Yes, and it should in everyone's. Deal in the real.Natural obviously NEEDS "Empirical" to play a big role in his existence.
Yes, and it should in everyone's. Deal in the real.Natural obviously NEEDS "Empirical" to play a big role in his existence.
The answer to all your questions. There is no system in my system. There is living and going. My favorite line from a movie is this. "It's only when we've lost everything, that we're free to do anything."1) Are you saying your prefered system is you just want the original government the US started with?
2) I believe you would be wrong. Circumstance is the thief of most opportunity. If you are not dealing with that, you have many more harms to account for. Under your system will people be able to vote on how they want to structure their communities?
3) Are you saying spirituality isn't part of your system in actuality. You just wanted to plug it, but don't actually want to plan around it? If so, its not really a relevant answer to how you plan to make this all come about. And if you do plan to make it relevant, then you are a theocracy and deserve much scorn.
4) Yes, inclusion is good. Are you admitting your system plans to leave some out? Seems that way so far.
5) Letting them care isn't the problem. You need to make them care. How do you plan to do that?
6) Still no plan here to prevent our current system from reforming. No mechanisms for dealing with the corruption you see all around you. Are you going to lobotomize people or genetically modify us so that we all just get along and are nice to each other? This is complete fantasy, there is no meat on your bones. Is this based on some writings or are you just making this up on the fly?
What's real is that you are a human, you are going to die, and you are going to spend most of that time catering to the system, rather than enjoying the life that the system is simply an unfortunate product of, due to the disconnection from life in the very minds of the people who live.Yes, and it should in everyone's. Deal in the real.
So you want a world with no governments, no taxes, no law enforcement?The answer to all your questions. There is no system in my system. There is living and going. My favorite line from a movie is this. "It's only when we've lost everything, that we're free to do anything."
I've always ventured to believe that the statement had more than one meaning but the core meaning was that we are so busy worrying about what we have or don't have, that we no longer cared for who we actually are.
Perhaps you should drop the needless complications you seek, and rediscover the difference between us and the ground you walk on. Take time to understand that you are though, also part of that ground.
Which is unfortunate because empirical is not a bad word, he's just looking to use that words meaning in a way that isn't actually beneficial to him because of what he wants to relate it to.Natural obviously NEEDS "Empirical" to play a big role in his existence.
What's real is that you are a human, you are going to die, and you are going to spend most of that time catering to the system, rather than enjoying the life that the system is simply an unfortunate product of, due to the disconnection from life in the very minds of the people who live.
Or, you rediscover yourself and work your way out of the mundane and cavalier nature of the system.
Yes, yes, and yes. Life is not a program, we need not live like it is. When are you happiest? When you work in the system and you get to stay comfortable because of it? Or when you are 'getting fruity', with another living being?So you want a world with no governments, no taxes, no law enforcement?
I have not, but I will take the time to do so, thank you.MRW, have you ever listened to or heard of any of N.D. Walsch's Conversations With God? A lot of your comments remind me of that. Although, that message can come through in millions of ways. If not, check it out sometime.
You'll throw him way off when you start referring to context. Only he can define it and only he can identify it. You're playing a dangerous game there.Which is unfortunate because empirical is not a bad word, he's just looking to use that words meaning in a way that isn't actually beneficial to him because of what he wants to relate it to.
OK, now I understand you. Thank you for finally spelling it out so plainly. I'm glad you and Strumm found each other, you will be great friends.Yes, yes, and yes. Life is not a program, we need not live like it is. When are you happiest? When you work in the system and you get to stay comfortable because of it? Or when you are 'getting fruity', with another living being?
For real!You'll throw him way off when you start referring to context. Only he can define it and only he can identify it. You're playing a dangerous game there.
We just may be. You are allowed into our tribe as well, if you wish.OK, now I understand you. Thank you for finally spelling it out so plainly. I'm glad you and Strumm found each other, you will be great friends.
I wouldn't seek to confuse him, but I'd explain to him that the context of living begins with understanding that you are among the living.You'll throw him way off when you start referring to context. Only he can define it and only he can identify it. You're playing a dangerous game there.
Yes indeed sir, it truly is a lost art. Its the source of most of our pain in my opinion.When you mention spiritual, you make people recoil. Atheists think you're talking religion. Religious people think you're talking more religion!
Who the hell does Natch? Is that like a trick question or some thang? I am loving the influx of these new posters.So you want a world with no governments, no taxes, no law enforcement?
Thank you for the invitation. Likewise I will keep a light on for you both.We just may be. You are allowed into our tribe as well, if you wish.
I know right? This place is getting even more interesting.Who the hell does Natch? Is that like a trick question or some thang? I am loving the influx of these new posters.
I'd like to believe my influence is helping with it. Nat, Strum, MW, NoleSoup, Shank, etc,..it's beautiful. There has been an awakening......have you felt it?I know right? This place is getting even more interesting.
Who is Shank? There's that Harah (sp?) guy who tosses in with you guys too. Used to be another too. But yes, I feel it, I smell it, I see it. Good empirical data, you are getting more friends Prime.I'd like to believe my influence is helping with it. Nat, Strum, MW, NoleSoup, Shank, etc,..it's beautiful. There has been an awakening......have you felt it?
Habah? he's more of a con sometimes though. He's convinced Obama is a muslim, when I've tried to tell him that he's much worse. He's a corporatist puppet. ShankHawk sucka,...he's good people.Who is Shank? There's that Harah (sp?) guy who tosses in with you guys too. Used to be another too. But yes, I feel it, I smell it, I see it. Good empirical data, you are getting more friends Prime.
Don't forget worthywishI'd like to believe my influence is helping with it. Nat, Strum, MW, NoleSoup, Shank, etc,..it's beautiful. There has been an awakening......have you felt it?
Ah, yes, He's a keeper too. This has to be pissing off the lefty and righties.Don't forget worthywish
Maybe a new guy not used to our ways, but not Fred. He's probably just working out his next scathly brilliant insult. We do like to sling a lot of shit at each other around here, but its all just fun. We only mean it when we aim at a Cyclone fan.Habah? he's more of a con sometimes though. He's convinced Obama is a muslim, when I've tried to tell him that he's much worse. He's a corporatist puppet. ShankHawk sucka,...he's good people.
The excitement is from knowing that not everyone is stuck in the mud buddy. MW has done and admirable job of explaining what I usually yell and scream at people. Frederick the Bless-ed has been gone awhile? Do you think our buddy cop relationship really angered him that much? He's usually a regular on here.
Are you kidding? You guys make us all look good. Its so much fun.Ah, yes, He's a keeper too. This has to be pissing off the lefty and righties.
There's no curfew for lights on our side.Thank you for the invitation. Likewise I will keep a light on for you both.
Where do you live that the authorities are telling you to turn your lights on and off? Here in Iowa that's not an issue. Maybe you just aren't seeing our great system as it really is.There's no curfew for lights on our side.
Good examples of what happens when you don't think things through?Are you kidding? You guys make us all look good. Its so much fun.
I think you missed the sarcasm there buddy. I'm just guessing though, I don't require empirical data to know for sure.Where do you like that the authorities are telling you to turn your lights on and off? Here in Iowa that's not an issue. Maybe you just aren't seeing our great system as it really is.
I have fun with it, it tests our wits.Maybe a new guy not used to our ways, but not Fred. He's probably just working out his next scathly brilliant insult. We do like to sling a lot of shit at each other around here, but its all just fun. We only mean it when we aim at a Cyclone fan.
Calm yourself little Führer.Good examples of what happens when you don't think things through?
Nein, nein, nein, nein!!!!
I know, this is your consistent downfall. The other little Führer didn't pay attention to empirical data either.I don't require empirical data to know for sure.
This is where you always veer off-course. You throw in your dry wit and compulsion to be clever at the wrong time. You're using an actual concept that's trying to be explained and shown to you and then casting doubt or ridicule on it by dragging in something that you insist is working better, or instead of, and they don't really mix. I don't know if you do it to lie to yourself, or if it helps you mask the truth to yourself, or what. No one lives where authorities force lights-out. So, insisting that your system (or the one you're pushing for more of) is superior is just false. The thing you're measuring it against is a fiction. You do that way too often. It may seem cute and clever to you, but it's never proving what you're pretending it proves. It's lacking anything "empirical" that's for sure!Where do you like that the authorities are telling you to turn your lights on and off? Here in Iowa that's not an issue. Maybe you just aren't seeing our great system as it really is.
I completely agree, I'm measuring reality against your fiction. I'm just delighted that you think I'm witty.This is where you always veer off-course. You throw in your dry wit and compulsion to be clever at the wrong time. You're using an actual concept that's trying to be explained and shown to you and then casting doubt or ridicule on it by dragging in something that you insist is working better, or instead of, and they don't really mix. I don't know if you do it to lie to yourself, or if it helps you mask the truth to yourself, or what. No one lives where authorities force lights-out. So, insisting that your system (or the one you're pushing for more of) is superior is just false. The thing you're measuring it against is a fiction. You do that way too often. It may seem cute and clever to you, but it's never proving what you're pretending it proves. It's lacking anything "empirical" that's for sure!
Well, you can continue to resist learning something you don't already know and wrap it in a "I'd rather be cute and clever instead" gif. That's your empirical preference.I completely agree, I'm measuring reality against your fiction. I'm just delighted that you think I'm witty.