Needs to rip a page out of Kamala’s playbook and execute the elegant coup
Wrong board for this, but don't you think they would have brought it a little stronger than that if it truly were a coup?The only coup we’ve seen attempted recently was on jan 6 2021.
So Kirk hasn't been winning in the current college football era?We need someone with a killer instinct. It may sound dramatic, but the only way to win in the current college football era is having that kind of must win mentality. I'm not sure if Seth Wallace has that kind of instinct or not. I'm open to any successful coach, like Urban Meyer.
I know your schtick is being obtuse, someone calling you out on it, then you putting your hands up as if you did nothing wrong, but it's pretty clear what I mean. How many outright B1G titles and playoff births have we had under Kirk?So Kirk hasn't been winning in the current college football era?
Btw, he's much more of a killer than you realize. It had already been proven, but last year reminded us that the man is a badass
It's clear that what you said is wrong.I know your schtick is being obtuse, someone calling you out on it, then you putting your hands up as if you did nothing wrong, but it's pretty clear what I mean. How many outright B1G titles and playoff births have we had under Kirk?
Please just go bother someone else with your incessant nonsense.
The only coup we’ve seen attempted recently was on jan 6 2021.
So Kirk hasn't been winning in the current college football era?
Btw, he's much more of a killer than you realize. It had already been proven, but last year reminded us that the man is a badass
Aaaaaaaand you never answered my question. Again, just go away.It's clear that what you said is wrong.
Under KF, Iowa has been the most consistently successful non-blue blood program in the country
Subjective.It's clear that what you said is wrong.
Under KF, Iowa has been the most consistently successful non-blue blood program in the country
It was a rhetorical question, so just answer it yourself.Aaaaaaaand you never answered my question. Again, just go away.
No you didn't.It was a rhetorical question, so just answer it yourself.
I made a legitimate counterpoint
No, the numbers support it.Subjective.
Again, no it doesn't.No, the numbers support it.
I suppose if you really felt the need to split hairs, you would conclude that Iowa is one of the most successful non-blue blood programs in the country. And my point would remain
It's hard when you go back and forth every post. You make no sense.Read better
So Iowa is not one of the most successful non-blue bloods in the country?Again, no it doesn't.
Read betterIt's hard when you go back and forth every post. You make no sense.
That wasn't the question.So Iowa is not one of the most successful non-blue bloods in the country?
Only the one who poses the question decides if it's rhetorical. It wasn't a rhetorical question. You refuse to answer because you know I'm right. Because clearly, my use of the word winning, which I defined as championships and playoff births, is different than your use of the word.It was a rhetorical question, so just answer it yourself.
I made a legitimate counterpoint
Your question was, "how many outright Big Ten titles and playoff appearances has Iowa had under Kirk?" The answer to that question exists in the form of a number. What is there for you to be right about?Only the one who poses the question decides if it's rhetorical. It wasn't a rhetorical question. You refuse to answer because you know I'm right. Because clearly, my use of the word winning, which I defined as championships and playoff births, is different than your use of the word.
You're not going to word salad your way out of this one. You should have just left it alone.
Enlighten me because I didn't have a clue what you were talking about, and was askingThat wasn't the question.
Welcome to our world dealing with you Eyes.Enlighten me because I didn't have a clue what you were talking about, and was asking
What????Your question was, "how many outright Big Ten titles and playoff appearances has Iowa had under Kirk?" The answer to that question exists in the form of a number. What is there for you to be right about?
But you are correct that we define winning differently. I'll stand by my opinion that being one of the most successful non-blue blood programs in the country is winning
I think you know what the numbers say.Well, where are your numbers Eyes? Show me please. Prove your point. I'll be waiting.
No please, allow me to help you.Here, I'll help you out.
You said, "Under KF, Iowa has been the most consistently successful non-blue blood program in the country"
You then said numbers support that (whatever that means).
Show me these numbers. I suspect you won't, or can't, because, it's subjective rhetoric. Nothing more.
I know what the numbers say that state Iowa is the most successful and consistent non blue blood in the country?I think you know what the numbers say.
But the burden of proof is on you. You are the one asserting that what I have said is false. Prove it
What do the numbers say to you?No please, allow me to help you.
I know what the numbers say. If you disagree with what I've said, prove me wrong
This entire response encapsulates exactly what I was talking about. Obtuse, gets called out, and then acts like we're the ones who are confused.Your question was, "how many outright Big Ten titles and playoff appearances has Iowa had under Kirk?" The answer to that question exists in the form of a number. What is there for you to be right about?
But you are correct that we define winning differently. I'll stand by my opinion that being one of the most successful non-blue blood programs in the country is winning
This entire response encapsulates exactly what I was talking about. Obtuse, gets called out, and then acts like we're the ones who are confused.
I'll summarize my point quickly and be done with it. I want Iowa to win championships and get into the playoffs/win in the playoffs. Therefore, I want us to look for a coach with a killer instinct so we can get that far. You misconstrued my point as if I was saying we don't win games, which isn't true. I want games, championships, playoff births, and a shot at the national title. Kirk has not delivered on that front. When we do get a new coach, which eventually happen because Kirk isn't immortal, that's the kind of coach I'm looking for.
Totally get it and concurred.This entire response encapsulates exactly what I was talking about. Obtuse, gets called out, and then acts like we're the ones who are confused.
I'll summarize my point quickly and be done with it. I want Iowa to win championships and get into the playoffs/win in the playoffs. Therefore, I want us to look for a coach with a killer instinct so we can get that far. You misconstrued my point as if I was saying we don't win games, which isn't true. I want games, championships, playoff births, and a shot at the national title. Kirk has not delivered on that front. When we do get a new coach, which eventually happen because Kirk isn't immortal, that's the kind of coach I'm looking for.
How is it possible that you keep become more confused?I know what the numbers say that state Iowa is the most successful and consistent non blue blood in the country?
And now I'm supposed to prove that to myself because the burden is on me even though you wrote it?
Does this sound coherent to you?
Because I'm talking to you.How is it possible that you keep become more confused?