ADVERTISEMENT

  • Poll
VOTE: Is Kirk Ferentz a Hall of Famer? Assume he gets to a 60.00 Win% & stays there (currently @ 59.83%). Needs to go 9-4 next yr to get to 60.16%

Is Kirk Ferentz a Hall of Famer?

  • I am an Iowa fan. YES!

  • I am not an Iowa fan. YES!

  • I am an Iowa fan. NO!

  • I am not an Iowa fan. NO!


Results are only viewable after voting.

Update after Iowa's 27-24 loss to Missouri in the Music City Bowl:

You can change your vote, if needed.

As we have been discussing in this thread since September 2023, one of the stipulations for the College Football Hall of Fame is you have to have won 60% of your games.

Assuming Kirk gets to 60% next season (which he currently is just below) and stays there, what say you?

Kirk has now been the head coach in 361 games. He's won 59.83% of those games.

To be at 60.00% (or better) at the end of the 2025 season, assuming a 13 game season, Kirk needs to go 9-4 (or better), which would put him at 225-149 (60.16%).

Kirk's current record:

.......12-21 (36.4%):...............3 years at Maine..........(1990-92)
204
-124 (62.2%):...........26 seasons at Iowa (1999-present)
..................................................................
216-145 (59.83%) Overall Record
========================


When Kirk hit win #200 he became the 24th Division I coach to reach that milestone.

Keep in mind that KF never had a 60% season until his 7th year as a head coach when Iowa went 11-2 in 2002.

Kirk's first 6 years as a head coach:

12-21 (36.4%.......3 years at Maine)
...1-10 (9.1%...........Year 1 at IOWA)
...3-9 (25.0%.......Year 2 at IOWA)
....7-5 (58.3%.......Year 3 at IOWA)
.........................................................................
23-45 (33.8%) Record
===========================

Regarding the Aug 31, 2024 season opener vs Illinois State (40-0 Iowa win):


Login to view embedded media

Corporate Donations to Trumps Inauguration

Interesting

  • Meta: donated $1 million
  • Amazon: plans to donate $1 million
  • Sam Altman: plans to make a $1 million personal donation
  • Perplexity: plans to donate $1 million
  • Uber and Dara Khosrowshahi: donated $1 million each
  • Ken Griffin: plans to donate $1 million
  • Bank of America: plans to donate an undisclosed amount
  • Goldman Sachs: plans to donate an undisclosed amount
  • Robinhood: donated $2 million

HROT Dims, Help Me Understand How an ILLEGAL Kidnaps & Rapes Someone and is Then ROR'ed By Your Party to Avoid ICE?

Help me understand this level of evil you subscribe to >

  • Poll
Should the government give away Ozempic?

Should the government give away Ozempic?

  • Yes

    Votes: 17 36.2%
  • No

    Votes: 30 63.8%

Login to view embedded media
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.: "Today, over 100 members of Congress support a bill to fund Ozempic with Medicare at $1,500 a month. Most of these members have taken money from the manufacturer of that product, a European company called Novo Nordisk. As everyone knows, once a drug is approved for Medicare, it goes to Medicaid.

And there is a push to recommend Ozempic for Americans as young as six over a condition, obesity, that is completely preventable and barely even existed 100 years ago. Since 74% of Americans are obese, the cost of all of them, if they take their Ozempic prescriptions, will be $3 trillion a year. This is a drug that has made Novo Nordisk the biggest company in Europe.

It's a Danish company, but the Danish government does not recommend it. It recommends a change in diet to treat obesity and exercise. Virtually Novo Nordisk's entire value is based upon its projections of what Ozempic is going to sell to Americans. For half the price of Ozempic, we could purchase regeneratively raised organic agriculture, organic food for every American three meals a day and gym membership for every obese American. Why are members of Congress doing the bidding of this Danish company instead of standing up for American farmers and children? Because Novo Nordisk is one of the largest funders of medical research, the media and politicians and the medical schools all go along with them."
  • Angry
Reactions: Scruddy

FBI informant accused of lying about Joe and Hunter Biden pleads guilty

Alexander Smirnov has been given a plea deal after he spent years lying about President Joe Biden and his son Hunter, which resulted in a years-long investigation by Republicans in Congress, flagged national security expert Marcy Wheeler.

House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer (R-KY), Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA), and former Attorney General Bill Barr all bought into the false claims, resulting in years of investigations that probed the bank accounts of the president, his brother, and his son.

The court filing posted on Thursday said: "The events Defendant first reported to the Handler in June 2020 were fabrications. In truth and fact, Defendant had contact with executives from Burisma in 2017, after the end of the Obama-Biden Administration and after the then Ukrainian Prosecutor General had been fired in Feb. 2016 — in other words, when Public Official 1 could not engage in any official act to influence U.S. policy and when the Prosecutor General was no longer in office. Defendant transformed his routine and unextraordinary business contacts with Burisma in 2017 and later into bribery allegations against Public Official 1, the presumptive nominee of one of the two major political parties for president, after expressing bias against Public Official 1 and his candidacy."

Public Official 1 can reasonably be assumed to be President Biden.

The defendant then repeated the false claims to FBI agents in Sept. 2023, where he also changed his story and had new false stories about Public Official 1.

The court filing also revealed that Smirnov was given "more than $2 million in income from multiple sources in 2020, 2021 and 2022. He then used the money to prop up his and his girlfriend's lifestyle in Las Vegas. Expenditures included a $1.4 million condo, a Bentley, and hundreds of thousands of dollars of clothes, jewelry, and accessories for himself and Domestic Partner purchased at high-end retailers in Los Angeles and Las Vegas."

Incoming president Donald Trump has not indicated whether or not he intends to pardon Alexander Smirnov, only that he will pardon Jan. 6 defendants.

Link

Anchors Away: TV-News Veterans Exit Ahead of Ratings Challenges, Digital Change in 2025

Anchors Away: TV-News Veterans Exit Ahead of Ratings Challenges, Digital Change in 2025​


For TV-news outlets, 2025 is shaping up to be a year of out with the old and in with the….who?

With the economics of newsgathering less certain as info-hounds move to streaming and social media for their early facts, traditional TV-news venues have been parting ways with veteran anchors and correspondents. Whether the decisions are mutual or unilateral, amicable or adverse, they will leave places such as NBC News, MSNBC, Fox News, CBS News and CNN with fewer of some of their most recognizable faces at a point in the business cycle when viewership tends to narrow.

Hoda Kotb is taking a final lap this week at NBC's "Today," after deciding to leave the show and spend more time with her young children. Andrea Mitchell will this month sign off from the MSNBC program she has anchored since 2008, opting to work her reporting roles more heavily. Norah O'Donnell will leave "CBS Evening News" at about the same time and take on a new special correspondent role. Jeff Glor, a central part of CBS News' Saturday-morning program, left the network in September amid layoffs. Before the end of 2024, CNN bid farewell to both Chris Wallace and Alisyn Camerota. Fox News' Neil Cavuto, one of the few anchors whose time at the Fox Corp. owned outlet dates to its 1996 launch, said in late December he was leaving.

All these exits take place amid a not-so-gradual shrinking of the TV-news sector. CBS News, ABC News, NBC News, CNN and CNBC all shed staffers last year, and the fiscal terrain is likely to be just as challenging in months ahead - if not more so. News audiences typically dwindle after a presidential election cycle.

Already, 2025 projections from market-research firm Kagan, part of S&P Global Intelligence, call for declines in advertising and subscriptions at all three mainstay cable-news outlets. Ad sales at Fox News Channel are seen dipping to approximately $1.01 billion from $1.03 billion in 2024; to nearly $568.9 million at MSNBC from $639.6 million last year; and to about $499.1 million at CNN from $563.9 million. Each of the three is also projected to lose about 3 million subscribers over the next 12 months, according to the Kagan data.

Last year was supposed to be a watermark in the business, with interest in the 2024 presidential election fueling ratings, which in turn generate new ad dollars. Indeed, primetime ratings surged for all three cable-news outlets over the year, with the number of viewers between 25 and 54 - the demographic coveted most by advertisers - up 40% at Fox News,17% at CNN and 9% at MSNBC.

Of course, that was then.

Since the election, CNN and MSNBC have suffered notable ratings declines. According to Nielsen, MSNBC lost 65% of its primetime audience in the 25-to-54 demographic between the election and the end of 2024. CNN lost 57%. Fox News in December captured about 71% of the overall audience still turning in to any of the three outlets. Executives and producers at CNN and MSNBC remain optimistic that audiences will return following the second inauguration of President Donald Trump, and some hold out hope to attract more viewers via digital platforms.

The future, however, is foggy. Many of the corporations that support the aforementioned news divisions face existential dilemmas. Paramount Global, parent of CBS News, is about to be acquired by Skydance Media, which has vowed to cut another $1.5 billion in costs off the company's balance sheet - following $500 million in cuts that have already taken place. Warner Bros. Discovery, parent of CNN, is restructuring itself so that its cable networks are housed in a separate division from its production studios and streaming platforms. Many on Wall Street see the maneuver as one that could set up its TV networks for potential sale. What's more, CNN this week goes on trial in a defamation suit that has a plaintiff seeking $1 billion after a 2021 report on the network questioned the activities of a security consultant aiding people who wanted to escape Afghanistan.

The news assets of NBCUniversal are navigating through an uncertain time as parent Comcast spins off the bulk of its cable networks, separating MSNBC and CNBC from NBC News. Disney's commitment to ABC News has come under scrutiny after the company agreed to pay a settlement of $15 million to Donald Trump's presidential library after anchor George Stephanopoulos asserted incorrectly in March on air that Trump had been found liable in a court case for raping writer E. Jean Carroll.

Fox Corp., which sold off many of its cable and entertainment assets to Disney in 2019, has fared better than many of its competitors in recent years, but it faces challenges as well. The company's controlling Murdoch family is at odds about how Fox and sister News Corp. will be governed should founder Rupert Murdoch, 93, die. And its Fox News unit is expected to face a defamation lawsuit as soon as this year levied by voting-technology firm Smartmatic that seeks $2 billion for debunked claims aired on the network about that company's role in rigging the 2020 presidential election, which was conducted legally and without interference.

Perhaps those pressures clamp down on any desire to make startling hires to replace those who are departing. At CBS, John Dickerson and Maurice DuBois, veterans themselves, will helm a retooled "Evening News" that may closely resemble a local broadcast. NBC News will next week elevate Craig Melvin, a regular morning presence at "Today," to replace Kotb during the show's first two hours. Fox News, MSNBC and CNN are widely expected to rely at present on current staffers to fill vacancies made by the exits of Wallace, Mitchell and Cavuto, according to people familiar with each situation.

Veterans, with their entrenched ways of working and their higher-than-median salaries, seem like an obvious element for cost-cutting. In some cases, they have become so familiar over the years that viewers take them for granted, and they no longer generate the best ratings in their time periods. Little wonder, then, that so many have announced departures in recent weeks.

And yet, these well-known anchors still have connections to an audience. Some of them still have enough of a recognition factor to develop their own communities. Wallace, Cavuto and Camerota, have, for example, suggested that they have new chapters to explore. None of them will capture, most likely, the large simultaneous crowds that tune into their previous employers. But they won't have to in order to be successful.

They need only generate enough ad and subscription revenue to feed a small online venture - not so hard to accomplish in an era of YouTube channels and Substack newsletters. Former colleagues like Tucker Carlson, Megyn Kelly and Don Lemon have already dipped their toes into such waters.

TV-news mainstays have little to fear from any single departure. Stack up enough of them over time, however, and they may be looking at damage by a thousand cuts. Some of those well-worn anchors, as things turn out, may have a long way to go before their careers are truly at an end.

ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT