ADVERTISEMENT

***2024 Presidential Debate Thread****



This clip may be the most egregious example of ABC debate moderators' direct actions/inactions to affect viewers’ perceptions of the information presented at the debate.

There are at least seven instances of this within a two-minute span.

This is not “bias."

It’s much worse.

This is direct, planned interference in the debate outcome. When moderators take on the role of “fact checkers" the inference is that the absence of a “fact check” confers validity to the non-fact-checked information.

When one side is repeatedly “fact checked,” while the other is not, that is a signal to the viewer that one side is not reliable and truthful, while the other side is.

The ABC moderators had their orders, and here you see those orders executed.

In this clip:

1) Trump says Pelosi is responsible for security at the Capitol. True. Muir intervenes on Kamala’s behalf by cutting him off with snarky retort, doesn’t acknowledging the validity of Trump’s statement, and immediately redirects to Kamala to set up her “answer" he knows is coming. This is direct action by Muir to affect the outcome of this exchange.

2) Kamala says she was at the Capitol on J6. She was there in the morning, but left to go to DNC HQ prior to the riot. Critical information is omitted. No fact-check.

3) Kamala says Trump incited a mob to attack the Capitol. False. Trump’s “peacefully and patriotically” comments are ignored. Trump is not charged with inciting violence. No fact check.

4) Kamala says that “some" police officers died on January 6. False. No fact check.

5) Kamala recites the Charlottesville “Fine People” hoax. This has been thoroughly and repeatedly debunked. No fact check.

6) Kamala recites the “stand back and stand by” hoax. This is designed to infer that Trump was ordering a “militia” to act on later orders, when he was clearly asking for a cooling of tensions. No fact check.

7) Kamala recites the “bloodbath" hoax. Trump was talking about the automobile industry, not violence. No fact check.

To quote Megyn Kelly on the ABC moderators:

"They did exactly what their bosses wanted."
 
She got her citizenship 6 years ago....... after immigrating... lulz.

On Aug. 26, Canton police charged a 27-year-old woman with animal cruelty and disorderly conduct after she “did torture, kill, and eat a cat in a residential area in front (of) multiple people,” according to a police report.

But Allexis Ferrell is not Haitian. She was born in Ohio and graduated from Canton’s McKinley High School in 2015, according to public records and newspaper reports. Court records show she has been in and out of trouble with the law since at least 2017. Messages seeking comment were not returned by several attorneys who have represented her.

She is being held in Stark County jail pending a competency hearing next month, according to the prosecutor’s office.



Wow just wow. Whiskey you may want to walk away from the computer, you are starting to go off the rails like Trump LOL.

 


This clip may be the most egregious example of ABC debate moderators' direct actions/inactions to affect viewers’ perceptions of the information presented at the debate.

There are at least seven instances of this within a two-minute span.

This is not “bias."

It’s much worse.

This is direct, planned interference in the debate outcome. When moderators take on the role of “fact checkers" the inference is that the absence of a “fact check” confers validity to the non-fact-checked information.

When one side is repeatedly “fact checked,” while the other is not, that is a signal to the viewer that one side is not reliable and truthful, while the other side is.

The ABC moderators had their orders, and here you see those orders executed.

In this clip:

1) Trump says Pelosi is responsible for security at the Capitol. True. Muir intervenes on Kamala’s behalf by cutting him off with snarky retort, doesn’t acknowledging the validity of Trump’s statement, and immediately redirects to Kamala to set up her “answer" he knows is coming. This is direct action by Muir to affect the outcome of this exchange.

2) Kamala says she was at the Capitol on J6. She was there in the morning, but left to go to DNC HQ prior to the riot. Critical information is omitted. No fact-check.

3) Kamala says Trump incited a mob to attack the Capitol. False. Trump’s “peacefully and patriotically” comments are ignored. Trump is not charged with inciting violence. No fact check.

4) Kamala says that “some" police officers died on January 6. False. No fact check.

5) Kamala recites the Charlottesville “Fine People” hoax. This has been thoroughly and repeatedly debunked. No fact check.

6) Kamala recites the “stand back and stand by” hoax. This is designed to infer that Trump was ordering a “militia” to act on later orders, when he was clearly asking for a cooling of tensions. No fact check.

7) Kamala recites the “bloodbath" hoax. Trump was talking about the automobile industry, not violence. No fact check.

To quote Megyn Kelly on the ABC moderators:

"They did exactly what their bosses wanted."

You live in la la land.

The Orange Turd was given last word on virtually every topic. Harris was smart enough to let his incoherent rambles he the last word.

You MAGAs are so damned stupid.
 
Read the last few pages here and see WDT is being willfully ignorant and ****ing stupid once again
2a246f1f-9bec-49ad-ba99-7a5e28ff0617_text.gif
 




I feel like Democrats have lied so much and so oftened about January 6th 2021 that these communications never even happened in their eyes. They will never admit or acknowledge them. They aren’t brought up.

Kind of like how Kamala was never the border czar despite a publicly televised conference with Joe Biden saying she was the border czar.

Unreal.

Shitlibs
 
  • Haha
Reactions: fivecardstud14
And for those of you who need to see the post birth abortion quote:
"If a mother is in labor, I can tell you exactly what would happen," Northam said. "The infant would be delivered, the infant would be kept comfortable, the infant would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desired. And then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother."


Meanwhile Kamala couldn't even say she was against 9 month abortions.
You know that right now, in every state, family could conceivably ask that there baby not be resuscitated. The physicians might not go along, but they could ask. And there are always discussions between the family and physician about the extent of resuscitation. What’s wrong with you?

As far as full term abortions here is the story. They don’t happen except in extreme cases. The baby is dead or dying with a non survivable condition. The mother’s dying. If the baby is able to survive it’s not an abortion it’s not an abortion it’s a delivery.

What you and your ilk want is for late term abortions to be outlawed. Then, when a mother dies because of her pregnancy, you will shrug your shoulders and congratulate yourself on how pro life you are.
 
You live in la la land.

The Orange Turd was given last word on virtually every topic. Harris was smart enough to let his incoherent rambles he the last word.

You MAGAs are so damned stupid.



Mike DeWine just held a press conference about the Haitian situation in Springfield:

1) Springfield's healthcare system is strained because many of the Haitians have never been to a hospital

2) That means there's roughly 15,000 people (his number) that may have never received a vaccination, etc

3) The schools are also strained, and there's a big need for language services

4) On Road Safety: There aren't that many cars in Haiti and most people don't drive. Many of migrants don't have licences and have never received driver training. That's creating obvious problems

5) On the Housing Problem: They're seeing people bunched together in homes. The cost of rent is up.

6) They've been consulting about this for months (*cough* thanks Elon for bringing this to the national stage so it's finally addressed publicly)

What they've done so far:

1) Providing drivers ed

2) A new health clinic in the schools

3) Provided support to the local health department

4) Provided funds for translation services and English classes

5) Providing support for the surge of migrant students

What they're going to do next:

1) They're going to surge troopers and patrol cars. This begins tomorrow morning.

2) They're going to dramatically expand access to primary care. A couple million over the next two years.

Federal Government Inaction:

1) It's Federal Government Policy that have created this surge.

2) They're also seeing surges in Findlay and Lima (30 minute drive from me)

3) No community can be prepared for surges like these, and the consequences listed above are the natural result.

4) The Federal Government has to step up because it's their policies causing the problem.

5) These surges are affecting everyone in the community.

6) Lots of talk about how it's American to accept migrants. But, in this case there seems to be no plan.

7) He's not going to address any of the stories coming out about people eating animals. He wanted to address the essential facts. (rightfully so, it's a red herring, the people are what matter)

8) We don't have a good border policy and we need a good border policy.

9) Lots of dumb questions from reporters, so I stopped here, lol.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: RileyHawk


Mike DeWine just held a press conference about the Haitian situation in Springfield:

1) Springfield's healthcare system is strained because many of the Haitians have never been to a hospital

2) That means there's roughly 15,000 people (his number) that may have never received a vaccination, etc

3) The schools are also strained, and there's a big need for language services

4) On Road Safety: There aren't that many cars in Haiti and most people don't drive. Many of migrants don't have licences and have never received driver training. That's creating obvious problems

5) On the Housing Problem: They're seeing people bunched together in homes. The cost of rent is up.

6) They've been consulting about this for months (*cough* thanks Elon for bringing this to the national stage so it's finally addressed publicly)

What they've done so far:

1) Providing drivers ed

2) A new health clinic in the schools

3) Provided support to the local health department

4) Provided funds for translation services and English classes

5) Providing support for the surge of migrant students

What they're going to do next:

1) They're going to surge troopers and patrol cars. This begins tomorrow morning.

2) They're going to dramatically expand access to primary care. A couple million over the next two years.

Federal Government Inaction:

1) It's Federal Government Policy that have created this surge.

2) They're also seeing surges in Findlay and Lima (30 minute drive from me)

3) No community can be prepared for surges like these, and the consequences listed above are the natural result.

4) The Federal Government has to step up because it's their policies causing the problem.

5) These surges are affecting everyone in the community.

6) Lots of talk about how it's American to accept migrants. But, in this case there seems to be no plan.

7) He's not going to address any of the stories coming out about people eating animals. He wanted to address the essential facts. (rightfully so, it's a red herring, the people are what matter)

8) We don't have a good border policy and we need a good border policy.

9) Lots of dumb questions from reporters, so I stopped here, lol.
So nothing about them eating animals, got it.
 
So nothing about them eating animals, got it.

Being them in, dump them on locals, enlarge and expand every government agency and budget pertaining to overseeing foreign nationals using up social services. Screw over every private insurer and private insurance customer in auto & home insurance industries. Screw every renter and every would be homeowner with higher home prices and more expensive insurance.

Call anyone who objects xenophobic.

That about sum it up?
 
So Trump was right.

Why didn’t the moderators fact check Kamala Harris on this? Strange.

Of course Liberals didn’t do their homework and shot off at the mouth. Useful idiots in this thread.

Hi @wausauhawk



This isn’t rape, incest, physical health of the mother. The language is whether the pregnancy affects the “mental health” of the mother, which is vague enough to certify any unwanted pregnancy in the third trimester, including up to 40 weeks.

Of course Liberals tried to get this passed, then lied and gaslit ever since it was exposed.
 
Last edited:
You know that right now, in every state, family could conceivably ask that there baby not be resuscitated. The physicians might not go along, but they could ask. And there are always discussions between the family and physician about the extent of resuscitation. What’s wrong with you?

As far as full term abortions here is the story. They don’t happen except in extreme cases. The baby is dead or dying with a non survivable condition. The mother’s dying. If the baby is able to survive it’s not an abortion it’s not an abortion it’s a delivery.

What you and your ilk want is for late term abortions to be outlawed. Then, when a mother dies because of her pregnancy, you will shrug your shoulders and congratulate yourself on how pro life you are.
What me and my "ilk" want is free choice for the first trimester and then an exception for rape, incest, and health concerns.





What trump said, was accurate, the guy did infact say the decision could be made post delivery.
 
What me and my "ilk" want is free choice for the first trimester and then an exception for rape, incest, and health concerns.





What trump said, was accurate, the guy did infact say the decision could be made post delivery.

That was in the context of continued resuscitation and everyone knows that. There is no sane person who endorses after birth abortion for a healthy infant. Youre floating a red herring.

Are you equating a difficult decision for cessation of life support with an abortion? If so, is the elderly person who chooses to not be on a ventilator guilty of self abortion?
 
That was in the context of continued resuscitation and everyone knows that. There is no sane person who endorses after birth abortion for a healthy infant. Youre floating a red herring.

Are you equating a difficult decision for cessation of life support with an abortion? If so, is the elderly person who chooses to not be on a ventilator guilty of self abortion?
No.

Read what I wrote again.



But I did provide you the quote Trump referenced, whoch sure as shit talks about killing the baby post birth.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: RileyHawk
No.

Read what I wrote again.



But I did provide you the quote Trump referenced, whoch sure as shit talks about killing the baby post birth.
Read the attached article which states the context of the statement. At no time in no way was this bill referencing a healthy baby. Those are not aborted. Put another way, the article I attached say six states have no restrictions on abortions and those states aren’t aborting healthy babies. They are delivering healthy babies.

 
Read the attached article which states the context of the statement. At no time in no way was this bill referencing a healthy baby. Those are not aborted. Put another way, the article I attached say six states have no restrictions on abortions and those states aren’t aborting healthy babies. They are delivering healthy babies.

He won't read that. He prefers to not know what's actually going on and just continue to scream his own fake bullshit that has been proven wrong.
 
You live in la la land.

The Orange Turd was given last word on virtually every topic. Harris was smart enough to let his incoherent rambles he the last word.

You MAGAs are so damned stupid.

trump also then was able to have several more opportunities to lie. Maybe that was a good thing, but I was yelling at the tv set for the moderator to shut him up. I thought they had the option to mute them.
 
Read the attached article which states the context of the statement. At no time in no way was this bill referencing a healthy baby. Those are not aborted. Put another way, the article I attached say six states have no restrictions on abortions and those states aren’t aborting healthy babies. They are delivering healthy babies.

Who said anything about "healthy"..


This doctor said the baby would be born, alive, even if that means resuscitation to bring it back to life and then a decision would be made.

That's what Trump said he said.... and it's an actual quote.
 
Who said anything about "healthy"..


This doctor said the baby would be born, alive, even if that means resuscitation and then a decision would be made.

That's what Trump said he said.... and it's an actual quote.
What are we even talking about? Having a discussion about whether to do life preserving measures for a child that will not be able to continue life? Is that really what you are trying to go after here? I am very confused
 
  • Like
Reactions: RileyHawk
The infamous quote Trump throws around about aborting a baby post birth.


I provided the direct quote earlier.
Yes and in either case as discussed above that isn't abortion, that is not continuing life support on a baby that is unable to survive on its own. Do you say we abort adults when we take them off of life support. I am sorry, but we had to abort your grandpa today and age 92, he had been on live support for 3 days, and per his POA and durable will, we removed life support.
 
What are we even talking about? Having a discussion about whether to do life preserving measures for a child that will not be able to continue life? Is that really what you are trying to go after here? I am very confused
They’d have us believe this is fairly common, when it fact it’s incredibly rare. On those rare occasions, there’s something terribly wrong with the baby. They are NOT having this conversation regarding a healthy newborn.
 
Yup, and his dumbass "ShE wAs aN ImMiGrAnT!!!!!" stupidity reminds me a lot of that time he attempted to bring back the Pizzagate story and convince us all that was true because some pedophile said the word pizza when talking about a kid.

Didn’t WDD, for a while, play the centrist both sides angle?
 
They’d have us believe this is fairly common, when it fact it’s incredibly rare. On those rare occasions, there’s something terribly wrong with the baby. They are NOT having this conversation regarding a healthy newborn.
This conversation only occurs when the life expectancy is 0. Usually no lungs, partially developed brain or heart, some vital organ that is not there than they cannot fix with surgeries, and anymore they can fix a lot. Classmate of mines son has basically had a heart completely rebuilt. Have no idea how or why. In either case they can do some magical stuff. This is just crazy.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT