So there is a lot of info and too much actually. Last I heard is that Cook is still deciding whether or not to stay and complete his senior year. Is that accurate?
So there is a lot of info and too much actually. Last I heard is that Cook is still deciding whether or not to stay and complete his senior year. Is that accurate?
Baer, Kriener, and Bohannon will be working at Allstate selling me insurance if you want to go there.Fixed.
Gotcha... i dont know why the 11 th stood out... maybe thats the deadline to apply for the eval?April 21st
I've heard that some of the European teams are a little slow with paychecks if at all. No idea if it's true but I've heard this before.
So there is a lot of info and too much actually. Last I heard is that Cook is still deciding whether or not to stay and complete his senior year. Is that accurate?
I've heard that some of the European teams are a little slow with paychecks if at all. No idea if it's true but I've heard this before.
Yeah, who would want to be around the art, history, culture, and culinary opportunities in Europe?Yeah, playing basketball in Europe for $250-$300K year ain't bad for a 23 year old. But the lifestyle isn't so great. That said, if you can do it for 4-5 years...put some money in the bank and come back stateside to reinvent yourself at 28 it's not a bad option.
Garza became a consistent force in the 1st half of the year as teams focused on Cook. When defenses refocused on Garza, Cook stepped up. But then didn’t seem to know how to find a balance of sharing the O after that.IMO getting the ball to him hasn't been the problem, it's what he does from there. Iowa was at its best when he played unselfishly and kicked it back out or drove hard to the hoop. Something changed and he began to hold longer and distribute less. Ultimately shooting low percentage shots and putting the team in a tough spot on transition defense.
Mike Gesell is doing quite well at Morgan Stanley.Baer, Kriener, and Bohannon will be working at Allstate selling me insurance if you want to go there.
Putting his degree and connections to good use. That's a positive outcome in my book.Mike Gesell is doing quite well at Morgan Stanley.![]()
I think the more guys who enter makes the chances for his return a little better because think will drop him down the board even more so. But for the record I think he goes pro no matter if he thinks he will be drafted or not.
Yeah, who would want to be around the art, history, culture, and culinary opportunities in Europe?
Of course I've been like a fifty year old in my thinking since I was 20, so what I think is a good opportunity wouldn't match with the vast majority of players in this situation.
If you can’t shoot worth a darn after playing since you were young— you never are going to be a shooter.I really can't see him getting drafted, especially in today's NBA, unless he develops into a Reggie Evans type glass cleaner. We haven't seen that type of consistent hustle or ability from him yet.
He needs to come back and start hitting 15 footers with consistency. If you combine his athletic ability with the threat of a jumper maybe he has a chance at next level success. It's a long shot, both him and the program would be better off if he came back.
I’d rather not see him back and working on his 15 foot jump shot. Concentrating on what he does best and coming back is good with me, but not jump shots.I really can't see him getting drafted, especially in today's NBA, unless he develops into a Reggie Evans type glass cleaner. We haven't seen that type of consistent hustle or ability from him yet.
He needs to come back and start hitting 15 footers with consistency. If you combine his athletic ability with the threat of a jumper maybe he has a chance at next level success. It's a long shot, both him and the program would be better off if he came back.
If you can’t shoot worth a darn after playing since you were young— you never are going to be a shooter.
I’d rather not see him back and working on his 15 foot jump shot. Concentrating on what he does best and coming back is good with me, but not jump shots.
Old bad news. The Iowa AD and Cook also said that this was premature, that he was still evaluating.https://twitter.com/BigWeitzHe's gone, he said so himself five days ago. A link below.
https://www.btpowerhouse.com/2019/4...s-for-2019-nba-draft-profile-evaluation-stats
If you can’t shoot worth a darn after playing since you were young— you never are going to be a shooter.
He's gone, he said so himself five days ago. A link below.
https://www.btpowerhouse.com/2019/4...s-for-2019-nba-draft-profile-evaluation-stats
I'm guessing you didn't read past the title?
Kwahii Leonard and Aaron Gordon disagree. Gordon was really criticized during his draft process and the first few years of his career in the NBA. He struggled finding effectiveness between being a 4 or a 3 without a pro level shot. However, with access to the best trainers and financial capital to invest in himself he has developed an effective shot which has transformed him into a nightmare for other teams.
The difference between TC and Gordon ( besides difference in prospect level) however, is that Gordon embraces being a top flight defender in addition to his freak athleticism, something Tyler should consider.
On the flip side of my argument was my comparison of TC with Derrick Williams. Williams never did put in the same work Gordon did and now is out of the league.
The developmental assets are there for prospects once they are drafted to develop to even another level. The NBA is much more focused on development than in yester-years. So it’s very possible to boost or even totally develop missing skills after arriving.
I will admit that there are far more examples of players not achieving this than that have, but I expect those numbers to even out with the new emphasis on development by the league.