ADVERTISEMENT

*****Election day 2023 thread*****

First of all I'm not a Dem, I'm termporarily aligned with them because the only other major party is busy trying to overturn democracy.

A lot of of the leaders of your party are trying to say Trump didn't do anything wrong and all the indictments against him are political.

After the Nashville shooting the Dems again tried to enact gun control measures to stop crazy and violent people like her from getting guns. No one is defending Antifa other than Antifa. I think the R's get a little nuts about them calling them a terrorist org even though they havn't really killed anyone. Personally I think they are just a group of rabble rousers who want to jump into any left wing protest and take things to a criminal excess. But terrorists? Give me a break. Terrorists kill people.

The group that attacked the WH is also a fringe group. They don't run the show in the Democratic party, they were in fact upset at the guy in the Democratic party who does run the show (Biden)

Trump and his MAGA nutters run the show in the Republican party.
Then the Jan 6th rioters weren’t terrorists either right? They didn’t kill anyone either. The only riot related death came at the hands of the Capital Police.
 


“Daniel Cameron lost because he couldn’t alleviate the stench of Mitch McConnell. I told him early that’s a big burden to overcome. McConnell and Romney are Kryptonite for Republican Candidates. I moved him up 25 Points, but the McConnell relationship was “too much to bear.” Tate Reeves, on the other hand, surged to a win for Governor in Mississippi after my involvement. Congratulations to Tate!

Donald Trump Truth Social Post 11:16 AM EST 11/08/23”

He lost because another guy in his party in that state that easily wins re-election every election also is in that state?

And Trump's touting a Republican winning in Mississippi as some sort of big win.

I mean seriously that's like Biden taking credit for the Dem winning in California.
 
Then the Jan 6th rioters weren’t terrorists either right? They didn’t kill anyone either. The only riot related death came at the hands of the Capital Police.

I would call them insurrectionists more than terrorists. Terrorists attack civilians. . . insurrectionists battle government forces. In this case Capitol Police.

Antifa could at times be called rioters, but not insurrectionists. Difference here is motivation and target. Insurrectionists have a motivation to overthrow the government. Rioters just want to cause as much destruction as possible and usually don't care who owns the things they are destroying.
 
Democrats are in no way the same as Republicans. Part of your party's problem is they keep falling into the "both sides!" trap. This is what right wing media is pushing so it makes it seem like it's not so bad to vote for the guy who is actively campaigning on using the Insurrection Act to arrest political rivals and Democrats as soon as he is in power.

No where are Democrats even close to this. You have a certain subset of progressives who are pro-Palestine and want the US to punish Israel, but they are not getting any traction with that. The most they have been able to do is get Biden to plea for a cease fire while he sends two aircraft carriers and a nuclear submarine to the region. Biden may lose Michigan because of this issue but he isn't budging from his position of supporting Israel, because that's what America does. The only reason Trump supports Israel is because he like Netanyahu and respects him as the dictator Trump wants to be. It has nothing to do with what American foreign policy has been, is, or should be moving forward.

The so-called "crazies" in the Democratic party do not dictate the overall direction of the party, not like they do in the Republican party. They have a seat at the table, but that's it. But because Fox News keeps screaming "Both sides!", Republicans have no idea of what Democratic policy actually is, let alone who is driving that policy. Anything to make the fascism of the right acceptable enough for them to vote for it.
Please tell me what ‘evils’ the run of the mill Republican stands for. Because whatever you think it is is wrong.

You mistake support for Trump as support for his brand of crazy. While that may be true for a small subset, almost all of us support him with our nose held. The fact is that many support him as a counter to the policies that democrats stand for.

These are the things that we fear:
1) gun confiscation
2) feckless foreign policy
3) inflation running amok. Loan rates at recent highs.
4) shifting of the morals of the country that is seen as the increasing secularization of it. This agenda being force fed on us by a willing media trying to move the Overton window in not just incremental fashion but in huge chunks. What was thought to be at the fringe of society is now encouraged.
5) increasing lawlessness
6) out of control illegal immigration

So while you try to equate his support to being for the overthrow of government, and I don’t blame you for trying to frame it that way to benefit yourselves, this isn’t the case.

The democrats increasingly are tearing the country apart from the inside covertly rather than overtly as the Jan 6th rioters did. Trying to separate us from each other.

The Gaetz's, Boebert's and MTG's of the party represent the fringes of mine just as the Squad does yours. The difference being the nuts in my party aren't defending actual terrorists. Just an unhinged small group of rioters that worship Trump.
 


“Daniel Cameron lost because he couldn’t alleviate the stench of Mitch McConnell. I told him early that’s a big burden to overcome. McConnell and Romney are Kryptonite for Republican Candidates. I moved him up 25 Points, but the McConnell relationship was “too much to bear.” Tate Reeves, on the other hand, surged to a win for Governor in Mississippi after my involvement. Congratulations to Tate!

Donald Trump Truth Social Post 11:16 AM EST 11/08/23”
Thumping his chest because the GOP retained the governor's mansion in MISSISSIPPI.
 
The problem with the GOP is that yours is a minority opinion in the party. What you said above is reasonable. And would also get you taken out in a primary if you were running for office or re-election. (Rock-solid conservative Liz Cheney is Exhibit A.)
See my follow up post below.
 
I would call them insurrectionists more than terrorists. Terrorists attack civilians. . . insurrectionists battle government forces. In this case Capitol Police.

Antifa could at times be called rioters, but not insurrectionists. Difference here is motivation and target. Insurrectionists have a motivation to overthrow the government. Rioters just want to cause as much destruction as possible and usually don't care who owns the things they are destroying.
Antifa is made up almost entirely of anarchists so I disagree. Which President did those that created the Autonomous Zone favor?

You think that your side is different. I get it. That's human nature. You feel just as disassociated from your crazies as I do mine. But fact is, those from the other side see those as representative.

Just because you don't like the ‘Both Sides’ argument doesn't mean it isn't applicable depending on your honesty.
 
You mistake support for Trump as support for his brand of crazy. While that may be true for a small subset, almost all of us support him with our nose held.
If it's such a small collection who genuinely support Trump and his brand of crazy ... then why aren't millions of Republicans selecting another candidate in the primary? Trump was chosen from a massive field in 2015 and he's being chosen willfully again from a large field in 2023. The "hold my nose and support him" claim doesn't work when Republicans continually have other options and choose Trump as their No. 1 choice. If it was a small subset of people who truly want Trump — as you are alleging — then Haley or DeSantis or Scott would be running away with this primary.
 
Antifa is made up almost entirely of anarchists so I disagree. Which President did those that created the Autonomous Zone favor?

You think that your side is different. I get it. That's human nature. You feel just as disassociated from your crazies as I do mine. But fact is, those from the other side see those as representative.

Just because you don't like the ‘Both Sides’ argument doesn't mean it isn't applicable depending on your honesty.

Except the Dems arn't backing Antifa or calling their prosecutions "politicial"

The current speaker of the house on the other hand was part of the group that tried to overturn the election.
 
I have some cousins only and a few prior close friends but mostly my peeps are residing on Earth 1.
It's the same for me. A couple aunts and an uncle I rarely see are lost and my sister was but she seems to be exiting the fog and realizing how crazy MAGA is. The rest of my family and friends are all sane which is kind of crazy because the vast majority of them are conservatives.
First of all I'm not a Dem, I'm termporarily aligned with them because the only other major party is busy trying to overturn democracy.

A lot of of the leaders of your party are trying to say Trump didn't do anything wrong and all the indictments against him are political.

After the Nashville shooting the Dems again tried to enact gun control measures to stop crazy and violent people like her from getting guns. No one is defending Antifa other than Antifa. I think the R's get a little nuts about them calling them a terrorist org even though they havn't really killed anyone. Personally I think they are just a group of rabble rousers who want to jump into any left wing protest and take things to a criminal excess. But terrorists? Give me a break. Terrorists kill people.

The group that attacked the WH is also a fringe group. They don't run the show in the Democratic party, they were in fact upset at the guy in the Democratic party who does run the show (Biden)

Trump and his MAGA nutters run the show in the Republican party.
This is the part that Rs don't get. The crazy is running your party. Pointing out the crazy in the other party when it is the minority voice and holds no real power is stupid when your crazy is controlling your side. Get your side in order and then maybe you might have an argument.
 
I would call them insurrectionists more than terrorists. Terrorists attack civilians. . . insurrectionists battle government forces. In this case Capitol Police.

Antifa could at times be called rioters, but not insurrectionists. Difference here is motivation and target. Insurrectionists have a motivation to overthrow the government. Rioters just want to cause as much destruction as possible and usually don't care who owns the things they are destroying.
If I'm not mistaken, didn't they burn down a police station? Maybe a Court house or two out west? Take over an entire downtown area in Seattle?
 
If it's such a small collection who genuinely support Trump and his brand of crazy ... then why aren't millions of Republicans selecting another candidate in the primary? Trump was chosen from a massive field in 2015 and he's being chosen willfully again from a large field in 2023. The "hold my nose and support him" claim doesn't work when Republicans continually have other options and choose Trump as their No. 1 choice. If it was a small subset of people who truly want Trump — as you are alleging — then Haley or DeSantis or Scott would be running away with this primary.
I have no idea. If I had the answer to that I’d try to get them to coalesce around one alternate.

I think it has a lot to do with the way that many feel increasingly made to feel that their beliefs and lifestyle are being assaulted. They want the firebrand guy. Especially if they feel like he has been unfairly accused of things, charged with crimes that others haven’t etc. Trump is their big middle finger to them.

Paradoxically, had he not been accused of collusion with Russia, accused of pressure on phone calls with Ukraine, accused of financial crimes, accused of the classified documents stuff he probably wouldn’t be leading right now. They see, clearly so, how similar behavior amongst top democrats (Biden, Hillary) isn’t scrutinized of charged like he has been and it pisses them off. I get it. And accordingly they wanna cut their nose off despite their face because of it.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Mpchillin
If I'm not mistaken, didn't they burn down a police station? Maybe a Court house or two out west? Take over an entire downtown area in Seattle?
That's where the term "rioters" comes into play.

And if I'm not mistaken, there was also a Proud Boy or 2 involved in that police station situation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BioHawk


“Daniel Cameron lost because he couldn’t alleviate the stench of Mitch McConnell. I told him early that’s a big burden to overcome. McConnell and Romney are Kryptonite for Republican Candidates. I moved him up 25 Points, but the McConnell relationship was “too much to bear.” Tate Reeves, on the other hand, surged to a win for Governor in Mississippi after my involvement. Congratulations to Tate!

Donald Trump Truth Social Post 11:16 AM EST 11/08/23”
You know what? Sure. That's it Donnie. You all run with that.

Why the hell should we try to educate them on why they keep f*****g up elections? They can live in denial land indefinitely. As long as Democrats keep pointing to the actions the GOP takes every time they are in control they will win every election for the foreseeable future.
 
If I'm not mistaken, didn't they burn down a police station? Maybe a Court house or two out west? Take over an entire downtown area in Seattle?

Was there a motivation to overthrow the government? Did they fight police with violence?
 
That's where the term "rioters" comes into play.

And if I'm not mistaken, there was also a Proud Boy or 2 involved in that police station situation.
Nope, they were not. They couldn't find evidence of them being there. Just like the Umbrella Man wasn't the Hell's Angel that the news reported. He checked out and wasn't even within 50 miles of the riots.

So, burning down Gov. buildings and take over an entire area of a city is just rioting? Strange in thought.
 
You know what? Sure. That's it Donnie. You all run with that.

Why the hell should we try to educate them on why they keep f*****g up elections? They can live in denial land indefinitely. As long as Democrats keep pointing to the actions the GOP takes every time they are in control they will win every election for the foreseeable future.
I want to see a smarter, more reasoned GOP. AS an independant, I might vote for them. I agree with some of what they propose (more fiscal than anything else). But this current field of R's is easy to dismiss.
 
  • Like
Reactions: torbee




It took too long but ALL of America is waking up to MAGA and tired of this BS. They are sick of it. I hope for our nation’s sake the GOP wakes up and figure it out quickly and take back their party from the lunatics driving it and trying to drive the country off the cliff. If I was a betting man, I would bet the farm they will not and will once again double down. We will know shortly if the house decides to default on our debt…
The thing is, the vast majority in Congress enabled Trump. The vast majority in the House voted to not certify the election. Which of these seditionists am I supposed to forgive and let them move onward making decisions for the rest of us? Good God when I actually find McConnell a voice of reason…
 
Last edited:
Democrats are in no way the same as Republicans. Part of your party's problem is they keep falling into the "both sides!" trap. This is what right wing media is pushing so it makes it seem like it's not so bad to vote for the guy who is actively campaigning on using the Insurrection Act to arrest political rivals and Democrats as soon as he is in power.

No where are Democrats even close to this. You have a certain subset of progressives who are pro-Palestine and want the US to punish Israel, but they are not getting any traction with that. The most they have been able to do is get Biden to plea for a cease fire while he sends two aircraft carriers and a nuclear submarine to the region. Biden may lose Michigan because of this issue but he isn't budging from his position of supporting Israel, because that's what America does. The only reason Trump supports Israel is because he like Netanyahu and respects him as the dictator Trump wants to be. It has nothing to do with what American foreign policy has been, is, or should be moving forward.

The so-called "crazies" in the Democratic party do not dictate the overall direction of the party, not like they do in the Republican party. They have a seat at the table, but that's it. But because Fox News keeps screaming "Both sides!", Republicans have no idea of what Democratic policy actually is, let alone who is driving that policy. Anything to make the fascism of the right acceptable enough for them to vote for it.
Bryan Cranston Mic Drop GIF
 
I have no idea. If I had the answer to that I’d try to get them to coalesce around one alternate.

I think it has a lot to do with the way that many feel increasingly made to feel that their beliefs and lifestyle are being assaulted. They want the firebrand guy. Especially if they feel like he has been unfairly accused of things, charged with crimes that others haven’t etc. Trump is their big middle finger to them.

Paradoxically, had he not been accused of collusion with Russia, accused of pressure on phone calls with Ukraine, accused of financial crimes, accused of the classified documents stuff he probably wouldn’t be leading right now. They see, clearly so, how similar behavior amongst top democrats (Biden, Hillary) isn’t scrutinized of charged like he has been and it pisses them off. I get it. And accordingly they wanna cut their nose off despite their face because of it.
I genuinely get the point you're trying to make, but reality is that the overwhelming majority of conservatives in this country like Trump, want Trump, and he's their No. 1 choice. The "hold my nose and support him" group is a sliver of the GOP. Countless times this party has been presented with alternatives to MAGA, but they always choose MAGA by a decisive margin that leaves no question who is beloved.
 
Nope, they were not. They couldn't find evidence of them being there. Just like the Umbrella Man wasn't the Hell's Angel that the news reported. He checked out and wasn't even within 50 miles of the riots.

So, burning down Gov. buildings and take over an entire area of a city is just rioting? Strange in thought.
Ahhh you're right, not a Proud Boy, it was a Boogaloo Boi. Shooting an AK47 type gun into the police station during a riot. My bad. Boogaloo Boi shoots up police station during riot, and Proud Boys attempt to overthrow the government. I always have a problem remembering the difference.

"MINNEAPOLIS – A Texas man pleaded guilty today to a federal riot charge in connection to the 2020 civil unrest, announced Acting U.S. Attorney W. Anders Folk.

According to court documents, Ivan Hunter, 24, admitted to traveling from San Antonio, Texas to Minneapolis with the intent to participate in a riot. Hunter is a self-described member of the Boogaloo Bois, a loosely connected group of individuals who espouse violent anti-government sentiments. The term “Boogaloo” itself references an impending second civil war in the United States and is associated with violent uprisings against the government.

On the night of May 28, 2020, Hunter was captured on video discharging 13 rounds from an AK-47 style semiautomatic rifle into the Minneapolis Police Department’s Third Precinct building. At the time of the shooting there were other individuals believed to be looters still inside the building. Law enforcement recovered from the scene discharged rifle casings consistent with an AK-47 style firearm."

 
Please tell me what ‘evils’ the run of the mill Republican stands for. Because whatever you think it is is wrong.

You mistake support for Trump as support for his brand of crazy. While that may be true for a small subset, almost all of us support him with our nose held. The fact is that many support him as a counter to the policies that democrats stand for.

These are the things that we fear:
1) gun confiscation
2) feckless foreign policy
3) inflation running amok. Loan rates at recent highs.
4) shifting of the morals of the country that is seen as the increasing secularization of it. This agenda being force fed on us by a willing media trying to move the Overton window in not just incremental fashion but in huge chunks. What was thought to be at the fringe of society is now encouraged.
5) increasing lawlessness
6) out of control illegal immigration

So while you try to equate his support to being for the overthrow of government, and I don’t blame you for trying to frame it that way to benefit yourselves, this isn’t the case.

The democrats increasingly are tearing the country apart from the inside covertly rather than overtly as the Jan 6th rioters did. Trying to separate us from each other.

The Gaetz's, Boebert's and MTG's of the party represent the fringes of mine just as the Squad does yours. The difference being the nuts in my party aren't defending actual terrorists. Just an unhinged small group of rioters that worship Trump.
None of the facts support this fever dream of desperation trying to justify how you've realized you are now with the bad guys. If you want anyone to actually believe that's what Republicans stand for then quit voting for them. It's going to hurt, it's going to hurt bad while you purge the crazies from the party, but it has to happen. The current party looks nothing like what you are describing here.

"Increasing lawlessness"?? Seriously? That's what they are concerned about? Then why are they voting for the guy who has 91 felony indictments?? Give me a break, lawlessness is increasing because it's Republicans in charge breaking the law.
 
Even if they had, how is this comparable to a coup?
See it's hard for both sides to accept that they both did very harmful things to America. You can spin things however you want, but if you hurt people/buildings and take over towns, that's an Inserection. You are causing harm to gain power and influence. So yes, in a roundabout way, it is a coup. Jan 6th was done the same way only with the other side. Both sides were wrong and are still wrong, and even more wrong now for not condemning the actions of the ones who did it.
 
See it's hard for both sides to accept that they both did very harmful things to America. You can spin things however you want, but if you hurt people/buildings and take over towns, that's an Inserection. You are causing harm to gain power and influence. So yes, in a roundabout way, it is a coup. Jan 6th was done the same way only with the other side. Both sides were wrong and are still wrong, and even more wrong now for not condemning the actions of the ones who did it.

Pardon the pun, but that’s a very liberal definition of insurrection…and you’re using it tk both sides 1/6; where one party literally tried to overturn the results of an election. Something that hasn’t happened since the civil war.
 
See it's hard for both sides to accept that they both did very harmful things to America. You can spin things however you want, but if you hurt people/buildings and take over towns, that's an Inserection. You are causing harm to gain power and influence. So yes, in a roundabout way, it is a coup. Jan 6th was done the same way only with the other side. Both sides were wrong and are still wrong, and even more wrong now for not condemning the actions of the ones who did it.
We have protests all the time. Many turn violent. Only once have we ever had the president direct his voters to invade the cap to try to overthrow the government. You comparing the two is not just insane, it's disrespectful to our democracy.
 
Ahhh you're right, not a Proud Boy, it was a Boogaloo Boi. Shooting an AK47 type gun into the police station during a riot. My bad. Boogaloo Boi shoots up police station during riot, and Proud Boys attempt to overthrow the government. I always have a problem remembering the difference.

"MINNEAPOLIS – A Texas man pleaded guilty today to a federal riot charge in connection to the 2020 civil unrest, announced Acting U.S. Attorney W. Anders Folk.

According to court documents, Ivan Hunter, 24, admitted to traveling from San Antonio, Texas to Minneapolis with the intent to participate in a riot. Hunter is a self-described member of the Boogaloo Bois, a loosely connected group of individuals who espouse violent anti-government sentiments. The term “Boogaloo” itself references an impending second civil war in the United States and is associated with violent uprisings against the government.

On the night of May 28, 2020, Hunter was captured on video discharging 13 rounds from an AK-47 style semiautomatic rifle into the Minneapolis Police Department’s Third Precinct building. At the time of the shooting there were other individuals believed to be looters still inside the building. Law enforcement recovered from the scene discharged rifle casings consistent with an AK-47 style firearm."

What about the court buildings and city take over. Who caused that? Why haven't they issued an apology to the guy they tried to frame as the Umbrella Man? They were all over the national news for weeks blabbing about the Hell's Angel who did it. Turned out not to be him.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT