Make a new thread for it. You posted it in a trans rights thread. It’s not even interesting.
Arrests of the Traitors coming in now
- Thread starter Chishawk1425
- Start date
When you say that you have read the court documents, have all of your handles read them, or just this one? How does the division of labor work with a split personality poster? Just asking.
I have no dog in this fight, but my in-laws are on our cell phone plan. What's the big deal, it just means in this one case he may be financially conservative/smart.
Here is your problem. I've told you this before, by the way. You keep coming back and engaging other people in the exact same language, and as if you have a relationship. You keep flying too high, too fast, Icarus.
Sure thing. Did you happen to glance at my profile before you posted this nonsense? I was so bored one day back in 2014, I created this account to wait for just this opportunity. Because I had, and have, nothing better to do. That's evidenced by the number of posts I have.
You live in a fantasy world. Presumably on an internet message board I guess.
And you never told me anything before. On this site. Or anywhere. It's very unlikely you'd be allowed to enter most places I spend time at. Or possibly you could enter, followed shortly by being asked to leave, and barring that, being escorted out by police.
You're like the rest. You post things that you think are smart. And then these posts are validated by other like minded echo chamber people who get their talking points force fed to them by television and Twitter.
Eventually reality hits you. At some point, becuase you answer to someone else, and not the other way around, you have to be (are told) to be someplace. This might even include not be able to post your nonsense on your employer's time. Because again, at some point you answer to someone.
You understand? We operate at different levels. One level people get backstage with multiple POTUS' That would be me. Both political parties by the way. You? You operate at some level somewhere. And no one cares, especially me.
I guess I cared a bit and must have been bored today to enter your internet fantasy cesspool.
I ran through a quick search of your posts. I pity someone as brainwashed to be a slave to one political ideology. It's not even a political ideology in your case, it's brainwashed by television, or someone telling you how to think. On your best day you can't even imagine there are other sides, valid sides, to the same issue.
Wow
U waited 8 whole years for an insurrection, just so you could complain about how unfairly the insurrectionists were being treated?
Amazeballs!!!
Have you figured out your previous inaccurate posts yet? I'm still waiting to understand why per you, I should blame a jury that doesn't exist. And waiting on that guilty verdict in the case that hasn't gone to trial yet.
I know, I know, you were referring to a different case. Even though you were replying to me and I referenced a specific case. Another example, as if we need more, of your lack of attention to detail and facts.
But cool screen name.
Isn't it about time for you to start calling me name? Isn't that next step in your rather simple thought process and behavior?
So the answer is no. I already knew this.
By the way, this 5 for 5 thing, are you assuming I don't want people convicted that committed crimes? It's an odd kind of spiking of the football. But I guess if it's all you got, it's all you got. Hang on tightly.
Yes, I'm sure it is. In some alternate universe.
I'm still not sure why you directly responded to one of my posts that stated a specific case, and responded as if you "got me", about an entirely different case. And after getting called out, now seem to think this is normal debate. To provide an answer that had nothing to do with the original topic, back track, and now claim your internet victory. There are researchers at UIHC that look into this very thing. You got that going for you. You're an interesting study in that way at least.
I don't recall, are you the same person who told me to read the court documents, and then proceeded to post proving to the world that you didn't read them? Or was this another genius?
It's confusing for me. Because groupthink and people like you are interchangeable.
No. That is the case I'd cited for you. Guilty on all 5 counts, after 4 hrs of jury deliberations.
If you're referring to a different case, then that's on you, as I've made clear 4 times now what I'm referring to.
Go recheck the "original topic"
One of the folks arrested on 1/6 is awaiting sentencing on 5 specific convictions.
That's part of the "original topic".
You directly responded to my post, which specifically named a case and person. You answered me with inaccurate information. Only later when I made fun of your answer did you move the goal post and claim you were referring to a different case. Even though you directly responded to a post which cited an entirely different case, and never mentioned you were not referring to the case you responded about.
To be clear, and accurate.
It's complicated for you I know. Frankly it's pretty complicated for anyone to try to follow your evolving story(ies). But to make it easier for you, you were wrong. Which is something you're likely used to.
It's odd. You suggest other should read court documents, and not only don't you read them yourself, your posts clearly show you have no idea what you're posting about.
You should stick to reposting Tweets and media opinion pieces. That way you won't prove to everyone you're not bright. Those that also regurgitate Tweets and opinion pieces wouldn't know the difference, so your reputation at that level wouldn't be harmed in any event. Which seems to be important to you and those at your level.
To be clear, and accurate.
It's complicated for you I know. Frankly it's pretty complicated for anyone to try to follow your evolving story(ies). But to make it easier for you, you were wrong. Which is something you're likely used to.
It's odd. You suggest other should read court documents, and not only don't you read them yourself, your posts clearly show you have no idea what you're posting about.
You should stick to reposting Tweets and media opinion pieces. That way you won't prove to everyone you're not bright. Those that also regurgitate Tweets and opinion pieces wouldn't know the difference, so your reputation at that level wouldn't be harmed in any event. Which seems to be important to you and those at your level.
Just give up. They’ll keep changing the topic and resorting to personal attacks.
You wouldn't be enlightened if Trump shoved one of his lightbulbs up your ass.
GTFH
Put him on ignore or quit your bitching. Snowflake pussy
What the F are you talking about? He's on his parents plan, they aren't on his. Also they're on T-Mobile that's not being smart. If I were your in-laws I would be worried my phone was getting shutoff. The person paying the bill has a reading comprehension of a 3rd grader.
Last edited:
We do, because they live in a smaller town and didn't have the options for cell phone plans at the time we signed up. It's a little dumb that they don't have their own, but we've been doing it for 15 years now.
WGAF who is paying the bill, family plans are there for a reason, they are cheaper the more people you add to them. How long has he been on their plan? Does he pay them for his share of the bill?
There's nothing wrong with being on a family plan, but when you let your parents pay for the plan when it's highly likely that said person pulls in far more money then something is wrong. My mom is on my plan and she's never paid a dime.
Thay are what they hate. And they actually help put in power what they hate. They are largely responsible for getting the guy elected that they can't stand.
It will be interesting to watch when the a pattern repeats itself. As I view it, we're already in the middle of them getting another person like Trump elected.
More than just an instinct, I've seen some interesting polling of Democratic voters done by Venable LLLP. Eventually posters, such as many on here, will aid in another Republican getting elected, and I suspect, another Republican like Trump.
The sheep on both sides getting led to either slaughter, or manna in heaven.
A Shakey's buffet is that exclusive these days, huh?
I would assume you could get into one of those.
Out of curiosity I looked them up. It seems they are only located in California. I recall some in Iowa. I've never seen one in Florida, Lake Geneva or Washington DC., which are the places I'm at the most.
You'd know more about pizza buffets than I would. So I guess you win this one.
Similar threads
Latest posts
-
-
-
-
HawkCast Ep 126 Iowa Women COMPETE w/ OSU, Will MBB Make the B1G Tourney?
- Latest: Eliot Clough
-