I thought he looked better last night. Like several of our guys he needs to be better defensively but I think he has the ability to do so.11 pts
8 reb
0 to’s
I thought he was decent.
I thought he looked better last night. Like several of our guys he needs to be better defensively but I think he has the ability to do so.11 pts
8 reb
0 to’s
I thought he was decent.
I'm not following the meaning. You mean he won't play a lot because he's behind Freeman at Center?Dembele’s biggest problem is that he’s the 2nd best center on the team.
Michaël Payne was never that versatile as there is 4 inches difference between the 2. Payne was a forward/center, Traore is a player that can play 4 positions if needed. Quite a pickup by Fran if I don't say so, he will be a big addition for the Hawkeyes going forward.He kinda reminds me of Michael Payne. Has the skills but needs to be more aggressive. He will improve!
I was referring to Dembele.Michaël Payne was never that versatile as there is 4 inches difference between the 2. Payne was a forward/center, Traore is a player that can play 4 positions if needed. Quite a pickup by Fran if I don't say so, he will be a big addition for the Hawkeyes going forward.
Don't spot up shooters shoot better than 31% (what he was shooting 3 days ago).Well from a 5 perspective he can't play with his back to the basket. He has no inside game whatsoever. He's not physical in his mindset. He can't alter any shots and they tend to rebound over him. South Dakota collected 14 offensive rebounds last night. Mulvey might actually be a better option backing up the 5 today.
The guy is a spot up shooter on offense. That's his game. Will he also have disadvantages vs the 4? Of course he will but that's just who he is. He's a tweener who is at a disadvantage on defense wherever he plays.
I didn’t say he was a good shooter, just that he plays like one and they represent the bulk of his shots. If he had any kind of inside game his percentages would undoubtedly be higher. Again, he's not a 5 that can play with his back to the basket. He doesn't have a post move in his arsenal and he lacks aggressiveness inside.Don't spot up shooters shoot better than 31% (what he was shooting 3 days ago).
I’d be very surprised to ever see this but I hope in practice they experiment with this for a couple minutes to see if it could have some effect on the boardsMy question against bigger teams can Freeman play the four some with Mulvey. Of course that assumes what Mulvey showed the other night wasn’t n illusion.
I look at a team such as ISU, Rutgers, Purdue, etc. Not sure Delembee is physical enough or Seydou big enough to consistently go up against those guys.I’d be very surprised to ever see this but I hope in practice they experiment with this for a couple minutes to see if it could have some effect on the boards
Athleticism and skill means much more than size against talented teams. If Mulvey was an option he'd be getting time. He isn't.I look at a team such as ISU, Rutgers, Purdue, etc. Not sure Delembee is physical enough or Seydou big enough to consistently go up against those guys.
Well we will find out in Iowa City soon enough. Ace Bailey of Rutgers is going to be a big problem for everyone . He looks every bit a star in the making.I look at a team such as ISU, Rutgers, Purdue, etc. Not sure Delembee is physical enough or Seydou big enough to consistently go up against those guys.
Or Traore or Koch or Brauns.Hard for me to understand how anyone could think Riley Mulvey would be a better option than Dembele. Dembele was a big part of why the defense against WSU was better. Except for Harding at PG and Payton when isolated at times, the defense was a big improvement against a better team.
Sometimes size matters. Womp. Womp.Or Traore or Koch or Brauns.
Hard for me to understand how anyone could think Mulvey is an option period.
If you don't think Ladji is physical enough, (his main problem last year was being too physical on defense) how would Mulvey be an improvement?
Mulvey looks like a taller version of Patrick that can't jump.Sometimes size matters. Womp. Womp.
That's racist. Oh, wait....Mulvey looks like a taller version of Patrick that can't jump.
Not even close.Mulvey looks like a taller version of Patrick that can't jump.
When the alternative is Dembele and Brauns it makes Mulvey look a little better but I'd really like to see Tadjo get more minutes too.I don’t think anyone is saying heavy minutes for mulvey. I never thought I would be defending the guy but he is fairly effective down low and not a bad defender.
Dembele is very “Glen Worely” like inside the paint, like a drug addict trying to make a two foot putt.
Mulvey is savvy, and while he missed a bunny seems to be able to score against big/tall defenders and is an adequate rebounder. Guy leads the team in fg% and has zero turnovers. Not many minutes mind you.
When the alternative is Dembele and Brauns it makes Mulvey look a little better but I'd really like to see Tadjo get more minutes too.
His potential is far beyond the other 3 and if he gets the ball close to hoop it's getting dunked.
I didn’t see much of the game but did see Tadjo when he was in and while raw damn he’s athletic. And as @RocknRollface says he’s going up strong. I’d rather see guys like him and Traore get more and more time. The Brauns experiment as the backup Center is not working. He can’t do it.100%. I have been highlighting the potential of Tadjo in other threads. He is raw but his combo of size, bounce and motor are hard to ignore. He needs to play smarter and under control. That lane violation cost us a point and am sure Fran was not happy.
I didn’t see much of the game but did see Tadjo when he was in and while raw damn he’s athletic. And as @RocknRollface says he’s going up strong. I’d rather see guys like him and Traore get more and more time. The Brauns experiment as the backup Center is not working. He can’t do it.
I’m willing to live with a few fouls. He just needs minutes. We’ve been asking for a guy like Tyler Cook for awhile (physically) and while he’s clearly got plenty of work to do we have nobody else like him.The guy is not afraid to take it to the rack, and plays with a reckless abandon that we need (minus some of the fouls)
He's also strong.100%. I have been highlighting the potential of Tadjo in other threads. He is raw but his combo of size, bounce and motor are hard to ignore. He needs to play smarter and under control. That lane violation cost us a point and am sure Fran was not happy.
He's also strong.
I watched UM bigs push Owen and others under the basket on freethrow block outs while Tadjo moved people backwards on his block out.
He just looks like a big ten player in size and build.
I like the idea of a guy who is too aggressive.
Rk | Player | MP | PER ▼ |
1 | Jacob Koch | 9 | 29.2 |
2 | Owen Freeman | 201 | 26.5 |
3 | Riley Mulvey | 33 | 25.4 |
4 | Brock Harding | 220 | 20.2 |
5 | Drew Thelwell | 204 | 19.7 |
6 | Josh Dix | 236 | 19.5 |
7 | Pryce Sandfort | 197 | 16.9 |
8 | Payton Sandfort | 282 | 16.8 |
9 | Seydou Traore | 89 | 15.5 |
10 | Cooper Koch | 77 | 11.8 |
11 | Carter Kingsbury | 32 | 9.1 |
12 | Ladji Dembele | 172 | 8.4 |
13 | Chris Tadjo | 17 | 6.3 |
14 | Even Brauns | 31 | 5.5 |
I know I'd be more comfortable. 😃He has zero confidence. Keeping him in the starting lineup is a disservice to him and the team. Maybe he’d be more comfortable coming off the bench
yep but all of frans teams have been.It does seem like he looked better last year, except he was awful on pick and rolls.
god no.I also like Carter for a few minutes he does not make mistakes and is a solid defender
My meaning is that he is a center, not a PF. He needs to be playing back up to Freeman instead of starting with him. Like tonight.I'm not following the meaning. You mean he won't play a lot because he's behind Freeman at Center?
Dimbele will see plenty of PT as backup center because Freeman is likely to be in foul trouble most games given his aggressiveness on defense. Dimbele > Braun. Braun is Dimbele without any skills---though he has good effort amd I respect his joining the team. Mulvey looked okay to me, but Fran has history of not playing him no matter how giant the opposing center is.
Dembele very strong, reasonably quick, has a 3pt shot, but not a leaper. As part time center he looks good, at PF he is a big step down from Traore.
So looks like a solid player, necessary player, not likely a star and he probably prefers playing PF over center because his professional prospects at center are not good for undersized guy.
I agree Dembele is not a PF. He gets lost on defense. He had some good minutes vs ISU backing up FReeman at center and he can be positive if he's making his 3's---but its too early to say he can shoot 3-ball at high enough percentage to be a positive.My meaning is that he is a center, not a PF. He needs to be playing back up to Freeman instead of starting with him. Like tonight.