Definitely noticed his weird looking shot. Don’t think that part of his game translate to the NBA, obviously other parts of his game do translate.
8th grade set shot.
Definitely noticed his weird looking shot. Don’t think that part of his game translate to the NBA, obviously other parts of his game do translate.
i cant get past the pulled up shorts!
Foster who?That is what you signed up for? Yo!
Hard to replace Shayok, Babb, Wiggington and Tucker from last year. All these guys were great individual talents--maybe not great team guys, but all capable of getting their own shots outside of the offense. They do not have those guys this year and it showed last night. Iowa controlled tempo which was huge. Had that game turned into an open court up and down game, I don't think Iowa wins as Haliburton and others excel in that type of game.
I think ISU fans recognize this and realize that it's hard to replace guys like that whether it be via transfer or traditional recruiting. They will fare better in the Big 12's low / no D and open court play. Suspect Haliburton leaves after this year given all the hype he is getting, so they will have a big hole to fill next year.
What game were you watching?
Did you not hear Dachick constantly harping about Garza running hard and the ISU guys not running?
Iowa did nothing to purposly slow the tempo. Iowa was running all game.
He should wish he'd be that lucky. Try looking at that team once Haliburton leaves....So is Foster stuck with that poor example of a basketball team we seen last night?
God forbid.......
The Marble twins, didn't even know that was a possibility. Did they take the Murray's scholarships?
I agree. You meant the Murray twins.
The Marble twins, didn't even know that was a possibility. Did they take the Murray's scholarships?
LOLNot to go sour grapes, as I think Foster has great potential, but give me big men like Garza and Woodbury any day of the week over Foster. I’ve seen Foster play many times. May end up being a star in college, but right now I question his intensity, hustle and toughness ... things Garza and Woodbury bring/brought every night, even in high school.
I would classify Horton-Tucker as a great recruit. Halliburton was an under the radar find who is a very good ballplayer. Most teams would take either of them in a heartbeat.In all seriousness, I continually hear what a great recruiter Prohm is. I follow Iowa recruiting kind of close, but don’t follow ISU at all. I have heard from tons of Iowa and ISU fans every year how great Prohm’s recruits are. Honest question, which of their guys were the great recruits?
With so many teams competing for these Transfers I wonder if Fred Hoiberg is going to have to reinvent himself at Nebraska and actually recruit high school kids.
Me either.Honestly I was never that impressed with foster what little i saw of him. Their other big man was more impressive actually. Foster may turn out pretty decent but I could see him as another glen worley too
When you shoot well, you look like a good team. When you dont, you look like an average to bad team. ISU shot it well vs Seton Hall, which opened up driving lanes, etc. They looked good. Against Iowa, the opposite was true. It will happen to Iowa some game, and the message board posse will emerge. Fire McCaffrey. Fire Barta. Bench Conner, etc. No knock on Iowa fans. Every fan base does it. ISU included. Drives me nuts, but I am guilty of it from time to time as well (more with FB than BB though).
Prohm can recruit. Prohm can coach. I like him and hope he stays for a long time. When you lose your top 4 scorers, it will be a tough year.
Foster? Who knows? I never get too excited about "big name" recruits. It's always a "show me" type mentality. Even with Wigginton + Horton Tucker, I waited to see if they lived up to the hype. I just find it funny how some (not all) posters here suddenly think XF is lazy, overrated, etc. These college coaches have forgotten more about bball than any of us will EVER know. If XF is good enough for Prohm, McCaffrey, Scott Drew, and other P5 coaches, I think we should trust their judgment.
Wears shorts like a girl too. AwfulHalliburton shoots like a girl
Haha, yup. Made a Clown of himself and his family. Now he gets to reap what he has sownSo is Foster stuck with that poor example of a basketball team we seen last night?
God forbid.......
In all seriousness, I continually hear what a great recruiter Prohm is. I follow Iowa recruiting kind of close, but don’t follow ISU at all. I have heard from tons of Iowa and ISU fans every year how great Prohm’s recruits are. Honest question, which of their guys were the great recruits?
Hopefully Prohm gets an extension in Ames, I like where their program is headed.
Add Prohm to the list of Campbell, Fleck, & Flop as the best things to happen to Hawkeye sports!
You are actually wrong, really wrong. ISU shot better against Iowa than Seton Hall from the field and 3 point range. The difference was Seton Hall lost their second best player early in this game, and is extremely overrated. Iowa would crush them.When you shoot well, you look like a good team. When you dont, you look like an average to bad team. ISU shot it well vs Seton Hall, which opened up driving lanes, etc. They looked good. Against Iowa, the opposite was true. It will happen to Iowa some game, and the message board posse will emerge. Fire McCaffrey. Fire Barta. Bench Conner, etc. No knock on Iowa fans. Every fan base does it. ISU included. Drives me nuts, but I am guilty of it from time to time as well (more with FB than BB though).
Prohm can recruit. Prohm can coach. I like him and hope he stays for a long time. When you lose your top 4 scorers, it will be a tough year.
Foster? Who knows? I never get too excited about "big name" recruits. It's always a "show me" type mentality. Even with Wigginton + Horton Tucker, I waited to see if they lived up to the hype. I just find it funny how some (not all) posters here suddenly think XF is lazy, overrated, etc. These college coaches have forgotten more about bball than any of us will EVER know. If XF is good enough for Prohm, McCaffrey, Scott Drew, and other P5 coaches, I think we should trust their judgment.
You are actually wrong, really wrong. ISU shot better against Iowa than Seton Hall from the field and 3 point range. The difference was Seton Hall lost their second best player early in this game, and is extremely overrated. Iowa would crush them.
I do believe Prohm can recruit, or at least hit on a couple guys, but I'm not sold he can coach or develop guys. Is Nixon better than when he arrived? Jacobsen? Young? Lewis? The rest of the guys on the roster are still young, but it's starting to look like a trend if I'm being honest.
I never thought Lard got much better. Shayok was much better than at Virginia. Seems like a majority aren't getting much better. Wiggs and THT left early, so you can't really tell with either of those.
Hoiberg's guys carried him his first two years, since then, man I'm not so sure. That doesn't look like an NCAA tourney team this year, and losing Jacobsen, Nixon, and Tyrese next year, that team will be bad next year. Foster is a good recruit, nothing bad to say about him, but the other guys fit in with the guys we are recruiting next year, which means not much help is on the way next year. Prohm seems like a good guy, but it's likely he's going to be four straight years of no NCAA tourney wins. Yikes.
Haha, maybe not anymore!
I posted that when Nebraska hired Hoiberg that I thought ISU fans (if they're being honest) would dump Prohm and take Fred back in a heartbeat. Almost every single one of them told me I was wrong. I'd like to try that topic again, but I'm certainly not going to start another ISU / Nebraska thread here.
If not for those B12 tourney championships that ISU fans seem to love more than the NCAA (and why not, it would be fun to dominate the crowd and Power & Light for a weekend) then I think the shine would really be off Prohm.
I would imagine Prohm's seat will be getting warm if he goes 3 out of 4 years without a tourney berth.
Prohm came in when Nader and Long were Seniors, Thomas and Monte were established Juniors. I don't know how anyone could feel Prohm made them good players, or even developed them. Thomas got better his last two years, but I'm still not sold that wasn't just him maturing as a player.Prohm has been pretty good at developing guys in the back court.
Nader, Thomas, Naz, Monte and Haliburton have been extremely good under Prohm.
Thomas, in particular, was a disaster under Hoiberg.
To be honest, I've been to the NCAA tournament. I have no desire to go again. It's stale, it's kind of boring honestly. The Big 12 tourney is a yearly trip for us, because it's just a lot more fun.