they were down 17 earlier down 10pts is a lot better and they need to win to get into NCAA. Now down six.
Indiana doesn't deserve to be in NCAA tourney, solid but unspectacular.
*****Conference Tournament games thread*****
- Thread starter Chishawk1425
- Start date
they were down 17 earlier down 10pts is a lot better and they need to win to get into NCAA. Now down six.
Indiana doesn't deserve to be in NCAA tourney, solid but unspectacular.
I feel ya, but that means Iowa would have to be a 7 or 10 seed to make it happen, as I don't see Duke as less than a 2-seed.
Hoping Iowa can - and does - get up to the 4/5 lines.
After NW's come from behind win last night and IU's current storm back from down 17 has me really nervous for the Iowa game, that its going to come down to the wire.
Prove me wrong Hawks!!
Not so fast my friend...
.....I was thinking of posting earlier in this game too that we really want to get rid of the Indiana teams in this tourny with the baked in home advantage which really sucks for other teams and what our Hawk lady's team had to endure and play against IU in Indianapolis....seriously. So here comes IU against Michigan and the crowd is now in this thing.....I don't have a good feeling now for Blue....
You'd think if they lose, they'd have slapped themselves right out of it.
Holy smokes. Just checked IU score on phone, 10 minutes apart. Had to check another source to make sure Fox app wasn't a glitch!
Butler up on Providence, Syracuse up on Duke, both second half. Things are heating up!
March Madness, man. Gotta love it.
(unless its your team on the other end of the spectrum, like Michigan right now)
I would think so too but I thought I heard this morning on BTN where not a ton of emphasis is put on the conference tourny results.....I wasn't paying the best of attention either...? Did anyone else hear this? Of course if you win the dang tourny, that really helps.
Jackson-Davis could have been the best player in the Big Ten. The guy should average 25 and 15 a game. He's still considered a really good player, just not discussed with the Murray, Davis, Cockburn and Ivey. It seems to be how engaged he is determines his output. He would have thrived under Fran.
Anyone else think the fact that "Quad" ratings go up and down is just plain ridiculous? Injuries can happen that affect a team and that shouldn't change the team/game value at the time.
Similar threads
