:
If this happens I would love to see it because then we can see how much success he has in another system in the same conference. Good apples to apples comparison.
Posted from Rivals Mobile
It would certainly be telling that is for sure.Originally posted by dawgs_04:
If this happens I would love to see it because then we can see how much success he has in another system in the same conference. Good apples to apples comparison.
Posted from Rivals Mobile
I'm pretty sure that if he did, that is exactly what would happen. But then again, if CJ does well also, then you have a very confusing situation.Originally posted by iceland:
If Jake goes to Michigan and really does well, I hope people would see it is an indictment of the overall system at Iowa and not just get angry about losing Jake.
Do you want a participation ribbon, Nancy?Originally posted by Cubhawk1:
I posted this clear back on February 12th... And quite a few laughed. One guy even said "no way Michigan would want Jake". Just sayin....
Or maybe somewhere with a med school. Like Michigan?Originally posted by grosie#2:
Hard to see Jake going to Michigan unless JH guarantees he will be the starter. Other than that he's not gaining anything other than an opportunity to compete for the starting QB spot at a different school that also has quality competition. Maybe a Boise State or a college of that level would offer a better opportunity for Jake to play right away.
You have to wonder how much of this would be getting his first year of graduate school payed for and not necessarily being the #1 guy... That would be a pretty huge thing for someone going into the medical field. I have no idea what is going on, but I wouldn't surprise me at all to find out that has something to do with it. Obviously he is a very smart guy and certainly is using his time in college better than, unfortunately, most college athletes.Originally posted by grosie#2:
Hard to see Jake going to Michigan unless JH guarantees he will be the starter. Other than that he's not gaining anything other than an opportunity to compete for the starting QB spot at a different school that also has quality competition. Maybe a Boise State or a college of that level would offer a better opportunity for Jake to play right away.