ABC News Responds to Project Veritas Video Showing a Frustrated Amy Robach

[timinatoria]

^ Project Veritas has lost lawsuits, or settled out of court, over multiple doctored videos, so let's immediately trust its video = timinatoria "logic". No wonder this guy is a Con.

You still didn't answer the question. Has ABC said the video isn't legit? Do you think the video is doctored?

I am not defending Project Veritas in any way, but since that seems to be the only thing you're capable of talking about I guess the topic at hand is beyond your comprehension.

But you do you. You refuse to discuss the actual topic, deflect and attack the source. Of course it's a source that I'm not even defending just stating that NO ONE is saying that the video isn't legit, not even ABC news.

Then you start with insults because....well...I don't know why. You're incapable of a normal conversastion I guess.

 

[BelemNole]

Anyone want to comment on Sondland?

Here's the link in case you missed the story: https://iowa.forums.rivals.com/thre...ing-ukraine-quid-pro-quo.291304/#post-7043896

 

[Pepperman]

Anyone want to comment on Sondland?

Here's the link in case you missed the story: https://iowa.forums.rivals.com/thre...ing-ukraine-quid-pro-quo.291304/#post-7043896

Appears to be bad for Trump.

Now, why are you talking about this in this thread? It is seemingly an unrelated deflection from the topic at hand. Moreover, the topic you're bringing up is CLEARLY being discussed by the mainstream media. There is simply no reason to be bringing it up here as far as I can tell.

Anybody want to comment about the Chicago Bears?

 

[Funky Bunch]

Appears to be bad for Trump.

Now, why are you talking about this in this thread? It is seemingly an unrelated deflection from the topic at hand. Moreover, the topic you're bringing up is CLEARLY being discussed by the mainstream media. There is simply no reason to be bringing it up here as far as I can tell.

Anybody want to comment about the Chicago Bears?

I heard they passed up Mahomes and Watson for Trubisky AND traded up to get him

 

[Irwin Fletcher10]

3 pages in, and no pics of Amy Robach yet? WTF???

 

[BelemNole]

Appears to be bad for Trump.

Now, why are you talking about this in this thread? It is seemingly an unrelated deflection from the topic at hand. Moreover, the topic you're bringing up is CLEARLY being discussed by the mainstream media. There is simply no reason to be bringing it up here as far as I can tell.

Anybody want to comment about the Chicago Bears?

I just found it comical that you all were here in this thread but not a one of you were in the thread that was actually newsworthy.

 

[Joes Place]

Moreover, the topic you're bringing up is CLEARLY being discussed by the mainstream media.

Meanwhile, in MAGA-Land, the MAGA Media is regurgitating this "story" that the news reporter has already clarified.

As well as people like myself who have pointed out that ANY outlet could have run the Epstein story if the evidence was out there.

 

[Joes Place]

I just found it comical that you all were here in this thread but not a one of you were in the thread that was actually newsworthy.

THAT'S.THE.POINT

 

[timinatoria]

I just found it comical that you all were here in this thread but not a one of you were in the thread that was actually newsworthy.

What would you like me to say in that thread? You want me to defend Trump or something? Why would I start now?

 

[BelemNole]

What would you like me to say in that thread? You want me to defend Trump or something? Why would I start now?

Silence is complicity.

 

[Joes Place]

What would you like me to say in that thread? You want me to defend Trump or something? Why would I start now?

Acknowledging he should be impeached and removed from office would be a start....

 

[Pepperman]

Feels more to me like you guys are moving the goalposts and deflecting... but carry on.

 

[timinatoria]

Acknowledging he should be impeached and removed from office would be a start....

I'm treating this like the Russian investigation, just let the investigation it play out and see where the evidence takes us. So far it doesn't look great for Trump.

I know, it's a pretty radical concept that will probably piss some people off, but I like that approach.

 

[ottumwan in tx]

I just found it comical that you all were here in this thread but not a one of you were in the thread that was actually newsworthy.

so calling out fake news for being fake news... is not newsworthy. but talking about fake Ukraine stuff that is insanity, is newsworthy? oh boy...

 

[ottumwan in tx]

I'm treating this like the Russian investigation, just let the investigation it play out and see where the evidence takes us. So far it doesn't look great for Trump.

I know, it's a pretty radical concept that will probably piss some people off, but I like that approach.

you saw where the Russia thing went... same thing here....

 

[timinatoria]

Silence is complicity.

Lol....get over yourself. You think all your Trump rants will help him be impeached?

That's cute.

 

[ottumwan in tx]

Anyone want to comment on Sondland?

Here's the link in case you missed the story: https://iowa.forums.rivals.com/thre...ing-ukraine-quid-pro-quo.291304/#post-7043896

Ukraine stuff is insanity and the rumblings and mumblings of fools

 

[Joes Place]

I'm treating this like the Russian investigation

Not reading any of it(?), per the Mueller Report, or Senate Intel Committee Report?

Roger that.

 

[timinatoria]

Not reading any of it(?), per the Mueller Report, or Senate Intel Committee Report?

Roger that.

I read some of both, not all. I have a full time job and a life. If I had memorized every word would it have changed the outcome?

 

[Joes Place]

Feels more to me like you guys are moving the goalposts and deflecting... but carry on.

FUNFACT: Any "evidence" ABC had at the time could now EASILY be run as a story, because Epstein isn't around to sue them for libel or slander.

So, why isn't this reporter revisiting this "issue" if the story was so "hot", yet quashed because of libel/slander concerns? Easy thing to rectify now, isn't it?

 

[ottumwan in tx]

FUNFACT: Any "evidence" ABC had at the time could now EASILY be run as a story, because Epstein isn't around to sue them for libel or slander.

So, why isn't this reporter revisiting this "issue" if the story was so "hot", yet quashed because of libel/slander concerns? Easy thing to rectify now, isn't it?

maybe she's afraid of arkancide

 

[ottumwan in tx]

FUNFACT: Any "evidence" ABC had at the time could now EASILY be run as a story, because Epstein isn't around to sue them for libel or slander.

So, why isn't this reporter revisiting this "issue" if the story was so "hot", yet quashed because of libel/slander concerns? Easy thing to rectify now, isn't it?

funfact: hills and bill are still alive and the arkancide gun is loaded and cocked and ready

 

[tarheelbybirth]

I'm treating this like the Russian investigation, just let the investigation it play out and see where the evidence takes us. So far it doesn't look great for Trump.

I know, it's a pretty radical concept that will probably piss some people off, but I like that approach.

Ahhh...the exact same approach you've taken with THIS story.

GTFO

 

[BelemNole]

Lol....get over yourself. You think all your Trump rants will help him be impeached?

That's cute.

Politicians only act if people make noise. I make noise. It's my job as a citizen.

 

[timinatoria]

Ahhh...the exact same approach you've taken with THIS story.

GTFO

Is there an investigation into ABC news that I'm not aware of? Should I be waiting for the results of that investigation before I can comment? Why are these two topics linked again???

 

[timinatoria]

FUNFACT: Any "evidence" ABC had at the time could now EASILY be run as a story, because Epstein isn't around to sue them for libel or slander.

So, why isn't this reporter revisiting this "issue" if the story was so "hot", yet quashed because of libel/slander concerns? Easy thing to rectify now, isn't it?

You think Epstein is the only person in this story they were worried about pissing off? The reporter specifically mentioned Clinton and Prince Andrew, not to mention Alan Dershowitz.

 

[tarheelbybirth]

Is there an investigation into ABC news that I'm not aware of? Should I be waiting for the results of that investigation before I can comment? Why are these two topics linked again???

LOL...watching you flail is kind of entertaining. Did ABC do anything wrong? Yes or no.

 

[Joes Place]

You think Epstein is the only person in this story they were worried about pissing off? The reporter specifically mentioned Clinton and Prince Andrew, not to mention Alan Dershowitz.

....and you can report those as "rumored" as part of the story - cuz they've been in lots and lots of rumors on this....

 

[Joes Place]

Meanwhile, as the MAGAs and Russian Troll Farmers keep the focus on ancient Epstein news, they continue to ignore key FACTS on the Biden saga:




Stay uninformed, my friends!!!

 

[Joes Place]

Ahhh...the exact same approach you've taken with THIS story.

GTFO

LMFAO!!!!

 

[What Would Jesus Do?]

Networks will run unsubstantiated Blasey Ford allegations as fact.

Won’t report factual evidence on Epstein.

That’s all you need to know.

Interesting view.

In the real world, the so-called liberal press beat up Epstein relentlessly.

 

[What Would Jesus Do?]

Meanwhile, as the MAGAs and Russian Troll Farmers keep the focus on ancient Epstein news, they continue to ignore key FACTS on the Biden saga:

View embedded media

Stay uninformed, my friends!!!

Even if you weren't thrilled with US policy toward Ukraine, there's nothing to suggest Biden was doing anything other than carry out official policy.

Not personal policy.

Not family policy.

Official US policy.

 

[TheCainer]

Liberals protecting pedophiles.

BAU

He died under AG Barr's watch.

Where is the calling out of that fact?

 

[timinatoria]

LOL...watching you flail is kind of entertaining. Did ABC do anything wrong? Yes or no.

Yes, they could have run the story. According to their own reporter they spiked it to keep access to the royal family. Of course NOW they say they couldn't verify anything. That hasn't stopped them from running stories about accusations before has it? And the reporter doesn't want to be fired so she's backtracking.

Run the interview. Say it's an accusation. Have they not done that before?

Me flail? I'm not the one trying to blend other topics into this one.

 

[timinatoria]

LMFAO!!!!

For the record I'm neither defending Trump nor am I bashing any Democrats, yet the libs are jumping all over ANY criticism of ABC News.

Why is that? What's in it for you?

 

[hawkland14]

For the record I'm neither defending Trump nor am I bashing any Democrats, yet the libs are jumping all over ANY criticism of ABC News.

Why is that? What's in it for you?

The question hasn’t been answered yet in three separate threads

 

[Joes Place]

For the record I'm neither defending Trump nor am I bashing any Democrats, yet the libs are jumping all over ANY criticism of ABC News.

Why is that? What's in it for you?

Although it's been stated several times already: this is basically a non-story. No one's "defending" ABC. The reporter, herself, clarified things.

This is an RT and Troll Farm effort to distract you from the bombshell that Sondland just laid out. And, per the MAGAs flocking to this, it appear to be a very very effective strategy.

Not sure how that can be explained any more clearly to you. It's been stated outright several times. And the fact there have been several posts on this from separate MAGA-leaning posters definitely implies it is being driven from somewhere.

Meanwhile, the Sondland testimony is actual NEW news, and is rather astonishing in its detail and impacts on the impeachment inquiry. It is not surprising at all that the Sondland news would be all over the place; it's very surprising an old, rehashed news nugget is being pushed this hard.

 

[silasstarr]

Liberals protecting pedophiles.

BAU

Epstein dying is just as much protecting Trump as Clinton.

 

[Joes Place]

The question hasn’t been answered yet in three separate threads

FUNFACT: She answered it, herself.

FUNFACT II: You still avoid the Russian interference news, and the Sondland bombshell like the sunshine from those facts will melt your skin away....

 

[Joes Place]

Epstein dying is just as much protecting Trump as Clinton.

Publicly, perhaps.

But if we have a DOJ that is willing to independently delve into this, there is no longer anyone to prevent them from searching through all of the information found on his computer systems (and any compromising material he had on anyone). Epstein isn't around to challenge any searches.

Ergo: if there's any "conspiracy" covering up Epstein's misdeeds and those otherwise involved, it is a near certainty that Barr is up to his ears in it.