I suspect not.
For years, I’ve been fighting this “we need more black players” view with “We don’t need more black players, we need more good players”.
And I never recall, not one time, anyone explaining that the reason “we need more black players” was because it would change the perception of the Iowa program, so that we could eventually get the really good black players to give us a look. It was always “blacks are better than whites”.
Now here is why I believe I am not a lost cause: This perception approach is a good one, and a reasonable one. It is one I would support. It has risks (sucking because you are taking worse black players, losing more, and repelling better players because you suck), but it is a solid and defendable strategy.
Am I redeemed?
Side note: Can we all get better at posting rationales for positions?