Arrests of the Traitors coming in now
- Thread starter Chishawk1425
- Start date
Post Reports: Four Hours of Insurrection
The Washington Post’s daily podcast takes us inside the Capitol and walks us step-by-step through the unprecedented events of January 6th.
www.wnycstudios.org
I like the thought of him just starving himself to death. Will spare us the expense of a trial and years of incarceration.
His choice.
Traitors to the country deserve death, Comrade
Don't give a shit what happens to him. He tried to overthrow the US government. Should be hung for it. As should the rest. They are terrorists, not freedom fighters.
Don't care if they were too stupid to listen to Trump, Hannity, Giuliani, etc. They were adults.
Saying the dude needs to be punished to the highest degree and saying "I like the thought of him starving himself to death" are to totally different things. Carry in with your little circle jerk though, didn't mean to interrupt.
I'll bet you'd talk differently, if he was a Muslim AQ/ISIS terrorist
#WhitePrivilege
I'll bet I wouldn't say I like the thought of anyone starving to death. You want to say "hang them" or "shoot them" go for it but "liking the thought of starvation" is ****ed. Don't worry about me though bro, you guys just keep the lube flowing I'll step away.
Then he should ****ing eat something. It's not hard, and it's not like he has some crazy allergic reactions. If he would rather starve then eat something *gasp!* non-organic, then so be it. A moron to the end.
I dont give two shits about what Buffalo bill does. I think its ****ed someone likes the idea of thinking of a human starving to death. But again, you guys get in these echo chambers and think this shits funny because you don't actually interact with people in the real world and when someone points out the actual words you are using it hits you upside the head with "yeah, that is a bit ****ed".
You continue to reveal yourself. Who doesn't interact with people in the real world? Please be specific. Democrats? All posters on this board? Specific ones? I think the EOs made you snap.
I dont know what your talking about but keep swinging bud. I'm specifically talking to joes place and chris.
- Sep 13, 2002
- 99,453
- 208,939
- 113
His starving himself is a "choice". Not "imposed".
Don't care.
EDIT: And it's not for a "cause" or "injustice". He's doing it because he cannot get his froo-froo "organics". You're in prison; you get what the prison serves. You want "kosher"? they got that. You want Halal? They got that.
Organics? Screw that shit. It's a "brand", it's not a "thing".
Last edited:
Your boys are the ones who do the hanging. They actually built the gallows for YOUR Vice President. So you keep the stupidity flowing...per usual.
Last edited:
Dems need to jam the Garland nomination through on Monday. Just ball it up and cram it down the collective throats of Hawley/ Cruz / Graham / Paul, and every other soft on crime Republican in the Senate.
So.....isn't this an admission he DID incite the insurrection?
And, as this is an attempt at criminally including your lawyers IN the conspiracy, aren't those convos no longer considered privileged, and those lawyers can TESTIFY to them?
Release the Kraken here; get 'em all on the stand as witnesses.
The team, led by South Carolina lawyer Butch Bowers, resigned in part because of disagreements over how to mount Trump’s defense, the sources said. The lawyers had planned to argue the constitutionality of holding a trial given Trump is now a former president.
This was a losing argument, anyway. The Constitutional text on this is crystal clear.
- He was impeached while still in office.
- The Constitution empowers the Senate to try ALL impeachments. There are no "qualifiers" on it.
Today's GOP is the party of "Eff your feelings", no?
GOP only likes lack of qualifiers when it pertains to the 2A.
- Sep 13, 2002
- 99,453
- 208,939
- 113
The irony is there may be military tribunals.
But it won’t be what the Qidiots think it is.
But it won’t be what the Qidiots think it is.
Not only the text of the US Constitution but IMO the original intent of its authors.
The argument relied upon by GOP senators - that the constitution does not permit a trial of an impeached president whose term has expired - leads to an absurd conclusion, namely: that any president could commit a high crime or misdemeanor in his/her final day(s) and avoid impeachment and conviction only because there is insufficient time to implement the full impeachment process. Ridiculous.
Similarly, the impeachment clause could be sabotaged and defeated by a president's voluntary resignation if you subscribe to the GOP view. Idiotic.
This is nothing more than 45 cowardly Republican senators looking for an excuse to avoid judging Trump.
Last edited:
I'm confused as why they voted this way now. Do it at the trial. With Trump knowing the fix is in. It let him pivot back to his election conspiracy. These idoits still don't realize. Only Trump matters and this isn't a team sport to him.
But 50 congressmen signed a letter to censure or get rid of Liz Cheney for standing up for the rule of law, and none stood up for the scum for trying to steal our democracy. Sounds about right for the republicans.
Similar threads
