Maybe if you're so concerned for us you'll come and try to get them.Sad that you can't believe an obvious point. Get your guns out of your house (probably a trailer) and you, and your family will be safer and better off.
Maybe if you're so concerned for us you'll come and try to get them.Sad that you can't believe an obvious point. Get your guns out of your house (probably a trailer) and you, and your family will be safer and better off.
Maybe if you're so concerned for us you'll come and try to get them.
cough... secondhand smoke... cough.....
Someone in danger of being shot at is more likely to carry a gun.
The claim the OP made is as dumb as saying having a life preserver makes you more likely to drown, which is every bit as true.[/QUOTE
https://membership.nrahq.org/forms/signup.asp
I voted for Stein and have an AR-15 and an AK. I figure I'm just the exception to the rule.I'm an Obama voter that owns an AR -15 and a RIA 1911. That probably makes me one of the most effed up and dangerous posters on the board.
I'll take 2015 where the neighbor kid gets to live.
Are you not concerned that the same government that wants to take our guns, is the same one that is arming the world (and our enemies and terrorists) with high tech weaponry and chemical weapons to make our world unsafe?https://www.newscientist.com/articl...un-increases-risk-of-getting-shot-and-killed/
Before you buy and carry a gun, know that doing so makes you less safe.
Of course you would the liberal mantra is to run from every fight and hope someone else takes care it for you.I'll take 2015 where the neighbor kid gets to live.
Yes. Not that our government is actually trying to take our guns.Are you not concerned that the same government that wants to take our guns, is the same one that is arming the world (and our enemies and terrorists) with high tech weaponry and chemical weapons to make our world unsafe?
https://www.newscientist.com/articl...un-increases-risk-of-getting-shot-and-killed/
Before you buy and carry a gun, know that doing so makes you less safe.
You're probably right that facts won't convince gun owners. All I hope is that they know owning and carrying a gun makes them more likely to be shot. It certainly is not making them safer.
Owning does not equal wearing.It probably does in a probabilistic sense. Just because I'm wearing my gold Rolex as I stroll through a bad neighborhood doesn't necessarily mean I will get robbed, but it's a good bet that it increases the odds.
SMH.Owning does not equal wearing.
Walking through a bad neighborhood would be the largest probability factor
So you would rather live in a time when we have WW3? Of course you would since conservatives are war monguering fools who would rather send our youth to die. Ya know since we are generalizing and stereotyping here. I would rather we don't have WW3 so the neighbor kid gets to live but maybe that flew over your head. I would rather no one fights any battles.Of course you would the liberal mantra is to run from every fight and hope someone else takes care it for you.
Liberals are spineless jelly fish.
Compared to what? And what do you want to do about it?You can have that here too, although it's a lot tougher since the ACA has caused premiums to skyrocket.
Compared to what? And what do you want to do about it?
Watch who you call stupid. It's not very Preacher like.Yes. Not that our government is actually trying to take our guns.
Can we have more sensible policies in both arenas? Being stupid on one does not justify or require being stupid on the other.
If we were Syria and the weapons we gave to the supposedly moderate rebels were now shooting up my home town, I might feel different. But we aren't. So can we stop making it easy for America's radical extremists to load up on weapons and ammo?
Note that the common thread on the domestic gun trade and the international gun trade is that in both cases our laws favor high sales and high profits. How do you, as a market guy, object to the international trade yet defend the domestic trade? Not trying to be snarky; just curious how you distinguish them to allow what seems to be nearly opposite stances.
So you would rather live in a time when we have WW3? Of course you would since conservatives are war monguering fools who would rather send our youth to die. Ya know since we are generalizing and stereotyping here. I would rather we don't have WW3 so the neighbor kid gets to live but maybe that flew over your head. I would rather no one fights any battles.
People with ideals like you helped put it in motion.Sorry to be the one to tell you Mr. Neville Chamberlain but WWIII has already been put in motion.
The followers of Islam have already lit the fuse for WWIII and this one will make WWII look like a clam bake. The enemy wants you dead because you are who your are. They take no prisoners and they lop the heads off women and children. There is no such thing as reaching any type of agreement they simply want you dead because you are not one of them. They don't want your property or your money they just want you dead.
WWIII has started and it will only end if you get them before they get you.
There isn't one.
Carrying a gun is dangerous on so many levels. Many gun owners don't understand this.
Playing with matches can also be dangerous.....your blown mind can be also be very dangerous.
![]()
Obama shares as much blame as anyone for his lack of handling terrorist attacks here in the motherland and his lack of a spine to fight them overseas.People with ideals like you helped put it in motion.