ADVERTISEMENT

New Story Report: Kirk Ferentz, Jon Budmayr suspended

A good 20 months after the fact, Kirk Ferentz and Jon Budmayr are suspended for the Illinois State game, according to Scott Dochterman. Rumors had been on the board here as well. Working on finding out more ahead of the 1:30 press conference.

Iowa’s school book law is about control, not sex

It’s back to school time, so here’s a quiz.



Can you name these books according to their summaries?


Book People says this book depicts a “ … dystopian future, environmental disasters and declining birthrates have led to a Second American Civil War. The result is the rise of the Republic of Gilead, a totalitarian regime that enforces rigid social roles and enslaves the few remaining fertile women … At once a scathing satire, an ominous warning, and a tour de force of narrative suspense, the book is a modern classic.”




This book, according to study.com, “follows an African American teenager named Celie being raised in rural Georgia in the early 1900s. Through letters written by Celie to God, we follow her struggle with an abusive father, a teenage pregnancy, and abusive marriage. The novel documents triumphs in the face of adversity, particularly the struggle against gender inequality and racism.” The book is a winner of the Pulitzer Prize.


PI Media says this book “Tells the story of a mass shooting at Sterling High School, which takes place in 2007 in New Hampshire. It follows Peter Houghton’s massacre through the grounds of his school after enduring years of brutal bullying by his peers. (The author) takes us through the events leading up to the shooting: seventeen years before, five years before, one year before, the morning of. She shows us Peter’s evolution, from a child who delights over receiving a Superman lunchbox from his mother on the first day of kindergarten, only to have it thrown out of the school-bus window by the bullies … to a teenager at breaking point drawing a red circle around photos of his planned victims in his high school yearbook.


Bookrags says this book “details 13-year-old Lakshmi’s experiences after being sold into sexual slavery by her stepfather to pay growing debts … There, Lakshmi is beaten and drugged into submission after she initially refuses to have sex with any of the customers, at which time she is forced to have sex with men to pay off the cost for which she has been purchased.”


Time’s up. I won’t keep you in suspense.





The books are “The Handmaid’s Tale” by Margaret Atwood, “The Color Purple” by Alice Walker, “Nineteen Minutes” by Jodi Picoult and “Sold” by Patricia McCormick.


According to a Des Moines Register survey of Iowa school districts published in June, these books are among the top 10 titles removed from Iowa school library shelves in an effort to adhere to a new law which prohibits schools from making books available that depict sex.


Republicans who championed the law want us to believe it’s only about books such as the graphic novel “Gender Queer,” which includes illustrations showing a nonbinary person experimenting with sex using a fake penis. Republican leaders and their Moms for Liberty friends are fixated on these pictures. They show them to everyone. That’s weird, considering the book wasn’t written for white, straight middle-aged Christians.


Many books dealing with LGBTQ issues and written by LGBTQ writers have been removed from shelves. The law, which also bars teaching lessons in grade school that include LGBTQ people, tries very hard to reduce the identity of our fellow Iowans to a sex act.


Any explanation claiming this law is about liberty must be shelved under fiction. The law is all about controlling what students can read.


The books being banished depict the dangers of religious fundamentalism, the tragedy of gun violence, the results of racism and the desperate plight of the poor around the world. This is a state that also discourages teachers from addressing racism because it might make white kids feel bad. Connect the dots and you’ll see religious fundamentalism, bigotry and racism.


And that’s the thing. This really isn’t about sex. The vague law is pushing school districts to ban books that don’t express a conservative worldview. It turns out the law is more about removing controversial ideas from the school library than protecting kids from sex.


None of the books listed above should be assigned to grade schoolers. But high school students can handle them, even the dreaded “Gender Queer.” Learning about the real world beyond Iowa has always been a goal of public education in this state. It’s a goal teachers are still seeking to achieve, although now they must do it with Republicans breathing down their necks and under threat of losing their licenses. Don’t think its backers don’t know what they’re doing when they blame schools for overreacting to this nonsense.


Better to play it safe and steer clear of any book that might be targeted by the righteous right and a governor who tells lies about “pornography” in classrooms. She’ll go down in Iowa history beside Gov. William Harding, who is infamous for trying to make it a crime to speak German and other languages during World War I.


It’s also not about parental rights, because the only rights it affords go to zealots. The rest of us, who think book banning is about as un-American as you can get, have seen our rights curtailed.


A court fight over this law is ongoing. But the truth is the courts never had to be involved. This law should never have passed. It was unnecessary, considering parents already could challenge books at the district level. It should be repealed.


This law is an anathema to free speech. It sullies Iowa’s proud public school traditions and sends a message to the nation that our state is hardly a place where freedom flourishes.


Iowa kids will be poorer for the books they can’t read and the lessons they can’t learn. But what they have learned is politicians will sell their rights down the river to solve fake issues and score political victories.


(319) 398-8262; todd.dorman@thegazette.com
  • Haha
Reactions: NoWokeBloke

Neither Organization is Profitable: NCAA WBB or WNBA

WNBA is not profitable. And the Iowa Hawkeye WBB team does not pay for itself. If the women's basketball team was a standalone Profit and Loss program, it would be in the RED every year. Does not matter how many sellouts the lady Hawks have in a season. Everyone quotes secondary market prices. "STOP" That is not what Iowa gets. And remember Caitlin Clark is gone. Most season ticket packages were about $195 (about $12-13 per game) for last season. The new TV deal for Woman's March Madness will help NCAA WBB teams. Football (TV deals) and Men's BB (March Madness) carries the day and pays for the other sports.

Both women's leagues, the NCAA and WNBA are on the rise but still a long way from profitability.

I believe Iowa fans will continue to support the lady Hawks by going to the game? Yes.
But make the Iowa WWB tickets same price as men's games. Also make the WBB season ticket holders donate money to the athletic program to get the right to buy some tickets. Not so sure what the attendance would be if that was done like Football and MBB?
I enjoy Lady Hawks BB more than the men right now. That is just me.
WNBA is in same boat here. Trust me if the W starts even getting close to making more money, the players will want more. As they should. Low salaries. The WNBA has to go way more than the NCAA WBB to become profitable and popular everywhere.

Oilfields in eastern Libya that account for almost all the country's production will be closed and production and exports halted

BENGHAZI, Aug 26 (Reuters) - Oilfields in eastern Libya that account for almost all the country's production will be closed and production and exports halted, the eastern-based administration said on Monday, after a flare-up in tension over the leadership of the central bank.

There was no confirmation from the country's internationally recognised government in Tripoli or from the National Oil Corp (NOC), which controls the country's oil resources.

NOC subsidiary Waha Oil Company, however, said it planned to gradually reduce output and warned of a complete halt to Libya's production, citing unspecified "protests and pressures".

Another subsidiary Sirte Oil Company also said it would cut output, calling on authorities to "intervene to maintain production levels".

Nearly all of Libya's oilfields are in the east, which is under the control of Khalifa Haftar who leads the Libyan National Army (LNA).

If eastern production is halted, El Feel in southwestern Libya would be the only functioning oilfield, with a capacity of 130,000 bpd.

Overall oil production was about 1.18 million barrels per day in July, according to the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, citing secondary sources.

The Benghazi government did not specify for how long the oilfields could be closed.

While the Tripoli-based Government of National Unity provided no confirmation, its head Prime Minister Abdulhamid al-Dbeibah said in a statement oilfields should not be allowed to be shut down "under flimsy pretexts".

Two engineers at Messla and Abu Attifel told Reuters on Monday on condition of anonymity that production continued and there had been no orders to halt output.

POWER STRUGGLE

Libya's oil revenues have stoked tension for years in a country that has had little stability since a 2011 NATO-backed uprising. It split in 2014 with eastern and western factions that eventually drew in Russian and Turkish backing.

Tensions have escalated this month after efforts by political factions to oust the Central Bank of Libya (CBL) head Sadiq al-Kabir, with rival armed factions mobilising on each side.
Advertisement · Scroll to continue
The Tripoli-based CBL said on Monday that it had suspended its services at home and abroad "due to exceptional disturbance".

The central bank is the only internationally recognised depository for Libyan oil revenue, which provides vital economic income for the country.

"The Central Bank of Libya hopes that its ongoing efforts in cooperation with all relevant authorities will allow it to resume its normal activity without further delay," it said in a statement.

It temporarily shut down all operations last week after a senior bank official was kidnapped but resumed operations the next day after the official was released.
Protests have previously disrupted oil output.
The NOC declared force majeure earlier this month at one of the country's largest oilfields, Sharara, located in Libya's southwest with a capacity of 300,000 bpd, due to protests. The force majeure is still in force.

Waha, which operates a joint venture with TotalEnergies (TTEF.PA) and ConocoPhillips (COP.N), has production capacity of about 300,000 barrels per day (bpd) which is exported through the eastern port of Es Sider.
It operates five main fields in the southeast including Waha which produces more than 100,000 bpd as well as Gallo, Al-Fargh, Al-Samah and Al-Dhahra.

TotalEnergies and ConocoPhillips did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

After Biden’s decision, a relieved country can applaud his success

By David Ignatius
July 21, 2024 at 2:03 p.m. EDT
President Biden has always had trouble letting go, even if it was something as simple as a handshake in a receiving line. He might be tired and stressed at the end of a workday, but he would clasp each guest’s palm, maybe a pat on the back, too, or a hug, reminiscing and cajoling as the minutes ticked by and the line backed up.


Sign up for Democracy, Refreshed, a newsletter series on how to renovate the republic.

Biden seemed to love all his jobs in government, especially this last one. The whole world was waiting in line to shake his hand. He could be irascible and demanding with his staff, but in his public role as president he was nearly always the genial patriarch. After a lifetime of being underestimated, he liked being in charge. And it was hard to give that up.
The country has watched Biden’s agonizing path toward Sunday’s announcement that he won’t run for a second term. By the end, he seemed nearly alone in resisting this decision. Three-quarters of the country told pollsters a year ago that he was too old to serve another term as president. But perhaps Biden saw that long receiving line stretching toward the horizon, and he didn’t want to step away.



Biden’s decision will allow a relieved country to applaud his success as president. Much of the Republican critique of Biden is pure nonsense. In fact, he helped steward sustained economic growth. He made critical investments in technology and infrastructure. He rebuilt America’s foreign alliances. And he was steadfast in the great moral challenge of our time, which was resistance to Russian President Vladimir Putin’s dark designs on Ukraine and the world.


It’s often said that if we could see ourselves through others’ eyes, we would make better decisions about our weaknesses. But Biden for many months resisted recognizing what television viewers could plainly see: that he was aging and increasingly unsteady in ways that made another term as commander in chief problematic.
Simply raising the question drew the wrath of Biden and his inner circle, as I discovered when I wrote a column in September arguing that despite my admiration for him and his policies, he shouldn’t run for reelection.



In Biden-world, retirement was unmentionable, and his team quickly closed off any real discussion last year of his age and fitness for office. It wasn’t the best moment for his party, or for some members of the news media, who were so focused on the threat they saw in former president Donald Trump that they deflected any real discussion of Biden’s weaknesses.
Why was Biden so resistant? Part of it surely was the pride and vanity everyone feels as they age. Older people don’t want to give up the keys to their cars even as they become a danger to others. They insist they can do everything as well as they could decades earlier, even when they can’t. It’s human to resist the signs of aging. I’m 74 myself, and I am deep into denial.
But it’s different when you’re commander in chief. You can’t talk about getting to bed earlier when you’re the person who could receive the ominous phone call at 2 a.m. warning that an adversary has launched a missile strike. “I just got to pace myself a little more, pace myself,” Biden said in a July 11 news conference. That’s good advice for most people, but if you hold the fate of the world in your hands, it’s not enough. Covering over your infirmities can be an act of recklessness.





http://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...c_magnet-op2024elections_inline_collection_17

Biden’s stubbornness has in some ways been one of his superpowers. He was the guy who was always undervalued. Others might be sharper debaters or more innovative thinkers, but Biden stayed in the fight, through personal tragedies and political reversals. That bred a self-confidence that could be downright ornery at times. One of Biden’s close advisers likened the Biden White House to a sentimental but sometimes dysfunctional Irish family. You did not want to make the boss angry.
The public Biden conveyed the common sense of a normal person. He was the guy from Scranton, Pa., who had grown up in the middle of the middle. He prized the “regular order” of the Senate. After spending more than half his life as a legislator, he knew how to compromise. He was the scrappy come-from-behind guy. People didn’t think he could win the White House in 2020 or be a good president. But he proved them wrong, twice over, and that reinforced his belief in his own judgment and resistance to others.
Biden’s mission, as he so often said, was to defeat Trump, who he thought was genuinely dangerous to the country. If Trump hadn’t cruised toward the nomination, Biden might have stepped back months ago, one of his close friends told me. Biden truly felt an obligation to halt the MAGA menace again, as he had in the 2020 presidential race and the 2022 midterm elections.



“I think I’m the most qualified person to run for president. I beat him once, and I will beat him again,” he said at that July 11 news conference. “I got more work to do. We’ve got more work to finish.” Really, it was as simple as that.
I hope Biden will preside over a competitive race to choose a successor, rather than anoint Vice President Harris. She will be a better candidate and potential president if she goes through a tumultuous one-month barnstorming campaign that should energize the Democrats and the country.
When President Lyndon B. Johnson stepped back from reelection in March 1968, he had a kind of rebirth. Doris Kearns Goodwin writes in a new book that “the lame duck rose like a phoenix from the ashes.” Johnson’s poll ratings reversed from 57 percent disapproval to 57 percent approval. An editorial in the Washington Post said he had made “a personal sacrifice in the name of national unity that entitles him to a very special place in the annals of American history.”



A similar wave of public admiration should follow Biden’s decision. He did the right things as president for America and the world, even when it hurt. He put the country back together after a bruising Trump presidency. And in the end, he understood it was time to go.

ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT