ADVERTISEMENT

Confirmed ...vouchers were a handout to wealthy.

So that means the other 67% was needs based this year.

This should please you people.

Huh? The first year you could only get an ESA if you were a family of four at or below 300% of FPL.

Me thinks you got it backwards Nordy. Quick, edit your post...nobody will know!

Edit to add link to Kimberly's shit:
 
Last edited:
Suck at links, but Ciggy can help me out when he sees this thread.

Got the info off of KCRG website.

Thanks. One thing I really want to know is of these 33% of needs based approved ESA accounts - how many were actually accepted by the school they applied to? Just getting approved for the ESA doesn't mean shit. You can still be left out in the cold (like we all want poors to be). Per Kimberly's news release:

"In addition to applying and being approved for an ESA, families must separately apply to the accredited private school of their choice and, if accepted, update their ESA account indicating the school their child plans to attend."
 
Last edited:
This is shocking. Thankfully, private schools now have accountability and oversight of the public dollars they receive just like public schools. Oh wait.....
Accountability for private schools boils down to convincing people to keep bringing their kids there instead of to the competition.

How does accountability for the public schools work?
 
Accountability for private schools boils down to convincing people to keep bringing their kids there instead of to the competition.

How does accountability for the public schools work?
Huh? As public schools we are beholden to conducting and paying for an annual audit ($17,000 for our district this year), and the timely filling of a certified Certified Annual Report (CAR) that literally examines every account and every transaction during a fiscal year.

Private schools area subject to neither of those. Any other brain busters?
 
Huh? As public schools we are beholden to conducting and paying for an annual audit ($17,000 for our district this year), and the timely filling of a certified Certified Annual Report (CAR) that literally examines every account and every transaction during a fiscal year.
What happens if the school fails the audit?
Do they close the school, or just tell them to do better next time?

Private schools area subject to neither of those. Any other brain busters?
A private school is subject to merciless consumer whim.
Nobody needs an audit to close a bad restaurant, lack of customers will do the job.
That's real world accountability.
How can public schools be held accountable by their customers?
 
What happens if the school fails the audit?
Do they close the school, or just tell them to do better next time?


A private school is subject to merciless consumer whim.
Nobody needs an audit to close a bad restaurant, lack of customers will do the job.
That's real world accountability.
How can public schools be held accountable by their customers?
If an audit was "failed" that school would have to appear in person in front of the School Budget Review Committee to explain how the district would turn their financial situation around through a comprehensive school finance improvement program. If they don't show improvement within two years, then yes, steps can be taken to punish the district including closure.

And are you not familiar with the concept of open enrollment? Our dipshit governor just made it possible to open enroll at any point of the year for some reason. Students open enrolling costs the resident district thousands of dollars.

I know you're from Florida apparently, but this concept is not a difficult one.
 
Huh? The first year you could only get an ESA if you were a family of four at or below 300% of FPL.

Me thinks you got it backwards Nordy. Quick, edit your post...nobody will know!

Edit to add link to Kimberly's shit:

I believe in the first year current private school students are only given funds if they meet the needs based criteria.
 
If an audit was "failed" that school would have to appear in person in front of the School Budget Review Committee to explain how the district would turn their financial situation around through a comprehensive school finance improvement program. If they don't show improvement within two years, then yes, steps can be taken to punish the district including closure.
Has that ever happened? A closure.
Cause I've seen a lot of restaurants go out of business and be replaced by better ones.
The threat of consumer demand isn't a hollow one.

And are you not familiar with the concept of open enrollment? Our dipshit governor just made it possible to open enroll at any point of the year for some reason. Students open enrolling costs the resident district thousands of dollars.
I know you're from Florida apparently, but this concept is not a difficult one.
If I decide that Chick-fil-A isn't good enough, and I take my money to Popeyes, am I costing Chick-fil-A money, or is their inability to satisfy my needs costing them money?
Who do you think bears the responsibility?

Is this concept a difficult one?
 
What happens if the school fails the audit?
Do they close the school, or just tell them to do better next time?


A private school is subject to merciless consumer whim.
Nobody needs an audit to close a bad restaurant, lack of customers will do the job.
That's real world accountability.
How can public schools be held accountable by their customers?
You mean like the "consumer whim" that the Catholic church faced?
 
I don’t understand vouchers (not a thing here), so can someone give me the crayon eater explanation? Without all the team red vs blue?

Being talked about where I live, and don’t want to just side with something I don’t understand.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CaboKP
Correct. And the number that met the “need” criteria was 33%.

According the the OP, 33% of the ESA went to new students. That means the remaining 67% went to current private school students. In year one and two, private school students are only given vouchers if they meet the needs based criteria.
 
According the the OP, 33% of the ESA went to new students. That means the remaining 67% went to current private school students. In year one and two, private school students are only given vouchers if they meet the needs based criteria.
Private school students who were already paying for private school. Now they get it subsidized. Soon there will be no income requirements and likely not even a requirement to attend a school.

This has always been a subsidy for religious organizations and well to do people who support them.
 
According the the OP, 33% of the ESA went to new students. That means the remaining 67% went to current private school students. In year one and two, private school students are only given vouchers if they meet the needs based criteria.

I’m off for a Friday night of boozing…I’ll let you warriors of pedantry fight it out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TennNole17
How many new students were we expecting? 33% new students? That sounds like a pretty good number. What's the problem here? Are we mad that people who were already going to private school are needs based?
The ESA applications exceeded the estimate by around 25%.

It's also why the financial ramifications will be much more than Terrace Hill planned for.

Hence...Dim Kim is stealing from other areas to cover.
And there won't be any audits to monitor the Statehouse.
 
Last edited:
The ESA applications exceeded the estimate by around 25%.

It's also why the financial ramifications will be much more than Terrace Hill planned for.

Hence...Dim Kim is stealing from other areas to cover.
And there won't be any audits to monitor the Statehouse.
Exceeded by 25% with 33% new students. Sounds like it was more than expected. I think this thread was bitching about a positive aspect of these vouchers. You guys just like to bitch.
 
That's really good actually, I didn't figure private schools would have capacity for new students at that rate in year 1.

Need time to open up some new options.

Simultaneously public schools should see the writing on the wall that they need to look to improve ASAP. Unless they're just sticking their heads in the sand and hoping Dems take the government back so they can continue as is, without choice for families.

I realize many in this thread would take the latter option, hoping everyone else lowers their standards so the status quo can live on infinitely.
 
I’d like to read the source of this number. Tried to find it. Can’t.

Can you post?


Approximately 33.7% of the 16,757 student participants who used an ESA at an Iowa accredited nonpublic school for the 2023-24 school year did not previously attend a nonpublic school. About 12.7% of the student ESA participants previously attended a public school. Close to 21% of the student ESA participants were entering kindergarten students.
 
That's really good actually, I didn't figure private schools would have capacity for new students at that rate in year 1.

Need time to open up some new options.

Simultaneously public schools should see the writing on the wall that they need to look to improve ASAP. Unless they're just sticking their heads in the sand and hoping Dems take the government back so they can continue as is, without choice for families.

I realize many in this thread would take the latter option, hoping everyone else lowers their standards so the status quo can live on infinitely.
I think you would get both sides to cool off if private schools had to a) accept everyone who applied and b) were subject to the same review standards as public schools.

Without those two things, public schools “needing to improve” are essentially fighting with one arm tied behind their back. But that’s ultimately the goal of all this - create a self-fulfilling prophecy that public education is a failure.
 
It would be nice if vouchers were limited to the portion of taxes a family pays towards public schools.

As it stands now, the amount likely exceeds most people's tax burden.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TornadoHawk93


Approximately 33.7% of the 16,757 student participants who used an ESA at an Iowa accredited nonpublic school for the 2023-24 school year did not previously attend a nonpublic school. About 12.7% of the student ESA participants previously attended a public school. Close to 21% of the student ESA participants were entering kindergarten students.
Good post.
Thanks
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT