ADVERTISEMENT

Can we not attack current & future Iowa players?

I agree I think the coaches who are professionals and ultimately responsible are mostly fear game but credit the kids for playing hard and until the end
 
Nah, they deserve it. That was shit basketball and the players/coaches should be publicly embarrassed.
 
Unfortunately, things gotta get pretty bad before you get change. Last time seat started getting Hot for Fran, Barta announced he'd given Fran a 10 year contract.
Fran not going to quit on his own.
 
Im fine if peeps want to critique effort... its another thing to attack who that kid is... ie “Player B is trash. “
 
  • Like
Reactions: Franisdaman
Pointing out areas of weakness is not an attack although I admit the line gets crossed often. Is stating my opinion that connor shouldn't be starting at point guard in the bten an attack? These guys have to accept the criticism and scrutiny right along with the glory and praise. Thats the price of fame
 
  • Like
Reactions: ROCKY MOUNTAIN HAWK
There is a big difference between: Player X needs to find the open guy when double teamed vs. Player X is a worthless black hole that should never play again.

That being said, I have no problem with harsher phrasing targeted towards the coaching.
 
If you don't like the way the Hawks played, focus your anger on the coaches and their preparation. Don't target a specific player; instead, say something like "Fran should have had Player X more at PG."

I hope people did not not tweet the players last night; unfortunately, I am sure it happened.

It was an ugly performance; it does not mean that we all have to turn into ugly fans.
 
Good kids, try very hard, skilled perhaps, just not that athletic compared to the kids they are plYing against. Not their fault they accepted a scholarship.
 
Good kids, try very hard, skilled perhaps, just not that athletic compared to the kids they are plYing against. Not their fault they accepted a scholarship.
i agree. It's Fran's recruiting. It's Fran's team. It's Fran's coaching. It's Fran's preparation.

Don't like what you see? Focus on Fran and what HIS team in year 10 is lacking.
 
They are trying, they just aren’t good enough....
What do you mean by attack?

Are you expecting people not to be critical?
Im fine if peeps want to critique effort... its another thing to attack who that kid is... ie “Player B is trash. “
Pointing out areas of weakness is not an attack although I admit the line gets crossed often. Is stating my opinion that connor shouldn't be starting at point guard in the bten an attack? These guys have to accept the criticism and scrutiny right along with the glory and praise. Thats the price of fame
There is a big difference between: Player X needs to find the open guy when double teamed vs. Player X is a worthless black hole that should never play again.

That being said, I have no problem with harsher phrasing targeted towards the coaching.

Recently we had Kenyon Murray starting a thread, defending his kids. This is when I knew the line had been crossed.
 
Recently we had Kenyon Murray starting a thread, defending his kids. This is when I knew the line had been crossed.
So it doesn't matter until the kids parent is someone we watched play? :)

I don't know what the "attacks" are...too afraid to read half these threads!
But unless they are really "low blows" then you'd better be ready for people to criticize you when you agree to play college bball/fball.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BlackNGoldBleeder
Recently we had Kenyon Murray starting a thread, defending his kids. This is when I knew the line had been crossed.

That's Kenyon Murray's prerogative.

I wish him and his sons well. And the truth is no one has any idea how any recruit will pan out, so every opinion should be taken with a grain of salt, good, bad, or neutral.

With all of that said, it's an anonymous message board. Fans are fans. Some more pathetic than others. It's with every fan base.

In terms of McCaffery's recruiting, after ten years, the criticism is warranted. If fans go over the line, then it's the mods responsibility to delete and censor accordingly.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT