I didn't mean that I have never talked to you, I meant that when I asked again for proof of Bush's attempt on Reagan's life, I was directing that request at Prime who has repeatedly said that such proof exists, but refuses to provide it.Actually Hoss, you were talking to me, as posts #41, 69, 85 and 86 clearly demonstrate. What's with the Rubio defense repetitively insinuating HP and I are 1? Is your teleprompter stuck?
I'm not switching topics to Kennedy. I'm illustrating a point to take down your ridiculous statements re: loyalty to the VP over Reagan. Reagan was never accepted by the Brahmins that run this country. Bush is the Patriarch of the Eastern establishment. Andover, Yale, generational Skull & Bonesman, CIA Dir. (also a S&B creation). To believe the VP, Bush, could not be protected, is to forever remain a child.
I point out the Katzenbach memo because it screamed cover-up when JFK was taken out. Since you won't answer my question, I guess I'll have to write it.
November 25, 1963
MEMORANDUM FOR MR. MOYERS
It is important that all of the facts surrounding President Kennedy's Assassination be made public in a way which will satisfy people in the United States and abroad that all the facts have been told and that a statement to this effect be made now.
1. The public must be satisfied that Oswald was the assassin; that he did not have confederates who are still at large; and that the evidence was such that he would have been convicted at trial.
We need something to head off public speculation or Congressional hearings of the wrong sort.
This is what's referred to as a smoking cannon.
Maybe there is a conspiracy in JFK's case, I don't know, but that memo certainly isn't a smoking gun or cannon. With only a basic understanding of how things work in the disgusting world of PR, it's pretty clear that the goal of the memo was to curb the potential of mass hysteria. Yes, our government lies to us, in many ways and for many reasons. One is so people don't lose their collective minds and go hysterical. Certainly we don't know the whole truth, but that doesn't mean it was necessarily an inside job.
Suggesting that Bush could have been behind the Reagan attack because of... whatever, scary societies, means very little. It makes no sense logically and there is no evidence other than wild speculation. You guys are cuckoo birds.