ADVERTISEMENT

Five easiest P5 schedules - Minnesota #4

Of course Florida, how many non-conference games do they play outside the state of Florida? When was the last time?
 
Iowa's 2016 schedule, just like their 2015 lineup, is Charmen extra soft as well...and shows up on numerous lists stating as much.


And don't even get me started on their (year in and year out) pathetic non con..


You would truly have to scour the schedules of all Div I teams to find a weaker 15 year period of non conference lineups than what the Hawkeyes roll out every year.


Go back and look up the last 10 years and the next 5, it's literally a complete shvt list of pathetic cupcakes with your annual game against ISU and good ol' Pitt. I mean, honestly, you won't find a weaker 15 year stretch anywhere in the country, maybe some SEC teams, but that would be it.


How is that even possible? How can you guys go 20 years (?!) without a single marquee matchup outside of the Big Ten?


I know, I know... Rabble rabble.. Iowa State, would love a divorce but can't get away from em, rabble rabble.. Minn sucks, rabble rabble


Pretty embarrassing that they refuse to play anyone with a pulse (EVER), while everyone else in the Big Ten consistently schedules great Sept match ups.

LMAO
 
  • Like
Reactions: MITCH492
Iowa's 2016 schedule, just like their 2015 lineup, is Charmen extra soft as well...and shows up on numerous lists stating as much.


And don't even get me started on their (year in and year out) pathetic non con..


You would truly have to scour the schedules of all Div I teams to find a weaker 15 year period of non conference lineups than what the Hawkeyes roll out every year.


Go back and look up the last 10 years and the next 5, it's literally a complete shvt list of pathetic cupcakes with your annual game against ISU and good ol' Pitt. I mean, honestly, you won't find a weaker 15 year stretch anywhere in the country, maybe some SEC teams, but that would be it.


How is that even possible? How can you guys go 20 years (?!) without a single marquee matchup outside of the Big Ten?


I know, I know... Rabble rabble.. Iowa State, would love a divorce but can't get away from em, rabble rabble.. Minn sucks, rabble rabble


Pretty embarrassing that they refuse to play anyone with a pulse (EVER), while everyone else in the Big Ten consistently schedules great Sept match ups.

LMAO

Jealous much? Maybe just a little school girl whining?
 
Jealous much? Maybe just a little school girl whining?

What a potato comment, but considering Packer possesses nearly the lowest comprehension skills on this entire board, color me not surprised.

If you can't intelligently refute what I wrote, please don't bother posting ITT. TIA.

Plain and simple, Iowa's non con has been a running joke in college football for quite some time now..
 
What a potato comment, but considering Packer possesses nearly the lowest comprehension skills on this entire board, color me not surprised.

If you can't intelligently refute what I wrote, please don't bother posting ITT. TIA.

Plain and simple, Iowa's non con has been a running joke in college football for quite some time now..



Do you mean as opposed to the school that built a new 50,000 seat venue within a metro area of how many millions of people and still cannot fill it up with this powerful scheduling you want others so much to believe?

By my count ( and I may be wrong) it sure looks like Minnesota fans should not be trying to talk smack about anyone else's schedule. What are there, eight games in the past decade and a half against four different teams from the traditional Power 5 conferences? That's it? Wow. That's like one real opponent every other season or so.

But there are plenty of Kent States, Ohios, Eastern Illinoises, Middle Tennesees, New Hampshires, Bowling Greens, Troys, Texas States... to fill a boat. And 2016 looks to be just more of the same. Congrats on the dubious recognition!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Packer54
Iowa's 2016 schedule, just like their 2015 lineup, is Charmen extra soft as well...and shows up on numerous lists stating as much.


And don't even get me started on their (year in and year out) pathetic non con..


You would truly have to scour the schedules of all Div I teams to find a weaker 15 year period of non conference lineups than what the Hawkeyes roll out every year.


Go back and look up the last 10 years and the next 5, it's literally a complete shvt list of pathetic cupcakes with your annual game against ISU and good ol' Pitt. I mean, honestly, you won't find a weaker 15 year stretch anywhere in the country, maybe some SEC teams, but that would be it.


How is that even possible? How can you guys go 20 years (?!) without a single marquee matchup outside of the Big Ten?


I know, I know... Rabble rabble.. Iowa State, would love a divorce but can't get away from em, rabble rabble.. Minn sucks, rabble rabble


Pretty embarrassing that they refuse to play anyone with a pulse (EVER), while everyone else in the Big Ten consistently schedules great Sept match ups.

LMAO

"Minn sucks" you said it all. Your whole football program is a joke.
 
What a potato comment, but considering Packer possesses nearly the lowest comprehension skills on this entire board, color me not surprised.

If you can't intelligently refute what I wrote, please don't bother posting ITT. TIA.

Plain and simple, Iowa's non con has been a running joke in college football for quite some time now..

Tissues and hugs being sent your way. Feel real bad for you and your whining about anyone else's schedule. Bottom line is it really does not matter, especially moving forward with a 9 game Conf schedule. Best MSU and we go to the playoffs. Once we pick up more of the OSU, Mich rotation I am sure nobody is going to be coming to this board from another Big Ten fan base saying "wow what a tough schedule". Fact is if your crap team was relevant it would help us but you are not so until chubby checkers gets his crap together take your tired old comments somewhere else. Never seen a poster who likes to continue chewing the same cabbage. You are intellectually lazy....color me amused by goofer fans.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bosoxfn28
Iowa's 2016 schedule, just like their 2015 lineup, is Charmen extra soft as well...and shows up on numerous lists stating as much.


And don't even get me started on their (year in and year out) pathetic non con..


You would truly have to scour the schedules of all Div I teams to find a weaker 15 year period of non conference lineups than what the Hawkeyes roll out every year.


Go back and look up the last 10 years and the next 5, it's literally a complete shvt list of pathetic cupcakes with your annual game against ISU and good ol' Pitt. I mean, honestly, you won't find a weaker 15 year stretch anywhere in the country, maybe some SEC teams, but that would be it.


How is that even possible? How can you guys go 20 years (?!) without a single marquee matchup outside of the Big Ten?


I know, I know... Rabble rabble.. Iowa State, would love a divorce but can't get away from em, rabble rabble.. Minn sucks, rabble rabble


Pretty embarrassing that they refuse to play anyone with a pulse (EVER), while everyone else in the Big Ten consistently schedules great Sept match ups.

LMAO

Funny coming from a gopher fan ripping on last 15 years. Looking on ESPN they go back to 02'. The few years Minny had some success they had a true cream puff schedule not having 1 single power 5 team from 02' to 05'. 06' played that "power house" Cal team. Followed by 07' & 08' with not playing any power 5 teams again until 09' where you play Cal again and Syracuse (you know one of those garbage teams Iowa plays as you said shouldn't get any credit for) which is one and only time Minny played 2 power 5 teams. 2010 & 11' play someone good finally with USC but then 2012 there's Syracuse again one of those as you put "charmin soft" teams. 2013 another year of no power 5 schools until TCU last 2 years. But I'll give you credit Minny did manage to beat Kent st, Colorado st and Ohio all by 3 pts last year. Finally looking at next year you have the powerhouse of the PAC 12 in Oregon St you know the team who lost all their conference games last year and 2 wins overall.

So to summarize since 02' Minny has played 8 teams from power 5 conference 2 of the games being a team Iowa has played and have gone 2-6 with both wins coming against Syracuse. Rip on Pitt all you want but the gophers haven't beaten anyone better then them in last 15 years during the non conference schedule. They've had 7 years of not playing anyone but I forgot you had USC for 2 years so that means you schedule tough. Of all the schools to criticize non conf a gopher fan is the last one who should be doing that. in last 15 years you've won 10 games once in 03' when you are talking about easy non conf schedule beat 4 tough teams in Ohio, Troy, La Lafeyette and Tulsa. Since that year you've never managed to win more than 8 games. Seriously Minny fans are last ones who should be opening there mouths about schedules being too easy let alone about success for football due to the lack of quality they have in each.
 
Last edited:
How is that even possible? How can you guys go 20 years (?!) without a single marquee matchup outside of the Big Ten?
Hmm, we've had many of those. It's just that we play them in December/January when your season is already over ;)

We play PSU, MI, NEB, NW, & WI....not exactly a breeze! Though we do have our joker games like MN, IL, PU :)
 
Funny coming from a gopher fan ripping on last 15 years. Looking on ESPN they go back to 02'. The few years Minny had some success they had a true cream puff schedule not having 1 single power 5 team from 02' to 05'. 06' played that "power house" Cal team. Followed by 07' & 08' with not playing any power 5 teams again until 09' where you play Cal again and Syracuse (you know one of those garbage teams Iowa plays as you said shouldn't get any credit for) which is one and only time Minny played 2 power 5 teams. 2010 & 11' play someone good finally with USC but then 2012 there's Syracuse again one of those as you put "charmin soft" teams. 2013 another year of no power 5 schools until TCU last 2 years. But I'll give you credit Minny did manage to beat Kent st, Colorado st and Ohio all by 3 pts last year. Finally looking at next year you have the powerhouse of the PAC 12 in Oregon St you know the team who lost all their conference games last year and 2 wins overall.

So to summarize since 02' Minny has played 8 teams from power 5 conference 2 of the games being a team Iowa has played and have gone 2-6 with both wins coming against Syracuse. Rip on Pitt all you want but the gophers haven't beaten anyone better then them in last 15 years during the non conference schedule. They've had 7 years of not playing anyone but I forgot you had USC for 2 years so that means you schedule tough. Of all the schools to criticize non conf a gopher fan is the last one who should be doing that. in last 15 years you've won 10 games once in 03' when you are talking about easy non conf schedule beat 4 tough teams in Ohio, Troy, La Lafeyette and Tulsa. Since that year you've never managed to win more than 8 games. Seriously Minny fans are last ones who should be opening there mouths about schedules being too easy let alone about success for football due to the lack of quality they have in each.

Try using paragraphs next time, easier to break up your incoherent rambling.


Iowa was in the Top 20 for scheduling the toughest ooc schools because they schedule nearly 2 BCS/P5 teams a year, which virtually no one does.

That's the funniest thing I've heard in a long time.

Of course we get the usual recycled garbage response, never mind ISU is year in and year out one of the weakest Power 5 schools in the country. Then of course Iowegians claim to hate playing them.

And you got to be kidding about "virtually no one schedules 2 BCS teams a year"....that's ridiculous.

Over the last 10 years, Iowa has played EXACTLY 7 games non con vs Power 5 opponents not named Iowa State.

Getting the Clones every year (and into the future as your sole P5 opponent), is the biggest gift I've ever heard of. What makes it comical is how the Hawk fanbase looks down upon ISU, all the while reaping the benefits of getting that yearly cupcake match up (or maybe not? Doesn't Capt Kirk have a losing record vs the clones??)...

Looking back, it's Arizona twice. Syracuse twice. And Pitt 3 times.

Other than that, here's your last 10 years of non con opponents:

Northern Iowa 4 times
Northern Illinois 3 times
Ball State twice
Montana
Maine
Florida International
Eastern Illinois
Tennessee Tech
Central Michigan
North Texas
Illinois State
Missouri State
Western Michigan



Meanwhile Minnesota has played USC twice, TCU twice, Cal twice, Colorado State twice, Air Force..

Let's not act like those are the same, one lacks anything that even resembles a "big game".
Looking into the future, it will be more of the same...as Iowa will continue to play bottom feeder ISU as their single yearly matchup vs a Power 5 school...while padding the rest of the slots vs the usual cupcakes.

Moving to a 9 game B1G schedule means that there is exactly a zero % chance the Hawkeyes ever play a meaningful or "marquee" matchup before the start of conference play. Although it's nice to stack up those wins, it's also the same reason the nation doesn't show Iowa any respect, or give them any benefit of the doubt.

/facts.




Hmm, we've had many of those. It's just that we play them in December/January when your season is already over ;)

Was quite the track meet in Pasadena, I think that McCaffery kid took like 3 gold medals home that day.
 
Try using paragraphs next time, easier to break up your incoherent rambling.




That's the funniest thing I've heard in a long time.

Of course we get the usual recycled garbage response, never mind ISU is year in and year out one of the weakest Power 5 schools in the country. Then of course Iowegians claim to hate playing them.

And you got to be kidding about "virtually no one schedules 2 BCS teams a year"....that's ridiculous.

Over the last 10 years, Iowa has played EXACTLY 7 games non con vs Power 5 opponents not named Iowa State.

Getting the Clones every year (and into the future as your sole P5 opponent), is the biggest gift I've ever heard of. What makes it comical is how the Hawk fanbase looks down upon ISU, all the while reaping the benefits of getting that yearly cupcake match up (or maybe not? Doesn't Capt Kirk have a losing record vs the clones??)...

Looking back, it's Arizona twice. Syracuse twice. And Pitt 3 times.

Other than that, here's your last 10 years of non con opponents:

Northern Iowa 4 times
Northern Illinois 3 times
Ball State twice
Montana
Maine
Florida International
Eastern Illinois
Tennessee Tech
Central Michigan
North Texas
Illinois State
Missouri State
Western Michigan



Meanwhile Minnesota has played USC twice, TCU twice, Cal twice, Colorado State twice, Air Force..

Let's not act like those are the same, one lacks anything that even resembles a "big game".
Looking into the future, it will be more of the same...as Iowa will continue to play bottom feeder ISU as their single yearly matchup vs a Power 5 school...while padding the rest of the slots vs the usual cupcakes.

Moving to a 9 game B1G schedule means that there is exactly a zero % chance the Hawkeyes ever play a meaningful or "marquee" matchup before the start of conference play. Although it's nice to stack up those wins, it's also the same reason the nation doesn't show Iowa any respect, or give them any benefit of the doubt.

/facts.






Was quite the track meet in Pasadena, I think that McCaffery kid took like 3 gold medals home that day.
Just think what he would have done against MN. 112 to 3? Rather watch that disaster than watch Iowa beat central michigan by 7 lmao
 
Did he just brag about playing the murderers row of Colorado st and Air Force? I think he forgot Arizona State also if you are going back 15 years
 
Last edited:
Did he just brag about playing the murderers row of Colorado st and Air Force? I think he forgot Arizona State also if you are going back 15 years
He did and omitted the fact that the 2 times we played niu they went to a orange bowl and was pretty darn good the following year.. He is really reaching today.
 
  • Like
Reactions: eyeohuh
Dano needs some Xanax. Heard it's pretty easy to get up in dinkytown. Not sure if it will help with his insecurity and loneliness tho.
 
Try using paragraphs next time, easier to break up your incoherent rambling.




That's the funniest thing I've heard in a long time.

Of course we get the usual recycled garbage response, never mind ISU is year in and year out one of the weakest Power 5 schools in the country. Then of course Iowegians claim to hate playing them.

And you got to be kidding about "virtually no one schedules 2 BCS teams a year"....that's ridiculous.

Over the last 10 years, Iowa has played EXACTLY 7 games non con vs Power 5 opponents not named Iowa State.

Getting the Clones every year (and into the future as your sole P5 opponent), is the biggest gift I've ever heard of. What makes it comical is how the Hawk fanbase looks down upon ISU, all the while reaping the benefits of getting that yearly cupcake match up (or maybe not? Doesn't Capt Kirk have a losing record vs the clones??)...

Looking back, it's Arizona twice. Syracuse twice. And Pitt 3 times.

Other than that, here's your last 10 years of non con opponents:

Northern Iowa 4 times
Northern Illinois 3 times
Ball State twice
Montana
Maine
Florida International
Eastern Illinois
Tennessee Tech
Central Michigan
North Texas
Illinois State
Missouri State
Western Michigan



Meanwhile Minnesota has played USC twice, TCU twice, Cal twice, Colorado State twice, Air Force..

Let's not act like those are the same, one lacks anything that even resembles a "big game".
Looking into the future, it will be more of the same...as Iowa will continue to play bottom feeder ISU as their single yearly matchup vs a Power 5 school...while padding the rest of the slots vs the usual cupcakes.

Moving to a 9 game B1G schedule means that there is exactly a zero % chance the Hawkeyes ever play a meaningful or "marquee" matchup before the start of conference play. Although it's nice to stack up those wins, it's also the same reason the nation doesn't show Iowa any respect, or give them any benefit of the doubt.

/facts.






Was quite the track meet in Pasadena, I think that McCaffery kid took like 3 gold medals home that day.

Way to ignore the facts. And love how you are using Colorado St and Air Force as great non conference teams. Say Iowa has played 7 vs non isu teams they've played Pitt 4 not 3 so 8 overall which equivalent to Minnesota in last 15. Also ignore facts the goofers have only won 2 games both vs Syracuse in last 15. And almost half the seasons in last 15, seven, the gophers haven't even scheduled a power 5 school.

Also ironic you rip Iowa for "lack of national respect". Least Iowa has won and accomplished stuff in last 10-15 years. Conference and division titles and making BCS level bowl games. Last time Minny has gotten any attention, minus your coach retiring due to seizures and the interim eating ice cream on the field. And you were last in the rose bowl and won a conference title when LBJ was president, no?

Your rants and raves against Iowa are so hypocritical cause everything you rip on them one can easily apply to your dumpster fire of a program. But I forgot Minnesota has the power house Oregon st on their schedule next year
 
  • Like
Reactions: ichawk24
I live in Minnesota and even the few gopher fans I know realize that Minny is simply a perennial lower tier Big 10 football program.
 
Wow Minn that's pathetic! I'm a Rams fan also & can even admit that. CSU @ home can't/shouldn't be your toughest non-conference team. Horribleness!
 
Try using paragraphs next time, easier to break up your incoherent rambling.




That's the funniest thing I've heard in a long time.

Of course we get the usual recycled garbage response, never mind ISU is year in and year out one of the weakest Power 5 schools in the country. Then of course Iowegians claim to hate playing them.

And you got to be kidding about "virtually no one schedules 2 BCS teams a year"....that's ridiculous.

Over the last 10 years, Iowa has played EXACTLY 7 games non con vs Power 5 opponents not named Iowa State.

Getting the Clones every year (and into the future as your sole P5 opponent), is the biggest gift I've ever heard of. What makes it comical is how the Hawk fanbase looks down upon ISU, all the while reaping the benefits of getting that yearly cupcake match up (or maybe not? Doesn't Capt Kirk have a losing record vs the clones??)...

Looking back, it's Arizona twice. Syracuse twice. And Pitt 3 times.

Other than that, here's your last 10 years of non con opponents:

Northern Iowa 4 times
Northern Illinois 3 times
Ball State twice
Montana
Maine
Florida International
Eastern Illinois
Tennessee Tech
Central Michigan
North Texas
Illinois State
Missouri State
Western Michigan



Meanwhile Minnesota has played USC twice, TCU twice, Cal twice, Colorado State twice, Air Force..

Let's not act like those are the same, one lacks anything that even resembles a "big game".
Looking into the future, it will be more of the same...as Iowa will continue to play bottom feeder ISU as their single yearly matchup vs a Power 5 school...while padding the rest of the slots vs the usual cupcakes.

Moving to a 9 game B1G schedule means that there is exactly a zero % chance the Hawkeyes ever play a meaningful or "marquee" matchup before the start of conference play. Although it's nice to stack up those wins, it's also the same reason the nation doesn't show Iowa any respect, or give them any benefit of the doubt.

/facts.






Was quite the track meet in Pasadena, I think that McCaffery kid took like 3 gold medals home that day.
You sir are a turd, first of all Minny's athletic department is a dumpster fire. Both Iowa schools dwarf your basketball program and ISU would have a better record against you since Kirk was hired than we do against Iowa. There is nothing about your team or coach that rivals what Iowa has. Schedule Alabama every year so you can destroyed and beat your chest about playing a tough team.
 
What a potato comment, but considering Packer possesses nearly the lowest comprehension skills on this entire board, color me not surprised.

If you can't intelligently refute what I wrote, please don't bother posting ITT. TIA.

Plain and simple, Iowa's non con has been a running joke in college football for quite some time now..
Minnesota lost to USD. The university of South Dakota.
 
Even the media that covers the yellow rodents wish they were more like Iowa.
In some ways yes. However, as a Gopher fan, I'd like more. I do believe that the program has the potential. I am also seeing the most support from the University that the football program has had in my lifetime. The facilities are starting to catch up as well. That is what gives me hope for the Gopher football program.

BTW Someone in this thread brought up the size of TCF stadium and the size of the Twin Cities Metro area. Most programs in "Major" metro areas struggle with attendance. That includes Pitt. Miami(FL), heck even USC at times has struggled with attendance. One of the few programs that has actually done well Is OSU. Columbus does not have an NFL team though.
 
In some ways yes. However, as a Gopher fan, I'd like more. I do believe that the program has the potential. I am also seeing the most support from the University that the football program has had in my lifetime. The facilities are starting to catch up as well. That is what gives me hope for the Gopher football program.

BTW Someone in this thread brought up the size of TCF stadium and the size of the Twin Cities Metro area. Most programs in "Major" metro areas struggle with attendance. That includes Pitt. Miami(FL), heck even USC at times has struggled with attendance. One of the few programs that has actually done well Is OSU. Columbus does not have an NFL team though.



That would be me... guilty as charged.

Look, as a Minnesota fan, I suppose you are bound to try to defend them no matter how futile that may be. But, your examples of Miami, Pitt and the real reach of USC are more excuses that reasons. The Minneapolis/St. Paul metro area has more people residing in it than the entire State of Iowa. Yes, there is the competition for the entertainment dollar from the Vikings, but that does not explain why the only major college football program in the whole state can only manage 50,000 or so to home football games each fall. The University of Minnesota alone boasts the fourth highest enrollment in the Big Ten of nearly 35,000 and still has difficulties filling its venue.

For comparison, Wisconsin located in Madison (and impacted somewhat by the Packers) has a smaller enrollment and still produces 25-30K more fans on average to home football games. Tennessee in Knoxville shows nearly 100,000 attendees at home games with an enrollment of only 21,000+. Missouri, in Columbia is another example. On average there are 65,000 fans at games even with the pull on the entertainment dollar from the Chiefs and what was the Rams and there is an enrollment of 27,000.

Hey, you do have Houston though. Only reaching the low to mid 30s in attendance in a state with plenty of Power 5 representation in addition to the professional teams. Congrats on being the Houston of the upper midwest, I guess.
 
Also I think Miamis attendance problems were because the stadium is super far away (an hour) from campus
 
That would be me... guilty as charged.

Look, as a Minnesota fan, I suppose you are bound to try to defend them no matter how futile that may be. But, your examples of Miami, Pitt and the real reach of USC are more excuses that reasons. The Minneapolis/St. Paul metro area has more people residing in it than the entire State of Iowa. Yes, there is the competition for the entertainment dollar from the Vikings, but that does not explain why the only major college football program in the whole state can only manage 50,000 or so to home football games each fall. The University of Minnesota alone boasts the fourth highest enrollment in the Big Ten of nearly 35,000 and still has difficulties filling its venue.

For comparison, Wisconsin located in Madison (and impacted somewhat by the Packers) has a smaller enrollment and still produces 25-30K more fans on average to home football games. Tennessee in Knoxville shows nearly 100,000 attendees at home games with an enrollment of only 21,000+. Missouri, in Columbia is another example. On average there are 65,000 fans at games even with the pull on the entertainment dollar from the Chiefs and what was the Rams and there is an enrollment of 27,000.

Hey, you do have Houston though. Only reaching the low to mid 30s in attendance in a state with plenty of Power 5 representation in addition to the professional teams. Congrats on being the Houston of the upper midwest, I guess.

The point in all of this is that it isn't just Minnesota that has this problem. I cannot think of a program in a major Metro area that also has a NFL team that fills a mega stadium. Keep in mind the Gophers drew bigger crowds pre Vikings. Also of note in that era, the program was strong, and strongly supported. Finally the program is getting back such support from the admins.

You have your opinion, which I think is fair btw, I have mine. I think it was smart the way TCF Bank stadium was built. 50K for now. The footings on the structure will easily support up to an 80K(total) expansion if ever necessary. Why build more than that if it won't fill. Create demand then expand. Smart! Now the program just needs to start winning to create the demand.
 
The point in all of this is that it isn't just Minnesota that has this problem. I cannot think of a program in a major Metro area that also has a NFL team that fills a mega stadium. Keep in mind the Gophers drew bigger crowds pre Vikings. Also of note in that era, the program was strong, and strongly supported. Finally the program is getting back such support from the admins.

You have your opinion, which I think is fair btw, I have mine. I think it was smart the way TCF Bank stadium was built. 50K for now. The footings on the structure will easily support up to an 80K(total) expansion if ever necessary. Why build more than that if it won't fill. Create demand then expand. Smart! Now the program just needs to start winning to create the demand.



You are mostly right, however my original reply in this thread was in response to a Gopher fan lamenting the OOC scheduling for Iowa. Given that the two (Iowa and Minnesota) have generally similar Big Ten slates, then either the Minnesota schedule non-con is better as stated by this poster or it is not. One way to possibly determine that would be to look at attendance figures. Looking at the reported attendance for each, the notion that Minnesota schedules so much better OOC is not supported by fans in seats.
 
  • Like
Reactions: STPGopherfan
So will the talking heads on the major sports networks hammer Clemson incessantly about their weak 2016 schedule and argue they have absolutely no claim to a playoff spot like they did with Iowa last season? Probably not...:eek:
 
  • Like
Reactions: icu81222
You are mostly right, however my original reply in this thread was in response to a Gopher fan lamenting the OOC scheduling for Iowa. Given that the two (Iowa and Minnesota) have generally similar Big Ten slates, then either the Minnesota schedule non-con is better as stated by this poster or it is not. One way to possibly determine that would be to look at attendance figures. Looking at the reported attendance for each, the notion that Minnesota schedules so much better OOC is not supported by fans in seats.


I wonder if said fan is truly a fan. Moving right along. Honestly, aside from Oregon State, our OOC is not that great. CSU is actually a pretty good contest, for our program. Winnable, but might have to work to pull it off. Indiana State? This is a lose/ lose game. Win big, the response will be so what. Win by a little, or lose? The response will be; "The sky is falling, The sky is falling".

As far as the team itself goes, If the team can be adequately prepared to play the likes of Iowa, etc without losing too many players to injury or exposing the entire playbook, I am okay with a weak OOC schedule.

Bring on the Beavers...(can't type that with a straight face).
 
Also I think Miamis attendance problems were because the stadium is super far away (an hour) from campus

I get your point, but I know personnally of two Gopher fans that farm in Iowa, that drive up for every game. I am certain they drive more than an hour to get there. For Minnesota, the question is how to re-energize the "intown" fanbase. It is complicated, but I think the University of Minnesota(from the President on down) is moving the program in the right direction. Hopefully what they are doing will work and the program will start winning. If the program wins, I really think the more casual fans will return.
 
Meanwhile Minnesota has played USC twice, TCU twice, Cal twice, Colorado State twice, Air Force..


I'm sorry, but this is a horrible excuse for the fact that Minnesota sucks. Iowa will continue to rack up the wins, and your gophers will continue to lose BIG10 games (apparently because you have a tough non conference)
 
So will the talking heads on the major sports networks hammer Clemson incessantly about their weak 2016 schedule and argue they have absolutely no claim to a playoff spot like they did with Iowa last season? Probably not...:eek:

No, because they showed in the post season they were an elite team, which is what everyone will remember. Baylor (with Briles) would have received a pass too after their destruction of Carolina. If we would have beaten Stanford the media would give us more grace with scheduling as well. Last impressions are huge.
 
Minnesota lost to USD. The university of South Dakota.

USD beat Minnesota in basketball this past season also........ but far be it for me to rip the gauze off the gash which Is Gopher basketball.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT