There it is.
You're backed into a corner where you know you can't answer the questions honestly without contradicting your entire position.
And you keep claiming I won't consider other "opinions". That's nonsense. I won't consider "alternative facts". Alternative facts aren't real. They're ideas deluded people believe to keep their twisted worldview intact.
I asked you 4 questions that should easily be able to be answered with a simple yes or no and all 4 of those questions have only one correct answer that isn't an "opinion". The answers are objective, indisputable facts. Anyone not acknowledging those facts is biased and deluded. There's a very obvious reason why you dodged the questions.
Again, I owe you nothing. Believe what you want, you have ALREADY shown that is what you do NO MATTER what I say. I made that decision PRIOR to your perceived "gotcha" questions. Which in NO WAY are even close to that. I have just decided there is NO POINT in continuing this with you.
We are to the point that we are basically saying the same things over and over to each other in somewhat different formats. Now, I am happy to let the legal parts play out and see how that goes.
Lastly, for the future record, my confidence in his being found not guilty of felony charges are as follows:
1.) Florida-I think these are a joke and I wouldn't be surprised if this gets dropped prior to actually going to trial.
2.) D.C.- There is no way in hell you can prove he in ANY WAY coordinated the January 6th riot, nor does his asking for Pence to "Do his job" consititute anything to convict of these charges.
3.) New York-Everyone does their best to maximize their value when it benefits them and minimize it when they have to pay taxes. I am sure he has done enough to warrant some form of civil sanctions, but I am still very doubtful his actions reached felonious levels. Still, after seeing the civil case proceedings so far, I could see a jury of his "peers" convicting the rich guy for using the system to get richer.
4.)Georgia- If they do get him, I think it will be here. Unlike the D.C. mobs, he had direct connections to these people that have all taken deals. As such, they can at least give testimony that can try to show a direct link to Trump and show him as the "ring leader". Now, I am still far from believing they will be credible enough to do more than SAY they were following his orders. Without a memo, text, email or some other proof of direct contact, this case proving his guilt will still almost certainly come down to whether or not the jury believes any negative witness testimony, beyond a reasonable doubt. With that said, I will say that if they get Trump on any felonies this is the case it happens...
Feel free to use the above once the cases come to conclusion. Until then, I am not going down this road with you any further. Much like you said to me while insulting me, "take that how you will"..