ADVERTISEMENT

"1. Get as many illegals in the country as possible. 2. Legalize them to create a permanent majority – a one-party state."

New Biden rules for ICE point to fewer arrests and deportations, and a more restrained agency​


Itemize them for us, Cletus.

Cite the specific regulation, not something from a rightwing blog.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fsu1jreed

Biden Tries To Rein In ICE: New Rules Limit Who Immigration Agents Target for Arrest​



"Obama-era policies... set a dangerous precedent for the non-enforcement of the immigration laws of the United States in the name of prioritizing scarce ICE resources," said Andrew Arthur, a former immigration judge who is now at the Center for Immigration Studies, a nonprofit in Washington that advocates for lower levels of immigration.

MAGA judge is a less than credible source.
Have any that are politically impartial? Because that judge sounds like a racist.
 

New Biden rules for ICE point to fewer arrests and deportations, and a more restrained agency​


“The pendulum swing is so extreme. It literally feels like we’ve gone from the ability to fully enforce our immigration laws to now being told to enforce nothing.”

This is NOT what the policy states. That ICE officer sounds like a whiny little bitch
 

Biden Tries To Rein In ICE: New Rules Limit Who Immigration Agents Target for Arrest​


John Sandweg, an acting director of ICE during the Obama administration, said the preliminary guidance was a good step toward improving the agency’s public image and the quality of its work. “No one judges the FBI by the number of arrests they make. They judge them by the quality of arrests,” Sandweg said.

Measuring ICE’s performance according to the number of arrests and deportations, as Trump did, is “not a recipe for good law enforcement,” he said. “It’s a recipe for jacking up stats with the low-hanging fruit of the law enforcement system.”

The narrower priorities, he said, “will focus agents on getting dangerous people off the street.”
 


Are you saying this isn’t factual?

Because if you are trying to say that, you’re a lying sack of shit.

Musk is 100% right.

1. It shifts things to area with more people, not necessarily more immigrants.

2. If it provides more money and power, why would Rep governors be spending money to transport that money and power generating asset to Dem areas?
 
1. It shifts things to area with more people, not necessarily more immigrants.

2. If it provides more money and power, why would Rep governors be spending money to transport that money and power generating asset to Dem areas?

Not to mention Elon makes it sound like it’s something new, when it’s literally written into the constitution.
 
It contained zero compromises to what either the Senate or WH would sign off on.

Not how democracy works, Cletus.

So the House was supposed to open with compromises that it thought the Senate would like to see?,.. Not how it works.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: BelemNole
So the House was supposed to open with compromises that it thought the Senate would like to see?,.. Not how it works.

Well, the senate started with a bipartisan approach.

Rifled, I generally think you’re a smart post even tho we disagree on politics. Please don’t even try to argue the House GOP bill, which at no point was ever even discussed with House Dems prior to the vote, was a serious bill.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SocraticIshmael
Well, the senate started with a bipartisan approach.

Rifled, I generally think you’re a smart post even tho we disagree on politics. Please don’t even try to argue the House GOP bill, which at no point was ever even discussed with House Dems prior to the vote, was a serious bill.

He's not a smart poster. He continually posts the rightwing crap he sees on Fox and OAN.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SocraticIshmael
So the Dems are playing the looooonnnnggggg game.

Of course they are.

1. Let illegals in. Give them handouts.

2. Illegals that you have given freebies to end up having children. Those children vote.

3. Illegals count in the census resulting in more electoral power.

4. Constantly push for amnesty and hope that everyone ultimately capitulates.
 
Well, the senate started with a bipartisan approach.

Rifled, I generally think you’re a smart post even tho we disagree on politics. Please don’t even try to argue the House GOP bill, which at no point was ever even discussed with House Dems prior to the vote, was a serious bill.

Of course House developed HR2 was a pipe dream,..But from the Senate's perspective it needed to be a starting point for the conversation,.. If that's what this Senate bill is supposed to be, there's a very big separation to be negotiated here.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT