Successfull and Obama is an oxymoron.Once again, Obama successfully trolls the right wing.
Successfull and Obama is an oxymoron.Once again, Obama successfully trolls the right wing.
Don't come crying to me when Obama's decision to kowtow to a couple hundred Koyukons costs Democrats the state of Ohio (and consequently the general election) in 2016.
We were there in June (2003) and could not see the mountain. Were told few see it in the summer. Could you see it?
Wait...you have to be a direct descendant of a former President in order to be proud of him? There are 11.6 million people in Ohio and we're all proud of our former Presidents, not just McKinley. Alaska has less than a million people. I'm pretty sure we can kick their ass if it comes to that.Deal. I agree that if the election is so close that the 146 Ohio residents who are direct descendants of President McKinley decide that this is such a slap in the face to have a mountain in another state re-named Denali after a 40 year wait that they switch their vote to Rubio from Clinton and, as a result, the democrats lose Ohio -- and thus the election -- I will refrain from crying to you.
He might as well emerge from Air Force One wearing a Michigan sweater.If he hates tOSU as well, I certainly wouldn't object.
Republicans sure are running out of things to complain about these days. And good for Obama. Alaska has been petitioning to remove the McKinley name since 1975. Seems to me that if Alaska wants a name change, they should have one.
Wait...you have to be a direct descendant of a former President in order to be proud of him? There are 11.6 million people in Ohio and we're all proud of our former Presidents, not just McKinley. Alaska has less than a million people. I'm pretty sure we can kick their ass if it comes to that.
Some cynics might call this a meaningless, narcissistic gesture by our President's intended only to highlight his unsurpassed virtue. But really, think about it, isn't it about time we made it right with the Indians and called it square.
If the local people want the names change, you bet they should have it.
Alaska doesn't want it named McKinley. The mountain resides in Alaska. I think we should respect their wishes.Is it a state decision?
Is it a state park?
Alaska doesn't want it named McKinley. The mountain resides in Alaska. I think we should respect their wishes.
There are quite a number of Cree in the Lynn Lake Mb area so this notion that they have all moved south is completely ridiculous.If you're talking about the Cree tribe, than most of them have since moved down and share a reservation in Montana with the Chippewa. So they aren't citizens of Canada any longer. Not to mention there are close to 4,000 lakes in the NW provinces of Canada (some with their aboriginal origin still in place today). So I'm failing to see how this is a good comparison to ONE mountain in a state where most of the natives still live today.
Did you know they also named a lake after Johnathon Towes of NHL fame last summer too? Those crazy Canucks love them some NHL.
Here's a better question. What support is there for Ohio to tell Alaska what to do?Has their been a referendum?
If so, what % of support did it have?
Here's a better question. What support is there for Ohio to tell Alaska what to do?
It's more like Obama is an incompetent iron fisted tyrannical boob.Ah, I see. This week he's the iron fisted tyrant. Next week the incompetent boob. Nice to be able to keep up with the wingnut theme of the week!
There are quite a number of Cree in the Lynn Lake Mb area so this notion that they have all moved south is completely ridiculous.
curry favor
boob.
Hmm. Of the 35.6 million people that make up Canada only 317,000 actually classify themselves as Cree. So that is less than 1% of the population of Canada. What were you saying about me not knowing what I'm talking about or my ridiculous post?
Maybe you should just stop for a second and realize the comparison you made was a dumb one and then maybe reflect on "lessons learned" so you can be better next time.
Wait...you have to be a direct descendant of a former President in order to be proud of him? There are 11.6 million people in Ohio and we're all proud of our former Presidents, not just McKinley. Alaska has less than a million people. I'm pretty sure we can kick their ass if it comes to that.
Is it a state decision?
Is it a state park?
You're kidding, right ... I can see the typical Ohio voter -- in the polling booth -- election day, deciding between nominees: screw the democrats, I really liked that name of a mountain in a state I have never visited. Rubio it is!
Alaska doesn't want it named McKinley. The mountain resides in Alaska. I think we should respect their wishes.
Don't get excited by the language.Damn Indians.
Boob.
Obama will need to sign a whole bunch more EOs before he can be called the "Great One." Reagan signed nearly twice as many EOs.It's a federal park. Congress officially named it a Mt. McKinley in 1917 and President Wilson signed the bill. Emperor Obama, of course, who supercedes all consitutions and laws, signed an executive order naming it Denali. What's next for the Great One?
The 1% always get their way in this country.
When will they be stopped.
"There is a reason President McKinley's name has served atop the highest peak in North America for more than 100 years, and that is because it is a testament to his great legacy," Boehner said in a statement. "I'm deeply disappointed in this decision."
Ohio isn't telling Alaska what to do. Alaska is telling the rest of the country what to do. They can call it whatever they want to call it. But if they wanted the rest of us to play along then they should have negotiated that when they were admitted to the Union. It's too late for buyer's remorse now.Here's a better question. What support is there for Ohio to tell Alaska what to do?
It's more like Obama is an incompetent iron fisted tyrannical boob.
Sure Ohio isn't telling Alaska what to do. William McKinley is only from Ohio.Ohio isn't telling Alaska what to do. Alaska is telling the rest of the country what to do. They can call it whatever they want to call it. But if they wanted the rest of us to play along then they should have negotiated that when they were admitted to the Union. It's too late for buyer's remorse now.
And yet he still kicked the republican nominee's ass two elections in a row.
![]()
Obama will need to sign a whole bunch more EOs before he can be called the "Great One." Reagan signed nearly twice as many EOs.
How's Boehner's lawsuit going these days?If we gave Manhattan back to the Indians and returned California to the illegals, we could once again be the greatest nation on planet earth. Hell let's throw Chicago in. [Chicago is the Indian word "shikaakwa" which means stinky onion!!]
Irrelevant. EOs are intended to facilate and implement of the law. Obama has been issuing executive orders to subvert and countermand laws enacted by Congress. The number of executive orders argument is simply a lame Democratic talking point. He has taken executive power well beyond its constitutional limit and the sooner he's gone the better.
How's Boehner's lawsuit going these days?