This.The seeds were based off the current rankings. Iowa having only 8 ranked wrestlers= only 8 NQs = max of 8 AAs
Until a wrestler is in the top 33 rankings (or seeds, as I will do this throughout the year), they do not make it into the model.
This.The seeds were based off the current rankings. Iowa having only 8 ranked wrestlers= only 8 NQs = max of 8 AAs
He’s going to be hard to beat!!Lilledahl is most likely going to AA at a minimum , barring injuries of course . So 7 or more is probably accurate .
I was really impressed with Bastida last year, so that will be a great test for him.Absolutely, his match against Masoumi gave me a lot of confidence. We will find out quick how good Kueter is with ISU being the 3rd week of the season.
dude you must be in risk management,you sure know how to suck the fun out of wrestling
My guess is, Ben, will continue to ADD good size and continue on his mission to become BIG Ben! He will be a VERY tuff out against almost anyone and if he ever got on the special stuff, he could dang well WIN IT this year!!! He is only missing the HorsePower!Undersized compared to Kerk, Hendrickson, and Schultz, but he’s coming in the same size (Weight) as Bastida/Feldman. I think Kueter will place between 4-6, he has shown that despite being smaller the big guys still cannot horse him around.
And now he has to do all across 3 days in March.Not that I’m disagreeing with the order of the list, but I’m disagreeing with your statement on Arnold. He had wins over a 2x AA (that almost died and couldn’t compete at NCAAs), the guy that took 6th, and an AA up a weight last year. He had significant wins and specifically the Wolak win is against this field. And that was just last year. He’s beaten the guy that was the runner up multiple times through their careers.
Based on what? The guy has gone to 4 NCAA Tournaments and has AA'd every time. When it comes to being an AA, he is probably the most reliable option on the entire team....As much as I like Parco I feel as though he has the greatest chance to disappoint this year.
How much do you like him?As much as I like Parco I feel as though he has the greatest chance to disappoint this year.
I’m with you. Gotta give me something besides that nothing statement.How much do you like him?
125 - Peterson Hope he levels us, but not counting on anything125- I hope Peterson can handle the weight and stays healthy and competes hard. No clue need to see more
133- Ayala will be on the podium. How high depends on how much strength he gained going up. He has the tools we will see if has the HP. Top 4
141- Block, trying to read in between the lines and my best guess is he is going to be shot out of a cannon and will have a major impact. Can he carry this through march is the question. He is an athlete and stronger then he looks, My guess is he is in the mix to AA 50/50
149- Parco is going to thrive in our environment! Top 4
157- Teemer just needs to stay healthy and will be a factor come March. Top 4
165- Calstar Breaks out to become our leader with dominating wins. Top 3
174- Kennedy or Arnold will be on the podium 3-8
184- BRANDS will AA here 3-8
197- Buckshot 1-5
285- Big Ben will shock the masses 2-6
If we are healthy we get 8 on the podium, Im going to really enjoy this season.
The weight class and who I think could and should AABased on what? The guy has gone to 4 NCAA Tournaments and has AA'd every time. When it comes to being an AA, he is probably the most reliable option on the entire team....
As much as my red headed step child I guess.How much do you like him?
So, your answer is:The weight class and who I think could and should AA
Lol. You are the one saying a guy that is 4for4 at the weight is likely to not AA. I can MAYBE stretch it to favor Henson, Watters, Van Ness and Lovett over him, but it isn't like he can't beat those guys. After that, the weight class drops to a couple mid-tier AA's coming up from 141 and then drops quite a bit after them.Well for one the draw will matter alot. Off of international rankings and keeping it quick the top 8 I really do believe they will AA and from 9 to 15 I do see a sneaky win coming. I'm picking parco as the one that will not make it if any of them, that is all.
Maybe not enlightening but it's my take.
Now let's hear your long winded story about how wrong i am and how you are so gifted! My savoir, straighten me out!
Is there a reason you feel there might be disappointment with Parco?And just for the record, I did say the best chance at disappoi tment, not that he won't AA.
You didn't give a reason. You just said the 4 time AA Parco is the one you pick to disappoint. Just a random prediction?Read above
I’m with you. In looking at the possible AA obstacles I see 4 or 5 potentials that could take him out. Like you I see Parco as one of our better bets even in a tough weight class.So, your answer is:
1.) The weight class in which he has AA'd the last 4 straight years.
2.) Who "should" AA.
Please enlighten me on what 8 guys(bare minimum) "should" AA over a guy that has done it 4 years in a row? On top of that, WHY should they? I tried very hard to figure that out and I simply can not....
No worries. The more hostile the response, the better!I did blow up a bit at the end of the post.
Honestly though what other hawk do you think has a harder path to AA? Of the ones that are penciled in to AA.
I guess our fundamental difference lies in weighting past results. To me, a guy that has done it the last 4 years gets more credit than just about anyone short of a returning, rather dominant finalist. Some guys simply know how to bring their best and navigate that bracket in March. 4for4 clearly tells me he is one of those guys.Ok here it goes, big deep breath and 10 min of typing g because I'm a slow typer.
Ayala should be a favorite to high AA
Teemer well it's Teemer and it's a watered down 157 this year
Mikey he proved last year he is second to only one
Brands/Arnold I don't see who they can't beat after the top 4
Buch it's his to win
Kueter will be a NC just not this year
This leaves parco and a solid top 15 he's not coming in above 6th sorry, so yes the most likely to not AA.
Looks like 125 is going to be an interesting cut. He looks like a good sized 133 to me there.I know it's freestyle and a different weight class, but this gave me some more optimism for KP.
6+ year guys often regress. We've seen a ton of it with the covid years. I think he places, but wouldn't be surprised if he doesn't. First year in a much deeper conference + 6 years of D1 wrestling might mean he's pretty worn down by tournament time. All it takes is a couple bad matches.I guess our fundamental difference lies in weighting past results. To me, a guy that has done it the last 4 years gets more credit than just about anyone short of a returning, rather dominant finalist. Some guys simply know how to bring their best and navigate that bracket in March. 4for4 clearly tells me he is one of those guys.
If he was a 1x mid level AA, I could see where you are coming from. But, to me, picking against him comes very close to the classic "insanity" definition: Doing the same thing over and over again, expecting different results....
^yes^6+ year guys often regress. We've seen a ton of it with the covid years. I think he places, but wouldn't be surprised if he doesn't. First year in a much deeper conference + 6 years of D1 wrestling might mean he's pretty worn down by tournament time. All it takes is a couple bad matches.
Lugo was 2 years out of high school when he transferred to Iowa. Silly, silly comparison. Nobody transfers with the intention to get worse.He switched schools to get to the top of the podium could be wrong, but Parco is more like Lugo then some of these six year guys that may have withered
All the guys you mentioned AAd comfortability in their senior year.Lugo was 2 years out of high school when he transferred to Iowa. Silly, silly comparison. Nobody transfers with the intention to get worse.
It has less to do with where Parco is now than how long he's been in school. I would have the same regression and/or injury concerns for him at ASU. It's a long time to compete in college. We see it all the time now.
I think he places, but regression or injury is a real possibility. Same goes for Teemer. And Nelson. Just to use the last couple years of hawks as an example, Spencer, Woods, Marinelli, Kemerer, Cass, and Warner all finished their careers on the downslope compared to previous years, whether it was injury, general wear and tear, or burnout.