ADVERTISEMENT

Covid vaccines linked to saving millions of American lives per Brown University.

Is NIH making money off the vaccines? Where's the "conflict of interest" you refer to?

Email the authors, yourself if you think they had a conflict. Post back what they tell you.
I didn’t see an email address listed.
I also find it interesting that an article can say it saved x amount of lives. Do they live in another world exactly the same as this one where they didn’t give out the covid vaccine so they could figure out that number?

I just save 2 people’s lives by posting on this thread. You’re welcome people that I saved.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KFsdisciple
Meanwhile....prior infection with Covid is pretty much useless against the circulating variant...




The findings show that the protection of natural infection against reinfection with JN.1 is strong only among those who were infected within the last 6 months, with variants such as XBB*. However, this protection wanes rapidly and is entirely lost one year after the previous infection. The findings support considerable immune evasion by JN.1.
 
A lot of things can be true all at the same time.

The covid vaccine likely saved lives in 2021. Older people who got covid in 2021 tended not to die if they were vaccinated.

I also think the NIH has a bias related to covid due to Fauci. Although this doesn't necessarily make the article invalid.

After omicron hit, the vaccine has been minimally effective at best.

If they claimed the vaccine saved kids or <40 yo peoples lives, then I would dismiss the article's validity.

The covid vaccine may/likely have caused more harm than good for young healthy people under 40.
 
Last edited:
It's amazing, really, that Brown's study came up with the exact number of lives saved cited by 2 other studies.

It's also amazing the study was funded by the NIH, Grant Number R01AG073286, as well as others. I'm sure there's no conflict of interest there.

When naturalborn is supporting your post, you know you're an idiot.

Be better.
 
FALSE

The newest vaccine is quite effective against JN.1

Past Covid infections >6 months ago are not protective much at all against it.
According to worldometers, ~51,500 people died from covid in the usa in the past year. In comparison, on Mar 4, 2020 we had 11 deaths. By April 27th, 2020 we had 59,000 deaths in the usa. We are not dealing with a pandemic anymore.

Most of these people had co-morbidities that actually caused their death, but since they tested positive for covid, they were counted as a covid death per hospital billing rules.

Most people have a robust immune system that does a great job fighting covid. If a person does get sick enough to require hospitalization, our treatments are remarkably effective.

People are not dying from covid (medically) in the same way today as they died from covid in 2020. You are holding onto a vaccine for something that is not that big of a deal anymore. We have discussed the relative risk reduction vs. The absolute risk reduction. The arr for the covid vaccine is very low (feel free to look it up though).
 
  • Like
Reactions: GolfHacker1
Well, that is a load of misinformation. "Hospital billing rules"? Really? You obviously do not understand medical coding and billing.
Just curious if you would say that Covid was never marked as the cause of death even if it wasn’t really the reason behind someone passing away?
 
Most of these people had co-morbidities that actually caused their death
This is the SAME WAY influenza deaths are calculated.

Are people who have co-morbidities "less important" or "not people"?

Do elderly people "not count" anymore?
Do you not give a shit about your own grandparents, or elderly parents?
 
People are not dying from covid (medically) in the same way today as they died from covid in 2020. You are holding onto a vaccine for something that is not that big of a deal

It's actually still killing people at a far faster clip than flu ever has.
And we STILL recommend annual flu vaccines, >100 years after the Spanish flu pandemic.
 
Well, that is a load of misinformation. "Hospital billing rules"? Really? You obviously do not understand medical coding and billing.
These folks latch onto the latest piece of disinformation that shows up in their email Inbox, and post it here like it's something "new and exciting"...
 
Well, that is a load of misinformation. "Hospital billing rules"? Really? You obviously do not understand medical coding and billing.
I'm curious what you know about medical coding and billing? Do you know the rules for how covid plays into coding and billing?
 
  • Like
Reactions: GolfHacker1
This is the SAME WAY influenza deaths are calculated.

Are people who have co-morbidities "less important" or "not people"?

Do elderly people "not count" anymore?
Do you not give a shit about your own grandparents, or elderly parents?
Do you know what would be sent for billing if a person arrives to the hospital with pneumonia and tests positive for influenza and covid?

Covid looks worse on paper because of the coding rules associated with billing.
 
Covid looks worse on paper because of the coding rules associated with billing.

No; Covid is more difficult & costly to manage, because you need isolated areas for those patients which is not the case for other illnesses.
 
No; Covid is more difficult & costly to manage, because you need isolated areas for those patients which is not the case for other illnesses.
People with covid are placed in the same rooms as an influenza patient. About the only difference is the use of an n95.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GolfHacker1
Meanwhile....prior infection with Covid is pretty much useless against the circulating variant...




The findings show that the protection of natural infection against reinfection with JN.1 is strong only among those who were infected within the last 6 months, with variants such as XBB*. However, this protection wanes rapidly and is entirely lost one year after the previous infection. The findings support considerable immune evasion by JN.1.
Protection from infection or severe disease?

I wouldn't suspect old natural infections to protect against infection from newer strains like new vaccines might. (Of course the vaccines will suffer the same date in time and have to be refreshed)
 
No; Covid is more difficult & costly to manage, because you need isolated areas for those patients which is not the case for other illnesses.
Covid is prioritized as the principal diagnosis if it meets criteria for pdx. If you tested positive for flu, covid and rsv; covid would be the principal diagnosis. This coding priority creates an obvious bias toward covid looking worse than it really is.

"(b) Sequencing of codes
When COVID-19 meets the definition of principal diagnosis, code U07.1, COVID-19, should be sequenced first, followed by the
appropriate codes for associated manifestations, except when
another guideline requires that certain codes be sequenced first,
such as obstetrics, sepsis, or transplant complications."

 
  • Like
Reactions: GolfHacker1
Covid is prioritized as the principal diagnosis if it meets criteria for pdx. If you tested positive for flu, covid and rsv; covid would be the principal diagnosis. This coding priority creates an obvious bias toward covid looking worse than it really is.

"(b) Sequencing of codes
When COVID-19 meets the definition of principal diagnosis, code U07.1, COVID-19, should be sequenced first, followed by the
appropriate codes for associated manifestations, except when
another guideline requires that certain codes be sequenced first,
such as obstetrics, sepsis, or transplant complications."

People do not generally have Covid, flu and RSV all at once.

They sequence this way, because Covid is the MOST infectious of the three. AND the most serious.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BrianNole777
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT