Vivian brought in some super recruits that included girls considered #1 in their class.
Better yet but none as good.
Vivian brought in some super recruits that included girls considered #1 in their class.
You don't need to go to class, and you get NIL money from the eyelash and nail crowd.
Not picking a fight here.My remark was based on observations I made on the televised State Tournament game, and I realize Lewis is more highly regarded. IMO Levin's performance was the best I saw during the games, so what's the big deal?
B/C Jenna is higher rated as a recruit she is entitled to better performances?
Deal had neither a UConn nor a South Carolina offer (assuming you meant S. Carolina and not USC).It's terrific Iowa (Bluder) can go to-toe with the UConns and SCs.
another Hannah would be great. Curious how the scholarship room looks for 2025 and 2026 now.What Coach Bluder needs now is an enforcer in the 6'3" range and agile.
Ummm...did you watch the final minutes of the SEC final the other day???What is this, hockey?
Stop not wanting Maddyn Greenway to come to Iowa. You did a good job in helping to land Deal...........don't blow your good will up so soon.Do you know her personally?
Deal had neither a UConn nor a South Carolina offer (assuming you meant S. Carolina and not USC).
What a stupid post.It's terrific Iowa (Bluder) can go to-toe with the UConns and SCs.
Get off your lazy ass Ferentz and start recruiting like a grown-up.
My remark was based on observations I made on the televised State Tournament game, and I realize Lewis is more highly regarded. IMO Levin's performance was the best I saw during the games, so what's the big deal?
B/C Jenna is higher rated as a recruit she is entitled to better performances?
I would include UConn, South Carolina, LSU, Stanford, and Notre Dame as the truly ELITE schools that basically clear the rest in terms of recruiting. I'd then put Louisville right below them and a step ahead of the next tier (Ohio State, Maryland, Baylor, a few more). USC and UCLA are very trendy at the moment but haven't really achieved much yet to suggest that they will become the next blue blood (though USC has a very promising future).Deal had neither a UConn nor a South Carolina offer (assuming you meant S. Carolina and not USC).
I watched her at state as well; she looked pretty good. However, she was also playing against 3A competition, so she should be way better than the field if she landed an offer from Iowa. So, I don't think her state tournament will tell us anything regarding how she will translate to the B1G. Sorry, but 3A Iowa GBB and B1G are completely different animals.
Good list, though not sure LSU belongs. Not sure LSU is an elite HS recruiting school, but appears LSU will be an elite transfer/portal school.I would include UConn, South Carolina, LSU, Stanford, and Notre Dame as the truly ELITE schools that basically clear the rest in terms of recruiting. . . .
Seen Madynn Greenway at the top of the stairs as I was leaving the Michigan game and she had a Hawkeye sweatshirt on. Maybe that's a clue. I wish anyway.We need to add to the front court, and we need Greenway.
Maddyn says she wants to play for Iowa so what's keeping her from committing? Iowa is now an attractive power and doesn't have to fill in with marginal talent. The last two recruiting classes were 4 and 5 stars except for Levin I believe was under rated.
Watching the state tournament finals on TV I believe she was the best player on any court I witnessed.
I would include UConn, South Carolina, LSU, Stanford, and Notre Dame as the truly ELITE schools that basically clear the rest in terms of recruiting. I'd then put Louisville right below them and a step ahead of the next tier (Ohio State, Maryland, Baylor, a few more). USC and UCLA are very trendy at the moment but haven't really achieved much yet to suggest that they will become the next blue blood (though USC has a very promising future).
With the exception of Notre Dame, the coaches in that list hold multiple national titles. Ivey is new to ND but has done an outstanding job recruiting and has returned ND to the top of the ACC in her short tenure. Louisville doesn't have a title but Jeff Walz has been to the Final Four 4 times and the title game twice -- I think that speaks for itself. Of Iowa's top targets for 2025 and 2026, it looks like the only ones with such offers include:
2025:
- Jordan Speiser: Notre Dame, LSU
- Brynn McGaughy: UConn, Stanford (though she turned the latter)
- Dee Alexander: UConn, LSU, South Carolina, Notre Dame
2026:
McGaughy, Skinner, Bjorn, Vukosa, Lewis hold Louisville offers as well (so does Adelaide Jernigan, not listed above). I didn't include Bourrage b/c I think the chances of getting her are 0%. I think chances are slim with Alexander (we did make her Top 15, apparently) and Vukosa as well...but not quite 0% lol. I may very well have missed some (I feel like Skinner should have more, the 2026 kids have time to pick up more, Layla Hays may have some as well)...
- Vukosa: UConn, South Carolina, Notre Dame, Stanford
- Lewis: UConn, Notre Dame
- Greenway: Stanford
- Bjorn: UConn, Stanford
FWIW I think Stanford and Louisville are trending down, as is UConn to a lesser extent (all 3 have a long way to go before collapsing though). Regardless, I think it would be quite a coup for Bluder to get one of the recruits who has a UConn offer. I think that's a realistic next benchmark.
I've done some browsing on other message boards/social media since Deal committed. LSU fans are a bit bummed/annoyed, while Stanford fans are more flabbergasted (Mater Dei is a bit of a feeder school to Stanford). It'd be very interesting to see what Husky fans would say if Bjorn 5'11or McGaughy were to choose Iowa (Lewis to Iowa might be more predictable...but she has reportedly said UConn was her dream school...and they're aware
Well they did have the #1 recruiting class in 2023. I guess I’m just referring to Mulkey. Her titles from Baylor still factor into her sales pitch.Good list, though not sure LSU belongs. Not sure LSU is an elite HS recruiting school, but appears LSU will be an elite transfer/portal school.
Good point. But struck out this year on top targets.Well they did have the #1 recruiting class in 2023. I guess I’m just referring to Mulkey. Her titles from Baylor still factor into her sales pitch.
Is Speiser to LSU a for sure? We need front court help. 247 projects Journee as a G/F but 5'11"" is marginal. The film clips I've seen on Deal are amazing (is it true she can dunk?) Heiden at 6'4" has the post-up and forward type mobility to fit Bluder's offense. Imagine having multiple mobile bigs capable of posting with mid range, and with Heiden, 3 point range.
I would think Carver will be bursting at the seams anticipating this group of young and seasoned
Hawkeye women basketball players.
Ummm...did you watch the final minutes of the SEC final the other day???
No one said Speiser is headed to LSU, just that she has an offer.
I don't think we should let the behavior of those "girls" dictate how the game should be played and disregard for sportsmanship.Ummm...did you watch the final minutes of the SEC final the other day???
Great scorer.
She wasn’t playing PG and saw only one pass. Hope she has 1/4 of CC’s vision.
It's weird to hope that a basketball player has good vision?Weird hope for an off ball guard.
No deep 2's. Not 100% sold on her yet.
Thanks for sharing. Watching these highlights of AAU (or whatever the organization) games it always looks like defense is just an annoyance. Do we really have to play defense?
Bluder coached the women up and used the talents of a generational playerIt's terrific Iowa (Bluder) can go to-toe with the UConns and SCs.
Get off your lazy ass Ferentz and start recruiting like a grown-up.
Does she make everyone around her better?
It's weird to hope that a basketball player has good vision?
ESPN does write ups from time to time on stand-out recruits and she was included in such a story. She was listed among the 2 most versatile players in the Class of 2025. She could conceivably play anything 1-4, especially in Iowa's system. My guess is she will start at the 3 as a freshman (replacing Affolter). She could of course play the 2 as well if her defense is as good as described (see below) -- but I suspect McCabe will be our go to SG for the next two seasons and the 3 will make most sense.Does she make everyone around her better?
Oh, I understood your point. It was just silly. It's like mocking someone for wanting Hannah Stuelke to develop a three point shot.Different jobs…if she had Caitlin’s court vision she probably would be a point guard