ADVERTISEMENT

*****Election day 2023 thread*****

What about the court buildings and city take over. Who caused that? Why haven't they issued an apology to the guy they tried to frame as the Umbrella Man? They were all over the national news for weeks blabbing about the Hell's Angel who did it. Turned out not to be him.
I have absolutely no idea what the Umbrella Man is, or why you keep bringing up the Hell's Angels. I'll go ahead and bow out of this convo because you're very clearly just another poster on here that just throws shit at a wall and then tries to make it relevant to a discussion.
 
I have absolutely no idea what the Umbrella Man is, or why you keep bringing up the Hell's Angels. I'll go ahead and bow out of this convo because you're very clearly just another poster on here that just throws shit at a wall and then tries to make it relevant to a discussion.
Two seconds of research you can find it.
 
I have absolutely no idea what the Umbrella Man is, or why you keep bringing up the Hell's Angels. I'll go ahead and bow out of this convo because you're very clearly just another poster on here that just throws shit at a wall and then tries to make it relevant to a discussion.

Account is just under two months old. It’s probably Ryan
 
Account is just under two months old. It’s probably Ryan
Oh, because I just started posting, that makes me unreliable in my knowledge. I don't even know who Ryan is.

What your real problem is; that I don't see it the same as you. I don't subscribe to Group Think. I'm not for one side or the other. You and many on here can't handle the free thinker. It bothers people like you. If I got on here and agreed with everything you think then I would be totally acceptable and somehow a smart person. But because I see the bad in both, well now somehow, I'm stupid and should just take a back seat to Group Think. I and many others are sick of you people with this all on board or nothing crap.
 
Last edited:
You’re citing 2000 Mules now?

Brah. Take a step back. You’re in the very non-serious zone.
I'm not your "Brah". Let's get that straight right now. And I'm being to take you in the "non-serious zone."
 
I'm not your "Brah". Let's get that straight right now. And I'm being to take you in the "non-serious zone."

You’re my huckleberry, brah.

Not sure what bat signal you’re attempting to send with “being to take you…”, but I do not want to have sexual intercourse with you. NTTAWWT.
 
Oh, because I just started posting, that makes me unreliable in my knowledge. I don't even know who Ryan is.

What your real problem is; that I don't see it the same as you. I don't subscribe to Group Think. I'm not for one side or the other. You and many on here can't handle the free thinker. It bothers people like you. If I got on here and agreed with everything you think then I would be totally acceptable and somehow a smart person. But because I see the bad in both, well now somehow, I'm stupid and should just take a back seat to Group Think. I and many others are sick of you people with this all on board or nothing crap.

Brah…you’re accusing people of group think, and you cite “2000 Mules” in your next breath. That ain’t original thinking, brah. That’s taking a puff of the right wing media bong.
 
Oh, because I just started posting, that makes me unreliable in my knowledge. I don't even know who Ryan is.

What your real problem is; that I don't see it the same as you. I don't subscribe to Group Think. I'm not for one side or the other. You and many on here can't handle the free thinker. It bothers people like you. If I got on here and agreed with everything you think then I would be totally acceptable and somehow a smart person. But because I see the bad in both, well now somehow, I'm stupid and should just take a back seat to Group Think. I and many others are sick of you people with this all on board or nothing crap.

100% Ryan
 
Well I intend to do my best next year to convince others to move away from Trump. Vivek, Haley, DeSantis are all much better options.
lol

Vivek is Trump. He praises his policies and can’t criticize him
In an interview he did with TYT a few weeks ago, when pressed on why voters should choose him over Trump, his play was that he was younger

Desantis is more authoritarian and not as lazy as Trump.

Haley just goes whichever way the wind blows re: Trump
 
  • Like
Reactions: franklinman
I want to see a smarter, more reasoned GOP. AS an independant, I might vote for them. I agree with some of what they propose (more fiscal than anything else). But this current field of R's is easy to dismiss.
I can't think of one issue I agree with the GOP on. I'm talking about what the GOP actually is and does, not the fantasy land they like to make people believe they stand for. I love fiscal responsibility. Republicans don't have it and in fact are pretty much all of the problem. At least that's the way it's been for my entire lifetime.
 
Oh, because I just started posting, that makes me unreliable in my knowledge. I don't even know who Ryan is.

What your real problem is; that I don't see it the same as you. I don't subscribe to Group Think. I'm not for one side or the other. You and many on here can't handle the free thinker. It bothers people like you. If I got on here and agreed with everything you think then I would be totally acceptable and somehow a smart person. But because I see the bad in both, well now somehow, I'm stupid and should just take a back seat to Group Think. I and many others are sick of you people with this all on board or nothing crap.
Oh ffs. If you have to recite your bullshit resume in a post to try and prove some credibility, you aren't a serious person who should be taken seriously.

If you want respect, earn it. This crap you are spouting is the opposite of that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SocraticIshmael
We don’t want your approval pal. You’re for open borders? Because your party is.
 
We don’t want your approval pal. You’re for open borders? Because your party is.

Gus, it’s stuff like this that drives me nuts. What does open borders even mean? Link to democrats stating they want to just wave immigrants on in, disbanding the border patrol, dismantling the entire immigration system, etc?

Republicans like to scare people by making it seem like people are just waltzing across; ignoring conveniently of course all the things that are in place.
 
Oh ffs. If you have to recite your bullshit resume in a post to try and prove some credibility, you aren't a serious person who should be taken seriously.

If you want respect, earn it. This crap you are spouting is the opposite of that.
Depends, if I wanted respect from you or not. I really could care less if I get respect from you or not. Respect is only earned from those who are respectable themselves.
 
Depends, if I wanted respect from you or not. I really could care less if I get respect from you or not. Respect is only earned from those who are respectable themselves.
Well, it's good to know that you have no desire to be a credible poster on these boards. I can at least respect your honesty on that.

I don't have to agree with you for me to respect you as someone who wants to have legitimate debates on these boards. There are several posters that I generally think have idiotic viewpoints, but I do believe they want to have actual discussions rather than just be here to be a complete douchebag with no other purpose than to try and piss other people off.
 
Well, it's good to know that you have no desire to be a credible poster on these boards. I can at least respect your honesty on that.

I don't have to agree with you for me to respect you as someone who wants to have legitimate debates on these boards. There are several posters that I generally think have idiotic viewpoints, but I do believe they want to have actual discussions rather than just be here to be a complete douchebag with no other purpose than to try and piss other people off.
Don't twist my words. I said I didn't care to earn YOUR respect. You aren't some super amazing person and only you and your views exist. You aren't entitled to respect, so just because you say that you don't give me it, doesn't mean i will try and earn it from you either. So, someone like you calling out someone's else point of view shows your character. So, I have no desire to waste my time earning respect from someone who doesn't respect others.
 
Don't twist my words. I said I didn't care to earn YOUR respect. You aren't some super amazing person and only you and your views exist. You aren't entitled to respect, so just because you say that you don't give me it, doesn't mean i will try and earn it from you either. So, someone like you calling out someone's else point of view shows your character. So, I have no desire to waste my time earning respect from someone who doesn't respect others.
Talk about twisting words...

For someone who doesn't claim to care if they are taken seriously you sure are pretty defensive about it. Or maybe you are trying to get under my skin with whatever this is. So, to be clear, I don't believe you when you claim you don't care about being respected on these boards or you don't care about not being taken seriously. You are way too into this to not be. It's a shame. I am always looking for more people who want to have serious discussions on here that I completely disagree with. Oh well, have a nice day.
 
Talk about twisting words...

For someone who doesn't claim to care if they are taken seriously you sure are pretty defensive about it. Or maybe you are trying to get under my skin with whatever this is. So, to be clear, I don't believe you when you claim you don't care about being respected on these boards or you don't care about not being taken seriously. You are way too into this to not be. It's a shame. I am always looking for more people who want to have serious discussions on here that I completely disagree with. Oh well, have a nice day.
Blah blah blah.
 
Gus, it’s stuff like this that drives me nuts. What does open borders even mean? Link to democrats stating they want to just wave immigrants on in, disbanding the border patrol, dismantling the entire immigration system, etc?

Republicans like to scare people by making it seem like people are just waltzing across; ignoring conveniently of course all the things that are in place.
Well I think based on the numbers of people crossing illegal immigrants are, in fact, just waltzing across.

I mean look at this data. There is no other conclusion to be drawn.

 
Well I think based on the numbers of people crossing illegal immigrants are, in fact, just waltzing across.

I mean look at this data. There is no other conclusion to be drawn.

you know those tables both showed the number of border encounters, right? meaning, they are coming into contact with border patrol, law enforcement, etc.

I'd be more than happy to have a discussion on immigration policy, but imo Republicans are more interested in this topic as a hot button issue for their base.
 
you know those tables both showed the number of border encounters, right? meaning, they are coming into contact with border patrol, law enforcement, etc.

I'd be more than happy to have a discussion on immigration policy, but imo Republicans are more interested in this topic as a hot button issue for their base.
I love when GOPers use arrest/LEO encounters as an example of there being an open border that everyone waltzes through.

Ive heard they can also stop at a computer kiosk on their way in to get registered to vote and issued an ebt card as well.
 
you know those tables both showed the number of border encounters, right? meaning, they are coming into contact with border patrol, law enforcement, etc.

I'd be more than happy to have a discussion on immigration policy, but imo Republicans are more interested in this topic as a hot button issue for their base.
I know exactly what it shows. Acting like it doesn’t show what it does is part of the problem.

More contacts equals more people trying to enter. If you are trying to say more contacts mean more intradictions you’re wrong.
 
I know exactly what it shows. Acting like it doesn’t show what it does is part of the problem.

More contacts equals more people trying to enter. If you are trying to say more contacts mean more intradictions you’re wrong.
How does that equate to "open borders"?

No one's ever denied more people are trying to enter. But the GOP seems to constantly calling for securing the southern border in response to the "open border policy" supposedly espoused by Democrats, which implies they're just letting everyone in.

Your chart shows the opposite. The great majority of migrants at the people are encountering border patrols, local law enforcement, etc., and from there are either being turned away, entered into asylum process, detained at least temporarily etc.

Again, I'm all for comprehensive immigration reform. I've yet to see any sign that Republicans are.
 
  • Like
Reactions: auntie_fah
How does that equate to "open borders"?

No one's ever denied more people are trying to enter. But the GOP seems to constantly calling for securing the southern border in response to the "open border policy" supposedly espoused by Democrats, which implies they're just letting everyone in.

Your chart shows the opposite. The great majority of migrants at the people are encountering border patrols, local law enforcement, etc., and from there are either being turned away, entered into asylum process, detained at least temporarily etc.

Again, I'm all for comprehensive immigration reform. I've yet to see any sign that Republicans are.
Ok great. Whta does 'comprehensive immigration reform" mean. Like exactly. Because it sounds a lot like all the other emocrat slogans like 'common sense gun control'

My recommendation:

1. Close the border. Period.
2. No one comes in without a full background screening no matter how many women and children you've drug along. They can apply for entry or asylum online or in person and the embassy in the country of origin. Yes thjis will mean a delay.
3. Bring in the national guard. Erect a wall or barrier where appropriate. IN places this isnt, use drones, motion sensor and any other technology we might have.
4. Establish aggressive quotas for work visas. Consider some sort of technological monitoring so as to keep track of individuals. Maybe create some sort of monthly check ins or something to be sure they don't get in and disappear. Failure to check in or disabling of any monitoring system results in immediate deportation once found.

Thats a start.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT