It’s exactly what we all said it would be. Northern bitches repeatedly about a stadium for a public school but has no problem subsidizing a new car or the kids’ college educations for well to do families. This is just a grift. Republicans and their narrative don’t allow them to admit it. They are incapable of it.
300% of the poverty level or roughly $65K per year for a family of four is the first year income limit. Over $110K the 2nd year and no income requirements thereafter. It's a subsidy for the religious organizations and the people who support them.
Less than 1% of the public school population.
Looks like no one can argue with it.
LOL
Tell me how private schools are going to accommodate every public school student.
Wrong. My wife and I both work for public schools. Many of our friends work for public schools.
Should University of Iowa accept anyone, and keep them as students, no matter how ill prepared they are scholastically or emotionally to do the level of work the University of Iowa expects?
So you're not a proponent of providing education for all children?
LOL...does Iowa guarantee an education to anyone over 16? Get outta here with that weak shit.
Do you think students are on an even playing field? I don’t, that’s why I think a top down bureaucracy is a terrible way to meet their needs.
Would it be detrimental to the University of Iowa’s mission to accept anyone regardless of their scholastic ability?
WTF is this nonsense? JFC - no one types more words and says nothing than you.
LOL at you calling anyone out for not answering a question.
They. Don't. Have. To. What about that fact is confusing you? Your local public school, on the other hand, has to accept ANYONE under 16 who shows up who meets the residency requirements. Do you honestly NOT understand the difference?
No students aren’t, thus the reason we adjust resources to respond to kids in need.
I didn’t ask if they had to.
I do, what I’m stepping you toward is seeing the detriment in that policy.
Nope. Point me to a private school that provides an engineering program that gave my middle kid a path to being a national merit finalist and helped him get into a top 5 engineering school for college, while providing a performing arts program that prepared my oldest kid to enter college ahead of his peers in music education, while providing a agriculture curriculum that has set my third kid on a path to go to a top tier agricultural school to study plant science/horticulture.
Again, you don’t know what you’re talking about. You’re 180 degrees off here.
You keep bringing the ignorance. I told you to stop. Now you’re just rambling.
You're an idiot.
That the funding to provide that level of education on a broader scale is being siphoned off by politicians to subsidize religious entities and those who support them.
I have literally no idea what point you think you're trying to make. If you think having to accept any student who shows up is detrimental to the mission of the school then eliminate that requirement for public schools. If public schools getting PUBLIC money have to accept any student and be held accountable then the same requirement should hold true for private schools accepting PUBLIC money to serve the SAME students.
Do you think giving students choice in college is worse than if everyone was assigned a college based on where they lived?
Congratulations, you’re an idiot.
So you admit to the fact that the 67% of current private school students were only given the money if they had a ‘need’ ?
Answer the question and we can get there.
Oh look...more irrelevant horseshit.
Always avoiding the question.
