ADVERTISEMENT

Study links state ESA program to spike in Iowa K-12 private school tuition

ROBIN OPSAHLIowa Capital Dispatch
A study published by Brown and Princeton universities shows that kindergarten tuition at Iowa private schools went up by between 21% and 24% since the implementation of the state’s Education Savings Account program.
The ESA program, signed into law by Gov. Kim Reynolds in early 2023, allows families to create an account for their K-12 student to pay for private school tuition and associated costs. ESA accounts for the 2023-2024 school year were $7,635 — equal to the per-pupil funding total received by public K-12 schools — and will increase to $7,826 for the 2024-2025 school year.

However, these funds are not yet available to all students. For the first year of implementation, the current school year, all kindergartners, Iowa public school students and private school students with a family income of 300% or below the federal poverty line were eligible for the program. In the upcoming year, the income eligibility limit will expand to 400% the FPL before having no income limit beginning in the 2025-26 school year onward.

People are also reading…​





The program, spearheaded by Reynolds and voted for by a majority of Republican lawmakers, was discussed by supporters as a means to ensure Iowa students of different economic backgrounds have equal access to the schooling that best suits their academic needs.
But in the study, researchers Jason Fontana and Jennifer Jennings found that private school tuition increased significantly in Iowa following the implementation of the ESA program, while private school tuition in Nebraska, which passed a similar program into law in 2023 that will not be implemented until the 2024-25 school year, did not see the same increase.

In Iowa, tuition for students in grades 1 through 12, where not all families are yet eligible for ESAs, increased by between 10% and 16%, the study found. The average increase in cost was $1,280 for kindergarten tuition and $830 for higher grades when accounting for fixed effects, according to the research.


In an Iowa Press interview, Senate President Amy Sinclair — a major proponent of the program — said that while the private school tuition costs have increased, “most of the non-public schools are still below the cost per pupil that public schools are spending on a student.”

She also said there are other economic factors, like recent inflation, that have pushed Iowa K-12 private schools to raise tuition for reasons other than the public funds being available.

“That is pretty telling in that we are facing an inflation crisis,” Sinclair said. “I think those tuition increases would have occurred regardless of an education savings account scholarship when you have, over the course of the last three years, cumulative inflation of about 20%. Those costs impact non-public schools. I would suggest to you that regardless of the study, those tuition increases would have had to have occurred.”

As inflation rises, costs of schooling are going up, she said, meaning that private schools need more funding for costs like teacher salaries, food and school supplies.

Reynolds has also previously stated that she is not concerned about private schools increasing tuition due to the ESA program, as Iowa private schools are facing the same issues with funding and teacher shortages as public schools, and that tuition increases are a means to help alleviate those problems.


However, the researchers in the study concluded that higher tuition was directly linked to the ESA program, comparing Iowa’s increase in costs during the program’s first year of implementation to the growth in previous years. Additionally, the study compared Iowa’s jump in mean private school tuition with Nebraska — where the state’s ESA program has not yet taken effect — which saw between 3% to 5% increased tuition costs at the state’s private schools.

Using this data, the researchers argued that the ESA program is not meeting its intended goal of making private schools more accessible for lower-income Iowans.
“To the extent tuition levels outpace the ESA payment, families unable to further contribute to tuition may be priced out of schools, thus defeating the program’s stated goal,” the paper states. “If this is the case, ESAs act as tuition subsidies for families who can already afford private school. Future work should consider to what extent tuition increases limit families’ options.”

Sinclair said she was not worried about lower-income students being priced out of private schools due to the ESA program, as many private schools offer scholarships to students in addition to ESA funds. She also criticized the study as “very, very flawed” for not including data from all of Iowa’s private schools. The study said that data from 51% of Iowa’s private schools was used in the final analysis.


“The study itself was so grossly flawed as to not even be a topic of conversation for me,” Sinclair said. “Yes, there have been tuition increases. We have also increased funding to our public schools because 20% inflation over three years is going to be detrimental to any system that has to buy supplies and pay people. It’s just a reality of what this economic crisis that we have been facing as a nation under the Biden administration brings us.”

The increase in per-pupil state aid for public schools that the Legislature approved for next year was 2.5%.
Democrats have argued that the ESA program is providing government funding to private schools to the detriment of Iowa’s public K-12 system. When a student enrolls in a private school using the ESA program, the public school district loses its “per-pupil” funding through State Supplemental Aid for that child. However, the program does provide school districts with roughly $1,200 for each student living in the district attending a private school.

House Minority Leader Jennifer Konfrst criticized the program’s high cost earlier in May — in its first year, ESAs cost the state $107.4 million. The Legislative Services Agency estimated in 2023 that the program will cost $132.3 million in fiscal year 2024, $294.7 million in 2025 and $344.9 million in 2026.

“We’re going to see hundreds of millions of dollars spent on this, a billion dollars over five years is not unreasonable,” Konfrst said. “And in a state like Iowa, that is simply not sustainable, especially when we remember that that money is coming. That money could be going to public schools to make it better for everyone — 54% of the vouchers so far have gone to 10 counties. So, how is this helping rural Iowa? But the budget for public education has been reduced statewide. So, it’s simply not a fair system.”

Biden, Trump remain in tight race nationally, latest poll finds

President Biden and former president Donald Trump remain locked in a tight race nationally, with Biden drawing 50 percent support and Trump drawing 48 percent among registered voters, according to an NPR-PBS NewsHour-Marist National Poll released Thursday. The result is also within the margin of error among those who say they definitely plan to vote.

HawkCast Ep. 73 Payton Sandfort Confirmed BACK

Ross, Adam and I breakdown Payton Sandfort's decision to return.

Thoughts with Sandfort dragging things out to the end, how the #Hawkeyes floor raises, what the starting lineup will look like with him back, Kate Martin's start to her WNBA career and more.

PODCAST:
  • Like
Reactions: nwhawkincr

Why Deion Sanders’ son Shilo filed for bankruptcy, what’s next in Colorado safety’s legal saga

Colorado starting safety Shilo Sanders’ legal woes are under scrutiny as a near decade-long saga continues to unfurl. Sanders, the 24-year-old son of Buffaloes head coach and Pro Football Hall of Famer Deion Sanders, filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy last October on the heels of a Texas court judgment against him for nearly $12 million in damages owed to a former security guard at his Dallas high school following an alleged assault.

Advertisement

According to court records in Texas and Colorado obtained and reviewed this week by The Athletic, John Darjean alleged that Sanders, then 15, assaulted Darjean during an altercation at Triple A Academy in 2015, leaving Darjean with damage to his cervical spine and permanent neurological issues. Sanders has claimed in court records that it was Darjean who was the aggressor.

Sanders’ declaration of bankruptcy has brought into question his personal net worth in an era in college sports when athletes can cash in on name, image and likeness rights.

Darjean and his lawyers claim in court documents that Sanders didn’t properly disclose his assets when he filed for bankruptcy. They are still seeking to collect on the $11.89 million judgment he was ordered to pay after a March 2022 civil trial in a Texas district court ruled in favor of Darjean. Sanders failed to appear at the trial and claims in court documents that he could not afford legal representation at the time, notice of new trial dates never reached him and he did not learn of the default judgment until 2023.

According to April 2020 court documents, his previous lawyers collectively withdrew from the case due to being informed by Sanders “that he is unwilling or unable to continue funding the defense of this case.” Sanders’ bankruptcy filings in Colorado note that he is a graduate student looking for a “fresh start in life.”



This week, Sanders and his lawyers filed a motion in a Dallas area court to seal 21 court records dating to August 2017 they state feature “sensitive and confidential information” relating to Sanders. The motion stated that Darjean has been violating the initial protective order set in 2018 on various social media platforms in recent years, part of an ongoing dispute over what information should be kept under wraps as Sanders was a minor at the time of the incident.

Advertisement

This April, Darjean appeared on “Fearless with Jason Whitlock” for a 90-minute sit-down interview in which he details his side of the story and includes video testimony from Deion Sanders. Darjean alleged that a former administrator at the school “stole” surveillance footage of the altercation and gave it to Deion Sanders. The former Cowboys star cornerback told TMZ in 2016 that Darjean was “a real-life grifter.”

A University of Colorado spokesperson said Wednesday that the university, as well as Deion and Shilo Sanders, “are going to reserve comment as the litigation is ongoing.” Lawyers for Sanders and Darjean did not respond to requests for comment.

The alleged assault​

Video obtained by TMZ in 2016 shows the early stages of the altercation and alleged assault on Sept. 17, 2015. Darjean approaches Sanders on the school’s basketball court and grabs Sanders’ right arm. Sanders shakes off the attempt before the video cuts to a scuffle taking place in the distance as it spills into the school’s foyer.

Both parties claim the dispute had to do with Sanders talking on his phone, which was against school policy, to his mother, Pilar. Darjean’s lawsuit stated Sanders attacked him by elbowing him in the neck and chest before striking Darjean several times more in the same area and called the attack “sudden, unexpected, unprovoked.”

According to documents filed with the bankruptcy court in February, Sanders’ version of the story is markedly different. It states that Darjean became overly physical with the teenager. Sanders said he was pressed up against a wall for over a minute by Darjean and couldn’t move. The school’s principal, Ruda Nash, witnessed the ordeal and was one of several staff members who attempted to remove Darjean from Sanders, according to Sanders. The Texas Department of Family and Protective Services received a written statement from Nash, who said Darjean held Sanders by the neck before throwing him to the ground. After they were eventually separated, Sanders dialed 911, according to Nash.

Advertisement

Beyond the dissenting claims of what transpired, Deion Sanders and Darjean knew each other before the incident. Darjean, a former pitcher in the New York Yankees organization, coached youth baseball in the community. Deion Sanders also served as the head football coach at Triple A Academy for two seasons in 2015 and 2016. In his interview on Whitlock’s show in April, Darjean claims that Deion Sanders called him personally to take the phone away from Shilo because of his disdain for Pilar, his ex-wife. They were divorced in 2013.

In June 2016, Darjean first filed the lawsuit against Deion, Pilar and Shilo in Dallas District Court alleging his “severe and permanent injuries.” Deion Sanders was eventually removed from the suit in January 2019.

“I tried to reach out to him, he didn’t come visit me in the hospital, he didn’t say, ‘Hey man, I know my son did you wrong,’” Darjean said on Whitlock’s show. “He flipped the script and sent a piece of video to TMZ and said I was the aggressor and said I attacked his son.”

A year later, in June 2017, Darjean filed a defamation suit against Deion Sanders for Sanders’ comments to TMZ. The case would eventually be dismissed for want of prosecution in February 2019.

A YouTube channel titled “Prime Time for The Truth” was created in November 2021. It previously had deposition video of Deion Sanders, but has since been removed. A separate YouTube video was made a month ago asking for donations to a GoFundMe account that states that Darjean’s medical bills have exceeded $900,000 and that Sanders has yet to complete his payments. It has received $150 of the $800,000 goal.

Collecting on the judgment and NIL​

Darjean and his lawyers allege in bankruptcy court that Sanders hasn’t been transparent about the entirety of his assets that came from being in demand in the NIL landscape.

Sanders, who began his collegiate career at South Carolina before transferring to play for his father at Jackson State and ultimately Colorado, has been part of high-profile NIL deals as the Buffs under Deion Sanders became one of the biggest stories in sports.

Advertisement

Shilo was recently featured in a cameo on Starz’s hit show “BMF” — in which he played his father. In January, Shilo and his brother Shedeur, Colorado’s starting quarterback, walked the runway in Paris for the fall-winter show for Louis Vuitton. He’s been in commercials for Google alongside Shedeur and has starred in marketing campaigns alongside his dad and siblings for Kentucky Fried Chicken and Oikos yogurt.




In his bankruptcy filing in Colorado court last year, Sanders revealed he had a gross income of $193,713 in 2023, while netting $216,950 the year before in his last season at Jackson State. It also showed his liabilities — mainly the court judgment from 2022 — an estimated $11.3 million. Among his claimed assets is a 2023 Mercedes GLE valued at $75,900. Necklaces valued at $75,000 were later removed as assets.

Court filings say Darjean has alleged that Sanders is worth more than the reported $320,000 on his bankruptcy filing — he believes Sanders transferred money into one of his two LLCs, Big 21 and SS21.

“It is Shilo’s very NIL value and/or public value that are the source of the non-stop paid engagements and social media appearances,” Darjean’s complaint reads, according to Westword, an independent publication based in Denver that first reported on Sanders’ bankruptcy case May 24 and downloaded the filing before it was sealed this month. “The entire underpinning of the NIL concept is the value of the individual athlete, but Shilo chose not only to hide the value of the entire NIL endeavor with the ‘unknown’ listings for the two of the entities that were disclosed (Big 21 LLC and/or SS21 LLC), but also Shilo intentionally failed to identify and disclose his individual NIL property interest anywhere in the schedules.”

Sanders’ lawyers disputed the claim by noting that the transcript of Sanders’ meeting with creditors makes it clear that his NIL agreements were always done with Big 21, LLC, and therefore were part of the assets of Sanders’ claimed estate estimate.

“This allegation is based on pure conjecture and media ‘hype,’ without hav(ing) any basis in fact and reality,” Sanders’ lawyers wrote.

Sanders has filed a motion for summary judgment, which has also been sealed by the judge. If it is granted, Darjean would not be able to collect on the judgment in Texas. Darjean’s lawyer filed a request last week to extend the deadline for a response to June 24.
  • Like
Reactions: lucas80

Iowa GOP wants to control where citizens can travel

Iowa politicians should leave the kids alone


Student trips help mutual understanding between nations​

MAY 24

In some parts of Iowa, road signs greet visitors with our new state slogan: “Iowa, Freedom to Flourish.”

Some Republican lawmakers obviously don’t get the concept.

US Reps. Mariannette Miller-Meeks and Ashley Hinson and state Rep. Taylor Collins, have all been wringing their hands recently over trips that some students and staff from Muscatine High School took to China.

China apparently paid the costs, according to a recent article in the right-wing British newspaper, the Daily Mail, and that has triggered the Iowa Republicans. Now, there’s talk of stopping these visits.

Miller-Meeks called China a national security threat and said the trips were a “bridge too far.”

In an interview on Fox Business, where one of the hosts asked about the trips, including whether they should be banned, Hinson said a committee in Congress is investigating.
Meanwhile, Collins announced that during next year’s legislative session he’s going to introduce legislation to stop “this kind of infiltration by the Chinese Communist Party into Iowa’s classrooms.”

So much for freedom-loving Republicans.

I’d like to think an attempt to limit a citizen’s right to travel overseas would fail, even in the Iowa Legislature. But as we’ve seen recently, Republicans in this state like to use the power of government to impose their priorities on Iowans in ways that mock that cheery new slogan greeting visitors.

A prime example: The book ban Republicans put in place—and a federal judge blocked—that violates the rights of students, even high schoolers, to read what they want. Lawmakers also have censored teachers and restricted what had been a rather robust right of Iowans to vote by mail, among other limitations.

As I’ve said before, freedom in Iowa is a commodity and the party in power today sees itself as its chief distributor.


As for the student trips, Muscatine has longstanding ties to China and its leader, Xi Jinping. Xi first visited in 1985 and has maintained ties to the area ever since.
In 2012, the then-vice president of China came back to Muscatine and was greeted with open arms, including by top Republicans.

“We consider you a great friend of Iowa,” then-Gov. Terry Branstad told Xi at a gathering at the Muscatine home of Roger and Sarah Lande.

It’s not like China wasn’t a national security challenge back then. Its human rights violations were also clearly evident. There were demonstrations in Muscatine that day highlighting Chinese repression. Even so, Branstad and Xi later raised glasses to one another and enjoyed a gala dinner in the state Capitol.

I don’t recall any Republicans worrying then that Xi and China were using Iowa’s governor as a propaganda tool.

I do remember, later, a lot of coverage in the media about Branstad’s long “friendship” with Xi when he was appointed ambassador to China, and how it was a plus for the US. Even Donald Trump cited it as an asset.

I also remember a Foreign Policy article suggesting that, at least in terms of real-world international relations, all this talk of Branstad’s friendship with Xi was meaningless.
Propaganda, you might say.

The Muscatine school visits appear to stem from Xi’s remarks on a trip last year to San Francisco where he said he wanted to invite 50,000 American students to his country over the next five years.

According to a Des Moines Register article, Sarah Lande reached out to the Chinese leader, whom she’s known for nearly 40 years, writing that she hoped his invitation would include students from Muscatine.

Xi responded positively, and the Register reported that 24 students from Muscatine and four staff went to China.

According to the Daily Mail, the visits yielded praise for the country and gratitude to China’s leader. This seems to have set off at least some of the criticism.

The school district issued a statement to media in the Quad-Cities responding to the controversy that made it clear it understands the political and economic differences between the two countries but also recognizes the value of student exchanges in “fostering understanding, empathy, and valuable perspectives that extend far beyond the classroom.”

Lande, meanwhile, issued her own statement recognizing “these educational exchanges supported by the Chinese government are part of China’s soft power promoting their country along with friendship and understanding.” In Muscatine, she added, “Our people fund reciprocal exchanges. Should our students and educators take part in this opportunity with their eyes open? Yes! These exchanges have brought life changing experiences to students. Knowledge is freedom to make wise decisions. These are the values upon which America was founded. We are part of worldwide competition, cooperation and interconnection. Citizens need to know and understand each other to find a way to work together and avoid conflict.”

Both statements are posted to KWQC-TV’s website.

In my opinion, these statements exhibit the kind of realistic, eyes-open commitment to mutual understanding between nations that are a credit to these Iowans and consistent with our state’s heritage. It would be a shame if reactionary lawmakers were to interfere; if they were to try to undermine the right of Iowa students to have these once-in-a-lifetime opportunities.

Nobody should be naïve about China, or the kind of leader Xi Jinping is. But neither should we crawl into an isolationist hole and, in the process, violate the rights of young adults to travel on the questionable assumption that they’ll let themselves be used as pawns.

That’s not the kind of state that trusts its citizens to do the right thing. It’s not the kind of state that gives them the freedom to flourish.

Biden continues historic diversity with 200th judge confirmed by the Senate.

Almost 2/3 off Biden’s judges are women, and almost 2/3 are people of color. He also continues to select people from a wide range of legal backgrounds.

New Johnson County jail, estimated to cost $80 million, would increase capacity, address deficiencies

A preliminary proposal for a new Johnson County Jail and sheriff’s office, presented to the county’s Board of Supervisors on Wednesday, includes space for 140 inmates — more than double the current jail’s capacity — at an estimated cost of $80 million.



The current Johnson County Jail, which opened in 1981, is in “very poor” condition, according to a 2022 facility condition audit. The building has numerous structural deficiencies, including cracks and deterioration in walls, ceilings, and portions of the roof.




The current jail has a total of 92 beds, but its functional capacity is just 65 beds. That means the jail must send excess inmates to other county jails, including the Linn County Jail in Cedar Rapids.


In 2022, county officials told The Gazette the facility has reached the end of its useful life.

The sheriff’s office signed a contract with Shive-Hattery, a Cedar Rapids-based engineering and architectural firm, in September 2023 to conduct a space needs study of the current jail for $75,000. The firm presented its findings and preliminary design concepts to the supervisors during a work session Wednesday.



The consultants told the supervisors the current jail has several design issues, including an inefficient linear setup of cells and operational spaces, nine housing units that do not comply with state size standards, and handicap inaccessibility.

Rendering of the Johnson County Sheriff's Office and Jail, as designed by Shive-Hattery and presented to the Johnson County supervisors on May 29, 2024. (Courtesy of Johnson County Board of Supervisors) Rendering of a proposed new Johnson County Sheriff's Office and Jail, as designed by Shive-Hattery and presented to the Johnson County supervisors on Wednesday. (Courtesy of Johnson County Board of Supervisors)
If the county were to keep the current jail and make no changes, the capacity would have to be capped at 46 beds to comply with state standards, the consultants said.


The estimated cost of transportation and housing for inmates to other county jails would increase from its current standing at nearly $16 million through December 2023, to more than $96 million over a 20-year period, according to Shive-Hattery’s findings.


The main features of the preliminary design include:


  • 140 beds, with space to increase to 240 beds if needed
  • Improved law enforcement training facilities
  • A pod-style design that would promote staff efficiency and “direct lines of sight”
  • No need for additional staffing
  • A larger medical unit

Shive-Hattery’s 3D visualizations of a possible design for the facility are intended to “evoke community pride,” “instill a sense of safety and security” and create an “enduring architectural image,” according to the presentation.

Rendering of a proposed new Johnson County Sheriff's Office and Jail, as designed by Shive-Hattery and presented to the Johnson County supervisors on Wednesday. (Courtesy of Johnson County Board of Supervisors)
The proposal presented to the Board of Supervisors is not the complete report from Shive-Hattery. The final report will be finished in about 10 days, the consultants said.


The proposal presented Wednesday does not include a possible location for a new sheriff’s office and jail, but the documents indicate the site would need to be 15 to 20 acres.


The supervisors did not discuss possible sources of funding for such a project, but the preliminary budget considerations presented by Shive-Hattery put the price of the new facility at around $80 million for a mid-2025 bid.


Previous Johnson County bond referendums to finance jail improvements failed in 2012 and 2013. In both years, the proposals received more than 50 percent approval from voters, but they fell short of the 60 percent required for the referendum to pass.


Supervisor pushes back on design​


During Wednesday’s work session, Supervisor V Fixmer-Oraiz raised several concerns about the design and the design process.


Fixmer-Oraiz described the maximum potential bed capacity of 240 as “almost ludicrous” when national and local crime rates are on a recent downward trend.


“It’s almost ludicrous to be having this conversation about 240 beds when the sheriff himself said that across the state, we’ve had a decrease in incarceration rates,” Fixmer-Oraiz said. “So what are we planning for?”


Fixmer-Oraiz added that declining crime rates show the county’s efforts to invest in diversion programs and mental health services are working, and should continue.






Sheriff Brad Kunkel said while initiatives like diversion programs do good work and help people, they don’t necessarily work in cases of more serious, violent crimes. These kinds of crimes are what keep the county jail at capacity, he said.


Another concern that Fixmer-Oraiz brought up was the lack of public input into the preliminary design. The Shive-Hattery consultants said they spoke with county officials involved with the jail and sheriff’s office, including the county attorney and law enforcement staff.


While the process of planning a new jail facility is in the early stages and the design can be altered along the way, Fixmer-Oraiz said they would like to have seen more public engagement at the start of the process.


“Up until this point, whether it’s initial or not, there have been other reports that have been done that include much more stakeholder input,” Fixmer-Oraiz said. “How you do the thing is what you get in the end. Programming drives form.”


Supervisor Rod Sullivan, the board’s chair, said there still is plenty of time to change the jail design as many times as necessary based on public input garnered throughout the process.


This preliminary design and report, while not complete, is necessary because the supervisors need to know the needs of the jail, Sullivan said.


Kunkel said he wanted to get something to present to the supervisors because he’s been asked about the status of the project.


Next steps​


After some discussion, the supervisors agreed to wait for the final report before discussing next steps in the process.


Sullivan said the initial plan was presented Wednesday because there will be few meetings in the coming months at which all five supervisors will be present.


In order to give the supervisors time to review the contents of the Shive-Hattery report before discussing it and deciding on next steps, the board will wait to further discuss the issue again at its June 26 work session, which will begin at 9 a.m.
  • Angry
Reactions: Here_4_a_Day

So according to “local news” small town Iowans complaining “Where’s the Government?”

Storms this past week have done substantial (FLOOD) damage to a small town in central Iowa (Lynnville), located in Jasper County….(maybe Poweshiek)….Local news had a story this evening about their respondents wanting to know where their government help is? The damage occurred Tuesday, I believe. The county really has no money for them and the Governor has her own issues in western Iowa from a tornado earlier in the week. The flooding is substantial, too.

Isn’t this what politicians are for? Where is the Governor (Reynolds)? Where is the Congressman (either Nunn or Miller-Meeks)? That is where the federal/state $$ comes from….that is “the government”! Don’t piss and moan to the local news! Piss and moan to your local politicians who have the keys to assistance! The money is there…but you have to go through the process to get the money coming your way!

Get the ball rolling….the news folks cant do a thing for you…..that’s what your politicians are to do…that is there #1 job…to assist and aid their constituents.
Ironic ain’t it….in good ol’ Red Ioway, where there’s too much government to begin with..,..Red Ioway is obviously a home to Bill Cohen’s Law, that states “the government is your enemy until you need a friend.”

Sites and dates for eight 2025 NCWWC Regionals







It is great to be an Iowa Wrestling fan.

Go Hawks!
  • Like
Reactions: T8KUDWN

Minneapolis Police Department faces stark officer shortage as it seeks to rebuild public trust

O’Hara says his department is short by more than 200 officers, and has lost 40% of its police force in the last four years.

“It is incredible,” O’Hara said. “It’s not just that we lost 40% of the force, they’ve been facing the highest levels of crime and violence, in some categories, that the city has ever seen.”

Minneapolis is facing a surge in assaults, and nearly three dozen shooting calls a month. Officers have been subject to some mandatory overtime.


Full article:
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT