ADVERTISEMENT

“We Need a Covid Commission” – Bill Maher Says Fauci and Democrats Refuse to Admit They Got It Wrong

If only we'd have had a playbook on what to do if there's a pandemic based on actual experience from dealing with a pandemic...

Oh, wait...
Don't worry. They let Randi Weingarten and the teachers union write it for them. Right after declaring it was OK to protest because racism was more of a health hazard than COVID. Some real sharp people making these decisions, I tell you.
 
I liked when our VP said not to trust the vaccine because "Trump" and the left applauded her...then turned around and wanted to punish everyone who didn't trust the vaccine or want to take it...except for blacks of course because Biden said they experimented on the Tuskegee airmen (or some shit, lol). But hey...we shouldn't judge.
 
Yeah. And YouTube took their video off the platform , if I recall. As if their vast medical degrees at YouTube were more in the know about it then the doctors. Again...who were way more correct than the going "consensus" on the topic at the time.

And these are the people who pretend to be worried about fascism and the end of democracy. They used to be all about free speech and against censorship. Not anymore.

Not to mention the people "building the consensus" let the fvcking teachers union write a bunch of the protocol for the CDC. God for bid we look back on that and judge it, eh?
A lucky guess doesn't mean that's good science or good practice. Particularly if you are wrong more people die versus the more conservative approach where if you wrong the worst consequence is people are annoyed a little bit.
 
A lucky guess doesn't mean that's good science or good practice. Particularly if you are wrong more people die versus the more conservative approach where if you wrong the worst consequence is people are annoyed a little bit.
Here was the controversial thing they said that got them ostracized and shot off of social media.

“Do we need to still shelter in place? Our answer is emphatically no. Do we need businesses to be shut down? Emphatically no. Do we need to test them and get them back to work? Yes, we do,”

Oh the horror.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hawkosx
A lucky guess doesn't mean that's good science or good practice. Particularly if you are wrong more people die versus the more conservative approach where if you wrong the worst consequence is people are annoyed a little bit.
It was ALL guess work. Fauci, the WHO and many others were wrong and an entire generation of children are fvcked because of it. Again, they let the NEA write protocol. Tell me again about Randi Weingarten's medical expertise.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gimmered
I liked when our VP said not to trust the vaccine because "Trump" and the left applauded her...then turned around and wanted to punish everyone who didn't trust the vaccine or want to take it...except for blacks of course because Biden said they experimented on the Tuskegee airmen (or some shit, lol). But hey...we shouldn't judge.
well she's an idiot so ...
 
Like what? I love these people that come out after the fact and act like it was obvious during the middle of the crisis. Things happened pretty fast. And all anyone does is blame Fauci. There were LOTS of other people involved in decision making at federal, state, and local levels.

The time to decide what to do during a crisis isn't during it but BEFORE it. Preparedness matters and we as a country, were woefully unprepared.
I had a pretty good grasp on things fairly early in the pandemic, feel free to review my posts in 2020. I gave a lot of evidence of the lab leak, I knew 6 feet was a random number, I advocated for sending kids back to school, I said kids didn't need the vaccine.
 
i'd be willing to bet the federal agencies did after action reviews...the problem is that those agencies (fairly or unfairly) became such political hot-potatoes that the public isn't really interested in their internal reviews

let's be honest about what maher is asking for here...he wants some kind of reckoning or punishment for the people he thinks were in the wrong
This news is important because the WHO pandemic accord/treaty is coming up soon (they are currentlyworkingon another draft). This would give all the powers during a pandemic to the global doctors at the who. They could decide how the usa has to respond. These are the same people fauci was working with.

They can't review the response because they are claiming "A pandemic accord is critical to safeguard our collective future. Only a strong global pact on pandemics can protect future generations from a repeat of the COVID-19 crisis, which led to millions of deaths and caused widespread social and economic devastation, owing not least to insufficient international collaboration,” the leaders write in their joint letter."

If people realize they didn't do that much right, then countries would be less likely to put the who in charge of the next pandemic.
 
I had a pretty good grasp on things fairly early in the pandemic, feel free to review my posts in 2020. I gave a lot of evidence of the lab leak, I knew 6 feet was a random number, I advocated for sending kids back to school, I said kids didn't need the vaccine.
I'll tackle all of these:

1) we still haven't figured out the exact origin of covid 19. The lab leak is just one possibility.

2) So what if 6 feet was a random number? We know that close contact spreads viruses. They were likely going off of things they already knew and applied it to this virus. It's not like they had time to research the exact distance that was safe. It was a guideline.

3) In most places (here in Iowa) kids were really only out of school for about 3-4 months. Many were back in person at least part time by fall 2020. I still think pulling kids in March 2020 through the remainder of that school year was a good call. We didn't know much at all about this virus yet. Also, I think they likely knew kids were at a reduced risk for severe infection but wanted to try and make this didn't spread. I think at that point in the pandemic there was still hope they could curb the spread and this thing would sputter out.

4) That's fair but again I don't think kids were ever required to get the vaccine so it was a personal choice for many families.
 
  • Like
  • Angry
Reactions: Ree4 and Pinehawk
I'll tackle all of these:

1) we still haven't figured out the exact origin of covid 19. The lab leak is just one possibility.

2) So what if 6 feet was a random number? We know that close contact spreads viruses. They were likely going off of things they already knew and applied it to this virus. It's not like they had time to research the exact distance that was safe. It was a guideline.

3) In most places (here in Iowa) kids were really only out of school for about 3-4 months. Many were back in person at least part time by fall 2020. I still think pulling kids in March 2020 through the remainder of that school year was a good call. We didn't know much at all about this virus yet. Also, I think they likely knew kids were at a reduced risk for severe infection but wanted to try and make this didn't spread. I think at that point in the pandemic there was still hope they could curb the spread and this thing would sputter out.

4) That's fair but again I don't think kids were ever required to get the vaccine so it was a personal choice for many families.
Fair enough, I agree that my thoughts were not necessarily ground breaking, and there is lots of evidence to back it up so its not like I was going too far out on a limb, but I still had a bunch of people on here denying every word I said.

I'm curious what you think about the WHO pandemic accord/treaty that I posted 2 posts up? Do you know what it is?
 
That's not how science works. Science works by consensus. When consensus goes against you, you write papers. You don't go to media and start complaining. People will use your paper as a body of evidence for later, Their mistake was how they went about it.
That Osterholm dude is one of the nations top infectious disease docs and called out the bullshit on staying home and closing schools before it even happened. It was a dangerous display of groupthink that took over and any dissent was ridiculed.
 
And I was hoping I could go the rest of my life never hearing the name F@uci again...sigh
 
I think it's very worthwhile for that to occur. Here's the issue: While it probably wasn't perfect, there was a pandemic response plan in place that Trump and his administration threw out upon entering office. They never bothered to replace it. They were the ones in charge in 2020, let's not forget.
BINGO^^^^
No one, ( especially MAGA Trumpers) seem to want to recall some of the steps Trump took upon taking office to “reduce” the nation’s debt…. “Emergency response” took a big hit in Trump’s effort to make government “more efficient”…
 
Because it would be a waste of time and money. It will come down to what information was known at the time and then deciding to go with the safest option possible to limit the number of people dying. Sure, after mountains of more evidence has been collected some of those choices could have been different and we would likely have been ok. But now you want to tie some people to the stake and burn them alive? Because they had limited information to work with?

Here's hoping you never have to be held responsible for choices made without the benefit of hindsight.
Fauci was well informed from the beginning. In February of 2020 Fauci knew the structure of the virus, and was already talking about a vaccine being in the works. Fauci knew experiments were ongoing with gain of function on the SARS virus since 2014, and was well aware of the gain of function research being done by Ecohealth Alliance at the Wuhan lab.

It wasn't hindsight.
 
While it probably wasn't perfect, there was a pandemic response plan in place that Trump and his administration threw out upon entering office.

As I recall the Trump administration didn't fully fund the plan going in, and then when it was actually needed we quickly discovered that there were numerous elements of it that simply didn't work,.. One big issue was that at the start, the CDC had sole responsibility for development, manufacture and distribution of all vaccines,.. For an isolated outbreak this makes some sense, but for a national event it was totally inadequate, as the CDC was immediately overwhelmed...
 
Agree with most of this, including Trump’s complete incompetence. But it wasn’t that he “ignored” Covid. Quite the opposite. Daily panic briefings with Fauci/Birks, operation warp speed, criticism of governors like DeSantis and Kemp for reopening…
 
Some on here have been asking for a commission to examine and learn from our Covid response.
Nobody seems to want to revisit those decisions (and take ownership of them) for some reason.

1.2M Americans dead; thousands of others dealing with the effects of Long Covid.
I think we did fine.

Idiots seem to think that scientists and policymakers have some kind of crystal ball, to see the future.

You've completely forgotten what the deaths numbers looked like 1 month in, how we were running out of supplies/PPE and how no one knew what medications would work to keep people alive.
 
He gave you the most important thing that would come out of an after action report. There was a playbook based on past pandemic events, from after action reports. Because it was written by Obama, Cheeto and crew threw it out. There was also an office in China set up as an early warning station to monitor for early signs of a pandemic. Cheeto closed that office after Bannon told him to do so.
Weird that we would need that office in China. Why not Belgium?

As if we were lied to deliberately about covid being a lab leak by the very people that were supposed to protect us and illegally funded gain of function research in China.
 
1.2M Americans dead; thousands of others dealing with the effects of Long Covid.
I think we did fine.

Idiots seem to think that scientists and policymakers have some kind of crystal ball, to see the future.

You've completely forgotten what the deaths numbers looked like 1 month in, how we were running out of supplies/PPE and how no one knew what medications would work to keep people alive.
Look at the liar in residence continuing to sell his bullshit.
 
A reminder of how it went.

First Biden and Pelosi called people Xenophobes and racists when they suggested we may want to avoid incoming flights from China.

When the president kept calling it the “Chinese virus” he was berated as a racist even as Communist Party of China officials lied that the bug had been spread by the American military.

Then CNN complained that the president’s coronavirus task force exemplified the “Trump administration’s lack of diversity,” as if race or gender were more important than assembling the best brains.

Meanwhile, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, rather than concentrating on not botching the rollout of coronavirus test kits, spent time clogging its COVID-19 public-information Web page with gratuitous admonitions about “stigma.”

At the top of the CDC “Frequently Asked Questions” page, two of four items headlined “Basics” are about stigma: “How can people help stop stigma related to COVID-19?”

Under “Symptoms and Testing,” one-third of topics involve stigma.

You have to scroll past these irrelevancies to find important health information, such as “Can the virus . . . be spread through food” and “How can I protect my child.

Then of course, the CDC and the left magically decided at the same time that it was perfectly safe to protest the police but dangerous as hell to be on the beach in Florida.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hawkedoff
Then CNN complained that the president’s coronavirus task force exemplified the “Trump administration’s lack of diversity,” as if race or gender were more important than assembling the best brains.

Meanwhile, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, rather than concentrating on not botching the rollout of coronavirus test kits, spent time clogging its COVID-19 public-information Web page with gratuitous admonitions about “stigma.”

At the top of the CDC “Frequently Asked Questions” page, two of four items headlined “Basics” are about stigma: “How can people help stop stigma related to COVID-19?”

Under “Symptoms and Testing,” one-third of topics involve stigma.

You have to scroll past these irrelevancies to find important health information, such as “Can the virus . . . be spread through food” and “How can I protect my child.

Then of course, the CDC and the left magically decided at the same time that it was perfectly safe to protest the police but dangerous as hell to be on the beach in Florida.
You are literally making shit up here.
 
Nice to see it is STILL political.

Call me a fool, but I'll take a physicians advice over a politicians any day when it comes to my welfare.
 
  • Like
Reactions: srams21
You are literally making shit up here.

Biden wasn't President then.

Have any direct quotes?
“You know we have right now a crisis with the coronavirus, emanating from China," Biden said then. "The national emergency and worldwide alerts. The American people need to have a president who they can trust what he says about it. That he is going to act rationally about it. In moments like this, this is where the credibility of a president is most needed, as he explains what we should and should not do. This is no time for Donald Trump's record of hysterical xenophobia and fear mongering to lead the way instead of science."

 

Toxic: How the search for the origins of COVID-19 turned politically poisonous

DAKE KANG and MARIA CHENG
Updated Mon, April 22, 2024 at 5:21 AM CDT·14 min read

607

FILE - A security person moves journalists away from the Wuhan Institute of Virology after a World Health Organization team arrived for a field visit in Wuhan in China's Hubei province on Feb. 3, 2021. The hunt for COVID-19 origins has gone dark in China. An AP investigation drawing on thousands of pages of undisclosed emails and documents and dozens of interviews found feuding officials and fear of blame ended meaningful Chinese and international efforts to trace the virus almost as soon as they began, despite years of public statements to the contrary. (AP Photo/Ng Han Guan, File)

FILE - A volunteer looks out near a Chinese national flag during a farewell ceremony for the last group of medical workers who came from outside Wuhan to help the city during the coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan in central China's Hubei province on April 15, 2020. The hunt for COVID-19 origins has gone dark in China. An AP investigation drawing on thousands of pages of undisclosed emails and documents and dozens of interviews found feuding officials and fear of blame ended meaningful Chinese and international efforts to trace the virus almost as soon as they began, despite years of public statements to the contrary. (AP Photo/Ng Han Guan, File)

1 / 9

China Covid Origins​

FILE - A security person moves journalists away from the Wuhan Institute of Virology after a World Health Organization team arrived for a field visit in Wuhan in China's Hubei province on Feb. 3, 2021. The hunt for COVID-19 origins has gone dark in China. An AP investigation drawing on thousands of pages of undisclosed emails and documents and dozens of interviews found feuding officials and fear of blame ended meaningful Chinese and international efforts to trace the virus almost as soon as they began, despite years of public statements to the contrary. (AP Photo/Ng Han Guan, File)
ASSOCIATED PRESS
More

BEIJING (AP) — The hunt for the origins of COVID-19 has gone dark in China, the victim of political infighting after a series of stalled and thwarted attempts to find the source of the virus that killed millions and paralyzed the world for months.
The Chinese government froze meaningful domestic and international efforts to trace the virus from the first weeks of the outbreak, despite statements supporting open scientific inquiry, an Associated Press investigation found. That pattern continues to this day, with labs closed, collaborations shattered, foreign scientists forced out and Chinese researchers barred from leaving the country.
The investigation drew on thousands of pages of undisclosed emails and documents and dozens of interviews that showed the freeze began far earlier than previously known and involved political and scientific infighting in China as much as international finger-pointing.
As early as Jan. 6, 2020, health officials in Beijing closed the lab of a Chinese scientist who sequenced the virus and barred researchers from working with him.
Scientists warn the willful blindness over coronavirus’ origins leaves the world vulnerable to another outbreak, potentially undermining pandemic treaty talks coordinated by the World Health Organization set to culminate in May.
At the heart of the question is whether the virus jumped from an animal or came from a laboratory accident. A U.S. intelligence analysis says there is insufficient evidence to prove either theory, but the debate has further tainted relations between the U.S. and China.
Unlike in the U.S., there is virtually no public debate in China about whether the virus came from nature or from a lab leak. In fact, there is little public discussion at all about the source of the disease, first detected in the central city of Wuhan.
Crucial initial efforts were hampered by bureaucrats in Wuhan trying to avoid blame who misled the central government; the central government, which muzzled Chinese scientists and subjected visiting WHO officials to stage-managed tours; and the U.N. health agency itself, which may have compromised early opportunities to gather critical information in hopes that by placating China, scientists could gain more access, according to internal materials obtained by AP.
In a faxed statement, China's Foreign Ministry defended China’s handling of research into the origins, saying the country is open and transparent, shared data and research, and “made the greatest contribution to global origins research.” The National Health Commission, China's top medical authority, said the country “invested huge manpower, material and financial resources” and “has not stopped looking for the origins of the coronavirus.”
It could have played out differently, as shown by the outbreak of SARS, a genetic relative of COVID-19, nearly 20 years ago. China initially hid infections then, but WHO complained swiftly and publicly. Ultimately, Beijing fired officials and made reforms. The U.N. agency soon found SARS likely jumped to humans from civet cats in southern China and international scientists later collaborated with their Chinese counterparts to pin down bats as SARS’ natural reservoir.
But different leaders of both China and WHO, China’s quest for control of its researchers, and global tensions have all led to silence when it comes to searching for COVID-19’s origins. Governments in Asia are pressuring scientists not to look for the virus for fear it could be traced inside their borders.
Even without those complications, experts say identifying how outbreaks begin is incredibly challenging and that it’s rare to know with certainty how some viruses begin spreading.
“It’s disturbing how quickly the search for the origins of (COVID-19) escalated into politics,” said Mark Woolhouse, a University of Edinburgh outbreak expert. “Now this question may never be definitively answered.”

CLICK TO READ FULL ARTICLE:
 
  • Like
Reactions: binsfeldcyhawk2
It was ALL guess work. Fauci, the WHO and many others were wrong and an entire generation of children are fvcked because of it. Again, they let the NEA write protocol. Tell me again about Randi Weingarten's medical expertise.
Outside of the Spring of 2020 there was no mandate to close schools at a national level. If schools were closed that was done at the local level. You are trying to blame these people for decisions made by local school boards. Seems like an overreach.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT