Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I believe they are cynics, which is the only reasonable option if you ask me.I'm not a God Fearing conservative and Stone and the other guy aren't liberals...I don't think, anyway.
How 'bout we have the mom's sign an agreement, if the unwanted babies grow up to be criminals we just kill them at that point. I mean, what the frack is the difference when we kill the human?
The nice thing about a lifetime appointment to the court is that the justices rarely make everyone happy. Despite what people think they will do the justices are not puppets.
Well, Roe has been the law of the land for 47 years now and hasn’t been overturned yet.I was not implying you are a Trump supporter. It was a general statement.
However, overturning Roe is most certainly a concern to anyone who cares about the issue.
Well, Roe has been the law of the land for 47 years now and hasn’t been overturned yet.
I think it’s time we moved on from basing supreme court appointments on how the nominee would vote on Roe v Wade.
Fantasy. As soon as this Cuban woman is appointed, it will be overturned next year
Could you explain your logic? Because it seems to me that a justice could easily be a puppet if they wanted to be, what is to stop them?
MAGAts can then work on rolling back other women’s rights. 1950s here we come.
I think we should abort this two party system.
Yeah don't get raped!it’s not a right it’s a consequence of an action. If only there was a way not to become pregnant?!
They literally owe nothing to anyone once they are on the court.
it’s not a right it’s a consequence of an action. If only there was a way not to become pregnant?!
I grew up when abortion was frowned upon, now it’s almost celebrated. Where is the moral compass? You don’t want a convicted murderer receive the death penalty but a 38 week pregnant woman can off her kid all in the name of “a woman’s right?” Unreal.
No it is not. Just a few years ago the Rs controlled everything. They would do it now if the 2018 vote had been different. Being blind is what got us this mess.That is a fantasy.
More allegiance to religious procedures over a relationship with Jesus. Drop your stone.How 'bout we have the mom's sign an agreement, if the unwanted babies grow up to be criminals we just kill them at that point. I mean, what the frack is the difference when we kill the human?
I thought they were libertarians?What is a good god fearing conservative doing watching South Park which is created by bleeding heart liberals?
It’s silly to not let a woman control her body to a certain point.
It silly to kill an unborn child past a certain point.
Another self-assessment I see.Definition of canard
1a: a false or unfounded report or storyespecially : a fabricated report
b: a groundless rumor or beliefthe widespread canard that every lawyer is dishonest
I thought they were libertarians?
It’s silly to not let a woman control her body to a certain point.
It silly to kill an unborn child past a certain point.
Too late. Alito, Thomas, Kavanaugh already want to if given the chance. I have some faith Gorsuch (and more in Roberts) won’t fall in line with the ultra right wing evangelical nut jobs, but I’m not particularly sanguine.Well, Roe has been the law of the land for 47 years now and hasn’t been overturned yet.
I think it’s time we moved on from basing supreme court appointments on how the nominee would vote on Roe v Wade.
what on earth are you rambling about now? geebus.More allegiance to religious procedures over a relationship with Jesus. Drop your stone.
The bad thing is that a lot of people want to return to a time before 1973. And, it isn't just abortion. We have also seen a large push by the far right to restrict access to birth control. Overturning Roe won't be the end of it. Zealots don't celebrate and go home once they win. They will keep pushing farther and harder.So many more options now than in 1973 - there were no morning after pills, and birth control pills weren't even universally available to women under the age of 21 in some states. And women now are more likely to tell a man he's as responsible for contraception as she is...no glove no love...
I just see this as an overblown scare tactic, and like it or not it's not going to be a right denied to a woman. We're just not going back to those days. Ever.
I think it's a settled issue. But repeated abortions aren't good for women's bodies and shouldn't be used as a primary means of birth control. Health issues, of course. Rape or incest, no question.
Interesting that there are two pages in this thread full of men arguing over what a woman can do with her body. Gosh, you might mistakenly think this is still 1973...