By Thomas B. Edsall
Mr. Edsall contributes a weekly column from Washington, D.C., on politics, demographics and inequality.
Sign up for the Opinion Today newsletter Get expert analysis of the news and a guide to the big ideas shaping the world every weekday morning. Get it sent to your inbox.
Over the past decade, a liberal faction within America’s colleges and universities, corporate America and the media has promoted goals of diversity, equity and inclusion, endorsed regulations restricting “harmful speech,” encouraged the ostracization of dissenters and sought to grant enhanced status to the previously marginalized.
Now, in reaction, come the governor of Florida, Ron DeSantis, his allies in the state legislature and Republican politicians across America with a blunt-force counteragenda that uses the coercive power of government to impose its own speech code and ideology on education, including higher education, as well as on private businesses.
In this, DeSantis and his emulators are demonstrating that the hard right is willing not only to jettison the conservative principle of restrained government but also to endanger the accreditation of a state system of higher education — a crucial pillar of economic growth — in order to promulgate their own repressive version of permissible language in America’s universities and colleges, which have traditionally been bastions of academic freedom.
“We want education, not indoctrination,” DeSantis proclaimed recently while setting out what cannot be taught and what must be taught in Florida’s extensive network of postsecondary schools.
Story continues below advertisement
Continue reading the main story
Many who have in the past been sharply critical of progressive excess now see DeSantis as promoting excess on the right.
Amna Khalid, a history professor at Carleton College in Minnesota, has written extensively in The Chronicle of Higher Education and other publications on such subjects as “Yes, D.E.I. Can Erode Academic Freedom. Let’s Not Pretend Otherwise” and “The Data Is In — Trigger Warnings Don’t Work.”
However, when I asked Khalid about legislation in Florida (HB 999) that would codify DeSantis’s higher education proposals into law, she emailed back:
Musa al-Gharbi, a sociologist at Columbia and a research fellow at the Heterodox Academy, noted in an email that
On Jan. 31 the DeSantis administration issued a set of proposals, under the headline “Governor DeSantis Elevates Civil Discourse and Intellectual Freedom in Higher Education,” to “further push back against the tactics of liberal elites who suppress free thought in the name of identity politics and indoctrination” to ensure that
Among the provisions:
In a February Inside Higher Education article, Brian Rosenberg, a president emeritus of Macalester College in Minnesota and a visiting professor at the Graduate School of Education at Harvard, raised the issue of accreditation. He cited the standards used by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges, which suggest that DeSantis’s proposals could result in the revocation of accreditation by the commission.
Among the standards Rosenberg points to are:
Mr. Edsall contributes a weekly column from Washington, D.C., on politics, demographics and inequality.
Sign up for the Opinion Today newsletter Get expert analysis of the news and a guide to the big ideas shaping the world every weekday morning. Get it sent to your inbox.
Over the past decade, a liberal faction within America’s colleges and universities, corporate America and the media has promoted goals of diversity, equity and inclusion, endorsed regulations restricting “harmful speech,” encouraged the ostracization of dissenters and sought to grant enhanced status to the previously marginalized.
Now, in reaction, come the governor of Florida, Ron DeSantis, his allies in the state legislature and Republican politicians across America with a blunt-force counteragenda that uses the coercive power of government to impose its own speech code and ideology on education, including higher education, as well as on private businesses.
In this, DeSantis and his emulators are demonstrating that the hard right is willing not only to jettison the conservative principle of restrained government but also to endanger the accreditation of a state system of higher education — a crucial pillar of economic growth — in order to promulgate their own repressive version of permissible language in America’s universities and colleges, which have traditionally been bastions of academic freedom.
“We want education, not indoctrination,” DeSantis proclaimed recently while setting out what cannot be taught and what must be taught in Florida’s extensive network of postsecondary schools.
Story continues below advertisement
Continue reading the main story
Many who have in the past been sharply critical of progressive excess now see DeSantis as promoting excess on the right.
Amna Khalid, a history professor at Carleton College in Minnesota, has written extensively in The Chronicle of Higher Education and other publications on such subjects as “Yes, D.E.I. Can Erode Academic Freedom. Let’s Not Pretend Otherwise” and “The Data Is In — Trigger Warnings Don’t Work.”
However, when I asked Khalid about legislation in Florida (HB 999) that would codify DeSantis’s higher education proposals into law, she emailed back:
What’s most dangerous about the bill, Khalid continued,HB 999 is an abomination. It’s the most comprehensive attack on academic freedom we’ve seen. From banning concepts and theories that can be taught to limiting faculty and student speech outside the classroom to the erosion of tenure and faculty involvement in hiring decisions, this bill, if passed, will turn Florida colleges and universities into state propaganda factories and intellectual wastelands.
In addition, Khalid wrote, the measure “empowers university presidents and boards of trustees” (board members are appointed by the governor)is its vagueness. Calling for general education courses to ban “critical race theory” and the teaching of “identity politics,” without defining what exactly those terms mean, is a most devastatingly effective way of intimidating instructors. Anyone who wants to keep their jobs will no doubt have to self-censor and toe the line.
Khalid is by no means alone among those who have turned their fire on DeSantis.to make hiring, firing and post-tenure review determinations, making it impossible for faculty to critique any policy or challenge any position that runs counter to that of state officials. HB 999 targets the very core of academic freedom, the very thing that has made U.S. universities the envy of the world. If passed this bill will sound the death knell for higher education in Florida.
Musa al-Gharbi, a sociologist at Columbia and a research fellow at the Heterodox Academy, noted in an email that
Al-Gharbi, however, is equally critical of DeSantis:there is a vast and growing literature showing that existing D.E.I. programming used in many schools and corporations is not just ineffective, it’s actually pernicious. It demoralizes people, reduces trust, increases hostility and conflict and even sometimes reinforces stereotypes or legitimizes prejudicial behaviors.
Many of the laws being passed, al-Gharbi wrote,What is the main complaint of DeSantis et al.? Not that knowledge being produced is unreliable or that students are failing to get good jobs, etc. No. They don’t like that institutions seem to bolster the cultural and political power of their rivals. And they want to instead leverage these institutions in the service of their own agenda. They’re not committed to academic freedom.
What is the focus of the controversy?prevent teachers from discussing certain areas of research or force them to toe particular lines or drive them toward self-censorship or weaken tenure protections. These are not moves that enhance academic freedom but undermine it. They aren’t concerned about academic freedom. They’re concerned about power.
On Jan. 31 the DeSantis administration issued a set of proposals, under the headline “Governor DeSantis Elevates Civil Discourse and Intellectual Freedom in Higher Education,” to “further push back against the tactics of liberal elites who suppress free thought in the name of identity politics and indoctrination” to ensure that
DeSantis’s proposals were subsequently introduced in legislative form as HB 999 by State Representative Alex Andrade of Pensacola.Florida’s public universities and colleges are grounded in the history and philosophy of Western Civilization; prohibit D.E.I., C.R.T. and other discriminatory programs and barriers to learning; and course correct universities’ missions to align education for citizenship in the constitutional republic and Florida’s existing and emerging work force needs.
Among the provisions:
- State university boards of trustees appointed by the governor will be responsible “for hiring faculty for the university.”
- “Each state university board of trustees may, at the request of its chair, review any faculty member’s tenure status.”
- “General education core courses may not suppress or distort significant historical events or include a curriculum that teaches identity politics, such as critical race theory, or defines American history as contrary to the creation of a new nation based on universal principles stated in the Declaration of Independence.”
- Mandatory removal from college and university course offerings of “any major or minor in critical race theory, gender studies or intersectionality or any derivative major or minor of these belief systems.”
In a February Inside Higher Education article, Brian Rosenberg, a president emeritus of Macalester College in Minnesota and a visiting professor at the Graduate School of Education at Harvard, raised the issue of accreditation. He cited the standards used by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges, which suggest that DeSantis’s proposals could result in the revocation of accreditation by the commission.
Among the standards Rosenberg points to are:
- “Effective governing boards adhere to the laws and regulations that underpin the institution’s legitimacy while championing its right to operate without unreasonable intrusions by governmental and nongovernmental agencies and entities. This applies to any governing board, whether public, private not-for-profit or private for-profit. The board protects and preserves the institution’s independence from outside pressures.”
- “Because student learning is central to the institution’s mission and educational degrees, the faculty has responsibility for directing the learning enterprise, including overseeing and coordinating educational programs to assure that each contains essential curricular components, has appropriate content and pedagogy and maintains discipline currency.”
- “The essential role of institutions of higher education is the pursuit and dissemination of knowledge. Academic freedom respects the dignity and rights of others while fostering intellectual freedom of faculty to teach, research and publish. Responsible academic freedom enriches the contributions of higher education to society.”
Opinion | ‘The Death Knell for Higher Education in Florida’
When “freedom from indoctrination” is anything but.
www.nytimes.com